
With 100 days now in the books, how are Americans feeling?
With 100 days now in the books, how are Americans feeling? | The Excerpt
On a special episode (first released on April 30, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: As of today, President Donald Trump has been in office for 100 days. In that short span of time, he has transformed American government. From public health to the economy, immigration to education, the second Trump Administration has affected changes that are singular in their scope and the speed at which they were made. While some Americans are pleased with Trump's policies and executive orders, they've also thrust many Americans into uncertainty, anxiety and in some cases, detention. Listeners and viewers of The Excerpt should be very familiar with what Trump's done in the past 100 days because The Excerpt has been breathlessly covering every executive order, every firing, every cut. But what's been the impact to ordinary Americans? How are they feeling at Day 100? USA TODAY National Correspondent Trevor Hughes joins The Excerpt to share reporting from across the network on how Americans are feeling.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Jennifer Miller:
Eggs used to be under $3. Now the cheapest I've found them is six.
Brenda Wilson:
I just want to give some of the benefit of the doubt and more time to see where everything goes.
Larry Mays:
Unadulterated non-stop chaos is not an environment in which a small business can be successful.
Jennifer Miller:
I don't see how the tariffs' costs are going to not trickle down to consumers.
Russell Johnson:
I agree with President Trump's immigration policies and actions. Yes, I do.
Andre Lewis:
I really do wish you would get rid of all the criminals. I'm all for it.
Dana Taylor:
Hello and welcome to The Excerpt. I'm Dana Taylor. Today is Wednesday, April 30th, 2025. As of today, President Donald Trump has been in office for 100 days. In that short span of time, he's transformed American government, from public health to the economy, national security to education. The second Trump administration has affected changes that are singular in their scope and the speed at which they're made. While some Americans are pleased with Trump's policies and executive orders, they've also thrust many Americans into uncertainty, anxiety, and in some cases, detention. Our loyal listeners and viewers should be very familiar with what Trump's done in the past 100 days, because The Excerpt has been breathlessly covering every executive order, every firing, every cut. But what's been the impact to ordinary Americans? How are they feeling at day 100? Joining us to delve deeper into this is USA TODAY National Correspondent Trevor Hughes. Thanks for joining me, Trevor.
Trevor Hughes:
You bet. Glad to be here.
Dana Taylor:
You spoke to several people across the nation about their impressions of Donald Trump's first 100 days in office. One of those individuals was Tracy Dixon. What's her story?
Trevor Hughes:
Tracy lives in Independence, Missouri with her wife. She's a certified nursing assistant. And she says that life has never been harder than it is today. Gas prices are still high, although they've come down a little bit. Food costs are still high, although they aren't rising quite as much as they were. And wages are not going up in a way that allows people to afford those things. And so she, like millions of us, are really feeling that pinch. She did not vote for President Trump. She felt like she couldn't get time off of work during the election to do that. But she was hopeful that he would bring a significant economic change to the country, especially rapidly as he had promised.
Dana Taylor:
Is her experience similar to others you spoke to?
Trevor Hughes:
Yeah. We've heard this from around the country. My colleagues and I have been doing interviews with hundreds and hundreds of Americans. We did this before the election and we're doing it now. And one of the things we're finding is that a lot of folks who really wanted to see President Trump swept into office, because he had what they believed was a better economic plan, they're still waiting to see it. Again, gas prices are down a little bit. Food costs haven't risen as much, but folks are really feeling the pinch. You see that in the increase in credit card debt. You see that in the increase in auto loan delinquencies. I mean, people are really, really feeling the pinch still.
Dana Taylor:
Trevor, how is Trump's second term impacting Americans differently than his first?
Trevor Hughes:
I covered President Trump's first term. And when you look back on it, he was still kind of a more traditional president in a traditional role. He had ideas about what he wanted to accomplish, but he tried to work through Congress. He tried to work through legislation. What we've seen in the second term is that they have come out of the gate far, far faster. They had a better plan and how to do this, and they understood the power of the executive. Now, the presidency is very powerful, especially when you think about how slow moving Congress can be and how remote the judiciary can be. And so, President Trump has really taken advantage of his ability to issue these executive orders and tell the government what to do. And that has allowed him to reshape the country very, very rapidly. Of course, a lot of courts have struck down some of those executive orders, but the lesson stands, the president has come out really with a very muscular approach to the presidency.
Dana Taylor:
Let's dig in deeper, starting with the economy. Donald Trump promised to change the economy, improve inflation, and bring down prices. So far that hasn't happened. The latest polling shows that six out of 10 Americans disapprove of the tariffs he's imposed. What's the general mood among Americans about the economy right now?
Trevor Hughes:
Well, I'll tell you, talking to folks who did not support the president for the White House, those folks are saying, "Well, we told you so." A lot of folks saying, "How could it be that Vice President Harris had economic plans that were endorsed by economists, that were widely supported by leading banks, and then you have President Trump come into office? And what he's done is not that. But he's done exactly what he said he would do. And so, a lot of his supporters, a lot of his very strongest supporters, they honestly don't care in the short term. They're telling me, and I heard from quite a lot of them over the weekend, that it's worth this pain to reshape the government, to reshape how we work as a society. And they're willing to accept that short-term pain. But again, there's a lot of folks who did not vote for the president who are saying, "We told you so and look where we're at."
Dana Taylor:
Tariffs were a key talking point for Trump on the campaign trail. And while he delivered on that front, the ping-ponging, as you write, has sent the market into turmoil. How did tariffs directly impacted Americans so far?
Trevor Hughes:
Well, I'll tell you, my wife works for a big American furniture manufacturer. I mean, they make furniture here in this country. And every day, I hear her on calls talking with her bosses, talking with her customers. What impact do the tariffs have? What are they going to have? How are we going to adapt? Do we pass these costs on to consumers? I think the honest truth is we have not really yet seen the full impact of the actual tariffs. We've seen the fear of the tariffs reflected in pricing and uncertainty, but I think Americans may discover shortly that things are going to get a lot more expensive.
Dana Taylor:
We've talked a lot on the show about DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency headed by Elon Musk. Just recently, Musk said he would step back from spending time with the Trump administration. This comes after profits for his car company, Tesla, plummeted 71%. Elon Musk was appointed by Trump to address government bloat, which is something many Americans wanted, at least on paper. How do Americans feel about cuts to government budgets and jobs?
Trevor Hughes:
I think what we've been hearing from a lot of folks is this uncertainty has really rattled them. People are pulling back on their spending. People are canceling trips. People are not planning trips. When I talk to supporters of the president, again, they say the short-term pain, the short-term frustration is worth it. And frankly, the government was too big and it had its fingers in every little pie everywhere. And that wasn't really appropriate for a country like ours. But what I hear over and over again is, sure, no, I don't want my tax dollars wasted, but there's a difference between my tax dollars being wasted and my tax dollars no longer being able to support children getting free breakfast at schools anymore.
I think it has also really shaken the faith of a lot of Americans who didn't realize that one president could make this kind of change this rapidly. Again, the courts have overturned a lot of the president's decisions or a lot of his efforts, but what we've seen is he's injected a lot of uncertainty. And I think that has shaken a lot of Americans, and how they saw the government, and thought it was consistent, and stable and predictable. And businesses find that very difficult to work in that environment.
Dana Taylor:
Let's shift from economics to education, where there've been many, many changes. In fact, shortly after taking office, Trump said he wanted Education Secretary Linda McMahon to "put herself out of a job." What have you heard from students and families on this front?
Trevor Hughes:
Again, a lot of uncertainty, because the president has issued these executive orders. The president has declared things to be, and then courts have stopped that. I have friends whose kids are on what are known as individualized educational plans. These are kids who need extra support in schools. And they are particularly worried because a lot of that kind of money comes from the federal government. There's this sense that we are not really sure what's happening. And that lack of certainty seems to have really frustrated a lot of folks. There are many, many Americans who are happy to see efforts that DEI rolled back to sort of get woke ideology, as they say, out of schools, but it's how much that will affect individual students' educations. And I think parents are a little concerned about that.
Dana Taylor:
Immigration has been on Trump's agenda since his first term when he promised to build a wall between the US and Mexico. This time around, he's empowered ICE agents to round up and deport just about anyone who fits a particular profile, US legal status notwithstanding. We've heard a lot about the Maryland man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador. What have the Americans you spoke with said about Trump's actions on immigration?
Trevor Hughes:
I interviewed a young man who lives on Cape Cod, and he is happy that gas prices are down. He's happy that he's got a job that pays a little more than it was paying before. It means he's quit his second job, but he saw a friend of his deported. Cape Cod has a lot of Brazilians, because they have a strong Portuguese fishing heritage there. And this young man that I interviewed, he said, "I think there should've been a better process for weeding out the good people from the bad people. But overall, this is what it takes to get our country back." I've talked to a lot of people who are very happy to see what the president is doing to remove folks who are living in this country without permission. There is a lot of anger still about how Biden administered the border.
On the flip side, we've seen a lot of folks in this country who are very, very worried about seeing their friends and their neighbors and their coworkers, their loved ones being deported, being removed, being detained. My colleague, Lauren, had a fascinating interview a few months ago with a woman who was picked up because she had overstayed her visa during COVID. Her husband was a Trump voter and the story of that, because her husband was saying, "I support stricter enforcement, but my wife? That doesn't make sense."
Dana Taylor:
Trump has pushed out over 120 executive orders since he took office. And I think, fair to say, expanded on executive power. What does the general public say about that?
Trevor Hughes:
President Trump has a very muscular approach to the presidency. I mean, he is operating like the businessman, CEO, he said he would. This is a man who's accustomed to being in charge of things and just telling people to do it. It's been interesting because the United States government isn't really set up to work that way. The presidency, and Congress, and the judiciary are three separate and equal branches of government. And so, there are plenty of Americans that we've talked to who have a lot of concerns about not necessarily what the President is doing, but that Congress hasn't stepped in to say, "Whoa, whoa, whoa. We're the ones who decide how money gets spent. We're the ones who fund everything." And this criticism from the Trump administration over the judiciary.
The Trump administration often criticizes the judiciary for being these left wing radical judges. And there are a lot of Americans that I've talked to who are very uncomfortable with this idea of attacking judges because you don't like the ruling that they have made. And I think that has raised a lot of concerns. We've seen this concern about a possible constitutional crisis if the Trump administration is ordered to do something by perhaps the Supreme Court and they refuse to do it.
Dana Taylor:
A recent Pew poll asked people to describe what they liked most about the new administration's actions. 30% of those surveyed replied nothing. What did Trump supporters tell you they liked about Trump's impact since taking office?
Trevor Hughes:
I mean, the folks I've talked to are happy because they say he's doing everything he said he would do. Those of us who covered the campaign, I pay attention to this every single day. It's my job. The president hasn't done anything that has taken me by surprise. I think there are a lot of Americans who are really shocked at how far he has taken some of these things, but he promised to do these things. He said, "I will cut the size of government. I will drain the swamp. I will close the border. I will really go after immigration. I will go after woke ideology and DEI." I mean, these are things that he has said he would do, and he is doing them. A lot of Americans I've talked to are alarmed that we have moved so far, so fast. And there's a lot of this, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, can we talk about this a little bit? But the Republicans that I've talked to that support the president, they say, "Elections have consequences. We won the election, and this is what we get."
Dana Taylor:
It's always good to hear your insights. Trevor, thank you for being on The Excerpt.
Trevor Hughes:
Absolutely.
Dana Taylor:
Thanks to our senior producers, Shannon Rae Green and Kaylee Monahan for their production assistance. Our executive producer's Laura Beatty. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcast@usatoday.com. Thanks for listening. I'm Dana Taylor, Taylor Wilson. I'll be back tomorrow morning with another episode of The Excerpt.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Youth sports have become a hot area of investment — and it's prompted a fresh set of concerns
As a kid, I ran from field to field for soccer tournaments with back-to-back games, and woke up before the sun was up for lacrosse tournaments that were a long drive away. I'm not alone. It feels like nearly everyone in the US has some connection to youth sports, either through their own kids, their childhood experiences, or through siblings and other family members. Over 27 million children in the US — 54.6% — played organized sports, according to the most recent data from the National Children's Health Survey, which covered the 2022 and 2023. And investors ranging from venture capitalists to private equity have increasingly been paying attention to the deep connection Americans have with youth sports. "If you look at wallet share and the statistics around that for parents, how much they will spend on youth sports, it's insane," Aaron Miller, an investor at early-stage VC firm Will Ventures, told Business Insider. "For the first time, institutional investors are realizing that these are really interesting assets to own and maybe even optimize." Miller said the addressable market for youth sports is massive. According to The Aspen Institute's Project Play, the average US sports family spent $1,016 on their child's primary sport in 2024. Miller said the US is really the only country in the world with this level of spending on youth sports, which makes it attractive for investments. He said investments had grown in two areas: experiences and technology. Some of the new technologies in the space are using AI, like GameChanger, a livestreaming and game management software that youth teams use to keep track of stats and film, and put together highlights. Unrivaled Sports is an example of a company pouring money into experiences. Josh Harris, the owner of the Washington Commanders and cofounder of Apollo Global Management, along with Blackstone's David Blitzer, co-invested their own money to launch the company this year. Unrivaled Sports specializes in creating unique experiences for kids who play baseball, soccer, football, and action sports and also recently got a further $120 million investment, led by Dick's Sporting Goods. Miller's firm itself has invested in several youth sports companies, such as Youth Inc., a media and commerce company founded by former NFLer Greg Olsen, and Aktivate, a sports tech platform for K-12 schools. Some notable deals in the space include KKR acquiring Varsity Brands last year, and PlayOn (backed by KKR) buying MaxPreps from CBS Sports. TeamSnap acquired Mojo, a youth sports streaming service, in 2023. Investing in youth sports can also benefit leagues. Initiatives like the Junior NBA or LOVB's youth programs are helping to grow the game at a young level. "If you win over a kid in middle school, they're very influenceable, they could be loyal customers for the next 50-plus years," Miller said. Does the money stop kids from being kids? Concerns about the professionalization of youth sports have been growing in the last few years, with some parents concerned about burnout or overuse injuries happening at younger ages. As part of its Project Play research, the Aspen Institute found that some parents felt pressure to have their children specialize in a sport at an earlier age. The costs have also increased. The Aspen Institute reported a 46% increase in cost for a child's primary sport from 2019 to 2024. The study found that spending on travel and lodging, team registration fees, and camps or private training contributed to the increase. Melissa Jacobs is a journalist and the creator of the Good Game Substack, which focuses on talking about youth sports for parents. She said that destination youth sports tournaments and experiences have been proliferating. She said parents' inboxes can be "flooded with emails saying come to Huntington Beach, come to Omaha, come to Florida for every single sport." "It's making the equity gap humongous, and it's also watering down the experience," she said. Miller said he felt there needed to be a system to ensure that youth sports don't get over-optimized as more money flows into the space. Companies can offer services that can be great for talent development and earn more money. But this professionalization could negatively affect the kids playing who don't want to take things as seriously. "Youth sports are really expensive, and I think a lot of people have talked about, what's the breaking point?" Miller said. "Are a lot of these really expensive camps asking families to spend as much as possible? Yes. At the same time, I feel like there are a lot of really awesome products and solutions that haven't been built yet."

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
'Economic heart attack': 3 top experts detail how they see a possible US debt crisis unfolding
Investor concerns over a swelling government debt load were soothed last week. But some experts say the US isn't out of the woods yet. Goldman Sachs spoke to three top economic experts — Ray Dalio, Ken Rogoff, and Niall Ferguson — about rising debt levels in the US. All three said they were worried about an impending debt crisis, particularly when considering the effects of President Donald Trump's GOP tax and spending bill, which has been estimated to add trillions to the budget deficit over the next decade. That reflects a slightly more pessimistic view than the market. After a scare last month, demand for long-dated government bonds was strong this week. It was a sign that investors are feeling more comfortable about the fiscal situation in the US, after showing nerves last month after Moody's downgraded US debt and Trump's tax bill began making its way through Congress. Here are the top points each of the experts had to make: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates founder The billionaire hedge fund manager said he sees three factors determining the outlook for the US debt. How much the government pays on debt interest relative to its revenue. If interest payments keep rising, it can "unacceptably" prevent the government from spending money on other things. How much debt the government needs to sell relative to demand. If the government needs to sell more Treasurys than people are willing to buy, interest rates will have to rise. That provides a more attractive yield to investors to hold onto the US debt, but high rates also hurt markets and the economy. How much money the central bank needs to print in other to purchase the remaining debt. If demand for US Treasurys is especially weak, the Fed can step in to purchase bonds to keep the government funded. If it has to print more money to do so, that can raise inflation and ding the value of the US dollar. "One can easily measure these signs of deterioration and see movement toward an impending debt crisis," Dalio, who has long warned of troubling debt dynamics in the US, said. "Such a crisis occurs when the constriction of debt-financed spending happens, like a debt-induced economic heart attack." To prevent a crisis, Dalio said he believed the government should reduce the budget deficit to 3% of GDP. Reducing the debt could cause interest rates to decline around 150 basis points, he estimated, reducing interest payments on the national debt and stimulating the economy. Ken Rogoff, Harvard professor and former IMF chief economist Given Trump's current agenda, Rogoff thinks the US will likely enter a debt crisis within the next four to five years. That's faster than the five- to seven-year timeline he predicted prior to Trump's reelection. "The notion that debt is a free lunch that had been pushed by many economy-watchers is absurd," Rogoff said. "Today's larger deficit on top of already-high debt levels is setting up for a crisis that will necessitate a significant adjustment." Rogoff thinks a debt crisis could play out in two ways: Inflation spikes and results in an economic shock. "Exactly what that shock will look like is difficult to say, but it will likely be more painful than the Covid inflation shock that precipitated only relatively minor adjustments in bond markets," Rogoff said. The government could manage the debt by keeping interest rates artificially low and restricting capital flows. But those measures will hurt economic growth and essentially serve as a tax on savers in the economy, he said. Investors have long been concerned about the US debt, but the outlook is especially worrying now because long-term interest rates are going through a "normalization" from low levels that stretched over the past decade, Rogoff said. "People need to recognize that higher interest rates are here to stay and that a return to the low-rate era of the past might well prove wishful thinking," he added. Niall Ferguson, historian and Harvard researcher Ferguson thinks a crisis could be triggered by a military challenge that results in the US losing its position as a global power, as it goes deeper into debt. The British-American financial historian said his favorite gauge to determine how unsustainable national debt was is when a country spends more on interest payments for its debt than on defense. That rule, which he calls "Ferguson's Law," now applies to the US, which spent $1.1 trillion on interest payments on the national debt over the 2024 fiscal year, according to the Treasury Department. It was more than the $883.7 billion approved that year for total defense spending. Nearly every nation that has violated Ferguson's Law has lost its status as " great power" in financial markets, he said. "Any great power that pursues a reckless fiscal policy by allowing the cost of its debt to exceed the cost of its armed services is opening itself up to challenge," Ferguson said. "The US is just the latest great power to find itself in this fiscal jam." The US has been able to borrow as much as it has through now with no issues, in part because the US dollar remains the world's reserve currency and investors still see Treasurys as " risk-free," Ferguson said, meaning they have faith in the US's ability to make good on its interest payments. But that already appears to be shifting, he said, pointing to investors around the world shedding their exposure to US Treasurys and moving away from dollar assets. "I've warned the US is on an unsustainable fiscal path for 20 years now, and so at times have felt like the boy who cried 'wolf,'" Ferguson added.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned.
Kids are ditching traditional college for career tech programs. Parents are concerned. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump signs order to combat 'woke' university accreditation process President Donald Trump directed the Justice and Education Depts. to investigate universities for 'unlawful discrimination' and 'ideological overreach. More teens are showing interest in vocational training and other non-college options after high school. Parents tend to favor traditional four-year colleges over non-degree career paths, according to a new survey from nonprofit American Student Assistance. Financial concerns and a desire for hands-on work are driving some students toward technical education. Nush Ahmed, 22, said she was "stubborn" when she went against her parents' wishes and chose to attend a career technical program 800 miles from home instead of enrolling in a traditional four-year college nearby. Her parents, who live in Buffalo, New York, and immigrated from Bangladesh, said they believed a bachelor's degree was the only path to success. But Ahmed insisted. She's one of a growing number of high school graduates turning to technical schools over two or four-year colleges at a time of spiraling student debt and new incentives for vocational education. Ahmed's choice to forego college and pursue a career working in manufacturing made her an outlier in her South Asian immigrant community, where most parents expect young women to attend college near home, she said. "I was hoping that time she would go to either medical school or engineering college to become a doctor or engineer," said her father, Shuhel Ahmed. "But she really wanted to go into to this career, so I finally decided to let her go." By the numbers: How do kids and parents feel about career technical education programs? New survey data from the nonprofit American Student Assistance shows that teen interest in college is down while interest in nondegree paths is on the rise. Meanwhile, parents are skeptical of options outside of the traditional college pathway to work. Nearly half of all students surveyed – 45% – weren't interested in going to college. About 14% said they planned to attend trade or technical schools, apprenticeships and technical bootcamp programs and 38% were considering those options. Some 66% of teens surveyed said parents supported their plans to pursue a nondegree route compared with 82% whose parents encouraged them to attend college. More: In emergency appeal, Trump asks Supreme Court to let him gut Education Department Seventy percent said their parents were more supportive of foregoing education altogether right after high school rather than pursuing a nondegree program. Young people told USA TODAY that finances, along with the desire to enter the workforce without more classroom-type academics, were among their reasons for choosing technical education. The financial burden of college was on Andrew Townsend's mind when he opted out of college. Townsend graduated from high school in Golden, Colorado, this June and decided against college, saying he wanted to go to work right away. The choice was easy for Townsend, 19, because he was offered an apprenticeship as a manufacturing technician for printer manufacturer Lexmark during his senior year through his school's career and technical education program. That turned into an 18-month internship. "When I went into high school I anticipated going to college and going into biology or sports management," Townsend said. "But I can't sit still in a class, and I want to get my hands dirty and get into work. It's financially best for me right now." More: Is the push for career education prioritizing business over students? His dad, construction worker Corey Townsend, wasn't sure what path his son would take, but he supports Andrew's choice. "My family doesn't have the most amount of money," Andrew Townsend said. "Maybe if I want to go to college later on in life, that's a choice. But for now I want to focus on myself and make my life better for me." College costs vs. career technical education costs At the nation's public colleges and universities, the average cost for in-state tuition is $9,750 per year and and the average cost for out-of-state tuition is $28,386, according to researchers at the Education Data Initiative. The price tag is higher at private colleges. The average cost of tuition and fees at those schools is $38,421,. The Education Data Initiative estimates college tuition has doubled in the 21st century. The costs of career technical education varies widely by trade and program. The average cost of a complete trade school program's tuition and fees was $15,070 during the 2022-2023 school year, according to data from the federal Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics. The Trump administration advances non-college options As parents and teens navigate their post-college options, President Donald Trump and his administration have championed career technical programs as a viable alternative to traditional two-year and four-year colleges. "Under my leadership, America will once again champion a culture where hard work is rewarded and equip our people with real skills for real careers that our communities are in desperate need to fill," Trump said in a Feb. 3 statement. "By offering more alternatives to higher education, we will train college-aged kids in relevant skills for the 21st century economy." More: Colleges report widespread problems with financial aid since Education Department layoffs During Trump's first term, he signed a bill called the Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act into law. The law allows the federal government to provide states and local communities funding to enhance career and technical education programming. This term, the Trump administration announced it is reversing two Biden-era regulations that require states and local career technical education programs at high schools and community colleges to change the way they report on student progress to receive federal funding. What to do after high school ...if you're not heading straight to college 'They should let them follow their dreams' New survey data from Gallup, Walton Family Foundation and Jobs for the Future of 1,327 teens shows that most high school students and their parents are unaware of their post-high school options outside of the traditional four-year college path. The uncertainty resonated with Ahmed's father, who saw college as the only pathway to success for his daughter. Father and daughter now agree the path she chose has afforded her immense opportunity. If she could go back in time, Ahmed said, she would be less harsh on her parents for pushing college. Ahmed is enjoying the success that has come from completing a technical education program at the Universal Technical Institute, formerly known as NASCAR Technical Institute, in North Carolina. She works at a precision manufacturing company that specializes in metal and polymer 3D printing and has a podcast that highlights young people pursuing trade options after high school. She earns about $60,000 a year at her day job. "With the way she has gone through this and how she is doing now, I would say to parents that if kids want to try a short term school they should let them do and then see how it goes," Ahmed's father said. "If it goes well then great and if not, there's time to change. But they should let them follow their dreams." Contact Kayla Jimenez at kjimenez@ Follow her on X at @kaylajjimenez.