Scientists measure largest ever collision of two black holes
The two phenomena, each more than 100 times the mass of the sun, had been circling each other before they violently collided about 10 billion light years from Earth.
Scientists at the Ligo Hanford and Livingston Observatories detected ripples in space-time from the collision just before 2pm UK time on 23 November 2023, when the two US-based detectors in Washington and Louisiana twitched at the same time.
Alongside their enormous masses, the signal, dubbed GW231123 after its discovery date, also showed the black holes spinning rapidly, according to researchers.
'This is the most massive black hole binary we've observed through gravitational waves, and it presents a real challenge to our understanding of black hole formation,' said Professor Mark Hannam, from Cardiff University and a member of the Ligo Scientific Collaboration.
An artist's impression of a black hole using data from Nasa's James Webb Space Telescope (Nasa/JWST)
Gravitational-wave observatories have recorded around 300 black hole mergers.
Prior to GW231123, the heaviest merger detected was GW190521, whose combined mass was 140 times that of the sun. The latest merger produced a black hole up to 265 times more massive than the sun.
'The black holes appear to be spinning very rapidly — near the limit allowed by Einstein's theory of general relativity,' said Dr Charlie Hoy from the University of Portsmouth.
'That makes the signal difficult to model and interpret. It's an excellent case study for pushing forward the development of our theoretical tools.'
'It will take years for the community to fully unravel this intricate signal pattern and all its implications,' said Dr Gregorio Carullo, assistant professor at the University of Birmingham.
'Despite the most likely explanation remaining a black hole merger, more complex scenarios could be the key to deciphering its unexpected features. Exciting times ahead!"
Facilities like Ligo in the United States, Virgo in Italy, and KAGRA in Japan are engineered to detect the tiniest distortions in spacetime caused by violent cosmic events such as black hole mergers.
The fourth observing run began in May 2023, and data through January 2024 are scheduled for release later this summer.
'This event pushes our instrumentation and data-analysis capabilities to the edge of what's currently possible,' says Dr Sophie Bini, a postdoctoral researcher at Caltech.
'It's a powerful example of how much we can learn from gravitational-wave astronomy — and how much more there is to uncover.'
GW231123 is set to be presented at the 24th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation (GR24) and the 16th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves, held jointly as the GR-Amaldi meeting in Glasgow, from 14 to 18 July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
NRC Eyes New Accident Tolerant Nuclear Fuels For Commercial Use
Part of a nuclear reactor fuel rod element. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has completed a study of advanced, better performing accident tolerant fuels being developed by three U.S. companies as it prepares to handle licensing demand for new commercial nuclear power reactors. Accident tolerant fuels may offer important technological advances to increase the safety of U.S. nuclear power plants. ATFs are being studied to determine their potential to perform better in normal operations and during transportation as well as in nuclear power plant accidents. The NRC's Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research recently released the report prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The Richland, Wash.-based PNNL is providing technical assistance about the proposed nuclear fuel and new fuel cladding designs that may replace current nuclear fuel rods made with zirconium-based alloys. The 91-page highly technical report is called 'Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation of Accident Tolerant Fuel Concepts' and outlines the latest information on fuel material properties and performance associated with storing and transporting spent nuclear fuel. The federal government is evaluating the performance of nuclear power systems containing ATF. The NRC says the same performance requirements are being sought with irradiated ATF fuel as mandated for conventional zirconium alloy cladded uranium dioxide fuel. The new report explores the current activities of the following companies in their developments with ATFs and fuel cladding designs: The DOE is working on its Advanced Fuels Campaign with teams of researchers seeking new nuclear power plant fuels at five of its national laboratories. The federal collaborations are centered at the PNNL, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory. Advanced Fuels Campaign national laboratories are located in many regions of the U.S. According to DOE, ATFs offer several advantages over conventional nuclear energy fuel. ATFs are being developed to improve nuclear reactor safety 'by maintaining structural integrity and reactor cooling for a longer duration during severe accident conditions,' DOE says. ATFs The main objective of the Advanced Fuels Campaign is to develop and use ATFs to significantly increase nuclear power performance and safety. Researchers lower a test train into the Advanced Test Reactor at Idaho National Laboratory. The NRC report also discussed whether its current regulations would apply to ATF storage and transportation. While it advised companies applying for licenses to provide justification data to support their applications, the NRC noted the federal government's current regulatory framework for storing and transporting spent nuclear fuel would generally cover apply to ATFs. These findings would appear to pave the way for greater interest by companies in turning to nuclear power to meet their energy demands.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
When will NASA get a permanent leader and why is it taking so long?
Six months into President Trump's second term, name almost any federal agency and it has an ambitious leader carrying out significant change. Except NASA. The world's premier space agency does have significant change in its forecast, based on President Trump's spending plan, but it still has no permanent leader. That absence at the top has increased concern among the agency's 18,000 or so employees as the president proposed a $6 billion agency-wide funding cut, as well as a 47% cut to NASA science missions – although Congress has pledged to put some of that back in. This week, 287 NASA employees signed a letter warning of "catastrophic impacts" to America's space ambitions. They addressed it to acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy, who also leads the Department of Transportation. He's the second acting administrator since Trump took office, and according to some experts, there's a good chance he may hold that role through the end of 2025 or even take on the dual role of NASA leader and Transportation head on a permanent basis. "It is unusual to have multiple acting administrators before confirmation," Mary Guenther, head of Space Policy at Progressive Policy Institute, told FLORIDA TODAY. Sean Duffy, who was confirmed as head of Department of Transportation in January, was put in as interim NASA administrator on July 9, taking over from previous acting administrator and former Kennedy Space Center director Janet Petro. "I don't think its common to have someone who has already been Senate confirmed, but for a different position -- a dual hat role -- trying to oversee NASA and something else," said Guenther. Bill Nelson was the last NASA administrator, resigning after Trump took office. What happened to Jared Isaacman's NASA nomination? It didn't start out this way when Trump took office. It looked like not only was NASA in line to get a new administrator fairly quickly but Trump's initial pick generated excitement in the space community. Trump's initial choice was billionaire businessman and and private astronaut, Jared Isaacman, who was close to SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who was leading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency at the time. But on May 31, Trump dropped Isaacman, citing loyalty issues. Isaacman had moved forward to a final Senate vote with a favorable Senate committee vote of 19-9, and large support in the space industry. Trump said he was concerned that Isaacman had donated to Democratic campaigns. The change came around the same time as Trump and Musk had a very public falling out. "Now they have to find somebody else," said Space Policy analyst and historian, John Logsdon. "And that somebody else has to deal with what Trump wants to do with NASA." He said it's become clear that all Trump appointees are being assessed on loyalty. "These nominations -- just finding the right person, vetting them, all that jazz, usually takes a couple of months," said Guenther. "I would suspect we have a little bit longer to go." Guenther believes how long may depend, in part, on how well Duffy can handle running both NASA and the Department of Transportation. If he is successful, there could be less of a rush to get someone to NASA more quickly. How soon might NASA get a permanent administrator? There are multiple ways the next few months could play out. Guenther expects the whole process of assessing the situation and interviewing candidates to extend over the next few months. Then after a candidate is identified, there comes the Senate nomination process and vote, which can take time as was seen with Isaacman. For him, that lasted from January until his nomination was dropped in late May. "Once you get the nomination, you have to schedule the hearing and confirmation vote," said Logsdon. "It's a time consuming process." Guenther said she'd be surprised to see a confirmed administrator on the job this calendar year. She noted that may be a pessimistic way to look at it. One thing that could speed it up is if there had been another previously vetted candidate waiting in the wings even while Isaacman was proceeding through the nomination process. But it's not clear if such a candidate exists. "I think it's clear from the way Isaacman's nomination was pulled, there is a desire for loyalty − someone who is a strong proponent of the budget proposal that President Trump put forward," said Guenther. A White House budget proposal put NASA's annual budget as $18.8 billion beginning in 2026, down from the $24.8 billion this current year. The proposal includes massive cuts to science missions. Space Science will see a cut of $2.2 billion while Earth Science is set to see a $1.1 billion cut. Recently, U.S. Senate and House members approved appropriations bills which would keep NASA's annual budget at $24.9 billion. The White House proposal had also called for an end to NASA's SLS after the Artemis III moon landing in favor of commercial alternatives − however, the "big, beautiful bill" signed by Trump now allows for the Artemis IV and V missions. While it's not clear exactly what demands the administration wants from the next NASA leader, Guenther believes the candidate must be an advocate for commercial space. This means bringing in more of the private sector for NASA contracts. Logsdon said it's possible that Duffy could just assume both the Transportation and NASA jobs permanently. "He's just not confirmed as NASA Administrator, but he's been confirmed by the Senate as Secretary of Transportation, so I do not think they need to go through another hearing nomination, hearing confirmation. He's already there," said Logsdon. Should Duffy be picked to run both NASA and the Department of Transportation, the process could be expedited -- and, Logsdon said, it made sense that Petro was replaced. "If the Trump White House wanted to put Duffy in as administrator, and dual him with transportation, then Petro had to go," said Logsdon. Looking back in history: Waits for NASA leaders It's not unheard of for the space agency to be without a permanent leader for some time. Sean O'Keefe wasn't sworn in as NASA administrator until December 2001, 11 months after George W. Bush took office during his first term. Fred Gregory served as acting administrator during the wait. Gregory was then sworn in as deputy administrator. Looking back further, Richard Truly was not sworn in as NASA administrator until July 1989, serving under George H.W. Bush. "There's not one clear pattern," said Logsdon. "There have been several past instances where the nomination came in late." The best example of the nomination coming in late is James Beggs, who was nominated by President Reagan in June 1981. Six months after Reagan took office, Beggs was sworn in as NASA Administrator one month later. For now, it remains to be seen how long that wait will be during this second Trump administration. Brooke Edwards is a Space Reporter for Florida Today. Contact her at bedwards@ or on X: @brookeofstars. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: NASA still without a permanent administrator. Here's what could happen.
Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
How To Easily Find The ‘Northern Cross' In The Sky This Weekend
Photo of the constellation Cygnus with annotations from IAU and Sky & Telescope. Here is the ... More non-annotated version. You've heard of the Southern Cross in the Southern Hemisphere's night sky, but what about the Northern Cross? Far larger, easier to find and arguably more impressive, here's how to find the Northern Cross in your night sky tonight. When And Where To Look The Northern Cross is mostly a different way of looking at the constellation of Cygnus, the swan. Comprised of six stars, all easily visible to the naked eye even from the world's most light-polluted cities, the Northern Cross dominates the eastern sky after sunset from mid-June and finally sinks in the west during November. Right now, it's high in the southeastern night sky as seen from the Northern Hemisphere. From south of the equator, it becomes visible in the middle of the night due north, but never gets high above the horizon. What You'll See As well as finding the six stars of the Northern Cross — which is an asterism, not an official constellation — you'll also get to see the Milky Way (if you're under a dark sky). That's because the Northern Cross lies over the plane of the Milky Way, so expect rich starfields and the arc of the Milky Way's aptly named Cygnus arm. The former looks incredible through binoculars; the latter is best seen with the naked eye. Begin by finding Deneb, the brightest star on the Northern Cross and one of the most luminous stars in the Milky Way. Now take a line down through it to Sadr (where the cross intersects), then Eta Cygni, with the base of the cross marked by Albireo (a double star consisting of a gold and a blue stars that look fabulous in a small telescope). Either side of Sadr, where the cross intersects, are Gienah and Rukh. The Cygnus constellation (including the Northern Cross). Observing Tips Once you've found the Northern Cross, reverse it to see the constellation of Cygnus, with Albireo as the swan's head and it wings spread further back, either side of Sadr. If you have a very dark sky, look below a line from Sadir to Albireo for the "Great Rift," a dust cloud between the solar system and the Sagittarius Arm of the Milky Way. It looks like a dark band within the stars of the Milky Way. If you have a telescope, there's plenty to see with the Northern Cross — the North America Nebula (NGC 7000), the Pelican Nebula (IC 5070, IC 5067) and the Veil Nebula. What's Next In The Night Sky On Sunday, July 27, a crescent moon will be visible as it approaches Mars, while a few nights later, on July 29-30, the Delta Aquariid meteor shower will peak. Expect a display of shooting stars in the early hours of July 30. For exact timings, use a sunrise and sunset calculator for where you are, Stellarium Web for a sky chart and Night Sky Tonight: Visible Planets at Your Location for positions and rise/set times for planets. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
