Trump says there could be a Gaza deal next week after Hamas gives ‘positive' response
He told reporters aboard Air Force One there could be a deal on a Gaza ceasefire by next week but that he had not been briefed on the current state of negotiations.
Hamas said Friday it has given a 'positive' response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza but said further talks were needed on implementation.
It was not clear if Hamas' statement meant it had accepted the proposal from US President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire. Hamas has been seeking guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war, now nearly 21 months old. Trump has been pushing hard for a deal to be reached, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to visit the White House next week to discuss a deal.
The Hamas statement came as Israeli airstrikes killed 15 Palestinians in Gaza early Friday, while a hospital said another 20 people died in shootings while seeking aid.
The UN human rights office said it has recorded 613 Palestinians killed within the span of a month in Gaza while trying to obtain aid. Most were killed while trying to reach food distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organization, while others were massed waiting for aid trucks connected to the United Nations or other humanitarian organizations, it said.
Efforts ongoing to halt the war
Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, during which the US would 'work with all parties to end the war.' He urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen.
In its statement late Friday, Hamas said it 'has submitted its positive response' to Egyptian and Qatari mediators.
It said it is 'fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework.' It did not elaborate on what needed to be worked out in implementation.
A Hamas official said the ceasefire could start as early as next week but he said talks were needed first to work out how many Palestinian prisoners would be released in return for each freed Israeli hostage and to specify the amount of aid that will enter Gaza during the truce. Hamas has said it wants aid to flow in greater quantities through the United Nations and other humanitarian agencies. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the response with the press.
The official also said that negotiations would start from the first day of the truce on a permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza in return for the release of remaining hostages. He said that Trump has guaranteed that the truce will be extended beyond 60 days if needed for those negotiations to reach a deal. There has been no confirmation from the United States of such a guarantee.
Previous rounds of negotiations have run aground over Hamas demands of guarantees that further negotiations would lead to the war's end, while Netanyahu has insisted Israel would resume fighting to ensure the destruction of the militant group.
'We'll see what happens. We're going to know over the next 24 hours,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One late Thursday when asked if Hamas had agreed to the latest framework for a ceasefire.
20 killed Friday while seeking aid
Officials at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis said at least three Palestinians were killed Friday while on the roads heading to food distribution sites run by the Israeli-backed the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in southern Gaza.
Since GHF began distributions in late May, witnesses have said almost daily that Israeli troops open fire toward crowds of Palestinians on the roads leading to the food centers. To reach the sites, people must walk several kilometers (miles) through an Israeli military zone where troops control the road.
The Israeli military has said previously it fires warning shots to control crowds or at Palestinians who approach its troops. The GHF has denied any serious injuries or deaths on its sites and says shootings outside their immediate vicinity are under the purview of Israel's military.
On Friday, in reaction to the UN rights agency's report, it said in a statement that it was investigating reports of people killed and wounded while seeking aid. It said it was working at 'minimizing possible friction between the population' and Israeli forces, including by installing fences and placing signs on the routes.
Separately, witnesses have said Israeli troops open fire toward crowds of Palestinians who gather in military-controlled zones to wait for aid trucks entering Gaza for the UN or other aid organizations not associated with GHF.
On Friday, 17 people were killed waiting for trucks in eastern Khan Younis in the Tahliya area, officials at Nasser Hospital said.
Three survivors told the AP they had gone to wait for the trucks in a military 'red zone' in Khan Younis and that troops opened fire from a tank and drones.
It was a 'crowd of people, may God help them, who want to eat and live,' said Seddiq Abu Farhana, who was shot in the leg, forcing him to drop a bag of flour he had grabbed. 'There was direct firing.'
Airstrikes also hit the Muwasi area on the southern end of Gaza's Mediterranean coast, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians driven from their homes are sheltering in tent camps. Of the 15 people killed in the strikes, eight were women and one was a child, according to the hospital.
Israel's military said it was looking into Friday's reported airstrikes. It had no immediate comment on the reported shootings surrounding the aid trucks.
UN investigates shootings near aid sites
The spokeswoman for the UN human rights office, Ravina Shamdasani, said the agency was not able to attribute responsibility for the killings. But she said 'it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points' operated by GHF.
In a message to The Associated Press, Shamdasani said that of the total tallied, 509 killings were 'GHF-related,' meaning at or near its distribution sites.
In a statement Friday, GHF cast doubt on the casualty figures, accusing the UN of taking its casualty figures 'directly from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry'and of trying 'to falsely smear our effort.'
Shamdasani, the UN rights office spokesperson, told the AP that the data 'is based on our own information gathering through various reliable sources, including medical, human rights and humanitarian organizations.'
Rik Peeperkorn, representative of the World Health Organization, said Nasser Hospital, the biggest hospital operating in the south, receives dozens or hundreds of casualties every day, most coming from the vicinity of the food distribution sites.
The International Committee of the Red Cross also said in late June that its field hospital near one of the GHF sites has been overwhelmed more than 20 times in the previous months by mass casualties, most suffering gunshot injuries while on their way to the food distribution sites.
Also on Friday, Israel's military said two soldiers were killed in combat in Gaza, one in the north and one in the south. Over 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza.
The Israeli military also issued new evacuation orders Friday in northeast Khan Younis in southern Gaza and urged Palestinians to move west ahead of planned military operations against Hamas in the area. The new evacuation zones pushed Palestinians into increasingly smaller spaces by the coast.
The Health Ministry in Gaza said the number of Palestinians killed in the territory has passed 57,000. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry is run by medical professionals employed by the Hamas government, and its numbers are widely cited by the UN and international organizations.
The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
41 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Ghost factories are a warning sign for green manufacturing's future
The vast tract of land off Route 85 was meant to be a symbol of Made-in-America manufacturing. A billion-dollar battery factory was going to rise, bringing thousands of new jobs. The business announced, 'Get Ready Arizona,' the governor said the state was thrilled and even the US president gave the project a shoutout. But here, in the boomtown of Buckeye, less than an hour away from Phoenix, the 214-acre lot sits empty. Work on the site had started, said Shelby Lizarraga, who manages the gas station next door, 'but then it went all quiet.' Four years after the fanfare, battery maker Kore Power Inc. abandoned its plans for a plant in Buckeye. The company's chief executive officer stepped down and a promised $850 million federal loan was cancelled. Kore isn't alone in its dashed ambitions. In Massachusetts, a wind turbine cable factory set to be built on the site of a former coal power plant was scrapped. In Georgia, the construction of a facility that would have made parts for electric vehicle batteries was suspended more than halfway through. And in Colorado, a lithium-ion battery maker said it wouldn't go forward with its factory there, at least for now. They're among the dozens of planned green factories that have been cancelled, with more delayed or downsized, all hit by soaring costs, high interest rates and slow-growing EV demand. About 9 percent of the $261 billion in green factory investment announced since 2021 has been shelved — most of it since President Donald Trump returned to office in January — according to research firm Atlas Public Policy. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has said his agency doesn't plan to move forward with some of the big-dollar loans that had been made to green manufacturing plants during President Joe Biden's term. Now there's another, major threat to the sector: Trump's massive tax-and-spending package, which rolls back Biden's generous green subsidies. Signed into law by Trump on Friday, it phases out credits for producing solar and wind energy years before they were designed to expire. It also ends federal tax credits for electric vehicles this September instead of in 2032. Under Biden, a Democratic Congress passed the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in 2021 and the Inflation Reduction Act a year later, setting aside hundreds of billions of dollars in incentives for clean-energy projects. New factories were announced from South Carolina to Michigan to Arizona, set to churn out EVs, batteries and clean-energy parts. Biden and Democrats sought to bring manufacturing back to the US and make the country independent of, and competitive with, fast-electrifying China. Many of the projects would be in red and purple states, shielding the policy against GOP attacks — or so the thinking went. That idea has now collapsed. (Among the members of Congress who voted for Trump's bill was Paul Gosar, a Republican who represents Buckeye.) Trump said at the signing that the country 'is going to be a rocketship economically.' But fallout is likely to include more clean energy projects and the jobs they provide, or could have. Tesla Inc. Chief Elon Musk had lambasted the package on X as 'severely damaging' to 'industries of the future.' The US pulling back now means it will lag other countries that have invested in green technologies, and that will hurt economic growth and boost reliance on overseas manufacturers long term, said Hannah Hess of Rhodium Group, a research firm. 'There's also the risk of stranded investments, a sizable amount,' she said. Lithium-ion battery manufacturers like Kore face strict rules on using foreign components, plus knock-on effects from the solar and EV credit phaseouts. Because of the former, fewer grid batteries will be installed over the next decade, according to the research group Energy Innovation. The demise of the EV credit will likely dent consumer appetite for electric vehicles — and by extension, demand for the batteries they run on. Buckeye — a former farming town named by settlers from Ohio — is a hotbed of building activity. Close to the Kore site is the suburban sprawl that's come to characterize the Phoenix area's rapid growth. Concrete is being poured in foundations and piles of rebar are stacked on construction sites, where tracts of desert are being transformed into new neighborhoods. Executives at Kore had scoured 300 sites across the country before settling on Buckeye. Land was cheap, it was close to major West Coast ports and Arizona's dry climate wouldn't impair the chemistry of lithium-ion batteries. The company announced its factory in 2021, planning to start construction that year and roll out batteries in 2023. It would be Buckeye's biggest employer, creating 3,000 jobs. But as executives drew up construction plans, inflation hiked costs, while rising interest rates made financing more expensive. And the project got mired in the same slow permitting that stalls projects nationwide. Costs swelled to $1.25 billion from $1 billion, so the company made adjustments to control expenses — even downsizing the factory — and worked aggressively to keep the project alive, Kore's current CEO Jay Bellows said in a telephone interview. 'We were trying to move as fast as we could,' Bellows said. 'But ultimately, the costs were just really high.' The battery maker later got a loan commitment from the Energy Department. Kore ended up getting approvals to move forward with construction in 2024, almost a year after it had wanted to start producing batteries. And then uncertainty loomed over the fate of federal green incentives if Trump were to win the election. In Buckeye's city hall, about 10 minutes away from Kore's site, Mayor Eric Orsborn sensed that things were amiss. The project's timeline kept getting longer and delays dragged out. 'Things slipped a little bit more, a little bit more,' he said in an interview in his office. Kore then said it was ending its plans to build in Buckeye, 10 days after Trump was sworn in. It's one of 53 out of 715 green factories announced since 2021 that have been cancelled, according to Atlas Public Policy. The outlook for green enterprises has darkened as policy shifts unsettle manufacturers, with EV makers feeling it the most, said Matt Shanahan of Marathon Capital, an investment bank focused on the energy transition. 'The rules have changed,' he said. The pace of cancellations and delays depends on how the market reacts to the law, he added, but early-stage projects are especially at risk. 'To break ground on a new facility — I think it's very challenging right now.' Energy storage may remain more resilient thanks to surging data center demand, he said. Kore is now on the hunt for an existing building to move into, with power and infrastructure in place so it can save money and get to market faster, Bellows said. Looking back, he said he learned the need to move more quickly and efficiently. The company tried, he said, but 'it's a long, arduous process' to go from dirt to a fully operating factory. Even so, other green facilities in the region are forging ahead. In Queen Creek, another fast-growing community that's about 80 miles to the west of Buckeye, construction is underway on a $3 billion EV battery facility by LG Energy Solution. Cranes tower over the sprawling site, while bulldozers kick up plumes of desert dust as forklifts scuttle by. The project has faced its own challenges — construction was paused for some time last year as the company scrapped plans for a bigger plant. But now the factory is set to open next year, and LG plans to employ 1,500 workers there by 2027. The company said in an April press release that it aims to contribute to a 'local battery ecosystem' and that it will hire locally. 'It's a manufacturing powerhouse,' Queen Creek Mayor Julia Wheatley said in an interview, adding that the town is seeing strong interest from companies looking to move near the plant. On a Monday in late June, the empty Kore plot scorched in 100F-plus heat. Nearby, desert gave way to parcels of farmland, discount stores and palm-tree-lined neighborhoods. Dairy cows took shade from the heat, while trucks stacked with hay bales hurtled by. Across the road, Joe Skoog, who runs a trucking company, said he would have liked to have pitched his business to Kore had the factory gone ahead. But he didn't see the cancellation as much of a setback for the growing region. 'Come back in five, 10 years' time, and there will be more manufacturers and warehouses, and fewer farms,' he said. Orsborn, Buckeye's mayor, said he was disappointed, but not disheartened. He enthused about Buckeye's population boom, fueled by Californian transplants, the big-box retailers and movie theaters opening up and how Kore's shovel-ready site — with power, water and infrastructure now installed — is now even more attractive for other businesses that want to move in. 'Maybe another green energy one will,' he said.
Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Iran Conflict will End on Negotiating Table: Col. Dahouk
On June 13, 2025, Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran to eliminate its nuclear program and prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon. As a result, both countries exchanged intensified aerial and missile attacks for 12 days. Then on June 22, the US intervened in the conflict by striking three nuclear facilities in Iran, namely Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, using bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles. Although the US President, Donald Trump, has insisted that the US strikes had set Tehran's nuclear program back 'decades,' adding that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been 'completely and totally obliterated,' there are reports suggesting the Israeli and US strikes have not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear program. In this context, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, said that the US strikes caused massive damage to Iran's nuclear program but has not completely destroyed the program, emphasizing that the Iranian nuclear issue will be settled through negotiations. US Strikes Impact Speaking to Al-Arabiya, Col. Dahouk pointed to the damage inflicted by the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. 'It seems like the political messaging from all parties go beyond realty on the battlefield,' he said. 'The US strikes on three nuclear sites, Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, were highly effective and managed to undermine these sites. The US used the most powerful non-nuclear weapon in the world,' Col. Dahouk noted. 'There is a massive damage, but when we talk about the entire Iranian nuclear program, it has not been completely destroyed. There is no way to destroy knowledge or ideology by military power,' he added. Return to Negotiations Col. Dahouk said that the only way to resolve Iran nuclear issue is through negotiations. 'All this has to come to the negotiating table. Battles do not end on battlefields, they end on the negotiating table,' he noted. 'The US will win if Iran returns to negotiations to reach some sort of a deal. Trump may agree to something like that, but it seems that Israel perhaps may have a veto to this process because it wants to completely destroy Iran's nuclear program. So, we will see the outcomes of the next round of negotiations,' Col. Dahouk said. New Round of Talks Washington is preparing for the first direct meeting with Tehran since the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, in Oslo next week, Axios reported citing two American officials. The US Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, will meet with the Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, to resume talks. Commenting on the choice of Oslo as the location for the talks, Col. Dahouk, said: 'I think, not exactly sure why in Oslo, maybe because it is a neutral location and both parties agreed to it. The most important thing here is war and peace.' He pointed to the importance of building trust between the US and Iran. 'The most important thing is trust, which must be established between the US and Iran in the diplomatic process. We have to wait and see what Iran will agree to after the 12-day war, which has not ended in any form. There is a ceasefire, which means a temporary pause in the war and each party may be regrouping and assessing its position. We have to wait and see what Iran will agree to from the US' terms,' he said. Iran's Calculations Asked about Iran's insistence on not compromising and coming to the negotiating table, Col. Dahouk said that it depends on Iran's calculations. 'It is up to Iran. They are the only ones who can provide the reasons behind all this, and their calculations and ideologies,' he said. 'But the Iranian regime knows what happened to other countries when they gave up their nuclear capabilities, such as Libya, Ukraine, Iraq and Syria. It also knows what happened to countries which kept their nuclear programs, such as Pakistan and North Korea,' he added. 'Therefore, they consider the nuclear program the last line of defense and once they lose it, they will lose a lot of political and deterrence capabilities. This could end the Iranian regime. If the regime wants to protect itself, it must protect the nuclear capabilities. This is what they are fighting for,' Col. Dahouk said. Resumption of War Regarding the possibility of the resumption of war between Iran on one side and the Israel and the US on the other side, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State expected this could happen if negotiations failed. 'We are in a ceasefire. And during ceasefires, warring parties regroup and rearrange their political and economic capabilities. If the talks are not held, there might be another strike or more attacks,' Col. Dahouk noted. Short link : Post Views: 9
Leaders
2 hours ago
- Leaders
Hamas Responds Positively to Ceasefire Proposal as Israelis Clash over Gaza Plans
The Palestinian movement Hamas said on Friday it had delivered a 'positive' response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders clashed over plans for Gaza, as the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, ordered an evacuation plan to the south of the Strip, while the Israeli military chief of staff warned of the plan's consequences. Positive Response In a statement, Hamas said it had completed internal consultations regarding the latest ceasefire proposal, offered by the mediators Egypt and Qatar to stop the ongoing aggression against the people of Gaza. In the light of this, the Palestinian movement said it had responded positively to the proposal, stressing that it was fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework. An Egyptian security official told Reuters that Hamas' response included 'positive signs' that an agreement is near. However, Hamas has some demands that need to be worked on, he added. Discussing Gaza Ceasefire Details Despite Hamas' positive response, the Palestinian movement suggested that further talks were needed on the implementation mechanisms. The US President, Donald Trump, had proposed a 60-day ceasefire, during which the US would work with all parties to end the war. Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed to his proposal and urged Hamas to do the same. Speaking to the Associated Press (AP), a Hamas official said that negotiations are necessary before the ceasefire begins to determine the number of Palestinian prisoners who will be released in exchange for each freed Israeli hostage, as well as the amount of aid that will enter Gaza during the truce. Furthermore, negotiations will begin on the truce's first day on a permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza in return for the release of remaining hostages, the official said. Trump's Optimism Trump expressed optimism regarding the ceasefire in Gaza following Hamas' response. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One late on Friday, Trump said: 'They said they gave me a positive response? Well, that's good.' The US President added that he had not been briefed on the current state of negotiations, however, 'There could be a Gaza deal next week,' he said. Trump also said that he would be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on the urgency for a quick ceasefire in Gaza. On Wednesday, Trump said that Israel had agreed to the conditions required to finalize a 60-day ceasefire, following a 'long and productive' meeting between his representatives and Israeli officials on Gaza. He urged Hamas to accept the ceasefire deal. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,' he wrote on Truth Social. A Saudi Priority Saudi Arabia has stressed its position regarding the urgency of a ceasefire in Gaza, according to Reuters. In the light of this, the Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan, said that the Kingdom's top priority is a permanent ceasefire in the Strip. 'What we are seeing is the Israelis are crushing Gaza, the civilian population of Gaza. This is completely unnecessary, completely unacceptable and has to stop,' Prince Faisal said during a joint press conference with his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, in Moscow. Israel's Position on Gaza Ceasefire Netanyahu has yet to comment on Trump's announcement and Hamas' response. The Israeli Prime Minister is set to meet with Trump in Washington on Monday. But so far, their public statements have shown a wide gap, as Netanyahu has insisted on disarming Hamas – a demand that the Palestinian group has firmly rejected to discuss. 'There will not be a Hamas. There will not be a Hamastan. We're not going back to that. It's over,' Netanyahu said on Wednesday. Meanwhile, an Israeli official was quoted by Israeli media as saying that Tel Aviv had received and was considering Hamas' response to the ceasefire proposal. Israeli Dispute over Gaza Plans The Israeli media reported a clash between Netanyahu and the Israeli military chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, during a cabinet meeting late on Thursday. According to the Times of Israel, Ynet and Channel 12, Netanyahu asked Zamir to 'work on a wide-scale evacuation plan of the population to the south of the Strip' and lay siege to the north. Zamir responded by asking: 'Do you want a military government [in Gaza]? Who will govern 2 million people?' Netanyahu said that the alternative to the evacuation plan was to capture the entire Strip and risk harming the hostages. The Israeli military chief rejected the evacuation plan. 'We have not agreed to this. To control these people who are hungry and angry could lead to a loss of control and as a result of that loss of control they could turn on the (Israeli military),' he warned. But Netanyahu insisted on his position, ordering Zamir to 'Prepare an evacuation plan — I want to see it when I return from Washington.' Short link : Post Views: 22
