Heidi Montag's husband issues savage clapback to 'wig haters' after her hair disaster at AMAs
Spencer Pratt showed his mastery of social media on Wednesday with his responses defending his wife Heidi Montag from critics of the wig she wore to the American Music Awards on Monday.
A Tiktok fan commented that while they were a huge fan of Montag, 38, they did not love the blonde wig she sported to the award show stemming from Los Angeles.
'I love love love her, but you should've stopped that wig,' the fan told Spencer, who had a classic comeback in the chamber.
Pratt, 41, said in response, 'For the wig haters please pre order HEIDIWOOD now so that future wigs have more budget ❤️��.'
The Hills alum, who is father to two sons with Montag, his wife of 16 years - Gunner, six, and Ryker, one - was lauded with compliments ay his adept verbiage in handling the comment about Heidi's wig.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
Spencer Pratt showed his mastery of social media on Wednesday with his responses defending his wife Heidi Montag from critics of the wig she wore to the American Music Awards on Monday.
The Bachelor alum Demi Burnett joked she was '*taking notes on how to clap back*' adding to Pratt, 'well done my friend, well done.'
A post from E! read: 'If loving her wig is wrong, we don't wanna be right.'
Vanderpump Rules' Kristen Doute wrote 'caption' with an emoji of a coffin, indicating her approval of Pratt's witty and effective reply.
It's been a challenging five months for the couple, who lost their Pacific Palisades, California home in the Los Angeles fires in January.
Pratt, speaking about the rebuilding process in an interview with Variety January 17 said that TikTok had been a lucrative platform in addition to Montag's musical efforts.
He said, 'I made, like, $4,000 on TikTok this week, but on TikTok Live, where people can just give to me direct, I think maybe $20,000.
'So that's phenomenal and life-changing. That's the power of individual supporters, people just backing you and getting behind you.'
Pratt told the outlet that people had misconceptions about his family's finances.
'I know people are like, "You're rich, you will be fine,"' he said. 'Yeah, I wish. Everything in our house was paid for by Heidi and I hustling any way we could. Everything we have worked for was in this house … we are starting at zero now.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Live China accuses Trump of violating trade deal
China has accused Donald Trump's administration of violating its trade deal with the US as it vowed to re-escalate the trade war between the world's two largest economies. Beijing said Washington had introduced multiple 'discriminatory restrictive' measures as it hit back at the US president's claim it had broken the agreement made in Switzerland last month. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce said those measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and revoking visas for Chinese students. Asian shares plunged trade tensions flared up again, with the Hang Seng in Hong Kong down 1.6pc and the Nikkei in Japan down 1.4pc. China's Commerce Ministry said: 'The US government has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations.' It added: 'If the US insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Möbius Book by Catherine Lacey review – beyond the bounds of fiction
From her debut, Nobody Is Ever Missing, to 2023's Biography of X, Catherine Lacey's work has tested the forms and fabric of the novel with brilliant unease. In The Möbius Book, her experiment crosses the blurred border of fiction into something else. Life writing, autofiction, memoir? Whatever you call it, The Möbius Book is deeply serious and engrossingly playful, and it lavishly rewards serious, playful attention. A Möbius strip is a length of any material joined into a loop with a half twist. It's an uncanny shape, common and obvious, easily created and yet awkward to describe geometrically. For literary purposes, a Möbius is interesting because there's intricate structure and constraint but no ending. It goes around again, mirrored with a twist. Lacey's book takes this literally, the text printed from both ends, with memoir and fiction joined in the middle. Twin stories experiment with plotlessness and irresolution, while remaining aware of the way fiction attaches itself to linear plot and reverts to romance and quest. Characters find and lose love, find and lose meaning. In one half, two women, Edie and Marie, reminisce about their messy love lives and Christian beliefs in Marie's grotty apartment, ignoring the pool of blood forming outside a neighbour's door. In the other half, the first-person narrator leaves a controlling partner, recalls an ascetic adolescence and struggles to write and think about faith with clever friends during lockdown. Lacey is fascinated by literary form and by the metaphors for literary form, finding fiction at once a constraint and a space for play. Late in the day, the narrator, 'with trusted friends who knew how, got tied up and whipped', as 'a rite in all this, the chaos of having more freedom than I knew what to do with'. It's impossible, in a book so preoccupied with crucifixion, martyrdom and self-denial, not to see the image of the twisted Möbius loop in this friendly bondage. The structures of novels and the iconography of Christian martyrdom are both narrative responses to suffering; both offer freedom through constraint. But for Lacey, suspicious of pleasure, the compatibility of faith and art is questionable. The two modes of the book, which I hesitate to call fiction and memoir because neither is wholly committed to realism or reality, undermine each other, with images and anecdotes reappearing in transmuted form. The shadow of the angry, manipulative ex-partner falls across both, challenging the narrator's memories and intentions although, reassuringly, never inviting the reader's distrust. Edie's recounting of a transformative encounter with a dying, talking dog which speaks of the meaning of suffering (is 'dog' a Möbius rendition of 'God'?) is reprised when the narrator attends to a man lying on the street. In the first-person section, the narrator sees Matisse's painting The Red Studio in New York's Museum of Modern Art, 'the red I imagine on the floor of an otherwise white room', reflecting the blood pooling under a neighbour's door that Edie and Marie in the novel section decide is probably 'paint or something'. As the narrator comments: 'Reality at large has never been my subject, but interiority always has been.' Lacey asks large questions about interiority, especially with regard to the subject of Christian faith. For some readers, it may be an alien idea that the sharply modern intellectual rigour on display here could be combined with religious conviction. How can a narrator who can play off Proust against Gillian Rose seriously expect to find consolation in the old myths about the baby in the manger and the man rising from death? It's a question Lacey acknowledges, partly as unanswerable: 'We want to speak of gnosis and mysticism without our phones listening to us and populating browser ad space with advertisements for Goddess Retreats and bogus supplements and acupuncture mats.' Even so, the narrator attempts an exorcism, employs an 'energy healer', is seduced by ideas about magic numbers. 'Symbolism is both hollow and solid, a crutch, yes, but what's so wrong with needing help to get around?' The question is not rhetorical. There's a deep ambivalence in this book about needing literary and philosophical 'help to get around', about whether we're allowed to want or need art, which is related to the narrator's lack of appetite and consequent emaciation. 'I was afraid of the line between basic needs and cravings, between living and lust.' The fear of slipping from necessity into pleasure shapes the distrust of fiction. What if storytelling is for fun? What if we don't really need it? What if only what's necessary is true, or only truth is necessary? Inevitably, the fictional half of this book refuses many of the satisfactions of a novel. Like a miniature homage to WG Sebald's Austerlitz, the present action is mostly the recounting of past events, so that most of the characters, times and places appear only through a conversation between friends. There are complicated, triangular relationships in the background, between characters who never quite take shape, whose voices are only – and unreliably – recalled. Third-person narrative always calls into being a narrator, another layer of artifice, and here the slippage between present, past and past historic tenses also constantly reminds us that this story is at once engaging and not real. The questions are constant, implicit, teasing, elaborated rather than answered in the dark mirror of life writing. They don't go away. You can go round again. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion The Möbius Book by Catherine Lacey is published by Granta (£16.99). To support the Guardian buy a copy at Delivery charges may apply.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Musk takes hammer to Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as he makes dire DOGE prediction after White House exit
Elon Musk says most of the savings made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will be wiped out within a year by President Donald Trump 's freshly unveiled 'big, beautiful bill.' Musk made the astounding comments during a blistering interview aired on Sunday despite initially declaring he only wanted to avoid discussing 'presidential policy' and stick to 'spaceships'. In a previously released clip last week, Musk took aim at Trump's bill saying that he didn't think it could be both big and beautiful - just one or the other. Speaking just days after officially leaving his advisory post, Musk warned that Trump's sweeping legislation would quickly obliterate the fiscal reforms DOGE had fought for. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn't decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk told CBS Sunday Morning. The 'big, beautiful bill,' hailed by Trump as the keystone of his second-term agenda, proposes $5 trillion in tax cuts alongside aggressive new spending hikes, lifting the debt ceiling by more than $4 trillion over two years. Despite its ambitions, reshaping tax law, overhauling immigration policy, and slashing Medicaid benefits in the future, Musk believes the bill is fundamentally at odds with the hard choices DOGE made to streamline government. 'I actually thought that, when this "big, beautiful bill" came along, it'd be like, everything he's done on DOGE gets wiped out in the first year,' CBS reporter David Pogue said bluntly. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful... but I don't know if it could be both. My personal opinion,' Musk laughed. It was a rare, public rebuke of Trump from Musk - a man once dubbed the president's 'first buddy' and hailed on the campaign trail as a 'truly incredible guy' by Trump himself. Musk spent $288 million supporting Trump's election and became a fixture at the White House, invited into Cabinet meetings and leading the charge to slash federal bureaucracy with DOGE's chainsaw-wielding fervor. But after months of political warfare, Musk's relationship with Washington, and with Trump, has cooled. Lawsuits and protests coupled with a 71 percent crash in Tesla profits followed DOGE's drastic cuts which saw 250,000 federal workers either fired or bought out across every federal department. Musk saw grants slashed and staffing culled at environmental agencies including the EPA and NOAA, despite decades of warning about the risks of climate change. Musk's personal net worth shrank by $100 billion, whilst government workers blamed DOGE for everything from Social Security delays to shuttered national parks. 'It's a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk said. 'If there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE. 'I've had people think that, like, somehow, DOGE is going to stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue,' he went on. 'We became essentially the DOGE boogeyman, where any cut anywhere would be ascribed to DOGE,' he said. Originally touting a $2 trillion savings goal, Musk later revised his target to $1 trillion. In the end, Musk claims DOGE managed to slash an estimated $175 billion before his departure - a far cry from his lofty ambitions. Yet now, with Trump's bill promising $3.8 trillion in added debt over the next decade, Musk believes even those savings would essentially be rendered meaningless. 'We do expect, over time, to achieve a trillion,' Musk explained on Friday during his farewell press conference, but it was also clear he knew that a huge wave of fresh spending would overwhelm any of DOGE's victories. Musk's departure came after CBS previewed the interview in which he criticized the bill in a clip that quickly went viral and reached the Oval Office within hours. The timing was no coincidence: Musk's formal 130-day stint as a 'Special Government Employee' was over - yet until that moment, Musk seemed to imply that he would continue contributing to White House efforts part-time. At an Oval Office farewell event on Friday, both men tried to downplay the rupture. Trump presented Musk with a ceremonial gold key, praising him as a 'very special person.' 'Elon's really not leaving,' Trump said. 'He's going to be back and forth, I think. I have a feeling.' 'DOGE is gonna continue, just as a way of life,' Musk told CBS. 'I will have some participation in that, but as I've said publicly, my focus has to be on the companies at this point.' Sporting a noticeable black eye that he claimed to have received from a playful punch by his son 'Little X' he also made sure to praise the president one last time. 'The DOGE team is doing an incredible job. They're going to continue doing an incredible job, and I will continue to be visiting here and be a friend and advisor to the president,' Musk said. Despite the highly choreographed moment, there still appeared to be some tension. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who reportedly clashed with Musk behind closed doors, stood stone-faced at the event. Trump wistfully that both him and Musk had endured 'slings and arrows'. He described Musk as someone he would keep close. 'Many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them,' Trump said. Following the latest bill announcement, Musk appears to be distancing himself from the administration's latest fiscal ambitions. 'My frank opinion of the government is that it's just like the DMV that got big, okay?' Musk told CBS. 'When you say, "Let's have the government do something," you should think: "Do you want the DMV to do it?" 'It's not like I agree with everything the administration does. But we have differences of opinion. There are things that I don't entirely agree with. But it's difficult for me to bring that up in an interview because then it creates a bone of contention,' Musk explained. 'So then, I'm a little stuck in a bind, where I'm like, well, I don't want to, you know, speak up against the administration, but I also don't want to take responsibility for everything this administration's doing.' Following the CBS interview, Musk returned to SpaceX's Texas headquarters, where he attended the ninth test launch of Starship. As the massive rocket spiraled out of control and disintegrated upon re-entry, some observers couldn't help but note the symbolism.
