Is ExxonMobil's Plan for $35 Oil Breakeven Going to be a Game Changer?
Exxon Mobil Corporation XOM mentioned in its recent earnings call that it plans to lower its breakeven costs to $35 per barrel by 2027 and $30 per barrel by 2030. Now, the billion-dollar question lies with the investors: To what extent will this lower breakeven, if achieved, aid XOM?
This is a realistic question that should arise in every investor's mind since the integrated energy giant derives the lion's share of its earnings from its upstream business. The no-brainer answer is that this level of low breakeven costs will be highly beneficial for XOM's bottom line, especially from its upstream business. In other words, ExxonMobil will remain profitable even if crude oil prices drop significantly and stand to earn substantially more when prices climb.
To add to that, even during most months of 2020, when energy demand collapsed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, ExxonMobil's upstream operations could have been profitable if its breakeven costs had been $30 per barrel. Per data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the Cushing, OK, WTI Spot prices for March, April and May were only below the $30 per barrel mark. Thus, there is no doubt that this development, if achieved, is going to be a game changer for ExxonMobil.
Other Upstream Firms With Low Breakeven Costs: CVX, EOG
According to Statista, a leading platform for data collection and visualization, the breakeven price in the Permian, especially in the Delaware and Midland sub-basins, is well below $40 per barrel. Hence, companies operating in the Permian, like Chevron Corporation CVX and EOG Resources Inc. EOG, are experiencing low breakeven prices.
In 2024, CVX conducted 80% of its development activities in the Delaware basin. Chevron plans to increase the development program in the Delaware basin to 85% this year. This simplifies CVX's strong focus on low breakeven-cost operations to maximize its profit.
In its recent earnings call, EOG said that it could easily handle all its planned spending for this year, even if oil prices trade in the low $50 per barrel. That means that to remain financially healthy, EOG does not need high oil prices.
XOM's Price Performance, Valuation & Estimates
Shares of ExxonMobil have declined 4.4% over the past year, outpacing the 6.3% fall of the composite stocks belonging to the industry.
From a valuation standpoint, XOM trades at a trailing 12-month enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) of 6.45x. This is above the broader industry average of 4.05X.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for ExxonMobil's 2025 earnings has been revised downward over the past seven days.
XOM currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell).
You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
5 Stocks Set to Double
Each was handpicked by a Zacks expert as the #1 favorite stock to gain +100% or more in 2024. While not all picks can be winners, previous recommendations have soared +143.0%, +175.9%, +498.3% and +673.0%.
Most of the stocks in this report are flying under Wall Street radar, which provides a great opportunity to get in on the ground floor.
Today, See These 5 Potential Home Runs >>
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Chevron Corporation (CVX): Free Stock Analysis Report
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM): Free Stock Analysis Report
EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
33 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trump warns Musk not to fund democratic candidates as feud continues
Trump warns Musk not to fund democratic candidates as feud continues CTV's U.S. Political Analyst Eric Ham on the 'mudslinging' feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk and the warning for Musk not to fund democratic candidates.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be It.
Let's make this clear from the start: I would never recommend owning just one stock for the long haul. A proper nest egg needs some variety, either in a carefully assembled basket of diverse stocks or focused on a broad market-tracking exchange-traded fund (ETF). For the sake of argument, however, I could imagine buying some Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) stock and just letting it roll. The usual suspects aren't diverse enough for this challenge I know, I know. You wanted me to double down on Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), whose stock has absolutely crushed the general market in the long run. Or I could have picked Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX), the media-streaming pioneer that's created most of my wealth so far and that might join the trillion-dollar market cap club in a few years. Perhaps you expected Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), with its unmatched five-year returns and huge long-term future in the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. These stocks sure tick a few of the right boxes, but none of them are as naturally diversified as Berkshire Hathaway. That's really what I'm looking for in a "single stock for all ages." Why my biggest winners don't make the cut I own all three of the suggested Berkshire alternatives above, by the way. Netflix Netflix was an early name in my portfolio, inspired by fellow Fool Rick Munarriz's in-depth analysis of the company in the mid-2000s. When Netflix went through the Qwikster-branded separation of DVD and streaming services, I doubled down on my investment at a fantastic price. That particular Netflix stake has gained 10,350% in less than 14 years. But that's just my favorite play on the future of digital media services. I would never dare to make Netflix my only holding, just in case somebody builds a better media-streaming mousetrap. Amazon I wish I had pounced on Amazon much earlier, like Motley Fool co-founders Tom and David Gardner did. But I dragged my feet, and watched the online bookstore become an e-commerce buffet with a highly profitable side of cloud computing services. My oldest Amazon investment is only up by 430% since January 2017. Still, Amazon only operates in a couple of business sectors. The company (and stock) could be vulnerable to a sudden sea change in cloud computing, possibly led by Microsoft 's (NASDAQ: MSFT) Windows Azure. And how well would Amazon's dominant e-commerce business perform if global rivals such as Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) or MercadoLibre (NASDAQ: MELI) found some traction in the American market? Amazon is not a one-trick pony, but the company should pick up a few more skills before entering this single-stock discussion. Nvidia I'm especially worried about Nvidia's long-term tenacity. The early leader in AI accelerator hardware could very well run into a superior alternative in the next few years. The risk only grows larger if you stretch the timeline out over decades. Rivals like Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD) and Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) control tiny slices of the AI chip opportunity so far, but that could change. The next market-defining AI winner could be some upstart I haven't heard of yet. Moreover, leading cloud computing experts such as Microsoft and Amazon already design AI accelerators of their own, hoping to meet their exact needs at a lower cost. Nvidia's big growth spurt might have a few years left in it. I'm just not convinced that the stock will continue to rise after that. My largest Nvidia purchase has posted a 780% gain since June 2022, but I cashed in on those paper gains and sold most of my Nvidia shares earlier this year. This pony needs to learn a few more tricks, too. Berkshire is the Swiss Army knife of stocks So diversity sets Berkshire apart from the biggest success stories of this era. Sure, Warren Buffett's stock-picking and wealth management expertise deserves tons of respect. But he is also known as a great mentor, and many of Berkshire's top-performing picks in recent years were added by Buffett's lieutenants. I expect the company to continue doing well when the Oracle of Omaha retires at the end of 2025. The stock is kind of like a carefully curated ETF. Berkshire Hathaway owns and operates 68 distinct companies these days. The names range from GEICO car insurance and Duracell batteries to Business Wire information services and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad. Berkshire dabbles in e-commerce (Oriental Trading Company) and clothing (Fruit of the Loom), not to mention home construction (Clayton Homes) and fast food (Dairy Queen). This business list is almost as diverse as the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) market index. And that's just Berkshire's in-house brands. The company also owns stock in about 40 public companies. The largest investments include a $60.7 billion stake in Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), a $45.1 billion position in American Express (NYSE: AXP), and a $28.5 billion holding of Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO). That's consumer electronics, financial services, and beverage distribution. Apple's gigantic presence may look risky, but the danger looks smaller when you also consider Berkshire's epic collection of fully owned businesses. Do you see a theme here? I do, but it's not a single industry. Berkshire is all about diversity, shielding the company and its investors against the temporary ups and downs in any one particular industry. Full disclosure: I don't own Berkshire (yet) I don't actually own any Berkshire Hathaway stock yet. I get my portfolio diversification kicks in other ways, with several dozen hand-picked stocks and a couple of broad index funds serving this purpose. That's arguably a mistake, since Berkshire's stock tends to outperform the S&P 500 in the long run, and I can't compete with the Buffett team's stock-picking skill. So if you're starting a new portfolio today, or just looking for an alternative to the common S&P 500 index funds, you should give Berkshire Hathaway a serious look. It's definitely a safer long-term bet than Nvidia, Netflix, or even Amazon. Should you invest $1,000 in Berkshire Hathaway right now? Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. American Express is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Anders Bylund has positions in Alibaba Group, Amazon, Intel, Netflix, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Intel, MercadoLibre, Microsoft, Netflix, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Alibaba Group and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft, short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel, and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
‘There's Still Time to Invest in Snowflake Stock,' Says Five-Star Analyst
Although Snowflake (SNOW) shares have already climbed over 35% this year, UBS believes that the software stock still has more room to grow. Following Snowflake's annual Summit in San Francisco, UBS upgraded the stock from Neutral to Buy and raised its price target from $210 to $265. Despite being late to the upgrade, analysts led by five-star rated Karl Keirstead said that Snowflake's performance has only started improving in the last few quarters, and that the broader AI-related investment cycle is just beginning. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Indeed, UBS noted that Snowflake is one of the companies benefiting from the need for 'AI-ready' data, along with Palantir (PLTR) and Databricks. The analysts also pointed out that more software companies like Salesforce (CRM), ServiceNow (NOW), and SAP (SAP) are moving into the data space, which they see as evidence of the growing demand for data. As a result, UBS believes that Snowflake investors haven't fully priced in this growth potential yet and that there's still time to invest before the full AI boom happens. Separately, Morgan Stanley kept its Equal-weight rating and $200 price target despite Snowflake's strengths in data security, ease of use, and multi-cloud capabilities. While the analysts led by five-star rated Keith Weiss praised the company's role in secure AI integration, they remain cautious about the stock's high valuation, which sits at about 55 times the expected free cash flow for 2026. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that Snowflake's expansion into data engineering and AI has significantly increased its market opportunity and might justify its premium valuation. Is SNOW a Good Buy Right Now? Overall, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on SNOW stock based on 34 Buys, six Holds, and zero Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average SNOW price target of $225.03 per share implies 6.4% upside potential. See more SNOW analyst ratings
