NDA says Oppn march in Delhi a drama, fun of democracy
NDA
on Monday accused the opposition parties of creating chaos from Parliament to the streets in the name of electoral roll revision in Bihar as part of their conspiracy to weaken democracy in the country.
Commenting on the Parliament march by the MPs of the INDI Alliance led by leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha,
Rahul Gandhi
, against the special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar and the ECI "irregularities" in the voter lists of Karnataka and Maharashtra, BJP leader and deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha said, "The opposition is staging a drama. It is making fun of democracy. They were earlier engaged in vote robbery to establish the family system.
They used to steal votes from the booth by fake voting. Now this 'jinn' of theirs is ending," he said.
Sinha was referring to RJD chief Lalu Prasad, who used to say in the 1990s that "jinn" came out of the ballot boxes in his favour.
Health and law minister Mangal Pandey said the opposition wants to create an atmosphere of distrust and anarchy in the country by opposing the
Election Commission
. "By raising questions on the constitutional institutions of the country, the opposition is not only defying the democratic processes but is also insulting the people of the country," he said.
HAM (S) national president and minister Santosh Suman said the opposition is misleading the country by opposing the Election Commission. "The opposition, which failed to corner the govt on any issue in the last 11 years, now wants to tarnish the image of the country by making baseless allegations against a constitutional institution like the Election Commission," he said.
He said Rahul Gandhi, who keeps a copy of the Constitution in his pocket, actually wants to do his politics by putting the Constitution at stake.
The entire politics of Rahul is based on baseless and unfounded allegations, he said.
JD(U) national spokesperson Rajiv Ranjan Prasad targeted the Congress and RJD for unnecessarily raising questions about SIR in Bihar. "As the Bihar assembly elections are coming closer and the opposition is clearly hearing the sound of its defeat, their language and attitude are changing. These leaders who are crying for democracy are the same, whose political history is filled with dark chapters like booth loot, muscle power and bogus vote.
Today, when a process like SIR has been implemented to make the voter list clean and transparent in Bihar, Congress and RJD have suddenly started worrying about democracy. These are the same parties which in the past protected muscle power and openly captured booths and violated the voting rights of voters," he alleged.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Aid and advice: on Jammu and Kashmir, LG's Assembly member nominations
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs' assertion to the J&K High Court that the Lieutenant Governor (LG) can nominate five Assembly members without the 'aid and advice' of the elected government overrides democratic accountability. Consequential decisions such as nominating members who have voting rights in an elected assembly must flow from democratic mandate, not administrative discretion. The High Court's constitutional question could not be more direct: do the 2023 amendments to the J&K Reorganisation Act, allowing the LG to nominate five Assembly members 'which have the potential of converting the minority government into a majority government and vice-versa,' violate the Constitution's basic structure? Rather than addressing this, the Ministry delves into legal technicalities. Its submission argues that nominations fall outside the elected government's remit, seemingly invoking the K. Lakshminarayanan vs The Union of India precedent from Puducherry while claiming the 'sanctioned strength' includes elected and nominated members. It even references Section 12 of the 1963 Union Territories Act (voting procedures) as justification for bypassing democratic consultation. When five nominated members could determine government stability in a 119-member Assembly, the issue transcends statutory definitions of 'sanctioned strength'. The real question is whether any legal framework allowing appointed officials to potentially overturn the people's electoral verdict violates the democratic essence of the Constitution. The amendments inserted Sections 15A and 15B into the 2019 Act, allowing the LG to nominate two Kashmiri migrants (including one woman) and one from the Pakistan-occupied J&K community, besides the existing power to nominate two women, if inadequately represented in the elected Assembly. This effectively creates five nominated seats. The High Court's framing of this issue acknowledges the stakes involved: this could 'convert minority government into majority government and vice-versa', potentially subverting the electoral process. This concern is not unsubstantiated — in 2021, three years after Lakshminarayanan, Puducherry saw nominated members and defecting elected MLAs contributing to the collapse of the Congress-led government. Also, J&K's trajectory to Union Territory, without consultation with elected representatives, makes democratic accountability even more crucial. The unfulfilled promise of Statehood restoration, acknowledged by the Supreme Court and despite overwhelming support in J&K, reinforces that current arrangements should strengthen democratic governance. The Ministry's argument that nominations exist 'outside the realm of the business of the elected government' also contradicts evolving Supreme Court jurisprudence. In the Delhi services cases of 2018 and 2023, it ruled that the LG should act on elected governments' aid and advice, with discretionary powers treated as exceptions. Seen in this light, the Ministry's arguments do not hold water.
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Expanded list of docs to prove citizenship voter-friendly: SC
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday orally remarked that the Election Commission's decision to expand the list of acceptable documents for establishing a voter's identity in the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) was "actually voter-friendly." A division bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi orally remarked that the expansion of documents leads to "expansion of choice" giving the voters "more options". Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Speaking for the bench, Justice Bagchi told one of the counsels for the petitioners that "we can understand your argument on exclusion of Aadhaar card but increasing the number of (acceptable) documents gives the voters more options". The Bench said this in light of contention raised by the petitioners that in the past the list of documents under a revision of rolls was not more than seven as compared to eleven in Bihar's SIR. Weighing in, Justice Kant orally remarked "things would have been different if you (voter) had to submit all the eleven documents. Then it would have been against the voters. But (in the instant case) ECI has given eleven options". The Bench also questioned the contention raised by another counsel for the petitioners that ECI did not have the power to conduct the special intensive revision (SIR). Live Events The Bench referred to Section 21(3) of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1950, which says "the Election Commission may at any time, for reasons to be recorded, direct a special revision of the electoral roll for any constituency or part of a constituency in such manner as it may think fit." Justice Bagchi added that the residuary power of the Election Commission flows from Article 324 of the Constitution as well. The Representation of the Peoples Act mentions both summary revision and special revision and the Commission has only added the word "intensive". Advocate Prashant Bhushan argued that the Election Commission should publish the list of the 65 lakh voters who were omitted from the list and also the reasons for the omission. Bhushan urged the Bench to issue an interim direction to the Commission to publish the names of persons excluded from the draft, to make the draft list on the website searchable, give names of persons recommended/not recommended by the BLO, and the reasons for deletion. The case will come up for resumed hearing on Thursday when the Election Commission will present its counter. At the last hearing, on Tuesday, the Bench had verbally remarked that "largely it appears to be a case of trust deficiency". The Bench had also told the counsels for petitioners that they should "agree" with the claim of Election Commission that a "detailed inquiry is not required" for the purpose of preparing draft rolls. The Bench had questioned the petitioners if it was their argument that Aadhar card is a proof of citizenship. "Do we presume that it is your argument that Aadhar is proof of citizenship?", the Bench had questioned one of the counsels for the petitioners. Referring to the Aadhar act, the Bench had said that the Election Commission of India was right in submitting that an Aadhaar card is not a conclusive proof of citizenship. The argument by petitioners that electors in Bihar do not have a majority of documents sought by the ECI as proof did not find favour with the Bench. "Largely, it appears to be a case of trust is an integral part of India. If people in Bihar do not have (the documents) then people in other states won't also have", Justice Kant had orally observed on Tuesday.
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Vote chori' helped Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav win, says BJP's Anurag Thakur
New Delhi: The BJP on Wednesday alleged large-scale irregularities in voter registration in Rae Bareli, Wayanad, Diamond Harbour, and Kannauj - constituencies of Rahul Gandhi , Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Abhishek Banerjee, and Akhilesh Yadav - and demanded their resignation from the Lok Sabha. The party claimed they won through " vote chori " and accused the Congress and its allies of running a campaign against the Election Commission to undermine the mandate of "honest and genuine Indian citizens" while compromising national security. BJP leader Anurag Thakur, in a slideshow presentation at the party headquarters, flagged alleged voter registration irregularities in Kolathur (Tamil Nadu) and Mainpuri (UP), demanding the resignations of CM M K Stalin and SP's Dimple Yadav for "rigging" elections. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Sonia became voter before getting Indian citizenship: BJP The BJP also alleged that former Congress president Sonia Gandhi was registered as a voter before she became an Indian citizen. "Sonia Gandhi's name first appeared on the rolls in 1980 - three years before she became an Indian citizenship," BJP IT department head Amit Malviya said on X.
