'He acted decisively': Ndlozi supports Ramaphosa's decision amid criticism
The EFF said Ramaphosa should've fired Mchunu instead of placing him on special leave.
'This so-called 'special leave' is a cowardly deflection, designed to shield a corrupt minister whose involvement in organised crime has been laid bare by Mkhwanazi,' EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo said.
Build One SA leader Mmusi Maimane said the move was not enough.
'We have had enough commissions of inquiry. I believe Mchunu should have been fired and the other ministers who have lied to parliament. This was a missed opportunity,' he said.
The DA said it would not allow another commission of inquiry that would take years to yield results.
'These allegations provided the president with an opportunity to show bold and firm leadership,' DA leader John Steenhuisen said. 'Instead, he has again outsourced executive responsibility to a commission and South Africans have grown cynical of talk shops, task teams and commissions which they see as buying time and avoiding accountability.
'The country cannot afford another elaborate filing cabinet of findings that gathers dust while the politically connected escape justice.'
Social media users have also expressed disapproval of Ramaphosa's decisions. Here are more reactions from X:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
19 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa hopes diplomacy amid US push for sanctions on SA
The US House Committee on Foreign Affairs passed a bill tabled by Republican Ronny Jackson calling for a full review of US relations with South Africa. President Cyril Ramaphosa says South Africa is in the dark about the United States' push to ban ANC leaders, hoping that diplomacy will prevail. The US House Committee on Foreign Affairs this week passed a bill tabled by Republican Ronny Jackson in April, calling for a full review of US relations with South Africa. Sanctions bill The Committee voted 34-16 on Tuesday to send the 'US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act' to the full House of Representatives, where it could be subject to a vote. Jackson introduced the US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act, providing tools to impose sanctions on 'corrupt South African government officials' who support America's adversaries like China, Russia and Iran, among others. ALSO READ: US Congressman Ronny Jackson introduces bill to hold SA accountable He introduced a bill that would mandate a comprehensive review of the bilateral relationship between the United States and South Africa. Jackson said Representative John James was co-leading the US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act legislation. Ramaphosa responds The bill comes as relations between the US and South Africa are at an all-time low after US President Donald Trump cut financial aid to South Africa, citing Pretoria taking Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and 'strengthening ties with Iran, which supports terrorism globally'. Speaking to the media after his visit to the BMW plant in Rosslyn, Pretoria, Ramaphosa said he and his administration had taken note of the passing of the bill, adding that it would not impact South Africa's approach to dealing with the United States. 'We have heard what has happened in the US House committee, and that whole process still has a long way to go,' he said. 'Discussions will be ongoing, and we don't know exactly what is driving all this.' 'Our bilateral discussions and dealings with the United States will continue, and we will talk about all manner of things, including precisely this issue and many others. We've got good diplomatic relations with the US, and we want to enrich them and make them better. So, we are very positive,' Ramaphosa said. [WATCH] President Cyril Ramaphosa says South Africa is in the dark about the United States' push to ban ANC leaders. He adds that he is positive about the outcome of engagements between the two countries.#Newzroom405 — Newzroom Afrika (@Newzroom405) July 24, 2025 ALSO READ: Is Trump about to slap sanctions on SA for misguided 'white genocide?' US tensions South Africa's relationship with the US sharply deteriorated during Donald Trump's second term, during which he has accused the government of anti-white racism and started a refugee programme for white farmers and Afrikaners. Relations were further strained following the remarks of former South African Ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool on Trump. Rasool was expelled by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio after he claimed in a webinar that US President Trump (and, later, Elon Musk) are leading a global white supremacist movement. Rasool was not replaced, and it was recently revealed that the US had, several months ago, rejected the South African government's appointment of Mcebisi Jonas as a special envoy to its country. The Presidency said that while Jonas, as special envoy, does not present diplomatic credentials to host countries in the way designated heads of mission or other diplomats do, he had helped facilitate trade and international relations efforts 'to reset diplomatic relations and all areas of cooperation between South Africa and the United States'. Tariffs Ramaphosa met with Trump in May amid the rapidly deteriorating relationship between the two countries. Earlier this month, the US hit South Africa with 30% tariffs 'on any and all South African products sent into the United States'. The tariff will take effect on 1 August. In a letter to Ramaphosa, Trump claimed that the steep tariffs were necessary to correct what he described as 'a persistent trade deficit between the two countries'. However, this was challenged by Ramaphosa, who said the decision was based on a flawed interpretation of trade data. ALSO READ: WATCH: Donald Trump ambushes Cyril Ramaphosa in Oval Office
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Now that the Budget has finally been approved, GNU partners look ahead
For some parties, the GNU will endure despite tensions, urging focus on service delivery and economic reforms post-Budget approval. 'The GNU will survive, full stop,' said Democratic Alliance (DA) spokesperson Karabo Khakhau after a marathon session on Wednesday to pass the Appropriation Bill, which all Government of National Unity (GNU) parties supported. While the 10-party coalition united in pushing through the important Bill that ensures South Africa does not fall into a fiscal crisis, where to next for the GNU? For some parties, the GNU will survive its teething pains, and for others, now is the time to put aside party politicking in favour of getting the work done. After a protracted process since the firing of the DA's Andrew Whitfield, the deputy minister of trade, industry and competition, and the DA's announcement that it would not support votes for 'corruption-accused' ministers from the African National Congress (ANC), the DA eventually agreed to support the Bill and thus, the Budget. This came after President Cyril Ramaphosa fired Higher Education Minister Dr Nobuhle Nkabane over the unfolding scandal in the Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) boards. But does this mean the GNU has managed to work out its differences? DA leader John Steenhuisen said, 'To preserve stability within the GNU, it is imperative that the Presidency urgently implements the dispute resolution mechanism outlined in the GNU Statement of Intent. Without it, governance risks being undermined by internal conflict. 'With the Budget now passed, the focus must shift decisively to service delivery and the rapid implementation of critical reforms to unlock economic growth and create jobs. DA-led ministries have already demonstrated measurable success, and we remain committed to delivering with excellence, professionalism, and integrity.' The fights between the two biggest parties in the GNU have often taken centre stage, from the signing into law of contentious legislation such as the Expropriation Act and the Basic Education Laws Amendment Act to Budget issues around the planned VAT increase, and recently, Whitfield's dismissal. Patriotic Alliance leader Gayton McKenzie dismissed the squabbles as 'growing pains'. He told Daily Maverick, 'We are voting together — let me tell you, all families fight.' The controversial minister of sports, arts and culture, whose party is the fourth-biggest in the GNU, said the formation was a 'family' that fought internally, but stood together externally. ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu said, 'The passing of the Budget is a crucial process in the order of business by the National Legislature. We thank all parties that voted for the Budget.' The Sunday Times has reported that the ANC was looking to reconfigure the GNU. This week, ANC parliamentary chief whip Mdumiseni Ntuli told Daily Maverick that at some point the GNU must be reset or reconfigured, 'but we never really drill it down to the details as to exactly what we mean by a reset or a reconfiguration'. But for other parties in the GNU, there needs to be clarity and re-evaluation. Rise Mzansi's national communications director, Mabine Seabe, said: 'Coalitions are by their very nature unstable, but the GNU can avoid many of the growing pains through maturity, particularly through an understanding that all political parties are equals — the often-peddled notion that smaller parties are in the GNU as a favour smacks of arrogance. We are all elected by constituencies, however big or small.' Seabe said that for this, the Leaders Forum and the Clearing House Mechanism needed to function and meet regularly, 'so that disagreements do not happen through media statements. 'This period has been punctuated by tussles over the Budget; therefore, all parties need to start those discussions earlier and with honesty so that the work of government and the Budget aren't held hostage by differing views.' The Good party's secretary-general, Brett Herron, said: 'Party political manoeuvring in the Government of National Unity is a distraction, defocusing the state from its parallel priorities to grow the economy and meet its constitutional obligations to provide social justice. 'Now that the nation has an approved Budget, the GNU partners must resist the creation of further crises and prioritise the work for which South African taxpayers, regardless of political affiliation, richly reward them.' DM
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
Malema's three-point comeback plan for fired higher education minister
Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema hosted a press conference on Thursday, 24 July, ahead of the party's 12th anniversary. During the briefing, he addressed a range of political issues, including President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent decision to remove Dr Nobuhle Nkabane from her position as Minister of Higher Education and Training. Malema, who has been a prominent figure in politics from a young age, shared some advice for Nkabane in the wake of her dismissal. The Red Berets leader believes that with just three changes, the former minister can make a comeback. 'It's so painful. She's so young, she still has a chance to come back. I've seen people get demoted politically, and then they go rework on themselves, and then they come back,' said Malema. The politician offered some constructive advice. 'The first thing she must do is to stop chewing gum in a meeting. She was still doing it even yesterday, there in parliament. The second thing is she must be humble and know that she doesn't know and be prepared to be guided and be advised by proper people,' said the EFF leader. Finally, Malema said Nkabane must go back to her branch and learn, saying she was not ready to be a minister. In an interview with eNCA , Nkabane said she accepted her removal and viewed it in a positive light. Ramaphosa dismissed Nkabane in terms of Section 91(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. He has since appointed Buti Kgwaridi Manamela as Minister of Higher Education and Training. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
