Sukhbir ups ante against govt over land-pooling
Shiromani Akali Dal
Tuesday intensified its protest against Punjab govt's plan to pool about 40,000 acres of land in 164 villages of the state to come up with urban estates and industrial pockets.
The biggest chunk of land — about 25,000 acres — is to be pooled in Ludhiana alone.
Badal appealed to the panchayats of affected villages to pass a resolution in their respective areas, stating that they would not allow even an inch of land to be acquired by Punjab govt, come what may.
Addressing a protest at Ferozepur Road near the mini secretariat, the SAD president demanded the immediate revocation of the entire 40,000-acre land acquisition plan.
He said the SAD would intensify the agitation against the "land grab" by holding weekly protests, with the first one being held on July 28 in Mohali and on August 4 at Bathinda.
Significantly, this is the third time in the last two months that the SAD chief has addressed gatherings and led protests in Ludhiana against the land pooling policy. The issue has snowballed into a political controversy with a large number of farmer organisations and opposition parties stiffly opposing the move.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
Badal kept on raising the issue even while campaigning for the SAD candidate during the Ludhiana (West) bypoll, despite the fact that the assembly segment was purely an urban pocket.
Initially, SAD had planned Tuesday's protest on July 15 but postponed it to July 22 amid the forecast of heavy rain. Though Ludhiana saw heavy rain Tuesday as well, SAD president
Sukhbir Badal
announced on social media in the morning that the protest will be held as planned and not pushed forward any further.
On the other hand, Punjab cabinet Tuesday amended the policy whereby even those who will pool one kanal of land will be given 125 square yards residential plot and 25 square yards of commercial space in the developed land parcel. Moreover, the govt has also offered that even after pooling their land, farmers can keep cultivating their land and the govt will offer them Rs 50,000 per acre per year. After the govt takes possession of such land, the amount would be raised to Rs one lakh per acre, with a 10% hike every year till the parcel is developed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
AP aqua farmers in tight spot as US tariffs take toll
Rajamahendravaram: Andhra Pradesh's vital aquaculture sector is facing an unprecedented crisis following the recent imposition of increased tariffs on shrimp imports by US President Donald Trump. This move, described by local farmers as a plunge 'from the frying pan into the fire', has significantly jeopardised the Rs 18,000-crore aqua export industry in the state. Andhra Pradesh is the undisputed leader in India's shrimp production and exports, contributing roughly 75 per cent of the nation's total shrimp output and about 32-33 per cent of the value of India's seafood exports. Over 10 lakh families in the state are directly or indirectly reliant on this sector, with major production hubs in West Godavari, Konaseema, Kakinada, and other districts. On July 31, the US President announced 25 per cent tariff on imports from India. The immediate consequence of the new US tariff was a sharp drop in shrimp prices. Farmers in the Godavari districts, including Konaseema and West Godavari, lament that prices have fallen by up to Rs 40 per kg. This steep decline means export prices, typically ranging from Rs 270-Rs 300 per kg, have now plummeted to Rs 220-Rs 230, resulting in a loss of Rs 40-Rs 50 per kg for farmers. The industry, which produces 4 lakh tonnes annually with 3.5 lakh tonnes earmarked for international markets, is grappling with a severe crisis. Farmers stated that by July 31, the price of 100-count shrimp had already dropped by Rs 40 per kg. According to a farmer, with new tariffs, exporting Rs 1 lakh worth of shrimp to the US could attract a tax outgo of Rs 26,000, potentially pushing the total burden further when factoring in other costs. This will not only hit cultivators hard but also the livelihoods of lakhs of daily wage labourers in associated sectors like packing, processing, and transportation, he added. Aqua sector experts warn that this price collapse would put farmers at a high risk of being unable to recover investments, leading to a debt trap. A decline in exports will also force processing units to reduce operations, potentially resulting in significant job cuts across the state. However, T Jagadeesh, a leading exporter from Bhimavaram, expressed his optimism that the aqua sector in AP would overcome the crisis. Speaking to The Hans India, Jagadeesh acknowledged the severe anxiety prevalent in the region's aqua industry, comprising nearly 200 exporters. He stated that the new US tariffs, combined with existing duties, would impose an additional burden of nearly 35 per cent on exporters. He, however, pointed out that the aqua sector is no stranger to crises and has consistently overcome challenges with determination. He further explained that state's aquaculture industry was not solely dependent on the American market, noting the availability of several alternative market opportunities. In response to this looming crisis, the state government is said to be actively considering strategies to mitigate the impact. An official confirmed that measures such as rebranding shrimp products, boosting internal marketing, and diversifying export opportunities were being explored to increase local consumption and find new markets for the beleaguered industry.
India.com
9 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump's new visa rule to make travel to US nearly impossible, Indians may have to pay in lakhs just to enter US, visa bond policy to roll out soon
Donald Trump's administration has proposed new changes to the U.S. visa rules this week. If these new rules are approved, people from certain countries may have to pay a large amount of money as a security bond to enter the U.S., no matter why they are visiting, whether for business or tourism. As per a report by Reuters news agency, the U.S. State Department is planning to launch a pilot program where visa applicants will need to deposit a bond ranging from USD 5,000 to USD 15,000. In Indian currency, this would be around Rs. 4.2 lakh to Rs. 12.5 lakh. This rule could apply to people traveling for work, business, or even just for holidays. The main purpose of this bond is to act as a financial guarantee which is to make sure that people who come to the U.S. return to their home country on time. It is meant to prevent visitors from staying in the U.S. illegally after their visa expires. In simple words, visa holders must leave the U.S. before their allowed time ends and should not try to seek asylum or stay there without permission. U.S. State Department officials were informed about this plan on August 4, and the official notification has already been sent to the Federal Register. The final version of the new rule is expected to be made public by Tuesday, and this new program might start from August 20. Few countries to be part this pilot project Trump's administration has said that this new visa rule will first be tested as a pilot project. But what's surprising is that it will apply only to a few selected developing countries and India is likely to be one of them. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio said that the State Department is planning to start a 12-month pilot program. Under this, adults applying for a U.S. visa may need to pay a bond of USD 10,000, and for children, the bond could be USD 5,000. If the traveler leaves the U.S. on time, they might get their money back. Once the visa is approved, travelers will be required to enter the U.S. within 30 days, and they must also leave the country before their visa expires. Trump's new visa policy may create problems for India If India is included in this list, Indian citizens, no matter why they are visiting the U.S., may have to pay over Rs. 12 lakh just as a bond before even stepping into the country. This proposal has already started facing criticism. Experts believe that such a high bond amount will make it nearly impossible for people from developing countries to travel to the U.S. This could lead to a sharp decline in the number of tourists and business travelers going to the US. And this isn't the first time the Trump administration has suggested such a move. A similar limited pilot program was proposed back in 2020 as well, but it was never implemented by the Biden administration.
India Today
9 minutes ago
- India Today
Gujarat University syndicate member resigns after Rs 75 lakh bribery allegation
A controversy erupted at Gujarat University after government-appointed syndicate member Shwetal Sutaria was accused of demanding Rs 75 lakh from the Director of the Human Resource Development Centre (HRDC) in return for approving a allegation has sparked protests by NSUI workers on campus and led to calls for an investigation into the matter. Following the protests, Vice Chancellor Neerja Gupta, who is currently abroad, called an emergency meeting of the Executive the meeting, Sutaria submitted his resignation, which was accepted. On July 31, Sutaria had written to the university registrar asking for 10 years of records related to HRDC. The information sought included grants, income sources, audits, orientation programmes, external collaborations and tender allegation is that this request was made to pressure the HRDC Director after the money was not paid. Sutaria has denied the said he wrote the letter to request an enquiry into possible irregularities. He claimed that he was being targeted for asking questions. He also said he has documents that show problems in HRDC and that he will share them Sutaria called for a judicial investigation and said he resigned so that the inquiry can take place without Director Jagdish Joshi did not speak to the media but said he had presented his views during the council meeting.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Gujarat
