logo
Complaint against qcom players: Distributors submit additional info to CCI

Complaint against qcom players: Distributors submit additional info to CCI

Distributors of fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) have furnished additional information to the competition regulator to substantiate their allegations against quick-commerce players.
According to sources in the know, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the regulatory watchdog, has asked quick-commerce players to submit answers to the allegations.
Distributors, through the All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation (AICPDF), have said Blinkit owns the highest share of the market with 40-45 per cent, followed by Zepto with 25-30 per cent, and Swiggy Instamart with 20-25 per cent, according to documents seen by Business Standard.
'The dominance of these OPs (opposing parties; in this case, it is quick commerce companies), particularly Blinkit, creates a significant market power imbalance, enabling practices that contravene Section 4 of the Act (abuse of dominance) and predatory pricing.'
The additional information said quick-commerce companies had arrangements by which they had bundled delivery service with loyalty programmes or subscription models, which encouraged customers to purchase additional services to access discounts or priority delivery.
They cited the examples of Swiggy Instamart offering discounts through Swiggy One membership and Zomato giving promotions through its Zomato Gold membership.
They also alleged quick-commerce companies had contracts with suppliers, and such deals often included prioritising stock allocations to their dark stores and reducing supplies to traditional trade.
They also complained quick-commerce companies used location-based pricing, by which consumers would get different prices for the same product, depending on where they lived.
And, according to them, consumers ordering through an iPhone are charged higher than android users.
Frequent buyers are allegedly offered lower discounts whereas new customers get higher.
Blinkit and Zepto, they said, offered discounts of 35-50 per cent, pricing products below what distributors offer.
The AICPDF had filed a complaint with the CCI on behalf of its president, Dhairyashil Patil, against Blinkit, Zepto, and Instamart in March.
A source had earlier told Business Standard the CCI had asked the distributors' body for details on the relevant market share of each of the quick-commerce players in the FMCG sector. It had also sought clarity on whether the FMCG companies had any exclusive agreement for distribution.
The CCI, once it receives a formal complaint, can order an investigation if it is satisfied with the information shared. It also has the option to seek comments from the parties named in the complaint or the informant who has filed the complaint before ordering an investigation.
Last year, distributors' body wrote to the Ministry of Finance on fund utilisation and fund accumulation by quick-commerce companies and the deep discounting of goods on their platforms.
In October last year, it had first written to the CCI on issues the traditional supply chain was facing owing to the rapid growth of quick commerce. The appointment of these platforms as direct distributors of FMCG items by several companies was one of the complaints.
The federation had written to the Food Safety & Standards Authority of India, which asked ecommerce and quick-commerce operators in the food business to ensure a minimum shelf life of 45 days before the expiry of products at the time of delivery to consumers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk clashes with Sam Altman after accusing App Store of favouring OpenAI
Elon Musk clashes with Sam Altman after accusing App Store of favouring OpenAI

The Hindu

time40 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Elon Musk clashes with Sam Altman after accusing App Store of favouring OpenAI

Elon Musk has accused Apple of unfairly favouring ChatGPT on its App Store and threatened legal action, triggering a fiery exchange with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on Tuesday. "Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation," Musk said in a post on his social media network X on Monday, without providing evidence to back his claim. "xAI will take immediate legal action," he said, referring to his own artificial intelligence company. X users responded by pointing out that China's DeepSeek AI hit the top spot in the App Store early this year, and Perplexity AI recently ranked number one in the App Store in India. DeepSeek and Perplexity compete with OpenAI and Musk's startup xAI. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called the accusation "remarkable" in a response on X on Tuesday, adding that Musk was alleged to "manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like." Musk then called Altman a "liar" in a heated exchange, prompting the OpenAI boss to ask whether Musk would sign a sworn legal statement declaring that he had never ordered changes to the X algorithm to harm competitors or help his own companies. OpenAI and xAI both released new versions of their AI assistants, ChatGPT and Grok, in the past week. App Store rankings listed ChatGPT as the top free iPhone app on Tuesday, with Grok in fifth place. Apple did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Factors going into App Store rankings include user engagement, reviews and the number of downloads. OpenAI and Apple announced an alliance in June last year to enhance iPhones and other devices with ChatGPT features. ChatGPT-5 rolled out free to the nearly 700 million people who use it weekly, OpenAI said in a briefing with journalists last week. Tech industry rivals Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and xAI have been pouring billions of dollars into artificial intelligence since the blockbuster launch of the first version of ChatGPT in late 2022. Chinese startup DeepSeek shook up the AI sector early this year with a model that delivers high performance using less costly chips. OpenAI filed counterclaims against multi-billionaire Musk in April, accusing its former co-founder of waging a "relentless campaign" to damage the organization after it achieved success without him. OpenAI alleged in legal documents filed at the time in the northern California federal court that Musk became hostile toward the company after abandoning it years before its breakthrough achievements with ChatGPT. The lawsuit was another round in a bitter feud between the generative AI (genAI) start-up and the world's richest person, who accused OpenAI of betraying its founding mission in a lawsuit last year. OpenAI alleged in its countersuit that Musk "made it his project to take down OpenAI, and to build a direct competitor that would seize the technological lead, not for humanity but for Elon Musk." Musk founded his own genAI startup, xAI, in 2023 to compete with OpenAI and the other major AI players.

Mumbai regulatory body acts against Palais Royale developer over Rs 100 crore dues
Mumbai regulatory body acts against Palais Royale developer over Rs 100 crore dues

India Today

time5 hours ago

  • India Today

Mumbai regulatory body acts against Palais Royale developer over Rs 100 crore dues

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has initiated strong enforcement measures against Palais Royale's developer, Honest Shelters Pvt Ltd, over unpaid interest exceeding Rs 100 crore owed to finance & investment services companies IIFL Finance Ltd and IIFL Management Services a January 16, 2025 directive, MahaRERA instructed the developer to hand over eight luxury flats in the Worli-based Palais Royale tower, complete with occupancy certificates, and to clear interest liabilities as per Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, authorities had given a 60-day deadline for compliance. The developer's failure to meet these terms led to IIFL filing execution applications. Acting on these, MahaRERA's adjudicating officer has now issued recovery warrants under Section 40(1) of the RERA Act, enabling the District Collector to recover the amount as arrears of land process may involve attaching the company's assets, freezing accounts, or other statutory enforcement professionals say the order underlines MahaRERA's readiness to use its full authority to protect buyers and financiers from prolonged marketed as India's tallest premium residential project, the Palais Royale development has faced more than a decade of delays, legal disputes, and investor latest action is being seen as a significant step towards providing long-awaited relief to Kumar Mishra, Chief Legal Officer at IIFL Finance, said that the decision reaffirms the obligation of developers towards their commitments and assured that IIFL will continue pursuing legal avenues to safeguard its each of the eight flats estimated at around Rs 80 crore in market value — making their total worth nearly Rs 650 crore — and interest dues topping Rs 100 crore, attention now turns to how swiftly the Collector's office can execute the watchers say the case could influence how stalled and defaulting projects are tackled across Maharashtra in the future.(Disclaimer: The views, opinions, recommendations, and suggestions expressed by experts/brokerages in this article are their own and do not reflect the views of the India Today Group. It is advisable to consult a qualified broker or financial advisor before making any actual investment or trading choices.)- Ends

Tesla's robotaxi gig pays big! Earn $33.66 per hour driving the cars of tomorrow in NYC
Tesla's robotaxi gig pays big! Earn $33.66 per hour driving the cars of tomorrow in NYC

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

Tesla's robotaxi gig pays big! Earn $33.66 per hour driving the cars of tomorrow in NYC

Tesla wants people in Queens , New York, to operate prototype cars with "autonomous driving systems" to collect driving data, according to the company's job listing titled 'Vehicle Operator, Autopilot' on Tesla's website. The gig can pay up to $33.66 per hour. Test Operator I drivers earn $25.25–$27.60 per hour, while Test Operator II drivers make $28.75–$30.60. Afternoon or night shifts pay 10% more, and all positions include Tesla benefits. Applicants must be able to work a flexible schedule, including one weekend day. Shifts run either Tuesday–Saturday or Sunday–Thursday, with day, afternoon, and night options, as per the Business Insider news. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program What Tesla drivers do A detailed feedback by the Tesla workers should be accompanied by operational understanding of software debugging, recording of devices, and sound understanding of audio and camera data analytics. A familiratity tech laden autonomous driving systems is a must. ALSO READ: Viral video shows wild elephant attacking tourist, ripping clothes during selfie stunt Similar jobs are listed in Texas, Florida, and California. NY law requires salary ranges, but other states' listings don't always include pay. Palo Alto drivers earn similar pay to Queens drivers. Live Events Robotaxi testing and challenges The NYC Department of Transportation confirmed Tesla hasn't applied for a permit to test autonomous vehicles on city streets. New York has strict safety rules for AVs, calling it 'the country's most challenging urban environment', as stated by the report by Business Insider. Tesla is testing robotaxis in Austin, Texas, and San Francisco, with safety employees in the driver's seat to take control if needed. During Tesla's July earnings call, Musk said the company aims to launch autonomous ride-hailing across most of the US and could reach 'half of the US population by year-end,' depending on regulations. Last year, Tesla offered up to $48 per hour to train its Optimus humanoid robot. Tesla has also increased testing of autonomous vehicles in California. Tesla test drivers sometimes face risky situations on open streets, as per the reports. ALSO READ: Apple teases stunning all-glass iPhone design - sleek, futuristic, concept that looks straight out of Sci-Fi Recently, a Florida jury found Tesla partly liable for a 2019 crash that killed a 22-year-old woman. Shareholders also sued Tesla and Musk, claiming robotaxis violate traffic laws. Tesla's hiring signals the growing robotaxi race. Lyft is expanding in Europe, and Waymo leads the US market, applying for a NYC robotaxi testing permit in June, as mentioned by Business Insider report. FAQs Q1. How much does a Tesla robotaxi driver make in NYC? Tesla robotaxi drivers in NYC can earn up to $33.66 per hour, depending on shift and experience. Q2. What do Tesla robotaxi drivers have to do? Drivers operate autonomous test cars, collect data, debug software, and give detailed feedback while following safety rules.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store