Conservative MPP speaks out on Dresden landfill — and premier trying to fast-track it
Steve Pinsonneault says he's been silent for too long about his government's stance regarding a proposed landfill in the southwestern Ontario community of Dresden.
The Lambton-Kent-Middlesex Conservative MPP, who was recently re-elected, says he doesn't support the rural dump. He also serves as parliamentary assistant to both the minister of emergency preparedness and response as well as the minister of rural affairs.
In April, his government introduced Bill 5 — the Protect Ontario By Unleashing Our Economy Act. It includes language that would fast-track the project.
There has been community pushback about the landfill for the past several months.
Pinsonneault recently took to social media to say he doesn't support the project or the proposed legislation.
"People are angry and quite frankly, so am I," said Pinsonneault, who pledged during his campaign that he'd get an environmental assessment in place.
"As you can understand, I'm very frustrated. I deeply care for the people of Dresden. I went to school there, my kids went to school there and I do believe that the residents of Dresden need to know where the representative stands on this matter."
After receiving what he referred to as "thousands" of emails and "hundreds" of phone calls about the landfill, Pinsonneault says he's personally spoken with Premier Doug Ford and the ministers involved.
"I've told him of the concerns of this landfill and I told them how I'm opposed to it," he said in the social media video.
According to Pinsonneault — who's also a former longtime Chatham-Kent councillor — the site will still be subject to a "strict environmental compliance process" despite having the environmental assessment removed if the bill becomes law. The province has also stated continued oversight would also be "strong," in a statement to CBC news.
"I can assure I will make sure every process [is] followed to the letter of the law," he said.
While saying it's "not a nice position" that the community has been put in, Pinsonneault also stated there's only so much he can do.
"The reality is I'm one of 80 votes and no matter how I vote it's not going to change the outcome."
He says he's never met or heard of the landfill's owners.
Pinsonneault says he's been beaten up "pretty bad" on social media over the past few weeks and due to his silence he says that's "fair."
"But when my integrity comes into question I feel it's time to speak out."
Kingston MPP Ted Hsu recently asked Ontario's integrity commissioner to probe an alleged connection between Premier Ford's government and the Chatham-Kent landfill.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford says the province wants to expand the dump site because of U.S.-Canada tensions and garbage capacity in the province.
"We're relying on the U.S. again," Ford said to reporters earlier this month, stating 40 per cent of all Ontario trash goes to the U.S.
"It takes one phone call from President Trump to … cut us off, and then what do we do? We have to prepare."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Air Canada flight attendants continue strike despite order to return, airline delays restart
CUPE's Air Canada Component President Wesley Lesosky says that the union is 'not willing' to accept the back-to-work order. Air Canada flight attendants remained on strike on Sunday past the deadline in a government-backed labor board's order to return to work, causing the country's biggest airline to delay restarting operations. The Canadian Union of Public Employees said in a statement that members would remain on strike and invited Air Canada back to the table to 'negotiate a fair deal,' calling the order to end its strike unconstitutional. The airline said it would delay plans to restart operations from Sunday until Monday evening. On Saturday, Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government moved to end the strike by more than 10,000 flight attendants by asking the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order binding arbitration. The CIRB issued the order, which Air Canada had sought, and unionized flight attendants opposed. The Canada Labour Code gives the government the power to ask the CIRB to impose binding arbitration in the interest of protecting the economy. The government's options to end the strike now include asking courts to enforce the order to return to work and seeking an expedited hearing. The minority government could also try to pass legislation that would need the support of political rivals and approval in both houses of parliament, which is on break until September 15. The government did not respond to requests for comment. 'The federal government has entrusted a board to administer these rules in the Canadian Labor Code, and if you defy them, you are transgressing and essentially violating the law,' said Rafael Gomez, a professor of employment relations at the University of Toronto. The government, under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, intervened last year to head off rail and dock strikes that threatened to cripple the economy, but it is unusual for a union to defy a CIRB order. Flights grounded, passengers stranded Air Canada flight attendants walked off the job on Saturday for the first time since 1985, after months of negotiations over a new contract. Air Canada had said it planned to resume flights on Sunday evening, following the expected end of the strike that caused the suspension of around 700 daily flights on Saturday, stranding more than 100,000 passengers. The union called a decision by the CIRB chair Maryse Tremblay to not recuse herself from handling the case a 'staggering conflict of interest,' since she had worked as a senior counsel for Air Canada in the past. According to Tremblay's LinkedIn profile, she served as Air Canada's counsel from 1998 to 2004. The CIRB did not respond to a request for comment. Other unions joined the flight attendants' picket line in solidarity in Toronto on Sunday. 'They are in support here today because they are seeing our rights being eroded,' said Natasha Stea, an Air Canada flight attendant and local union president. Air Canada had started canceling flights on Thursday in anticipation of the stoppage. Travelers at Toronto Pearson International Airport said they were confused about whether their flights would resume or Air Canada would make alternative arrangements. 'We are kind of left to figure it out for ourselves and fend for ourselves with no recourse or options provided by Air Canada at this time,' said Elizabeth Fourney of Vancouver. The most contentious issue has been the union's demand for compensation for time spent on the ground between flights and when helping passengers board. Attendants are largely paid only when their plane is moving. CUPE had pushed for a negotiated solution, saying binding arbitration would take pressure off the airline. Air Canada said on Sunday that the CIRB had ordered the terms of the collective agreement between the union and the airline that expired on March 31 be extended until a new agreement can be reached. (Reporting by Allison Lampert in Montreal and Rishabh Jaiswal in Bengaluru; Editing by Tomasz Janowski, Kirsten Donovan, Rod Nickel)
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Should government be forcing flight attendants back to work?
Coming up on Cross Country Checkup... The Carney government forced the airline and its flight attendants into binding arbitration this weekend -- just hours into the work stoppage. But flight attendants say their rights have been taken away -- so they're challenging the back to work order in court. The federal Jobs Minister says she had no choice -- the economy can't take the hit -- and the parties couldn't find a deal. Meanwhile -- thousands of travellers are stuck -- at one of the busiest times of the year for travel. Our question: Should the government be forcing Air Canada flight attendants back to work? How have you been affected by the strike? Plus, how's the fight to cut screen time going this summer? Are we expecting too much from kids or not enough from parents?
CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
4 Things to know about the Air Canada labour dispute
Social Sharing After months of stalled negotiations, 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants walked off the job early Saturday morning. The federal government stepped in hours later to order binding arbitration, forcing an end to the strike — or so they thought. The union representing Air Canada flight attendants said Sunday it would defy the back-to-work order and remain on strike. Here's everything you need to know: 1. Government intervention The federal government used a contentious section of labour law to intervene and stop the strike, which began at 12:58 a.m. ET Saturday. Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, which gives the minister the power to order the end of a work stoppage to "maintain or secure industrial peace." Hajdu used her powers to direct the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to order both the airline and the striking workers back to work. Air Canada said Sunday it had been directed by CIRB to resume operations and have flight attendants return to their duties by 2 p.m. ET. Hajdu says she chose to intervene in the labour dispute because "the potential for immediate negative impact on Canadians and our economy is simply too great." "Now is not the time to take risks with our economy," said Hajdu at a news conference in Ottawa Saturday. "A work stoppage would cause thousands of Canadians to be stranded abroad and across this country and this is simply unacceptable." WATCH | How Hajdu intervened in the Air Canada labour dispute: What is Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code? 19 hours ago Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu said she has invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to order binding arbitration between the airline and its union and has ordered operations to resume. Air Canada previously asked Hajdu to intervene with a binding arbitration order, which is one of the powers granted to the minister through Section 107 of the code. Until recently, Section 107 was a relatively unknown piece of legislation. But last year, the Liberal government invoked it in several major disputes — sending unionized employees back to work at ports, rail yards and Canada Post. Unions are taking the federal government to court for its repeated use of Section 107, arguing it violates Canadians' constitutional right to strike and sours the bargaining process. 2. Union defies back-to-work order The Air Canada Component of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) said Sunday morning it will defy the back-to-work order handed down by CIRB. Picket lines remain outside of airports in Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Calgary. In a statement Sunday, the union pointed to "a staggering conflict of interest" involving the chair of CIRB, Maryse Tremblay, who served as legal counsel for Air Canada for nearly seven years from 1998 to 2004, according to her LinkedIn profile. WATCH | Air Canada flight attendants defy back-to-work order: Air Canada flight attendants to remain on strike, defy back-to-work order: union 4 hours ago Air Canada had been advocating in recent days for government intervention to resolve the bargaining impasse. "We will be challenging this blatantly unconstitutional order that violates the Charter rights of 10,000 flight attendants, 70 per cent of whom are women, and 100 per cent of whom are forced to do hours of unpaid work by their employer every time they come to work," the union said. Air Canada and CUPE have been negotiating a new contract for flight attendants after the previous 10-year contract expired in March. CUPE says that wages, work rules and unpaid hours are the big issues in contention. According to CUPE, many duties performed by flight attendants prior to boarding and after deplaning, including performing required safety checks and assisting passengers, go unpaid under the current pay structure. 3. Potential union penalties The federal government has invoked Section 107 a number of times in recent years. But it is unusual for a union to defy a CIRB order. "The penalties could be significant" for the union, labour law expert Adam King told CBC News in an interview. Defying a legal back-to-work order could result in fines for the union or workers being fired. It could also lead to criminal prosecution in some cases. WATCH | Picket lines remain at major Canadian airports: Hundreds of Air Canada flight attendants picket YVR 12 hours ago Hundreds of Air Canada flight attendants demonstrated outside Vancouver International Airport Saturday. The strike prompted a warning for passengers to avoid the airport unless they have confirmed a booking on a different airline. Shaurya Kshatri reports. In 1978, members of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers were ordered back to work during a national strike. Union president Jean-Claude Parrot defied that order, with workers staying on the picket lines for a week after it was issued. Parrot was jailed for two months for refusing to comply. But King says it's also possible that CUPE's refusal to comply could work in the union's favour. He pointed to the example of Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government ordering CUPE's education workers back to work when they went on strike in 2022. "The entire labour movement in the province responded with the threat of a general strike. And the government was forced to back down and take their legislation away," said King. "If something similar happens here, we could very well see no penalties. If labour mobilizes in support of the flight attendants, they could very well be victorious in this." CBC News has reached out to Hajdu for comment on how the government will respond and will update this story with any response. 4. What does this mean for flights? Air Canada said in a statement Sunday that it will suspend plans to resume operations after CUPE indicated its intentions to remain on strike. The airline says 240 flights that were scheduled to operate beginning this afternoon have now been cancelled. The airline said it will resume flights as of Monday evening. With flight attendants refusing to return to work, it is unclear how Air Canada plans to operate these flights. CBC News has reached out to the airline for clarification. Flights by Air Canada Express, which are operated by third-party airlines Jazz and PAL, are not affected. About 130,000 customers will be affected each day the strike continues, the airline said last week. WATCH | The impact of the flight attendants' strike on travellers: Air Canada flight attendants strike, setting stage for travel chaos 2 days ago Canada's largest airline is now mostly grounded after a strike deadline passed for more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants. Hundreds of flights have been cancelled impacting over 100,000 travellers and leaving some stranded. The airline says customers whose flights have been cancelled will be notified and are "strongly advised" not to go to the airport unless they have confirmed flights on other airlines. Air Canada will offer those with cancelled flights other options, including a refund or credit for future travel. For customers due to travel soon, the airline said it will also offer to rebook customers on other carriers, "although capacity is currently limited due to the peak summer travel season."
