Where Chinese Or American Tech Is Used In Cloud Data Storage
TOPSHOT - Joel Kjellgren, Data Center Manager walks in one of the server rooms at the new Facebook ... More Data Center, its first outside the US on November 7, 2013 in Lulea, in Swedish Lapland. The company began construction on the facility in October 2011 and went live on June 12, 2013 and are 100% run on hydro power. AFP PHOTO/JONATHAN NACKSTRAND (Photo by JONATHAN NACKSTRAND / AFP) (Photo by JONATHAN NACKSTRAND/AFP via Getty Images)
Cloud computing has changed the status of network hardware like servers and data storage from a common asset of organizations or companies to a type of infrastructure. With this wide-reaching change come many implications, not least which enterprise owns and operates this infrastructure and which country they are from.
American and Chinese firms dominate the cloud computing and data center space, raising questions around data security and independence for third countries, many of which host data centers from American and Chinese companies and store their data and applications there. Major players include Amazon, Google and Microsoft from the United States as well as Huawei, Tencent and Alibaba from China.
This chart shows the share of cloud availability zones in different countries, by national origin of ... More provider (in percent).
Research from Vili Lehdonvirta, Boxi Wú and Zoe Hawkins at the University of Oxford and Finland's Aalto University shows which countries are home to which kind of data centers. While several European nations including Italy and Poland as well as Israel and Gulf nations Qatar and Bahrain host exclusively American-owned cloud infrastructure, the picture is more mixed in Germany, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom as well as in France and the Netherlands. The countries have between 14% and 40% Chinese data center infrastructure, measured by the share of so-called cloud availability zones, which are one or several connected data centers. The paper is scheduled to be published in the Review of International Political Economy.
The United States as well as Canada have small shares of Chinese cloud availability zones, ranging from 8% to 12%. The same number was as high as 17% in Australia and 30% in South Korea. Much higher shares can be observed in countries in developing Asia and in Latin America. Here, reliance on Chinese data center providers ranged from 25% in Brazil to 40% in Chile and 100% in Argentina, Mexico and Peru. Likewise, 55% of cloud computing clusters in Singapore, 57% in Indonesia and 100 percent in Thailand, the Philippines and Malaysia were owned by Chinese companies. The same was true for Saudi Arabia and Turkey. The countries in question were rated as seeking the affordability that Chinese infrastructure offers, while some are also in favor of the Chinese model of the controlled internet, the report concludes. Worldwide, 70% of cloud computing infrastructure is American owned, while almost all of the remaining 30% is in Chinese hands.
While it is true that organizations can choose to host their data with a cloud provider all over the world, many use infrastructure that is close by or local. Government or corporate policy rules often stipulate that data centers within the same country or other type of jurisdiction are utilized. While this does have advantages in terms of legal recourse over data centers, questions remain regarding the ownership and country of origin of the technology used. While these concerns have in the past focused mainly on China, they could arise towards the United States more in the future as a consequence of the foreign policy actions of the current Trump administration.
The researchers of the report warn that due to these ownership structures, cloud infrastructure could theoretically be weaponized. A total disruption was deemed very unlikely, but extremely wide-ranging by the authors, as it would not only affect many workplaces and public authorities, but also, for example, banking applications, smart home devices and parcel delivery warehouses. The research concludes that the attachment to one or the other country of ownership has to do with trade intensity between the nations but also with strategic choices made by the third country's government. However, owner nations have also been pushing their companies to expand overseas in the cloud sphere. While governments in Europe have made attempts towards cloud sovereignty—driven by suspicion of Chinese as well as American providers—, these initiative were rated as inefficient so far.
Charted by Statista
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Why MBS Is Keeping the Pressure on Iran
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Though Tehran and Riyadh appear to be getting closer, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) is quietly boxing in Iran—replacing confrontation with containment through diplomacy, economic leverage, and nuclear pressure. When Saudi Arabia and Iran restored relations in 2023, the move was widely seen as a turning point. But behind the optics of smiles and handshakes, their core rivalry continued. MBS simply changed the game: masking the iron fist with a velvet glove. It may look like a thaw, but in reality, it's a recalibrated contest for influence. MBS is boxing Iran in Syria, Lebanon, and nuclear diplomacy. President Donald Trump speaks with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) before posing for a family picture with Gulf leaders during a gathering of the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in Riyadh on May... President Donald Trump speaks with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) before posing for a family picture with Gulf leaders during a gathering of the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in Riyadh on May 14, 2025. More BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images Once on opposite sides of Syria's civil war, Riyadh and Damascus are now forging a strategic bond. Saudi Arabia is using investment to edge out Iran. In May 2025, MBS arranged a private meeting between President Donald Trump and Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa—positioning Riyadh, not Tehran, as Syria's international diplomatic guarantor. In Lebanon, the 2023–24 Israel–Hezbollah war devastated Iran's top proxy. Israeli strikes killed much of Hezbollah's leadership, including Hassan Nasrallah, and crippled its infrastructure. With Tehran financially constrained, Saudi Arabia stepped in. Riyadh now plays a gatekeeping role in Lebanon's reconstruction, with foreign aid increasingly tied to Gulf approval. The rise of pro-Gulf leaders such as Army Chief Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, a former ICJ judge, signals a political pivot. Iran's "Shiite Crescent," once central to Tehran's power projection across Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq, is giving way to a "Saudi Full Moon"—a widening sphere of influence built on investment, diplomacy, and institutional leadership. The regional battlefield has shifted. Riyadh's former reliance on confrontation and harsh rhetoric has given way to diplomatic pressure. Saudi Arabia recently offered to mediate U.S.–Iran nuclear talks. Though seemingly de-escalatory, it was a strategic bid for influence. MBS cast himself as a global statesman, positioning Riyadh as a neutral convener with deeper intent. Excluded from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, Riyadh has now inserted itself into the architecture of diplomacy to ensure its red lines on nukes, missiles, militias, and regional destabilization shape any future agreement. In May 2025, the U.S. and Iran concluded their fifth round of indirect nuclear talks. Washington called them beneficial, but Tehran's foreign minister admitted complex issues remain. Saudi Arabia welcomed the talks—on terms aligned with its interests. Whether in the room or not, MBS is setting the diplomatic tone. A striking example came during the May 2025 summit in Riyadh, where MBS hosted Trump and Syria's al-Sharaa. The meeting marked Syria's diplomatic return—on Saudi terms. Trump announced a "cessation of sanctions" against Syria and secured nearly $4 trillion in Gulf investment pledges, including up to $1 trillion from Saudi Arabia. The summit cemented Riyadh's role as the region's financial and strategic anchor, sidelining Tehran, Qatar, and the UAE. It also spotlighted Trump's personal bond with MBS: "I like him too much. That is why we give so much." This is a gesture he has never extended to the UAE's Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan or Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad al Thani. The optics crystallized a regional reversal. Where Iran once posed as the vanguard of resistance, Riyadh now hosts Iran's former allies, reopens the Syria file on its terms, and presents itself as a future-oriented Arab power. Across much of the region, it is Saudi Arabia that now looks like the victor. Alongside its regional diplomacy, Saudi Arabia has embraced nuclear hedging—keeping the domestic capability option on the table to pressure both Tehran and Washington. MBS has made his position clear: "If Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible." This is strategic signaling, not bluster. During Trump's first term, U.S. officials explored nuclear cooperation with Saudi Arabia. Those talks have resumed, and Trump has removed the prior requirement that Riyadh normalize relations with Israel in exchange for nuclear cooperation. This break from Biden-era conditionality exposes Riyadh's unprecedented leverage. The message is twofold: if Iran expands its nuclear program, Riyadh will not remain idle. And if Washington wants regional influence, it must reckon with a Saudi Arabia no longer content to play the passive security client. It forces the U.S. to make a choice: either accommodate Riyadh or risk proliferation. It also underscores Saudi Arabia's refusal to be left behind diplomatically, militarily, or strategically. Is Saudi restraint truly de-escalation or a subtler form of coercion? MBS has not abandoned the rivalry with Iran—he has recalibrated it. The Kingdom has shifted from proxy wars and religious conflict to a more finessed strategy: strategic displacement, narrative control, and institutional gatekeeping. Whether by sidelining Iran in Syria, reshaping Lebanon, injecting himself into the United States via Iran nuclear diplomacy, or leveraging nuclear ambiguity, MBS is dictating the pace. The goal is redefinition. This is not rollback. It is replacement. MBS is working within a U.S.-led order while preparing for a post-American Middle East. Dr. Talal Mohammad is an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) and an independent consultant in government affairs, geopolitics, and strategic intelligence. He is the author of Iranian-Saudi Rivalry Since 1979: In the Words of Kings and Clerics, and his work has appeared in leading international outlets. You can find him on X @DrOxbridge. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P lowers outlook on Volvo Cars rating citing US tariffs, competition in China
STOCKHOLM (Reuters) -S&P on Friday lowered the outlook for its BB+ credit rating on Volvo Cars to "negative" from "stable", saying U.S. tariffs and tougher competition in China were hurting the company's growth prospects. The Sweden-based automaker, which is majority-owned by China's Geely, last month withdrew its earnings guidance and announced cost cuts, which will include laying off some 3,000 mostly white-collar workers amid a slowdown in demand. "The negative outlook on Volvo Cars reflects its large exposure to U.S. import tariffs and the increasing marginalisation in the Chinese market," S&P said in a statement. "We expect Volvo Cars' profitability and cash generation after investments to come under pressure in 2025-2026, partly alleviated by a substantial cost reduction programme." The United States represented 16% of Volvo Cars sales in 2024, while China accounted for 20%. Volvo Cars produces only one of its models in the United States, and relies on imports for the rest, leaving the company more exposed to U.S. tariffs than many of its European peers. S&P said a proposed 2027 U.S. ban on automakers controlled by a Chinese entity also weighed on the outlook. In the most recent twist in the trade turmoil sparked by President Donald Trump, a U.S. court on Thursday temporarily reinstated sweeping new tariffs, a day after another U.S. court had ordered an immediate block on them.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Philip Cross: Carney's stellar CV does not guarantee success
This week's opening of Parliament allows Canadians to begin to assess whether Prime Minister Mark Carney's government will measure up to the considerable challenges it faces, the two most daunting being redefining Canada's economic and strategic relations with the United States and reviving our moribund productivity growth. At the same time, Carney must address inter-regional tensions that are as old as Confederation, and despair among young people that is as new as social media. It will be months before we can judge how Carney is doing. History shows how hard it is to predict whether a leader will succeed based solely on their qualifications. Some who seem to have all the prerequisites flop once in office. Others apparently lacking in competence or temperament end up exceeding all expectations. In 1928 Herbert Hoover appeared to have a near-ideal skill set to be a successful president, having excelled in both the private and public sectors. He had parlayed his knowledge as an engineer into a fortune as head of a mining company. He then oversaw efforts to help Europe in 1917 as head of the American Relief Administration, before becoming secretary of commerce in the cabinets of presidents Harding and Coolidge. But despite these impressive credentials, Hoover proved incapable of leading his nation out of the Great Depression or even grasping the human toll of the slowly unfolding economic catastrophe. Here in Canada, Paul Martin also seemed perfectly positioned to handle power in 2003. During almost a decade as finance minister he successfully managed Canada's fiscal crisis of the mid-1990s, giving him ample opportunity to study how to govern effectively. Instead, he proved incapable of the decisiveness required of any prime minister, leading The Economist to label him 'Mr. Dithers.' Conversely, some leaders have been surprisingly effective despite appearing to lack the requisite qualities. Franklin Roosevelt, who trounced Hoover in the 1932 election, was dismissed by The New Yorker as a 'grown up Boy Scout.' Walter Lippmann, the leading American political commentator of the day, called Roosevelt 'a pleasant man … without any important qualifications for the office.' But FDR re-made American society with his New Deal and then shepherded the U.S. through the Second World War. After FDR died in office in April 1945, expectations for Harry Truman were abysmal. Many regarded Truman lightly because of his lack of education — though a lifelong reader of history he was the last president not to have attended college — and how he was kept in the dark by FDR's White House from key deliberations about the war's evolution. But Truman quickly grew into the job, authorizing use of the atomic bomb to dramatically shorten the war, thus saving hundreds of thousands of lives on both sides, and identifying the shift of the Soviet Union from wartime ally to principal postwar rival. Truman enacted the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe and enforced a policy of containing communist aggression. Mark Carney's qualifications for leading Canada rest largely on his years running the Bank of Canada and then the Bank of England. He is also an economist, which means two of Canada's past three prime ministers, Carney and Harper, have been economists — which must be a world record. On the other hand, Carney's halting performance during the election campaign was a reminder that leading a central bank and governing a country require quite different skills. And Carney has already created problems for himself by not yet choosing a permanent chief of staff. A skilled traffic cop is crucial to a leader's ability to be properly informed and then to ensure the civil service implements the decisions taken. William Watson: Carney's throne speech ventriloquism was a little too obvious Diane Francis: Carney must listen to Alberta As this week's OECD survey of Canada observed, Carney has the difficult task of 'balancing short-term macro-economic support to mitigate the impact of tariffs with medium-term debt reduction.' The Liberals' electoral platform of deficit-financed tax cuts and balancing the so-called operating budget by excluding capital spending suggests that, despite much brave talk, he does not fully grasp the difficulty of transforming an economy while balancing competing interests. Canadians can only hope he grows into his new job quickly. Philip Cross is a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
