MPs slam ‘disgraceful' rollback of Northern Ireland veterans legislation
MPs critical of the move suggested it would open a 'witch-hunt' against veterans who served to protect citizens across communities in Northern Ireland.
The debate followed a public petition against repealing the legislation which attracted more than 170,000 signatures.
Conservative MP John Lamont, who opened the parliamentary session, said the rollback could lead to 'two-tier' payouts for figures such as former Republican politician Gerry Adams.
Mr Lamont said: '[The change] could result in a six-figure payout for Mr Adams, simply because his interim custody order was not considered by the secretary of state, but rather a junior minister.
'That is simply outrageous.
'We have seen a lot of examples of two-tier justice since the Labour government came to power, but this may simply be the worst of all.
'Is the Government really contemplating creating a system to drag northern Irish veterans through the courts, whilst potentially paying millions to terrorists?
'We should also be clear about the differences between the actions of soldiers and terrorists. When terrorists get up in the morning, they go out with murderous intent to use violence to attack our democracy. Soldiers do not.
'The Legacy Act is by no means perfect, but it is better than the disgraceful spectacle of veterans being dragged through the courts.
'Doing so is not sustainable – legally or morally.'
Others echoed Mr Lamont's comments, highlighting the implications the rollback could have on the armed forces in future conflicts.
Conservative MP Sir David Davis argued the change would mean that British soldiers would be abandoned by the country they served.
He said: 'Getting this right is not just a matter of historical justice.
'The legal witch-hunt won't end in Northern Ireland.
'It'll cast a shadow over every future conflict that our armed forces engage in, and undermine their abilities to defend us.'
He added: 'Those who freely talk about human rights would do well to remember that our rights, our law, our democracy and our nation were protected by the very veterans that are at risk today.
'So let us all make one promise, that no British soldier will ever again be abandoned by the nation they have so bravely protected.'
Other MPs voiced their support in favour of the Government's proposals, arguing that the current act is not fit for purpose.
Labour MP Louise Jones suggested that the lack of support for the legislation among victims, politicians across parties in Northern Ireland, and veterans themselves meant it ought to be repealed.
She said: 'This Legacy Act has been found to be unlawful. It gives immunity to terrorists, and it denies justice to the families of the 200 service personnel that were murdered by terrorists during the Troubles.
'It is not supported in its current form by victims, it's not supported by a Northern Irish party, and many veterans are troubled by it. It must go and be replaced, and I call on the minister to outline how we can protect veterans from malicious lawfare of any conflict.'
'We have a huge duty here in Westminster to work with those communities not against them, and I hope everyone here will reflect on that important undertaking.'
Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn pointed to statistics from the Centre for Military Justice that show that only one British soldier has been convicted since the Good Friday Agreement in 1998.
He suggested that this was the case over the 27 years, despite immunity for British military personnel not being enshrined in law for the majority of this time.
Mr Benn also argued that the changes would allow incomplete investigations into the deaths of soldiers to reopen.
He said: 'Legacy is hard. This is the unfinished business of the Good Friday agreement.
'And that is why we need to listen to the many families who lost loved ones, including the families of British service personnel, who served so bravely.
'There are more than 200 families of UK military personnel who are still searching for answers 30, 40, 50 years ago about the murder of their loved ones.
'The Police Service of Northern Ireland recently confirmed they had 202 live investigations into Troubles-related killings of members of our armed forces, and a further 23 into the killings of veterans.
'Each and every one of those investigations was forced to close by the Legacy Act, and we will bring forward legislation to deal with that.
'The other challenge is the lack of confidence in the act on the part of communities in Northern Ireland, which we are going to seek to reform.
'We owe it to all these families.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
From NHS to Send: the key areas Labour wants to improve before next election
Angela Rayner has called on Labour colleagues to 'step up and make that case' for the government's achievements, saying it was important to stress policies were not about short-term fixes but 'fundamental reforms'. Here are four areas where Labour is seeking to improve society – but faces a race against time before the next election to do so. This is in one sense an area where the government can claim quick-ish gains, with the boast that an additional 2m appointments have been created since the election, and promises to cut waiting times, a promise which hangs in the balance. But at the same time, more fundamental change is needed to cope with an ageing population more prone to chronic conditions. Hence the NHS 10-year plan, set out earlier this month and intended to move the health service to a different model, one based less on acute hospital care and more on community hubs. Then there is the parallel process to find a working model for older people's social care. As with health, this combines the very immediate and the hugely knotty and long term. In the foreground is the political wreckage of the government's attempt to shave £5bn off the annual welfare bill, primarily by tightening rules for personal independence payment, an idea dropped amid a massive Labour rebellion. The context to that, of course, is the significant increase in the numbers of people receiving benefits for long-term sickness and disability, an area where the experts are not even clear precisely what is causing it, let alone how to alleviate it. This is likely to be a challenge for several governments to come. A subject just as pressing and controversial as welfare, and also one where there are no easy solutions on offer. Ministers have pledged a thorough examination of the current system, which is both increasingly expensive and the cause of much complaint and anguish for parents and children seeking to navigate it. While ministers have guaranteed the continuation of some sort of statutory provision for Send pupils, this will not necessarily be via the current method of education, health and care plans, or EHCPs, despite the worries of campaigners. After the welfare debacle, expect much caution. As is a common political truism, the things run by councils – bin collections, libraries, social care – are often the ones that voters notice most immediately. And it's fair to say that in many cases, the impressions are not good. Labour has already embarked on a shake-up of local government, combining a series of smaller councils and creating more mayoralties. This may simplify some things, but a much deeper malaise is the lack of money for local government, not helped by the reliance on a council tax system based on valuations last done in 1993. This is probably too big an ask for now, but at some point a government will have to get to grips with it.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Chinese carmaker slashes prices to match Labour grant
A Chinese electric carmaker is lowering the cost of its vehicles sold in Britain by copying new subsidies offered by Sir Keir Starmer's Government. Leapmotor, based in Hangzhou, is ineligible for Labour's Electric Car Grant scheme after the Government blocked Chinese carmakers from accessing the discounts because their cars were not made in an environmentally friendly way. But on Friday, Leapmotor said it would offer a £1,500 and £3,750 price reduction on two of its cars – the same amount as the UK government grants. The Chinese business will sell its small T03 runaround for £14,495, including the £1,500 price cut. This makes it Britain's cheapest electric motor after undercutting Dacia's £14,999 Spring, which is also made in China. The company also lowered the cost of its C10 SUV by £3,750. The car now costs £32,750. Leapmotor billed the price cuts as 'Leap-Grant' and said it had introduced the offers to 'help car buyers make the leap into electric by offering immediate savings'. The business, which builds its cars in China but sells them in Europe in a joint venture with Vauxhall-owner Stellantis, said the government grant scheme had 'left many potential car buyers in a state of limbo – unsure of when or how to take advantage of the promised incentives'. 'Consumers are still waiting to learn which vehicles will qualify, how much financial support will be available and when the grants will take effect.' Labour's electric car grant scheme comes as Chinese EV brands flood the UK market, with the launch of cheap models from businesses including BYD, Chery and Jaecoo. While the grants will offer discounts on electric cars worth up to £37,000, the Department for Transport officials do not intend to extend the subsidies to Chinese-made cars due to the industry's reliance on fossil fuels. Lilian Greenwood, the transport minister, this week said: 'The grant is restricted to those manufacturers that reach minimum environmental standards. 'Frankly, if you generate a lot of the electricity that powers your factory through coal power stations, then you are not going to be able to access this grant.' The decision prompted a warning from the Chinese embassy, which said it would 'resolutely safeguard' the interests of its electric car industry against potential discrimination. The world's largest EV maker, BYD, said it planned to apply for the discount scheme despite the likelihood it would be rejected. The discounts by Leapmotor threaten to fuel a price war for battery-powered cars in the UK, which could mirror a similar battle in China.
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Public ‘sick of cover-ups' at MoD, says Chinook crash campaigner
Calls for a public inquiry into the 1994 Mull of Kintyre Chinook crash have seen a surge in support in the wake of revelations about the Afghan data leak, with one campaigner saying it shows the public are 'sick of cover-ups and secrecy' at the Ministry of Defence (MoD). All 29 military and intelligence personnel on board RAF Chinook ZD576 were killed when the aircraft crashed in foggy weather en route from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to Fort George near Inverness on June 2, 1994. The bereaved families have called for a judge-led inquiry into the incident, which was initially blamed on pilot error before this was overturned in 2011. A petition calling for an inquiry saw a surge in support last week after campaigners took to social media to criticise efforts to cover up the leak of thousands of names of Afghans who had helped UK troops, which they said was another case of the MoD 'covering up its own mess'. Chris Cook, whose pilot brother Rick was killed in the 1994 crash, said: 'This Afghan cover-up shows that the MoD hasn't just lost its moral compass but has managed to avoid all democratic accountability and scrutiny. 'It hid this data leak from the very people who are meant to keep it in line – the Intelligence and Security Committee, which had a legal right to see the intelligence assessments.' He added: 'The MoD has become the Ministry of Deceit. It lies, it obfuscates and it squirrels away its mistakes until it is found out – just as it has with the Chinook crash. 'It took us 16 years to clear my brother's name, and all that time the MoD claimed information didn't exist – until we found it and then they questioned how we got the information. 'The trouble with this whole case over 31 years, and so many other MoD cases – the helicopter cancer cases, the nuclear vets, is that so much information has been suppressed. 'It seems that the Ministry of Deceit is unable to uphold the values of integrity, honesty, objectivity and impartiality which they expect our armed forces to serve with. 'It's time for truth and transparency at the MoD and it's time for the Prime Minister to step in and clear up the MoD's many outstanding cases of deception, with a legal duty of candour imposed.' 'This Afghan cover up shows that the Ministry of Defence hasn't just lost its moral compass but has managed to avoid all democratic accountability and scrutiny. Just like the Chinook crash, it has covered up its own mess as usual. The MoD has become the Ministry of Deceit." — Chinook Justice (@ChinookJustice) July 18, 2025 In a social media post, the Chinook Justice group said: '#Coverup appears to be the mantra of the British state… with the MoD at the centre of it. Again.' In another it said the petition had got the 'zoomies' as the number of signatories doubled in the space of eight hours to more than 22,000. Andy Tobias, who was eight when his father Lt Col John Tobias was killed in the crash, said: 'Clearly, we have touched a nerve with the British public who are sick of cover-ups and secrecy at the MoD. 'Like many other families – from Hillsborough to sub-postmasters, the infected blood scandal to nuclear veterans and MoD helicopter cancer victims, and now Afghan families – we should not have to fight tooth and nail for truth, transparency and justice from the Government. 'That's why we are calling for a legal duty of candour. Enough is enough.' Following an appeal by Mr Tobias, former defence secretary Sir Liam Fox has agreed to meet the bereaved families to discuss the matter. The news comes on the back of the former minister's offer to intervene on their behalf with the MoD and 'if necessary' the Prime Minister to push for an inquiry, as reported in the Daily Mail newspaper. An MoD spokesperson said: 'The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident, and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died. 'We understand that the lack of certainty about the cause of the crash has added to the distress of the families. 'We provided a detailed and considered response to the pre-action protocol letter stating the reasons why we will not be establishing a new public inquiry. 'It's unlikely that a public inquiry would identify any new evidence or reach new conclusions on the basis of existing evidence. 'The accident has already been the subject of six inquiries and investigations, including an independent judge-led review.'
