In Pictures: Tearful politicians showing their sensitive side
The precise cause of Rachel Reeves' distress on the front bench as the Prime Minister jousted with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch remains a matter of speculation but it was certainly uncomfortable to watch.
She is far from the first politician to show her emotions by shedding tears though.
Here, the PA news agency looks at some other examples over the years of politicians becoming tearful:
– Theresa May
Theresa May's tenure as prime minister was dominated by Brexit. The former home secretary had the unenviable task of bringing the country back together after a divisive referendum and negotiating the UK's exit from the European Union as she succeeded David Cameron in 2016.
Mrs May ultimately failed to deliver the latter of those goals and the toll that responsibility had taken on her during her time in No 10 perhaps showed as she delivered her resignation speech outside Downing Street in May 2019.
– Margaret Thatcher
Known as the Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher portrayed strength during her 11-year reign as prime minister.
However, she too, showed a more human side when she broke down in tears as she said goodbye to Downing Street in 1990.
– George Osborne
George Osborne wept as he attended Baroness Thatcher's funeral in 2013.
Mr Osborne, who was chancellor at the time, was moved to tears during a sermon by then Bishop of London Lord Chartres.
– Matt Hancock
Matt Hancock raised eyebrows as he appeared to wipe away a tear during a live appearance on Good Morning Britain as he reacted to news that a man called William Shakespeare had become the second person in the UK to receive a Covid vaccine.
'It's been such a tough year for so many people,' the then health secretary told Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid in December 2020.
– Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown wept when he opened up about the death of his daughter Jennifer during a TV interview in 2010.
The then prime minister's eyes filled with tears as he told Piers Morgan he knew that his newborn daughter was not going to survive.
She died in 2002 aged just 10 days after suffering a brain haemorrhage.
– Cherie Blair
Cherie Blair broke down in tears in 2002 as she tried to explain away the controversy surrounding convicted fraudster Peter Foster's role in buying two flats for herself and her then prime minister husband Tony Blair.
'I know I'm in a very special position, I'm the wife of the Prime Minister, I have an interesting job and a wonderful family, but I also know I am not Superwoman,' she tearfully said in a statement to the press.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Medicaid and Trump's tax cuts: What this means for millions of Americans
Millions of Americans who get health insurance through Medicaid will face new hurdles after the House passed President Donald Trump's massive tax cut and spending bill, which includes deep cuts to nation's safety-net health insurance program. Trump's marquee bill extends the 2017 tax cuts, ends taxes on tips and overtime and bolsters border security. It also takes aim at Medicaid, the federal and state health program that covered 78.6 million low-income children and adults as of March 2025, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The bill, approved by the Senate on July 1 and the House on July 3, is projected to cut $1 trillion mostly from Medicaid and Affordable Care Act insurance plans and eliminate insurance coverage for 11.8 million people over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Another 5 million could lose health insurance because the bill doesn't extend former President Joe Biden's COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that made Affordable Care Act plans cheaper for consumers, according to a previous CBO analysis. Health policy experts say the legislation amounts to a partial rollback of the health insurance gains under former President Barack Obama's signature 2010 health care law, the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. "It's a giant step backwards from the vision of universal coverage that was President Obama's legacy achievement in the Affordable Care Act," said Joan Alker, a research professor and executive director and co-founder of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. But Republicans say the Medicaid overhaul is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to seek work to maintain their coverage. Shortly before the House advanced the bill to Trump's desk, Speaker Mike Johnson said work requirements will "restore dignity and purpose to those on taxpayer funded benefits." How would the bill change Medicaid? The Affordable Care Act established federal and state exchanges where people can purchase subsidized health insurance plans. Obama's health law also gave states the option to expand Medicaid to eligible residents who earn up to 138% of the federal poverty level − or $21,597 for an individual. A total of 40 states and Washington D.C. have expanded Medicaid under the ACA. Ten states, including Florida and Texas, haven't expanded Medicaid. Now, under the GOP bill, those Medicaid expansion states will be required to double eligibility checks to twice a year and set up systems to verify a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation requires "able-bodied" Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month or qualify for an exemption, such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The job checks will apply to parents of children older than 13. Medicaid: Where you live matters The GOP bill requires the twice-a-year eligibility and job verification checks to be in place by the end of 2026. So by January 2027, the legislation mandates states should begin these checks. However, language in the Senate version allows the Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy to extend "good faith" waivers to allow states more time to implement work requirement checks, Alker said. States also might choose to launch work requirements sooner by submitting a waiver to CMS, the federal agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid. During the first Trump administration, 13 states sought a Medicaid work requirement. Arkansas was the only state during Trump's first term to implement a work requirement and remove people from coverage − shedding more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program before a federal court order ended the work requirement. Georgia − among the 10 states that didn't broadly expand Medicaid to nondisabled, low-income adults − is the only state currently with a Medicaid work requirement. Georgia Pathways extends Medicaid to eligible adults who work at least 80 hours a month or qualify for exemptions such as being full-time students or volunteers. The Biden administration stalled the program, but Georgia sued and the program began enrolling people in 2023. Fewer than 7,500 Georgians had secured Medicaid under Georgia's Pathways program as of April 30, according to data analyzed by the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute. States also might be motivated to act sooner because the bill changes how many states fund their portion of Medicaid. States have adopted "provider taxes" that assess taxes on hospitals and other health providers to leverage larger Medicaid payments from the federal government. The GOP bill freezes the current tax rates and in 2028 will require states to reduce provider taxes to 3.5%, down from the current limit of 6%. Although the bill doesn't require states to begin curtailing provider taxes until 2028, some states might choose to act sooner to address potential budget gaps. "States are going to anticipate that loss of revenue and will be looking to make changes," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. Consumer advocates: Medical debt concerns mount Consumer advocates said the loss of health insurance for millions of American will likely cause more people to take on medical debt. Medical bills accounted for more than half of debt collection on consumers' credit records, according to a 2022 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Before Biden left office, the CFPB finalized a medical debt rule that would ban medical debt on credit reports and prohibit lenders from using a person's medical debt history to make lending decisions. The three largest credit reporting companies already agreed to remove unpaid medical debts less than a year old and medical debt less than $500. The Biden rule would have eliminated larger debts, too. But, the CFPB is seeking to erase the rule that would ban the inclusion of all medical debt on credit reports. The CFPB had layoffs earlier this year, and the GOP bill will further slash funding for the consumer protection agency. The combination of a weakened consumer watchdog agency and the loss of health insurance coverage will harm consumers, said Sally Greenberg, CEO of the National Consumers League. "Consumers are going to pay − and patients are going to pay big time," Greenberg said.
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
Trump's 'big beautiful' budget bill includes a new tax break worth up to $2,000—around 90% of filers could take advantage
House Republicans on Thursday voted to pass President Donald Trump's massive budget bill, making good on a promise to deliver the legislation to the president's desk by July 4. The bill promises continuity for taxpayers by permanently extending the cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as well as a raft of new cuts, including breaks for tipped and overtime income. The new law also includes a throwback: an above-the-line deduction on charitable contributions. The bill allows taxpayers who don't itemize to deduct up to $1,000 for single filers and $2,000 for married couples filing jointly. "This could provide some tax savings for folks," says Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation. "That could be something unexpected if you're not currently deducting charitable giving." Most people don't currently deduct charitable contributions — and it's not because they're not generous or don't want a tax break. Other than under the Covid-19 relief bill, taxpayers generally have had to itemize deductions in order to get a break for charitable giving. For most people, that doesn't make sense. Some 9 in 10 taxpayers take the standard deduction, which in 2025 is $15,000 for single filers and $30,000 for joint filers. You'd typically only itemize if the sum of your deductions would save you more money than just taking the standard deduction. In short, the new law allows anyone who donates to charity to get a tax break — not just the mega-philanthropists among us. Because these deductions reduce your taxable income, they're the most beneficial for people in the highest tax brackets. A $1,000 deduction from income is effectively worth $100 to someone in the 10% tax bracket. The same deduction is worth $350 to someone in the 35% bracket. You'll still have to follow the IRS' rules on charitable giving to get the break. Donations must be made to qualifying charitable organizations — donations to political campaigns, crowdfunding efforts and, in the case of the proposed tax break, donor-advised funds won't be eligible. Before you make a donation you plan on deducting, check the IRS' search tool to make sure the organization is tax-exempt. And be sure to get a receipt for your donation; the IRS generally requires written acknowledgement of any donation in excess of $250.
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Putin and Trump discuss Iran and Ukraine in phone call, Kremlin official says
MOSCOW — President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed Iran, Ukraine and other issues by phone on Thursday, the Kremlin said, in their sixth publicly disclosed chat since Trump returned to the White House. While discussing the situation around Iran, Putin emphasized the need to resolve all issues by political and diplomatic means, said Yuri Ushakov, his foreign affairs advisor. The United States struck three sites in Iran on June 22, inserting itself into Israel's war aimed at destroying Tehran's nuclear program. On the conflict in Ukraine, Ushakov said Trump emphasized his push for a quick halt to the fighting, and Putin voiced Moscow's readiness to pursue talks with Kyiv. At the same time, the Russian leader emphasized that Moscow will seek to achieve its goals in Ukraine and remove the 'root causes' of the conflict, Ushakov said. Putin has argued he sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022 to fend off a threat to Russia posed by Ukraine's push to join NATO and protect Russian speakers in Ukraine — arguments rejected by Kyiv and its allies. He insisted that any prospective peace deal must see Ukraine abandon its NATO bid and recognize Russia's territorial gains. Thursday's call follows the Pentagon's confirmation that it's pausing shipment of some weapons to Ukraine as it reviews U.S. military stockpiles. The weapons being held up for Ukraine include air defense missiles, precision-guided artillery and other equipment. The details on the weapons in some of the paused deliveries were confirmed by a U.S. official and former national security official familiar with the matter. They both requested anonymity to discuss what is being held up as the Pentagon has yet to provide details. Ushakov said a suspension of some U.S. weapons shipments to Ukraine wasn't discussed in the Trump-Putin call. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in Denmark after meeting with major European Union backers that he may talk to Trump in the coming days about the suspension of U.S. weapons deliveries. 'I hope that maybe tomorrow, or close days, these days, I will speak about it with President Trump,' he said. Asked about his expectations from the Trump-Putin call, he said that 'I'm not sure that they have a lot of common ideas, common topics to talk [about], because they are very different people.' The previous publicly known call between Trump and Putin came June 14, a day after Israel attacked Iran. The resumed contacts between Trump and Putin appeared to reflect both leaders' interest in mending U.S.-Russian ties that have plummeted to their lowest point since the Cold War amid the conflict in Ukraine. On Tuesday, Putin and French President Emmanuel Macron held their first direct telephone call in almost three years. Isachenkov writes for the Associated Press. AP writers Aamer Madhani in Washington and Lorne Cook in Aarhus, Denmark, contributed to this report.
