'I slept with a hammer at my bed for protection - now I have peace of mind'
A domestic violence victim who said she slept with a hammer beside her bed for protection has described a scheme that installed new cameras, locks and security lights at her home as a lifeline.
Ashleigh Murray, 34, said she was terrified her abusive ex-partner would attack her and her unborn child at home.
But she said the Housing Executive's Sanctuary Scheme helped her rebuild her life.
The scheme allows people to stay in their homes with additional security measures, including cameras, lights, door and window locks and safety rooms.
Warning: This story contains details some may find distressing
The mother-of-one's ex-partner Donald Newell was sentenced in November 2023 to two years' probation after he was convicted of common assault, criminal damage and persistent improper use of electronic communications to cause anxiety against her.
Newell, 35 from Saltcoats outside Glasgow, was also convicted of being in breach of a non-molestation order against Ms Murray and sentenced to three months in jail, suspended for two years.
"Donald was very scary," said Ms Murray.
"He preyed on the good in you, seeing the good in him.
"Whenever he'd come out of that rage, he would always have a rhyme and reason as to why he was doing it.
"I was always the problem. It was always my fault."
She described a litany of abuse directed at her by her former partner including being strangled, verbally abused in public and threatened.
"I didn't deserve for him to threaten my life. I didn't deserve any of that," she said.
Newell would "always promise he would get help", she added, but the abuse got worse.
She recalled a night when getting into the car with her former partner, who was drunk.
"He was pushing my face into the car window. Telling me he was going to cave my head in. He was going to punch me.
"He then broke the ligaments and tendons in my fingers."
On another occasion, Newell drove a car into one being driven by Ms Murray, who was five months pregnant.
"He followed me down the dual carriageway and rammed me.
"I was pregnant and had reduced movement and had to go to hospital."
But she said the help received through the Housing Executive's Sanctuary Scheme gave her "real peace of mind".
Living in a one-bedroom flat and pregnant, Ms Murray said her house was red-flagged due to the risk Newell posed to her and her unborn daughter.
"He was given a non-molestation order to stay away within a mile of my property. But that didn't stop him," she said.
As part of the scheme, the Housing Executive installed door and window alarms, flood lights, cameras and heavy-duty door locks.
"If anyone tries the door, the alarms go off; if anyone taps my window, the alarms go off," she said.
"I rely on the alarms. I can watch my home from my cameras when I'm out also.
"It just gives me that peace of mind."
She added: "The thought of him knowing where I was whenever he leaves jail or after the non-molestation order ran out was actually a very scary thing. I was always on edge.
"So the fact that I can surround myself with good neighbours that are able to keep an eye out for me is a big relief.
"My daughter can grow up in peace and safety away from him."
Kerry Logan, from Housing Rights, welcomed the scheme but said she would like to see it extended beyond Housing Executive homes.
She also said an underlying issue was the urgent need for the government to build more social homes.
"With more than 49,000 households on the social housing waiting list in Northern Ireland and a temporary accommodation crisis, it can be very challenging for people fleeing domestic violence abuse to find a safe place to live in the time frame that they need it," she added.
Ms Logan also called for people experiencing domestic abuse to be prioritised on the social housing waiting list, by giving them access to a "much higher level of points than they're currently able to".
Previously, victims of domestic violence were awarded less points for social housing than victims of terrorism or paramilitary intimidation.
However, that changed in May when intimidation points were removed from social housing applications.
Communities Minister Gordon Lyons said it was to "level the playing field for victims of violence".
Figures from October 2023 to March 2024 show that 607 people presented as homeless due to the treat of domestic violence compared to 101 for intimidation.
Grainia Long, chief executive of the Housing Executive, said balancing the system is "a long-term project".
She said the removal of intimidation points was recommended to the department by the Housing Executive and that it is now putting in place a system that "ensures that the points that are allocated better reflect the nature of the violence and the scale of the violence".
She added: "I think the public understand the profound effect that domestic violence has on women.
"It's really important we talk about these things and build public awareness."
If you are affected by any of the issues raised, help and support is available via BBC Action Line.
All domestic abusers should be jailed, says victim
Domestic and sexual abuse strategy launched
Not enough officers to tackle violence against women
Police to contact high-risk domestic violence victims
Half of male victims 'do not report domestic abuse'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Motion hearing in Lily Peters murder case set for Monday
CHIPPEWA FALLS — When will the trial for Carson Peters-Berger take place, and where? Will the case be moved to a different county in the state, or will a jury be brought to Chippewa County? Those are the questions that will likely be resolved Monday at a motion hearing in the murder case. The hearing is expected to last the entire day. Peters-Berger, who turned 17 in March, is accused of killing and then sexually assaulting his 10-year-old cousin, Lily Peters, in April 2022. Peters-Berger is charged in Chippewa County Court as an adult with first-degree intentional homicide and two counts of sexual assault. He was 14 at the time. The motion hearing is set to begin at 8:15 a.m. Monday before Judge Steve Gibbs and could take the entire day. Because a trial is likely to go a week or more, and because all the witnesses and experts will need to clear their schedule, it is expected Gibbs will set a trial for some point in 2026. In May, Gibbs issued an order that precludes all media from live-streaming the proceedings, in any way, of all pretrial evidentiary hearings. Media also will be barred from recording any live testimony, and 'all media may not directly quote the testimony of the witnesses,' but may 'summarize the content of the testimony.' An offender will face contempt proceedings. A flurry of motions and letters have been filed with the court this week in advance of the hearing. Defense attorney Michael Cohen filed a motion to suppress Peters-Berger's interview with police, contending that Peters-Berger's 'statements were taken in violation of his Miranda rights, and the second claim being that the statements were involuntary.' Cohen contends that Peters-Berger believed he was not free to leave the interview. However, District Attorney Wade Newell countered that 'the only issue is whether the defendant was in custody,' and Newell contends that Peters-Berger was not formally arrested at the time of his questioning. 'No arrest-like restraints were placed on the defendant,' Newell wrote in a new court filing. 'He was not handcuffed; no weapons were drawn; the defendant was not frisked. He was simply shown the way to the interview room.' Newell added: 'The defendant was told that he was not being forced to be there, and could leave whenever he needed to. In fact, to make it clear to him, the investigator point blank told him that he was not under arrest.' Newell also stressed that all comments made by Peters-Berger to police were voluntary. Gibbs granted a request to seal the transcript of the interview recording with police and a flash drive that contains video of the interview. Cohen also has requested the trial be moved out of Chippewa County, citing news reports in the Leader-Telegram, WEAU and WQOW, among others. 'A jury in this matter will obviously be compromised, if kept within the county of Chippewa, of a significant portion of people that have friends, neighbors, co-workers, family members, etc., that have strong concerns and emotions and feelings and opinions about this case,' Cohen wrote. 'It is unfathomable and unrealistic to think that jurors can just set aside all of their own emotions, anxieties, concerns about being known within the public for being on the jury if the jury were to find in contrast to what public opinion thinks the verdict should be.' Newell also filed a new letter, arguing against a motion to have the trial moved to a different county. 'While the defense is correct that the defendant need not prove actual prejudice exists, vague allegations of improper and prejudicial publicity and inconclusive evidence thereof do not make a showing that the community was so infected with passion and prejudice as to make it likely that a fair trial could not be had,' Newell wrote. 'All we have at this point is speculation as to what effects the pretrial publicity or memorial activity will have on any potential jurors. The state still contends the best way to determine if the community has been so infected with passion and prejudice, is with a well-written jury questionnaire that will determine individual juror biases or prejudices. This will ensure that an impartial jury is impaneled.' Cohen countered with a new letter, saying he will be asking for a pretrial questionnaire, but that is 'separate and distinct' from any request for a change of venue. As the Leader-Telegram reported earlier this year, only two cases — both murders — have been moved out of Chippewa County in the past 25 years. Because of all the motions that will be discussed, Cohen has requested the hearing be split into two different days. Cohen had previously argued that the case should not be in adult court because Peters-Berger is a juvenile. However, Judge Gibbs ruled on Jan. 22, 2024, that the case would remain in adult court, rejecting the defense's petition to have it moved to a juvenile proceeding. The Court of Appeals later agreed with Gibbs. Gibbs has since unsealed the name of the suspect. Peters-Berger has been held in the Northwest Regional Juvenile Detention Center in Eau Claire on a $1 million cash bond since his arrest. Lily Peters was killed on April 24, 2022, in Chippewa Falls. Her body was discovered the next morning. When interviewed by investigators, Peters-Berger told police he punched Lily in the stomach, struck her on the head three times with a heavy stick, then strangled her until she was dead. He then had sex with her body. He went home and put his dirty clothes in the laundry, but later returned to the scene, dragged her body a few feet, and covered her body with leaves.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
'I slept with a hammer at my bed for protection - now I have peace of mind'
A domestic violence victim who said she slept with a hammer beside her bed for protection has described a scheme that installed new cameras, locks and security lights at her home as a lifeline. Ashleigh Murray, 34, said she was terrified her abusive ex-partner would attack her and her unborn child at home. But she said the Housing Executive's Sanctuary Scheme helped her rebuild her life. The scheme allows people to stay in their homes with additional security measures, including cameras, lights, door and window locks and safety rooms. Warning: This story contains details some may find distressing The mother-of-one's ex-partner Donald Newell was sentenced in November 2023 to two years' probation after he was convicted of common assault, criminal damage and persistent improper use of electronic communications to cause anxiety against her. Newell, 35 from Saltcoats outside Glasgow, was also convicted of being in breach of a non-molestation order against Ms Murray and sentenced to three months in jail, suspended for two years. "Donald was very scary," said Ms Murray. "He preyed on the good in you, seeing the good in him. "Whenever he'd come out of that rage, he would always have a rhyme and reason as to why he was doing it. "I was always the problem. It was always my fault." She described a litany of abuse directed at her by her former partner including being strangled, verbally abused in public and threatened. "I didn't deserve for him to threaten my life. I didn't deserve any of that," she said. Newell would "always promise he would get help", she added, but the abuse got worse. She recalled a night when getting into the car with her former partner, who was drunk. "He was pushing my face into the car window. Telling me he was going to cave my head in. He was going to punch me. "He then broke the ligaments and tendons in my fingers." On another occasion, Newell drove a car into one being driven by Ms Murray, who was five months pregnant. "He followed me down the dual carriageway and rammed me. "I was pregnant and had reduced movement and had to go to hospital." But she said the help received through the Housing Executive's Sanctuary Scheme gave her "real peace of mind". Living in a one-bedroom flat and pregnant, Ms Murray said her house was red-flagged due to the risk Newell posed to her and her unborn daughter. "He was given a non-molestation order to stay away within a mile of my property. But that didn't stop him," she said. As part of the scheme, the Housing Executive installed door and window alarms, flood lights, cameras and heavy-duty door locks. "If anyone tries the door, the alarms go off; if anyone taps my window, the alarms go off," she said. "I rely on the alarms. I can watch my home from my cameras when I'm out also. "It just gives me that peace of mind." She added: "The thought of him knowing where I was whenever he leaves jail or after the non-molestation order ran out was actually a very scary thing. I was always on edge. "So the fact that I can surround myself with good neighbours that are able to keep an eye out for me is a big relief. "My daughter can grow up in peace and safety away from him." Kerry Logan, from Housing Rights, welcomed the scheme but said she would like to see it extended beyond Housing Executive homes. She also said an underlying issue was the urgent need for the government to build more social homes. "With more than 49,000 households on the social housing waiting list in Northern Ireland and a temporary accommodation crisis, it can be very challenging for people fleeing domestic violence abuse to find a safe place to live in the time frame that they need it," she added. Ms Logan also called for people experiencing domestic abuse to be prioritised on the social housing waiting list, by giving them access to a "much higher level of points than they're currently able to". Previously, victims of domestic violence were awarded less points for social housing than victims of terrorism or paramilitary intimidation. However, that changed in May when intimidation points were removed from social housing applications. Communities Minister Gordon Lyons said it was to "level the playing field for victims of violence". Figures from October 2023 to March 2024 show that 607 people presented as homeless due to the treat of domestic violence compared to 101 for intimidation. Grainia Long, chief executive of the Housing Executive, said balancing the system is "a long-term project". She said the removal of intimidation points was recommended to the department by the Housing Executive and that it is now putting in place a system that "ensures that the points that are allocated better reflect the nature of the violence and the scale of the violence". She added: "I think the public understand the profound effect that domestic violence has on women. "It's really important we talk about these things and build public awareness." If you are affected by any of the issues raised, help and support is available via BBC Action Line. All domestic abusers should be jailed, says victim Domestic and sexual abuse strategy launched Not enough officers to tackle violence against women Police to contact high-risk domestic violence victims Half of male victims 'do not report domestic abuse'
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Philadelphia paper warns Fetterman to take Senate job seriously – ‘or step away'
The Philadelphia Inquirer's editorial board has issued a sharp rebuke of Pennsylvania senator John Fetterman in a new opinion piece, urging him to take his job 'seriously' and writing that 'it's time for Fetterman to serve Pennsylvanians, or step away.' In a strongly worded piece published on Sunday, the editorial board of the Philadelphia Inquirer, which endorsed Fetterman during his 2022 Senate campaign, said the first-term Democrat 'has missed more votes than nearly every other senator in the past two years' and 'regularly skips committee hearings, cancels meetings, avoids the daily caucus lunches with colleagues, and rarely goes on the Senate floor'. The editorial board also wrote that six former Fetterman staffers told an Inquirer reporter that Fetterman was frequently absent or spent hours alone in his office, avoiding colleagues and meetings. 'Being an elected official comes with public scrutiny,' the board wrote. 'If Fetterman can't handle the attention or perform his job, then in the best interest of the country and the nearly 13 million residents of Pennsylvania he represents, he should step aside.' Related: Republican senator criticized for mock apology after saying 'we all are going to die' 'Being an elected representative is a privilege, not an entitlement,' it added. 'Being a US senator is a serious job that requires full-time engagement.' Fetterman responded to the piece and allegations on Monday during a Fox News debate with Republican senator David McCormick. 'For me, it's very clear, it's just part of like this weird – this weird smear,' Fetterman said. 'The more kinds of, left kind of media continues to have these kinds of an attack, and it's just part of a smear and that's just not … it's just not accurate.' He continued: 'I've always been there, and for me, if I miss some of those votes, I've made 90% of them, and we all know those votes that I've missed were on Monday. Those are travel days and I have three young kids and … those are throwaway procedural votes that … they were never determined if they were important. That's a choice that I made.' Fetterman also reportedly claimed senators Bernie Sanders and Patty Murray had missed more votes than he has. 'Why aren't the left media yelling and demanding them and claiming they're not doing their job?' Fetterman said. In response, a spokesperson for Murray told Politico that most of her missed votes occurred during a vote-a-rama when her husband was hospitalized. A spokesperson for Sanders did not immediately respond to request for comment from Politico, but the outlet pointed out that according to data from a government transparency site, Sanders has missed 836 of 6,226 rollcall votes since 1991, or about 13.4%. Murray has missed 290 of 11,106 rollcall votes since 1993, or roughly 2.6%. By comparison, Politico reported that Fetterman has missed 174 of 961 rollcall votes, approximately 18.1%, in his first term, according to The editorial on Sunday comes as last month, New York magazine published an article on Fetterman which quoted several former and current Fetterman staffers who expressed concerns about the Senator's mental and physical health, and his behavior. In response, Fetterman dismissed the piece, calling it 'a one-source story, with a couple anonymous sources' and labeling it a 'hit piece from a very left publication'.