ActionSA slams Eskom's R3.6 billion diesel spending in one month as 'costly cover-up' for failing grid
Image: Timothy Barnard /Independent Newspapers
ActionSA has expressed concern over Eskom's R3.6 billion diesel spend in just 30 days, calling it an 'unaffordable illusion' used to mask South Africa's ongoing electricity crisis.
The party says government claims of ending load shedding are misleading, with diesel-powered emergency generation simply substituting blackouts rather than solving the core issues.
ActionSA Member of Parliament, Alan Beesley, said: 'South Africa hasn't ended load shedding – we've simply replaced it with an unaffordable illusion, paid for by the taxpayer.'
Beesley said that between April 1 and 10, 2025, alone, Eskom burned R1.34 billion in diesel. Yet, Eskom's Energy Availability Factor (EAF), the key metric for generation performance, sits at just 56.11 percent, well below the 70 percent target set by the Minister of Electricity.
This also reflects a decline from the same period last year, when the EAF was 58.96 percent. ActionSA says this proves there are fewer megawatts available now than a year ago, despite significantly higher spending.
'That is not a recovery – it is a cover-up with devastating fiscal consequences,'' Beesley warned.
According to Eskom's 2024 data, diesel-fired generation via Open-Cycle Gas Turbines costs R6,579 per megawatt-hour, compared to R541 for coal and just R113 for nuclear.
ActionSA argues that billions are being wasted to keep the grid afloat when those funds could have been used to restore failing coal infrastructure. If the same amount of electricity had been produced using coal, the cost would have been a fraction, closer to R300 million.
Beesley added: 'Eskom is burning billions, and the people of South Africa are being burned in the process.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
17% of SA's electricity consumed by a few giant consumers
Among them is South32, which owns the KZN Hillside aluminium smelter. It's 2025 discount could subsidise electricity costs of nearly 700 000 households. A recent investigation by Open Secrets laid bare the sweetheart deal that allows South32's Hillside aluminium smelter in KwaZulu-Natal to consume about 6% of Eskom's electricity output – while paying roughly half the normal tariff. That figure rises to nearly 9% when South32's Mozal smelter in Mozambique is added to the picture. The extent of the discount enjoyed by South32 is outlined in a negotiated pricing agreement (NPA) recently disclosed by Eskom to Open Secrets. 'The energy consumed by Hillside is equivalent to approximately six large ferrochrome smelters. The consumption is an equivalent of 1 300GWh (gigawatt hours),' according to the NPA with Eskom. A calculation by the Democratic Alliance spokesperson on electricity and energy, Kevin Mileham, shows 17.27% of Eskom's electricity is consumed through these NPAs or via international sales. 'What is shocking is that this 17.27% only generates 8.5% of Eskom's revenue from the sale of electricity,' he says. Based on this calculation, a few energy-intensive consumers are paying roughly half of what the rest of the country pays. While the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) recently approved a 24.3% tariff hike over the next three years, South32's NPA guarantees it producer price inflation (running at about 1% this year) plus 1.25%. The agreement allows Eskom to shut off its power for a maximum of two hours at a time for up to 104 hours a year. ALSO READ: 30% electricity tariff increase is a reality, says Erasa Mileham welcomes the recent announcement by electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa that a review of electricity pricing policy is now a priority. One customer knocking on the door for a better electricity pricing deal is ArcelorMittal SA (Amsa), which has been vocal about the 835% increase in its electricity tariff increase over the last decade. This hike has been a major contributor to its financial woes and the R5.1 billion headline loss reported for the 2024 financial year. The government is dangling all sorts of carrots to stop its threatened shut down of its long-steel plants, and a preferential electricity tariff is one of the carrots being considered. Regulated prices charged by government-owned entities such as Eskom and Transnet are running at an average inflation rate of 9.7% – well above the rest of the economy, which is at about 4.5%. The SA Reserve Bank wants to set an inflation target of 3%, but achieving this will require getting these regulated prices under some sort of control. ALSO READ: Nersa's municipal tariff process flawed, says Sapoa Good deal or not? Responding to Moneyweb's request for comment, South32 points to Hillside's significant contribution to SA's economy in employing 2 300 people directly and a further 27 400 indirectly. 'It has played a key role in South Africa's domestic aluminium industry as a supplier to local companies that manufacture products for sale domestically and abroad. 'Hillside plays an important role in keeping the South African electricity grid stable and helps to manage load shedding through the suspension of power to potlines at critical times. Despite limited loadshedding across South Africa during the past year, suspension of power to potlines at Hillside has continued during this period in order to support Eskom in managing South Africa's electricity grid,' says a spokesperson for South32 (see the full response below*). Hillside's initial preferential tariff was linked to the London Metal Exchange price for aluminium and the US dollar-rand exchange rate, and dates back to the 1990s, when Eskom had surplus power. Then, it was only too happy to sign up a large anchor consumer capable of absorbing some of this surplus power, but – despite warnings from Eskom and others of a looming power shortage – government sat on its hands until forced to green-light the grossly over-priced and seriously delayed Medupi and Kusile power stations in the late 2000s. A new agreement was signed with South32 in 2021, the details of which remained a secret until recently. Hillside was formerly owned by BHP and acquired by South32 in 2015 as part of BHP's divestment from SA. The current Hillside contract (2021) does not contain commodity price and exchange rate sharing. ALSO READ: Grim impact of soaring electricity prices on South Africans revealed According to Open Secrets, the initial (pre-2021) agreement sparked outrage when it was made public, as it showed former owner BHP was paying only 15% the tariff charged to ordinary consumers. South32 says it is unable to verify this, as Meridian Economics ran the numbers for Open Secrets comparing the Hillside tariffs with the standard 'Megaflex' tariff [for large industry and mines]. Meridian conservatively estimated the discount for the current financial year at about R10 billion, with South32 having already benefited from about R25 billion in lower electricity prices since the deal was struck. Over the full 10-year agreement, Meridian estimates the total discount will be about 50% – around R92 billion in forgone Eskom revenue. The R10 billion discount for 2025 is sufficient to subsidise the electricity costs of nearly 700 000 households, supporting 2.5 million South Africans. South32 responds that the cost to Eskom of supplying bulk power to a single major customer like Hillside is significantly lower than the cost of supplying to thousands of smaller or individual customers. Says Open Secrets: 'It is also worth reflecting on how much this could contribute to South Africa's energy transition. South32's discount for this year – R10 billion – is nearly three times the total grant funds disbursed to the Just Energy Transition Partnership over the past three years.' ALSO READ: ArcelorMittal long steel business closing for good due to policy inaction In motivating the NPA with Hillside, Eskom argued that the Hillside smelter would not be viable under the standard Megaflex tariff. 'In the absence of this proposed NPA, the Hillside smelter would close, with resultant negative consequences. The need for an incentivised energy pricing arrangement is the reality for aluminium smelters worldwide,' stated the utility. 'Without an appropriate NPA, there would be zero electricity sales and zero revenue to Eskom from the Hillside smelter. The proposed pricing arrangement should not be viewed as a discount, as it has been structured to result in a more cost reflective tariff and ensure that all applicable costs are recovered and a positive contribution is made to fixed costs.' Eskom goes on to argue that the proposed NPA would be advantageous to both Eskom and other customers 'as it is at a higher price than the existing NPAs'. 'The loss of the Hillside smelter sales and loss of the positive contribution to fixed costs would result in a higher tariff increase requirement, as other customers would have to make up this contribution.' ALSO READ: Electricity tariffs: Ramokgopa reveals how much Eskom customers pay for usage per month The NPA was supported by the government as well as Nersa, which had to be satisfied that the NPA tariff was above Eskom's cost of supply, allowed Eskom to make a reasonable return, and was not being subsidised by other electricity customers. Mileham says an appropriate question to ask is whether the Hillside NPA – and others like it – are in the best interests of the country and all its citizens. 'I would argue that we would see faster economic growth without having these preferential tariffs, and bear in mind that Hillside's profits don't stay in SA, they end up in Australia.' *South32's full response: 'Hillside Aluminium is a significant contributor to South Africa's national economy and a major employer. It employed over 2 300 employees and contractors in FY24 and supports a further estimated 27 400 indirect employment opportunities in the economy. 'It has played a key role in South Africa's domestic aluminium industry as a supplier to local companies that manufacture products for sale domestically and abroad. 'Hillside plays an important role in keeping the South African electricity grid stable and helps to manage load shedding through the suspension of power to potlines at critical times. Despite limited load shedding across South Africa during the past year, suspension of power to potlines at Hillside has continued during this period in order to support Eskom in managing South Africa's electricity grid. 'The pricing agreement for Hillside reflects the SA government's policy to support strategic industries that create value for the nation. It was approved by Nersa, following consideration of a range of factors. It helps the smelter to remain internationally competitive so it can continue to deliver these significant benefits to South Africa. 'Eskom outlined its rationale for the pricing agreement in a publicly available submission to Nersa in February 2021. In its submission, Eskom noted Hillside's role in supporting stability of the electricity grid. It also noted that the NPA would be advantageous to both Eskom and other customers. 'When it publicly outlined its rationale for supporting the agreement, Nersa stated there was a 'net benefit to the rest of the customer base in putting this agreement in place.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Lillydale power puzzle: Eskom's payment demand for electricity that does not exist
Lillydale power puzzle: Eskom's payment demand for electricity that does not exist Eskom has sent a mysterious bill to Swikoxeni Waste Management (PTY) LTD, demanding the payment of R49 330 despite the premises having no installed electricity at all. The company is situated on a piece of land between Justicia and Lyllidale trusts in the Bushbuckridge municipality. ALSO READ: Bullets fly as robbers storm church near Hazyview It uses a solar panels to generate electricity to power lights at night and the company owner says he was very shocked to receive the bill. Since I received the bill a few days ago, I started to have sleepless nights. There is not a single Eskom pole on the premises. But Eskom has the guts to send me a bill of almost R50 000. This is ridiculous. I do not doubt that other people may be experiencing the same challenges as well,' said Bethuel Mashele, the owner of Swikoxeni Waste Management. The letter of demand, a copy of which Mpumalanga News is in possession of, says the payment is due on August 22. Despite the due date being just over 15 days away, the letter contains a threat demanding that the money should be paid immediately. 'Total outstanding debt must be settled immediately. This is subject to disconnection without further notice,' reads the letter. Mashele said he was mystified as to what there was to disconnect. 'Maybe this means Eskom will come and disconnect the electricity that is not connected. I am stunned and confused about this bizarre payment demand,' said Mashele. When contacted for comment, Eskom's communication and stakeholder management practitioner, Lazarus Muthimba, simply appreciated that the matter had been brought to Eskom's attention 'Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Please be informed that the customer will be contacted by our customer services team in order to resolve the matter,' said Muthimba.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Thanks but no thanks: Herman Mashaba insists ActionSA uninterested in joining GNU
ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba says his party has not been approached to join the GNU, and he is uninterested in joining the governing coalition. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers As the African National Congress considers expanding the size and reach of the Government of National Unity (GNU) by adding more parties to the coalition currently governing South Africa, opposition party ActionSA insists it is not interested in joining the ruling arrangement. Mashaba said so far, he has only heard from media reports that the ANC wants to approach ActionSA for negotiations around GNU inclusion, but his party has not heard a word from Luthuli House. 'I can tell you as the leader of the party, the national chairperson, and our senate, which is the highest decision-making body of our party, we are hearing it from the media. 'I am not really sure. Perhaps there is another ActionSA somewhere in this country that the ANC is engaged with, I don't know through what channels. Definitely, not the party that I represent,' Mashaba spoke to broadcaster Newzroom Afrika. The business mogul said last year, when the GNU was formed, his party was invited to join but declined the offer. 'Even right now, I cannot see how ActionSA can play that role. The only role that ActionSA will play is to take away our independence and the role that we are playing as an effective opposition. That is something that we will not allow anyone to really compromise us in that regard,' said Mashaba. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'There is no reason, and I want to make it really clear, particularly to our supporters, to know that ActionSA will not really be part of a 70 percent government. I think a one party government is not good for our democracy here in South Africa and anywhere else in the world.' He said South African voters have made it abundantly clear that they want a vibrant, multi-party democracy and ActionSA will make its contribution as a 'constructive opposition' in the National Assembly. On Tuesday, IOL reported that ANC veteran and National Executive Committee (NEC) member Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has emphasised the need for the ANC to rebuild its structures on the ground and focus on local government to restore trust with the people. With the upcoming local government elections, Dlamini-Zuma stressed that the ANC should prioritise strengthening its branches and delivering services to communities. Service delivery remains a challenge in South Africa. This includes inadequate infrastructure, insufficient resources, and issues of maintenance and accountability. ANC veteran and National Executive Committee (NEC) member Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma at the Independent Media offices on Tuesday. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers Dlamini-Zuma highlighted the importance of building strong branches. "Our branches must be built properly because the strength of the branch is what they do in the community… We are going to the local government elections, and we should be concentrating on that right now." In 2017, Dlamini-Zuma lost the battle to become the ANC president to Cyril Ramaphosa, who won with 2,440 votes. Dlamini-Zuma got 2,261. However, under Ramaphosa, the party lost its parliamentary majority in a historic election result that put South Africa on a new political path, in which the ANC was forced to form the Government of National Unity (GNU) with the DA and other small parties. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
