13 Shameless TV Shows That Don't Care If You're Offended
They're presented in no particular order. Some are from long ago, but some are still going strong.
Starting with...
Related Headlines
All 6 Joker Actors Ranked Worst to Best
The 12 Funniest Comedies We've Ever Seen
The 13 Most Captivating Prison Movies We've Ever Seen
This pretty-much always funny FX series about the idiot proprietors of a very unhygienic Irish pub has covered a gamut of topics that make people uncomfortable, from race to abuse to religion to child beauty pageants. What other sitcom staged a (fake) baby funeral?
Audiences can't get enough: It's the longest-running live-action sitcom on television, after recently surpassing The Adventures of Ozzie & Harriet.
The brilliant story of a televangelist family with a slew of secrets mixes sex, violence and very big characters in endlessly inventive and unexpected ways, taking direct shots at the hypocrisy of many who preach the prosperity gospel.
It also gets huge laughs out of gratuitous sequences like one last year that started with a home invasion, then turned to a guitarist spending some quality time with himself in bed, and escalated to a brutal brawl. And we've lost count of how many times we've seen Baby Billy's penis this season.
But the most unexpected thing about the show, starring co-creator Danny McBride and a stellar ensemble cast, is that it actually seems to believe in God. It never makes fun of anyone's faith, just their hypocrisy.
Another HBO series, Euphoria has drawn shock from the start for its blunt (and some would say exploitative) portrayals of teenage drug use and sexuality.
In a 2022 story at the end of the show's second season, The New York Times noted that many of the show's young fans love the characters and plotlines, but not the man who created them, noting that Levinson "wrote all 18 hourlong episodes and directed all but three of them," and that fans routinely go on social media "to criticize his visions of the characters."
Levinson has said the show is very autobiographical: "I feel like I'm watching a version of myself navigating the world at a young age,' Levinson said in a clip promoting the show when it debuted in 2019.
After making stars of Zendaya, Sydney Sweeney and Jacob Elordi, it returns soon for its long-delayed third season.
Loudmouth Archie Bunker (Carroll O'Connor), an unrepentant bigot, was only really offensive to people who didn't understand we were supposed to laugh at him, not with him.
But the show's intentions were clear: All in the Family creator Norman Lear, who passed last year at 101, was one of Hollywood's most outspoken liberals, and wanted Archie Bunker to speak freely to show how ignorant his closed-minded notions sounded. But All in the Family also had the grace to present him as vulnerable character, capable of change.
In one of its most famous episodes, 1972's "Sammy's Visit," Archie gets to know Sammy Davis Jr., who, to Archie's alarm, not only Black but Jewish. Davis highroads him by giving him a kiss on the cheek at the end of the episode, hilariously violating all kinds of bigoted taboos.
The show was criticized for its countless dirty jokes and risque storylines, as well as for the piggish tendencies of Al Bundy (Ed O'Neill) and the portrayal of Peggy Bundy (Katey Segal) as lazy and selfish.
OK, but Married... With Children has aged very well as a sendup of saccharine-sweet sitcoms. It knew exactly what is was doing, and never endorsed or asked us to sympathize with the Bundys — who shared a name, after all, with a serial killer.
The Simpsons debuted not long after Married... With Children on the then-fledgling Fox network. Yet it's somehow still going. In fact, it's the longest-running sitcom.
The Simpsons inspired debate with many topics — from guns to drugs to politics — and also took a stand by presenting gay characters in a sympathetic light long before the majority of TV shows did. It tends to offend people on the right more than people on the left, and has never shied away from mocking Fox News.
But we bet if offends random restaurant chains the most, with out-of-nowhere zingers like, "I'm so hungry I could eat at Arby's!" (That joke is from Season 9's "Das Bus," above.)
We also love that The Simpsons even gives big moments to minor characters.
When South Park decides to take on a target — from Kanye West to Harry and Megan to religions to sex education in schools — everyone involved should prepare to be savaged.
The show's animation process is so streamlined that creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone can quickly weigh in on divisive and hot-button issues before other shows can even begin to process them. It's been going shamelessly strong since 1997.
Dave Chappelle left no stereotype unmocked in brilliant sketches like "The Racial Draft," in which various races tried to claim people of mixed ethnicity. Every episode of Chappelle's Show had something to offend you, from Rick James' catchphrase to homeless crack addict Tyrone Biggums.
Even Chappelle wasn't always sure people were laughing at the right things — he left while shooting the show's third season after an incident in which a white spectator laughed at a sketch about stereotypes in the wrong way, and made Chappelle question whether his show was subverting stereotypes, or adding to them.
"When he laughed, it made me uncomfortable," Chappelle told Time. "As a matter of fact, that was the last thing I shot before I told myself I gotta take f—ing time out after this. Because my head almost exploded."
Chappelle, of course, is one of the most successful standup comedians of all time, and continues to offend people. He continues to not care.
This magnificent Amazon Prime Video show is like an R-rated Avengers, where almost all the superheroes are in it for the fame and fortune, sexual harassment runs rampant, and some are outright racists.
The antiheroes known as The Boys are dead-set on stopping them, but even their leader, Billy (Karl Urban) is an antihero prone to saying offensive things and doing much more damage than he needs to.
The mix of sex, violence, comedy and gore will be a huge turnoff to people who don't love it. But not us: We love it.
Over 25 years, Family Guy has made jokes aplenty about race, religion, gay panic and even... Star Wars. Along the way its been accused of racism, homophobia, and sexism.
It's utterly ruthless in pursuit of laughs and audiences have rewarded it not only with one of the longest runs on television, but also three spinoffs.
The Kiefer Sutherland counterterrorism drama was criticized from the beginning for seeming to endorse and even encourage the use of torture to interrogate suspects. Many have argued that besides being reprehensible and inhumane, torture can in fact be counterproductive, and endanger Americans abroad.
It's not just liberal critics making these arguments.
In fact, The New Yorker reported that in November 2006, military and FBI interrogators met with the 24 creative team to "voice their concern that the show's central political premise—that the letter of American law must be sacrificed for the country's security—was having a toxic effect. In their view, the show promoted unethical and illegal behavior and had adversely affected the training and performance of real American soldiers.'
24 executive producer Joel Surnow shrugged it off, telling The New Yorker: "'We've had all of these torture experts come by recently, and they say, 'You don't realize how many people are affected by this. Be careful.' They say torture doesn't work. But I don't believe that.'
last year, 24 star Kiefer Sutherland defended the show again, telling the Independent:
'If the United States military can be derailed by a television show, we've got a much bigger problem than 24. ... To use 24, a television show, as a scapegoat for the behavior of the United States military is just absolutely asinine.'
As you're probably aware, the show just celebrated its 50 anniversary. It has had some of the most debated moments in TV history, and creator Lorne Michaels has made sure it weathered them all.
In 1990, for example, the presence of host Andrew "Dice" Clay, known for a misogynistic in-character routine, led cast member Nora Dunn and scheduled musical guest Sinead O'Conner to sit out the show.
But Clay's presence was nothing compared to the 1992 episode in which O'Connor delivered a stunning performance of Bob Marley's "War" — before tearing up a picture of the Pope to protest abuse in the Catholic Church. (A decades later, an investigation by The Boston Globe would reveal that sexual abuse in the church had indeed been covered up.)
SNL has also drawn criticism for booking polarizing hosts from Donald Trump to Elon Musk, and provided plenty of envelope-pushing moments with guests from Sydney Sweeney to Katy Perry. We could do a whole gallery devoted to its controversies... So we did.
You might also like these two other lists about one of our favorite TV shows: the 13 Best Saturday Night Live Sketches Ever, and the 15 Best SNL Characters, Ranked.
Main image: SNL. NBC
Related Headlines
All 6 Joker Actors Ranked Worst to Best
The 12 Funniest Comedies We've Ever Seen
The 13 Most Captivating Prison Movies We've Ever Seen
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
24 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Will Trump's Chip Tariffs Do What He Thinks They Will? - Tech News Briefing
President Trump has proposed sweeping tariffs on chips , while offering an exemption: companies that invest in manufacturing in the U.S. won't have to pay. It's an attempt to incentivize more chip production in the U.S., but WSJ Heard on the Street writer Asa Fitch notes that key chip-making companies already have invested in U.S. factories. Plus, Disney is in a difficult bind when it comes to AI. The WSJ's Jessica Toonkel takes us inside the company's thinking. Peter Champelli hosts. Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Peter Champelli: Welcome to Tech News Briefing. It's Tuesday, August 12th. I'm Peter Champelli for the Wall Street Journal. Like pretty much every company, Disney is trying to figure out how it can use generative AI, but it's facing pushback both from in and outside the company. We'll hear more about what Disney's been up to, including an attempt to make an AI double of Dwayne The Rock Johnson. Then, Trump is threatening huge tariffs to try and incentivize companies to make chips in the US and to get other companies to buy US-made chips. But our Heard on the Street writer thinks the result of those tariffs could be much different and potentially have the opposite effect. But first, in its efforts to navigate artificial intelligence, Disney is in a bind. It's been dancing with ways to incorporate generative AI, including an interactive Darth Vader chatbot that players could talk to in Fortnite. But some in the company worry about pushback from fans and potential legal complications. The Wall Street Journal's Belle Lin spoke with deputy media editor Jessica Toonkel about it. Belle Lin: Jessica, there's a great anecdote in your story about the star Dwayne Johnson and Disney's scrapped plan to use a deepfake of his face for the live-action version of the hit movie Moana. What exactly does this anecdote illustrate about the challenges that face Disney in Hollywood when it comes to AI? Jessica Toonkel: We love this story because you have The Rock who gave his permission actually for this to be done. The idea was Dwayne Johnson would not have to be at every shot. He wouldn't have to be there on set all the time. His cousin, who has his six-foot-three, 250-pound stature was going to be his fake double, basically, they were going to use his body and put Dwayne Johnson's face on it, had also given his permission. So they had all the permissions and everything and the technology to do this deepfake. Yet they could not get comfortable with all the questions around what could it mean if we use this tool? Belle Lin: Why is it so complex for Disney to be more bold in how it uses AI for its creative endeavors? Jessica Toonkel: This is such a fraught subject in Hollywood. It was not that long ago that actors and writers were on strike saying, "You cannot replace us with AI," and the actor's contract is coming up again. So you have the fear of upsetting talent. You have the fear of fans saying, "Hey, this isn't real." And there's the fear of who owns the copyright and who owns these characters that are created by AI. If we work with an AI company to do something, will we still own every piece of that? And Disney can't afford to let go of any of that. We spoke to the general counsel at Disney who was very clear like, we want to make sure Disney owns Darth Vader. Belle Lin: What are some early steps that Disney has taken in using AI inside its shows, movies or games? Jessica Toonkel: So we've seen bits and pieces. Disney has a joint venture with Epic Games, the owner of Fortnite, and they created an AI-generated Darth Vader in the game. And within minutes, the gamers figured out a way to get the generated AI Darth Vader to curse at them. They had to fix that. And they did fix it within 30 minutes, and they did feel like even with that happening, it was a success. Just the fact that Disney did that is a huge step from where they were even five years ago. Belle Lin: How would you describe the dynamic inside Disney when it comes to using AI, albeit it's certainly very complicated? Jessica Toonkel: Disney, they understand that this is something they need to do and they want to do it the right way. So they have their team, they've created an AI group, they've done all those things. It's just that this is a company that has been historically probably the most protective of its characters in IP than any company. Belle Lin: Where do you think that this all ends up? Where do you think that Disney comes to a conclusion on what the use of AI is amongst its creative endeavors? Jessica Toonkel: I don't think Disney has to be a first mover on being the first one to use some AI tool for a specific purpose. They're going to continue to be cautious, but they're going to continue to experiment with things because they realize that they have to at least know what the game is. And next year, Disney is going to be naming its new CEO, and it will be really interesting to see who they pick if that person has been involved in these discussions because it will tell us how Disney is thinking about how important AI is for its future. Peter Champelli: That was Wall Street Journal deputy media editor Jessica Toonkel. Coming up, we'll dive deep into Trump's proposed tariffs on chips from overseas and why the exemptions would probably spare the biggest players. That's after the break. Trump has proposed a nearly 100% tariff on chips and semiconductors being imported from overseas, but he's allowing an exemption. Companies that build or plan to build in the US won't have to pay. It's an attempt to incentivize US companies to buy chips from US makers and to get the companies that are making the chips to build factories in the US. But our Heard on the Street writer Asa Fitch says that these tariffs won't result in more US chip production. Asa, in your reporting, you mentioned that advanced chip making is a game only few can play. What are the companies most threatened by these tariffs and what would the immediate effects be? Asa Fitch: So the largest chip makers in the world are effectively Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company or TSMC and Samsung Electronics and Intel, the US-based chip maker. Those companies will be affected in different ways by these tariffs if they go into place. Now, Trump wants to put in place, he said, a 100% tariff on imports of semiconductors. It's a very complex supply chain. Things move around all over the place all the time. So it's hard to come to a very certain answer about what that impact will be. One thing it doesn't seem like these tariffs will do though is seriously incentivize chip production in the US, advanced chip production in the US, at least, in the way that Trump talked about them last week. Peter Champelli: So why isn't that the case? And could there be any unintentional consequences of the tariffs? Asa Fitch: The main reason why that's the case is that when Trump laid out this 100% chip tariff plan last week, he said that there would be exemptions for companies that invest a lot of money in the US. Now, all the large chip makers have already invested tons of money in the US so they've already passed that bar, and that means that they likely, based on the language that Trump used, will get exemptions. So there's no further incentive for these chip companies to build upon their existing manufacturing operations in US based on these tariffs because the tariffs are gone. So if anything, these companies are sort of more incentivized to import stuff tariff-free from other parts of the world where it's cheaper to produce chips than to make them here in the US. So there's a little bit of a mismatch of the stated intent of these tariffs and the actual fact of them, at least as they appear so far, to have been outlined. And granted, that is kind of vague. Peter Champelli: So the target of these tariffs are US companies buying foreign-made chips. But on the flip side, earlier this week, the news broke that Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices are going to give the Trump administration a 15% cut of their AI chip sales to China. How does this news factor into Trump's goal with the tariffs? Asa Fitch: That is really hard to tell. You could infer that the 15% surcharge on these companies' revenues in China means the Trump administration is trying to make it more expensive to sell this stuff, obviously. And that means that that's going to affect demand in the typical sort of supply-demand way. If you have higher prices, people will buy less of that stuff in general. It's not entirely clear that's going to happen in this case because if China or Chinese companies or Chinese government sees these chips as essential to their broader AI strategy and the key to unlocking AI for China, there's no way they're not going to pay a higher price. So the impact could be pretty limited. There've been some analysts who estimated the impact on Nvidia of this additional fee, something around maybe $3 billion a year. That sounds like a lot of money, but Nvidia is projected to make $200 billion plus in its current fiscal year. So $3 billion is maybe not a ton for that particular company. These are two different things, obviously. The tariffs are meant to incentivize manufacture in the US. These charges on sale to China are meant to disrupt in some way or limit the sales of AI chips in China. But there's two sides of the coin, if you will, or two different kind of objectives within the same envelope of national security, protecting US interests, growing US industry, things like that. Peter Champelli: And with Trump's proposed tariffs on the importing of chips and semiconductors, what would the longer term effects of those be on companies and on consumers? Asa Fitch: It's hard to say right now. We don't know what exact shape the tariffs are going to take. One thing that's clear, obviously, is that when you raise prices of goods, they tend to trickle down to consumers and to businesses who are buying those goods. So that could be the impact, but the magnitude of that is impossible to gauge without knowing exactly what shape these will take. And we've talked about the exceptions. Some of these companies like Apple qualify for exceptions so that the chips inside those iPhones aren't going to be charged a tariff. So it all depends on effectively the implementation. It's really uncertain right now. Peter Champelli: That was Wall Street Journal Heard on the Street reporter, Asa Fitch. And that's it for Tech News Briefing. Today's show was produced by Julie Chang with deputy editor Chris Zinsli. I'm Peter Champelli for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back later this morning with TNB Tech Minute. Thanks for listening.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift reveals new album during Travis Kelce podcast
Taylor Swift has announced her 12th studio album called The Life Of A release date has been revealed for the album, which was announced on the US singer's website after a countdown timer expired on Tuesday.A brief clip from the New Heights podcast, hosted by her NFL star boyfriend Travis Kelce and his brother Jason, a former NFL player, was posted on Instagram.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Keke Palmer says moms shouldn't feel guilty for working 'in this economy'
Keke Palmer doesn't think that working moms should feel mom guilt — especially not in this economy. "But the reality is, if you got to work, you got to work," she said. She also said working moms shouldn't feel guilty accepting help with childcare "because it takes a village." Keke Palmer has no time for mom guilt — especially not in this economy. In an interview with Parents published on Wednesday, the actor spoke about the realities of being a single working mom. Palmer has one son, Leodis "Leo" Andrellton Jackson, with her ex-boyfriend, Darius Jackson. "Don't feel guilt," Palmer said. "Your child is your child because you were meant to be their parent. And as a working parent, it could be really, really hard because you're wondering like, 'Damn, is this good for me and my child?' But the reality is, if you got to work, you got to work." The Emmy award-winning actor also said that mothers shouldn't feel guilty about receiving help from others when it comes to caring for their child "because it takes a village." "I think that's important, and especially in this economy where everybody's got to go to work," she said. In addition to acting, Palmer has hosted the NBC game show "Password" since 2022 and leads her own podcast, "Baby, This is Keke." In June, she also released her latest album, "Just Keke." Even with a packed schedule, Palmer says motherhood gives her the perspective she needs to keep going. "I think a lot of times you can feel like you got to do this, or you got to do that," Palmer said, adding that it can be especially challenging in the industry she works in. "But when you have a child that needs you, it's easier for you to prioritize what is best for your sense of self." Palmer isn't the only celebrity mom who has spoken about mom guilt and the struggles of juggling work and parenting. In August 2024, Blake Lively said she feels guilty whenever she has to choose between work and family commitments. "When you're working, sometimes you feel guilty for, you know, not being in your personal life in those hours you're at work," Lively said. "And then when you're at work, you feel guilty by being distracted by wishing that you were at your personal life." In May, Michelle Williams said that balancing her career and motherhood is like figuring out "which master you're going to serve." "Because the truth is, if work is going well, somebody else is taking care of the kids. And if you're in a high point with your kids, the work is shoved to the side," Williams said. A representative for Palmer did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent by Business Insider outside regular hours. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
