
Why some countries' healthcare spending is more wasteful than others
Higher levels of health spending are linked to better outcomes, but after a certain point, more money may not be efficient or practical. The more a country spends on medical care, the more it must pay to continue boosting citizens' health, according to the study published in The Lancet Global Health journal.
In countries that spend $100 (€85) per capita on health care, for example, spending another $92 (€79) per person earns them an additional year of healthy life. But in countries that spend $5,000 (€4,272) per capita, another healthy year would cost $11,213 (€9,580).
'Countries around the world have made significant progress in converting dollars into health,' wrote the researchers from the US-based Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).
'However, more reductions in inefficiency need to be made in an era of tightening health-care budgets [and] to maximise the returns on their health care spending'.
The researchers determined health spending inefficiency by comparing a country's total health spending – including the amount they spend and how they spend it – to the number of years people there can expect to live in good health.
The study included 201 countries and territories, and covered a 28-year period from 1995 to 2022.
Drivers of efficient and wasteful spending
Globally, health spending became more efficient between 1995 and 2019, but this progress was disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. While it began to recover in 2022, there are still major 'inefficiency gaps' between countries, the analysis found.
The United States spends more per capita on healthcare than any other wealthy country. But its system is not particularly efficient, which costs Americans 6.2 years of healthy life.
China was the most efficient country with zero waste, meaning it optimised its spending to deliver the best possible health outcomes for its citizens, according to the analysis.
Most European countries were considered fairly efficient. Exceptions included Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, and to a lesser extent, the Netherlands, Belgium, Belarus, Finland, Norway, and the United Kingdom.
Beyond their actual budgets, the most efficient countries tended to have better governance, greater uptake of primary care, infrastructure that makes it possible for people to access medical services, and more public spending on health care compared with the private sector.
Notably, the study does not take into account health care quality, but rather tracks how well a country scores among those with similar levels of spending.
The study authors said policymakers could use the findings to maximise their investments in health, which could be particularly important given many countries are facing pressure on their budgets.
'Expanding government-provided health-care coverage would decrease the inefficiency of the health care system,' the researchers argued.
'Countries should also focus on strengthening democracy, building infrastructure, and increasing the use of, and access to, preventive care,' they added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
EU regulators back climate-friendly inhaler
European regulators have given their backing to a new eco-friendly inhaler that could help curb health care's climate impact. Drugmaker AstraZeneca said the new inhaler has a fraction of the carbon footprint of its existing model, which uses a gas propellant to deliver a dose of medicine to patients and is already available in the European Union for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These types of inhalers may be small, but they pack a powerful punch, producing the same type of greenhouse gas as air conditioning and heat pumps. In the United Kingdom, they cause 3 per cent of the National Health Service's (NHS) overall carbon emissions, according to Asthma + Lung UK. Many of these gases are now being phased out in the EU for environmental reasons, according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). An EMA advisory committee issued a positive opinion of the new inhaler on Friday, and the European Commission, the EU's executive body, will make a final decision in the coming months. Other inhalers that do not use gas propellants are already available, and AstraZeneca's new model has a similarly low carbon footprint. The new option 'means patients and their clinicians now don't need to feel like they have to choose between the most appropriate treatment and the planet,' Pablo Panella, AstraZeneca's senior vice president of global respiratory and immunology, said in a written comment to Euronews Health. The new inhaler is already available in the United States, China, and Japan, and the United Kingdom signed off in May. AstraZeneca said it plans to transition its inhalers to the new model across the EU in the coming months, and that it hopes to roll the model out worldwide by 2030. The EMA said it 'works the same way and gives the same results in the lungs and the body [as] the product currently on the market'.


France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Aid groups warn of starving children as European powers discuss Gaza
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said that a quarter of the young children and pregnant or breastfeeding mothers it had screened at its clinics last week were malnourished, a day after the United Nations said one in five children in Gaza City were suffering from malnutrition. With fears of mass starvation growing, Britain, France and Germany were set to hold an emergency call to push for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and discuss steps towards Palestinian statehood. "I will hold an emergency call with E3 partners tomorrow, where we will discuss what we can do urgently to stop the killing and get people the food they desperately need while pulling together all the steps necessary to build a lasting peace," British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. The call comes after hopes of a new ceasefire in Gaza faded on Thursday when Israel and the United States quit indirect negotiations with Hamas in Qatar. US envoy Steve Witkoff accused the Palestinian militant group of not "acting in good faith". President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that France would formally recognise a Palestinian state in September, drawing a furious rebuke from Israel. 'Mass starvation' More than 100 aid and human rights groups warned this week that "mass starvation" was spreading in Gaza. Israel has rejected accusations it is responsible for the deepening crisis, which the World Health Organization has called "man-made". Israel placed the Gaza Strip under an aid blockade in March, which it only partially eased two months later. The trickle of aid since then has been controlled by the Israeli- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, replacing the longstanding UN-led distribution system. Aid groups have refused to work with it, accusing it of aiding Israeli military goals. The GHF system, in which Gazans have to travel long distances and join huge queues to reach one of four sites, has often proved deadly, with the UN saying that more than 750 Palestinian aid-seekers have been killed by Israeli forces near GHF centres since late May. An AFP photographer saw bloodied patients, wounded while attempting to get humanitarian aid, being treated on the floor of Nasser hospital in the southern city of Khan Yunis on Thursday. Israel has refused to return to the UN-led system, saying that it allowed Hamas to hijack aid for its own benefit. Accusing Israel of the "weaponisation of food", MSF said that: "Across screenings of children aged six months to five years old and pregnant and breastfeeding women, at MSF facilities last week, 25 per cent were malnourished." It said malnutrition cases had quadrupled since May 18 at its Gaza City clinic and that the facility was enrolling 25 new patients every day. Aid groups and medics have also warned that a lack of food is preventing the sick and wounded from recovering. 'High risk of dying' On Thursday, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) said that one in five children in Gaza City were malnourished. Agency chief Philippe Lazzarini said: "Most children our teams are seeing are emaciated, weak and at high risk of dying if they don't get the treatment they urgently need." He also warned that "UNRWA frontline health workers, are surviving on one small meal a day, often just lentils, if at all". Lazzarini said that the agency had "the equivalent of 6,000 loaded trucks of food and medical supplies" ready to send into Gaza if Israel allowed "unrestricted and uninterrupted" access to the territory. Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed 59,587 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. Hamas's October 2023 attack that triggered the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Of the 251 hostages taken during the attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.


Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
EU Commission unlocks health funds but leaves civil society reeling from cuts
The European Commission this week finally unveiled its 2025 work programme for its €571 million health budget, EU4Health—a flagship initiative launched in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to strengthen public health across the bloc. The publication ended months of uncertainty and delay, with deep funding cuts already severely impacting NGOs and civil society groups operating in the health sector. A Commission spokesperson attributed the delay to several factors including the transition to the new Commission that took office in December 2024 and digestion of updated mission letters for commissioners, which came in September last year. The need to adjust for earlier budget reallocations was also cited, notably a €1 billion diversion from EU4Health to support Ukraine, announced in February 2024. But more troubling for health NGOs is what the new programme confirms: a complete elimination of operating grants - funds that support an organisation's core operations - leaving only action grants, which finance specific projects. 'It does not mean that NGOs will not be able to directly participate. It's just that we are doing the funding now differently,' a Commission spokesperson told Euronews, referring to this new focus on action grants rather than operational ones. But for these organisations, what may appear to be a mere bureaucratic adjustment actually represents a significant structural shift, as much of their core work—such as on digital health and air pollution—does not easily fit into isolated, time-limited projects. Civil society left in 'survival mode' The delay to unveiling the work programme left health civil society organisations already unable to plan or secure interim financing, resulting in staff reductions and suspended operations. 'The absence of operating grants has pushed many in our sector into survival mode, especially for us, as a large organisation that has historically relied on them,' Milka Sokolović, director general of the European Public Health Alliance (EPHA), told Euronews. As one of the largest health-focused civil society groups in Europe, EPHA has been forced to cut its staff by 40% this year due to the uncertainty and reduced funding. It's not alone. EURORDIS, the European organisation representing patients with rare diseases, also criticised the cuts. 'It's deeply regrettable that the EU4Health 2025 Work Programme not only confirms the exclusion of operating grants for health NGOs, but also provides few – if any – alternative funding opportunities for civil society,' said Virginie Bros-Facer, CEO of EURORDIS. "Over the past 20 years, DG SANTE [the Commission's health service] has recognised the value of operating grants as the only funding mechanism that ensures meaningful interaction between civil society and EU institutions," said Florence Berteletti from the European Alcohol Policy Alliance. She added that operating grants represent only a marginal share of the EU health budget—just 1%. With cuts in operating grants, many of these NGOs are expected to struggle to stay afloat, as they will no longer be able to fulfil essential roles. EU, a shrinking space for civil society The funding shortfall comes amid broader concerns that civil society is being sidelined. Right-wing criticism of the Commission's funding of environmental NGOs has created a climate some see as increasingly hostile to non-profit organisations. For Sokolović, the Commission's funding of NGOs exists to balance the influence of wealthier private lobbies. 'It allows us to act as watchdogs for democracy at a time of democratic backsliding. Without it, commercial interests will dominate EU decision-making, unchecked. And I must say — this goes far beyond health,' she said. The other trend is a reduced space for health actions in the EU's priorities compared to the launch of EU4Health in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, designed as the EU's first standalone health budget, with €5.3 billion allocated to strengthen the sector. But five years on, and in the absence of core support for NGOs, many are now questioning whether public health remains a true EU priority.