Canberra man accused of attempted murder with machete denied bail
A man accused of using a 25-inch machete to sever three fingers from an associate's hand has had his bid for freedom refused by the ACT Supreme Court.
Zachery Norton, 30, is facing a charge of attempted murder over a violent altercation in September last year at a Wanniassa home, where police allege he had been a squatter.
It is alleged Mr Norton used a machete from beside his bed to attack the man, who he had discovered going to the toilet in a cardboard box in the kitchen of the property.
Court documents show the alleged victim was first struck in the back of the head, causing a 15-centimetre cut and a fracture.
He was then struck on the hand twice, severing three fingers on his left hand and severely injuring his wrist, the documents show.
The man underwent a 14-hour surgery and was in a coma for four days.
On Thursday, the ACT Supreme Court heard the man's fingers have now been reattached but have limited function.
Mr Norton has been in custody since he was arrested by police while trying to board a bus headed from Canberra to Yass in November last year.
At the time, he told police he did not have the option of calling police about the alleged victim, because he feared the man.
Chief Justice Lucy McCallum said she was aware of a moral code among a certain social milieu that applied the principle of "we don't call the police" and a fear of being labelled "a dog".
Mr Norton applied for bail arguing that three special circumstances applied to his case, including that he should be freed to care for his mother, who the court heard was of poor health.
He also argued there would be an unreasonable delay before his future trial and that his actions could in part be explained by self-defence.
Chief Justice McCallum said that despite court restraints, effort was made to prioritise matters involving young Aboriginal men and that any delay would not be significant.
She said Mr Norton's arguments did not amount to special circumstances and refused his application for bail.
He will remain in custody until his next court appearance in July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
32 minutes ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson grilled about deadly mushroom lunch
Prosecutors have accused mushroom cook Erin Patterson of telling more lies as they attempt to unpick her version of events of the deadly mushroom lunch in 2023.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson disputes testimony of witnesses and family in mushroom murder trial
Accused death cap mushroom killer Erin Patterson has disputed the testimony of several witnesses in her murder trial, including that of lunch survivor Ian Wilkinson and her own son. The accused triple murderer has given evidence for a sixth day in the Supreme Court trial in the Victorian town of Morwell. She has pleaded not guilty to charges of murder and attempted murder after three relatives — her parents-in-law Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson — died from death cap mushroom poisoning following a lunch at her house on July 29, 2023. Another relative, Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, fell seriously ill but survived. The trial of Erin Patterson, who stands accused of using a poisoned meal to murder three relatives, continues. Follow Tuesday's hearing in our live blog. To stay up to date with this story, subscribe to ABC News. Tensions appeared to flare at times between the accused and crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC during cross examination on Tuesday morning. During one line of cross-examination about her online activity, Ms Patterson attempted to direct the questioning, which was firmly shut down by the crown. "I'm the person who asks the questions. If there's something that needs to be clarified in re-examination then your barrister will do so," Dr Rogers responded. "No problem," Ms Patterson said. At several times over the course of Tuesday morning, Ms Patterson disputed evidence given by other witnesses during the trial, including her estranged husband Simon Patterson and the medical professionals who treated her after the lunch. In his testimony, lunch guest Ian Wilkinson told the court that Ms Patterson had served herself on a different-coloured plate to the other guests. The prosecution put to Ms Patterson that she had done this as an "extra precaution" against accidentally consuming one of the deliberately poisoned beef Wellingtons she had fed her guests — an accusation Ms Patterson denied. Previously, Mr Wilkinson told the jury the four guests had eaten from grey plates, while their host ate from an orange-coloured one. "Do you say that Ian Wilkinson has given incorrect evidence around the issue of the plates?" Dr Rogers asked. "Yes, I do," Ms Patterson replied. A police interview with Ms Patterson's son, where he told authorities about his mother's behaviour the day after the lunch, was also raised by the prosecution. Ms Patterson told the jury she had a different recollection of the events, denying that she was drinking coffee the morning after the lunch. The accused killer also disputed some of the testimony of medical staff including doctor Chris Webster and nurse Kylie Ashton, who treated her at Leongatha Hospital after the lunch. Conversations alleged to have happened in the hospital between herself and medical staff regarding her children and the origin of the mushrooms were dismissed by Ms Patterson, who said they did not occur in the way described by other witnesses. On Friday, Ms Patterson told the court she had booked an appointment at ENRICH cosmetic clinic in Melbourne in early September 2023. The jury heard Ms Patterson say she had planned to undergo gastric-bypass surgery, and that she had used a fabricated cancer diagnosis as a cover for the treatment. This claim was questioned by the prosecution on Tuesday morning, with Dr Rogers saying the surgery was not offered by the clinic at all. "The ENRICH clinic does not offer gastric-bypass surgery or gastric-sleeve surgery. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers asked. "I don't know," Ms Patterson said, saying she was "puzzled" as she recalled having an appointment. "It would have been related to weight-loss surgery, perhaps it was a different procedure I was doing with them ... I was looking into liposuction as well." Dr Rogers put it to Ms Patterson that she had lied to the court when she had said she had an appointment at the clinic for gastric-band surgery. "No, it wasn't a lie, that's what my memory was," Ms Patterson said. The prosecution also questioned Ms Patterson about possible visits made to the iNaturalist website, where observations of death cap mushrooms had been posted by other users. The court was previously shown evidence from police digital forensic experts that a computer in Erin Patterson's home had accessed the website on May 28, 2022. But Ms Patterson told the jury that she had no memory of ever visiting the site. "I suggest you were familiar with the iNaturalist website before this date, because you entered iNaturalist as the specific search term. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers asked. "I would have to disagree," Ms Patterson said. "Did you have an interest in death cap mushrooms on 28 May, 2022?" Dr Rogers asked. "I have no idea. My only interest ever was to find out if they [were] in South Gippsland or not," Ms Patterson said. When asked if it was her who navigated the page that day, Ms Patterson replied: "Well somebody did. And that somebody could've been me." Minutes after the May 28, 2022 visit to the iNaturalist website, computer records also showed a visit to the Korumburra Middle Pub's website to buy a meal online. When asked if it was instead one of her children using the computer, Ms Patterson did not provide an answer. "I'm not suggesting anything … I don't remember if it's me," she told the court. The trial continues.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Former Penrith young gun Taylan May has been signed by Wests Tigers after domestic violence charges were dropped
Wests Tigers CEO Shane Richardson says 'all players deserve a second chance' after the club officially gave former Penrith flyer Taylan May an NRL lifeline and reunited him with his brother Terrell. Taylan has been in NRL limbo since he was axed by the Panthers last year after being charged over domestic violence allegations and he was subject to the league's stand down policy. He pleaded not guilty and those charges were withdrawn three months ago leaving May, 22, to eye off an NRL return while also recently undergoing treatment in a mental health facility. The Tigers resumed talks once he checked out and South Sydney coach Wayne Bennett had also shown interest in May, which included a tour of the club's headquarters. But May has signed a train-and-trial contract for the rest of the 2025 season, and could yet take the park with his brother. He has been approved to commence training immediately and his paying return would be guided by meeting of training and off-field standards. 'Clearly, Taylan is a quality player who will further strengthen our squad in the back end of the competition,' Wests Tigers CEO Shane Richardson said. 'But we also believe his best chance of success on and off the field is if he is around family and friends. 'He will now have the chance to not only return to a team environment but also to play alongside his brother Terrell – which is important to him.' 'Taylan has made enormous strides since we first met with him 10 weeks ago through voluntarily attending education and counselling sessions. 'All players deserve a second chance and we think this is the environment which gives him the best chance of success both on and off the field.' Richardson said May's contract would be reviewed at the end of the year.
