
Senegal's ‘schools for husbands' aim to keep mothers from dying
'The Prophet himself says a man who does not help support his wife and children is not a good Muslim,' the 53-year-old said, as he described bathing his baby and helping his wife with other duties.
Some of the 14 men chuckled, not quite sold. Others applauded.
Diane was taking part in a 'school for husbands,' a United Nations-backed initiative where respected male community members learn about 'positive masculinity' in health and social issues and promote them in their communities.
In Senegal, as in many other West African countries with large rural or conservative populations, men often have the final say in major household decisions, including ones related to health.
Women may need their permission for life-changing decisions on accessing family planning or other reproductive health services, along with hospital deliveries or prenatal care.
Following his sessions at the school for husbands, Diane regularly holds sermons during Friday prayers where he discusses issues around gender and reproductive health, from gender-based violence to fighting stigma around HIV.
'Many women appreciate my sermons,' he said. 'They say their husbands' behavior changed since they attended them.' He said some men have told him the sermons inspired them to become more caring husbands and fathers.
Habib Diallo, a 60-year-old former army commando, said attending the sermons and discussions with the imam taught him about the risks of home births.
'When my son's wife was pregnant, I encouraged him to take her to the hospital for the delivery,' Diallo said. 'At first, he was hesitant. He worried about the cost and didn't trust the hospital. But when I explained how much safer it would be for both his wife and the baby, he agreed.'
The program launched in Senegal in 2011 but in recent years has caught the attention of the Ministry of Women, Family, Gender and Child Protection, which sees it an effective strategy to combat maternal and infant mortality.
'Without men's involvement, attitudes around maternal health won't change,' said 54-year-old Aida Diouf, a female health worker who collaborates with the program. Many husbands prefer their wives not be treated by male health workers, she said.
The classes for husbands follow similar efforts in other African countries, particularly Niger, Togo, and Burkina Faso, where the United Nations Population Fund says it improved women's access to reproductive health services by increasing male involvement, growing the use of contraceptives by both men and women and expanding access to prenatal care and skilled birth attendants.
Discussions for men also have focused on girls' rights, equality and the harmful effects of female genital mutilation.
The program now operates over 20 schools in Senegal, and over 300 men have been trained.
In some communities, men who once enforced patriarchal norms now promote gender equality, which has led to a reduction in the number of forced marriages and more acceptance of family planning, according to Senegal's ministry of gender.
Men join the groups after being recruited based on trust, leadership and commitment. Candidates must be married, respected locally and supportive of women's health and rights.
After training, the men act as peer educators, visiting homes and hosting informal talks.
'My husband used to not do much around the house, just bark orders. Now he actually cooks and helps out with daily tasks,' said Khary Ndeye, 52.
While maternal and infant deaths in Senegal have declined over the past decade, experts say it still has a long way to go. It recorded 237 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births in 2023, while 21 newborns out of every 1,000 died within their first month. The U.N. globally wants to reduce maternal deaths to 70 deaths per 100,000 live births and newborn deaths to under 12 per 1,000 by 2030.
One key problem was that many women have been giving birth at home, said El Hadj Malick, one of the Senegal program's coordinators.
'By educating men about the importance of supporting their wives during pregnancy, taking them to the hospital and helping with domestic work at home, you're protecting people's health,' Malick said.
He said he still experiences difficulty changing mindsets on some issues.
'When we just talk to them about gender, there is sometimes tension because it's seen as something abstract or even foreign,' Malick said. Some men mistakenly believe such talk will promote LGBTQ+ issues, which remain largely taboo in much of West Africa.
'But when we focus on women's right to be healthy, it puts a human face on the concept and its becomes universal,' Malick said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Long Live Donald Trump—and His Dubious Cankles
The President of the United States has cankles. The condition, known as chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), just means his veins aren't working great. It's common, particularly among the elderly—a population group which includes our nearly 80-year-old POTUS. Of all the things likely to kill a man of Trump's age and apparent girth, medical professionals seem to think CVI isn't high on the list. Still, the condition is yet another data point highlighting the decline of the Donald. Of late, we've seen him fall asleep in public on multiple occasions, fail to spot people sitting in the same room with him, confuse his facts and generally act like a man past his personal 'sell by' date. Physical and mental health, of course, should never be diagnosed by a basic cable comedian such as myself. But I'm going to do so anyway. As a layman, I see an old guy in a rumpled suit struggling to walk in a straight line. I see an old guy who cannot form a cogent paragraph. I see an old guy who spackles his face—and his hands—with so much make-up it belies a grasp of self-awareness. Do we care? Do we not care? Is it a concern that the Executive Branch is being run by a person who treats 'do not stare directly at the sun during an eclipse' as a dare? Obsessing over a president's health has always been a favorite parlor game among D.C. wags. And with the recent kerfuffle over former President Joe Biden's health leading to a change atop the ticket still stinging Democrats, the questions about Trump's fitness are certainly fair. But I'm not sure they're particularly salient. It's not like Trump is the first frail or sickly president. Would, say, the Reagan second administration have been any different if he hadn't been entering the early stages of Alzheimer's? What about America's war policy under the frail FDR? Trump is old and fat and crazy. He's going to die relatively soon, one way or the other. Do I think he'll die in office? I doubt it. Even if he did, his lackeys at the Heritage Foundation and Peter Thiel's Palantir will Weekend at Bernie's that mofo if they have to in order to get their oppressive agenda passed. For all of his awfulness and unlawfulness, Trump is only a symptom of the larger cancer eating the nation. When we speculate on his health, what we're really expressing is our anxiety about America as a whole. Would we better or worse off if he were to go? Impossible to say. The only thing we can say with any degree of certainty is we would have been better off had he not arrived in the first place. Just like how Russia won't turn around when Putin falls out of his own palace window, what ails the United States today won't be resolved with the passing of one of its central figures. Our problems are deep—deeper even than the pools of purple liquid collecting in Trump's lower limbs. The man may have exacerbated those problems, but he didn't cause them, and his eventual passing will not solve them. A nation such as ours should never be in a position to worry too much about the health of its leader because we're designed to not be dependent on a single person. That's the whole point of a democracy. We fought a king because too much power in the hands of too few leads to bad outcomes for too many. If we're so worried about our president's health, regardless of who is president, it leads me to believe that our presidents have too much power. This one certainly does. So yes, it's dishy to wag our tongues over Trump's occasional and outlandish medical reports—a perfect human specimen! The tallest, handsomest man who ever lived! The vigor of a teenager!—but my concern isn't for his actuarial table. It's for the millions of people whose lives he's put at risk. People reliant on USAID. People who fled violence in their home nations only to be denied entry to ours. People losing their livelihoods because of these tariffs. People whose own healthcare is at risk with his cuts to Medicaid. His squandered life doesn't mean sh-t to me. But just because he screwed up his own life doesn't mean we ought to allow him to rob people of theirs. I will never wish for the death of another. Personally, I hope Donald J. Trump has a long and healthy life— that he makes it to 110. 120, even. And I want him to spend those years as mentally sharp as possible. The only thing is, though, I want him to live them out inside of an 8x8 federal prison cell.


Medscape
11 hours ago
- Medscape
Infographic: How Doctors Feel About Labor Unions
A substantial share of physicians in a Medscape survey felt positively about the trend toward union representation in their ranks in the US. But they were somewhat more skeptical about how effective unions had been in representing doctors' interests, and they felt fellow physicians and patients might see unions in a less favorable light. This infographic presents key insights from a new report on the much-discussed topic of union organization of doctors. To learn more, check out the Medscape Future of Physician Unions Report 2025. Medscape Future of Physician Unions Report 2025


New York Times
17 hours ago
- New York Times
I Banned Phones in My College Classroom. Students Loved It.
I've taught the same course to a class of undergraduate, M.B.A., medical and nursing students every year for over a decade. While I didn't change my lectures or teaching style, somehow the students' evaluations of last year's class were better than ever before: 'This course taught me more than any course I've ever learned at Penn. …' 'The best course I have ever taken.' 'Amazing class!!' Out of all the reviews, only one was negative. But the point is not to brag — I don't think these comments reflect anything about me and my teaching ability. I'm teaching in basically the same manner I have for years. So what changed? I banned all cellphones and computer-based note taking in the classroom, with the exception that students could use a device if they wrote with a stylus. Initially, my students were skeptical, if not totally opposed. But after a couple of weeks, they recognized they were better off for it — better able to absorb and retain information, and better able to enjoy their time in class. My policy required phones to be turned off, and, more important, not be visible on desks. I did allow students who were expecting urgent calls — say, from a spouse about to have a baby — to have a mobile phone readily available during class. Class sessions are recorded, and transcripts of the lectures are available any time after class to students with academic accommodations or those who want to go over them again. My 40 years of pedagogical intuition tells me that this change made students less distracted and more engaged. I think it made them more attentive and satisfied with the learning. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.