'Pandora's box': alarm bells in Indonesia over rising military role
Greater military influence in government, reporters under threat and a stuttering economy -- Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto's first six months in power have triggered alarm bells for activists worried about a return to the country's authoritarian roots.
Last month, Indonesia's parliament amended a law allowing active-duty military personnel to work in 14 state institutions -- up from 10 -- including the attorney general's office, which rights groups say could weaken legal checks on military abuse.
The decision has critics anxious that the world's third-largest democracy could hark back to the days of dictator Suharto, who ruled Indonesia with an iron fist for more than three decades.
"The government does not realise that Indonesia has a collective trauma over (Suharto's) authoritarian New Order government," said Hussein Ahmad, deputy director of rights group Imparsial.
Before Suharto was toppled by student-led protests in 1998, Prabowo was serving as a commander for an elite force to suppress unrest.
He remains accused of human rights abuses, including allegations that he had ordered the abduction of activists at the end of Suharto's rule -- which Prabowo has denied and never been charged for.
He has since rehabilitated his image, and was elected last year on the hopes that he would continue the policies of popular predecessor Joko Widodo.
Yet in the six months since coming into power, Prabowo's former life as a general has been thrust into the public eye.
His administration's move to expand the military's role in government has raised eyebrows even within Indonesia's political elite.
After Prabowo appointed government representatives to kickstart discussions of the law in parliament in February, former president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said it used to be "taboo" for military personnel to enter politics.
"It was one of the doctrines that we issued back then... If you want to do politics, resign," he told a meeting.
Presidential spokesman Hasan Nasbi denied that the new law would regress Indonesia back to Suharto's era.
"This law actually limits the role... to 14 sectors that truly need the skills and expertise relevant to (military) training," he told AFP, adding that the critics were "inaccurate".
- 'Silencing' journalists -
After his October inauguration, Prabowo paraded his cabinet in military fatigues at a retreat.
In November, his defence minister -- also a former general accused of abuses under Suharto -- announced that 100 battalions would be set up to enforce the government's agenda.
And Prabowo has also faced backlash in recent months for slashing government budgets, as Indonesia's flailing economy is further hit by a plummeting rupiah and see-sawing markets in reaction to Washington's tariffs.
Adding to worries is a new regulation issued last month allowing police to monitor foreign journalists and researchers.
It gives the police the authority to provide a permission letter when reporting from "certain locations" -- though a spokesperson later said the letter was "not mandatory".
But the regulation could still spook reporters working on sensitive topics, said Human Rights Watch's Andreas Harsono.
"Journalism always goes hand-in-hand with democracy," Andreas told AFP.
"If journalism is suppressed, the freedom of speech is suppressed, democracy will be paralysed."
The country's press flourished after the fall of Suharto, but local reporters have in recent weeks raised fears of an environment of intimidation.
Last month, Tempo magazine -- which publishes articles critical of the government -- was sent a pig's head and six decapitated rats.
Prabowo's spokesperson denied any government role in the incident, and said an investigation was ongoing.
Tempo's website also started seeing cyber attacks this month after it published an investigation into some gambling companies in Cambodia and its links to Indonesian tycoons and politicians.
Journalist Francisca Christy Rosana, who was doxxed in recent weeks, said they got the message loud and clear.
"This terror was not just aimed at intimidating but silencing and stopping our work."
- 'Fed up' -
Thousands across Indonesia last month protested the new law, carrying posters that called for the military to "return to the barracks".
Dismissing the public's outrage over the military's potential dual role in government as "nonsense", Prabowo said he respected the people's right to protest.
But if the demonstrations "create chaos and unrest, in my opinion this is against the national interest", he said in an interview earlier this month.
Andrie Yunus of KontraS, the commission for missing persons and victims of violence, said the demonstrations are "the tip of the iceberg".
"Civilians are fed up with the entry of militarism into civilian affairs," he said, warning that the path to a military regime "is open".
"We consider the passing of the (military law) to be an attempt to open Pandora's box."
bur/dhc/tc
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mega detention center for US migrants sees violence, escapes
Less than a month after it began receiving migrants, a controversial detention center run by a private firm has been the scene of protests, violence, and escapes, sources said Friday. Soon after Donald Trump's inauguration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) inked a billion-dollar, 15-year contract to outsourcing giant Geo Group to transform an industrial estate near the international airport in Newark, New Jersey into a 1,000-bed detention center. In May, the center - Delaney Hall - began receiving migrants arrested by ICE and facing deportation, despite objections from area residents and local politicians. Late Thursday, detainees at the center began a protest against detention conditions, according to Mustafa Cetin, a lawyer for an asylum seeker being held there. "I have talked to my client yesterday and he told me that roughly 50 detainees were protesting against their conditions," Cetin told AFP. "They were getting aggressive and it turned violent." Cetin slammed the Geo Group and ICE for their performance, decrying "a lack of planning and accountability." US media reports and footage circulated late Thursday showed protesters trying to block an ICE van in front of Delaney Hall and clashing with police. A senior official with the US Department of Homeland Security meanwhile confirmed to AFP on Friday that four detainees "had escaped" from the center the night before. "Additional law enforcement partners have been brought in to find these escapees," the official said. Newark's mayor, Democrat Ras Baraka, said Friday that he was concerned about reports of events at Delaney Hall, "ranging from withholding food and poor treatment, to uprising and escaped detainees." "This is why city officials and our congressional delegation need to be allowed entry to observe and monitor, and why private prisons pose a very real problem to our state and its constitution," he said in a statement. The detention center has become one of the latest flashpoints in Democrats' fight against Trump's crackdown on what he calls an "invasion" of undocumented migrants. Baraka himself was arrested and briefly held last month after he tried to enter the detention center, closely guarded by ICE agents and security personnel. Following the dispute that broke out between elected officials and federal agents, Democratic congresswoman LaMonica McIver was also charged with assaulting law enforcement officers, something she has dismissed as "purely political." gl/ksb/nl
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Land grab conspiracies spread alongside Canadian wildfires
"This isn't just wildfire policy -- it's a global land control strategy operating through 'sustainability' language," a June 1, 2025 Facebook post claims. The text claims the "Rio Law" is a global framework established to encourage sustainability that can be used to reclassify land in Canada for resource extraction and forbid residents from returning home after they are evacuated due to wildfires. The text spread across Facebook, Instagram and X partly echoing debunked theories about Agenda 21 and moves to push fire-displaced residents into "smart cities" where they will be subjected to strict technology surveillance or face restriction of movement. Simultaneously, users on Facebook and TikTok made additional claims about land grabs precipitated by wildfire evacuations invoking either controversy over Ontario province's Bill 5 or images of a possible pipeline route, which would supposedly cross Manitoba to reach Hudson's Bay. Conditions are primed for another massive wildfire season in Canada, as the over 3.6 million hectares (13.8 thousand square miles) of area burned so far in 2025 has already surpassed the year-to-date average for the past decade (archived here). More than 30,000 people have evacuated their homes in western Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba provinces, including remote Indigenous communities fleeing south. But as of June 12, some 7,000 evacuees in Saskatchewan province began returning home. Media report people will also soon be allowed to go back to communities Manitoba, but many areas remain under evacuation orders there and in neighboring Ontario. The fires hit as trade tensions with the United States have triggered the new federal government to open discussions about access to Canadian natural gas and coveted minerals. But the potential projects, including pipelines, raise concerns of environmental impact and Indigenous consent. Nevertheless, experts told AFP it was highly improbable for a wildfire to be used to intentionally target specific areas for resource exploitation. Mike Flannigan a professor of wildland fire at Thompson Rivers University (archived here) said a wildfire is defined by three factors: how it starts, what it can burn through, and the weather conditions around it. Many fires are started -- mostly unintentionally -- by humans, he said, but fuel and weather play too large of a role in where flames spread, making it nearly impossible to start a wildfire that could successfully target a premeditated location. Flannigan also pointed out that climate change creates conditions that suck up moisture from vegetation and generate stronger wind, a mix conducive to more unwieldy fires. "The drier the fuel, the easier it is for a fire to start," he told AFP on June 5. Wildland firefighters use burning techniques to impede the path of smaller and less intense fires and keep them away from populated areas (archived here), but Flannigan said once the blazes reach the tops of the trees -- also known as a crown fire (archived here) -- response becomes limited. "There's only two options then: one is evacuate, get out of the way until the weather changes or the fuels change, or do a burnout operation, which is where you get in front, where the wildfire is spreading, start a new fire that's fighting against it," he said. Hossein Bonakdari, an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Ottawa (archived here), analyzed indicators such as leaf coverage and winter snow area to predict the probability of wildfire in certain parts of Canada. Even with these prediction tools, Bonakdari noted, a plethora of minute variables dictating a wildfire's spread exist, making it impossible to foresee whether it could reach a certain location. "I need a dataset of today to do the prediction for tomorrow," he said on June 6. While the claim that wildfires could be used to clear certain areas for resource extraction may be unsubstantiated, concerns about infringement on Indigenous treaty rights in relation to Ontario's Bill 5 exist (archived here). The legislation gives the province authority to declare "special economic zones" (archived here), overriding local laws for resource projects in a move that Indigenous leaders say will conflict with the government's treaty obligations. Ontario Premier Doug Ford plans, for example, on extracting minerals from the Ring of Fire deposit in the north of the province. Other Canadian premiers also recently floated the idea of a pipeline through Manitoba to end in Hudson's Bay, similar to what has been referenced in some land grab claims online. Using reverse image search, AFP traced the map in those posts to a 2023 blog proposing a path for pipelines (archived here). However, no formalized proposals for such a project could be found. The posts also misrepresent the 1992 Rio Declaration (archived here). The document produced at the United Nations' Earth Summit does not mention removing people from land. Rather, it lays out principles of protecting environmental and developmental systems, to which it says states should agree. AFP previously debunked claims about resident displacement to extract resources following hurricane evacuations. Read more of AFP's reporting on wildfire misinformation here.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What To Know About Iran's Nuclear Program After Israel's Strikes
Air raid sirens sounded in Jerusalem and loud blasts were heard on June 13, as the Israeli military said it had detected a missile launched from Iran. Credit - Jack Guez — AFP via Getty Images Iran's nuclear program suffered one of its most serious setbacks in years on Friday, after Israel launched a series of airstrikes on nuclear sites, top scientists, and military officials in a dramatic escalation of its long-running campaign to contain Tehran's atomic ambitions. Israeli officials described the strikes as a preemptive operation aimed at crippling Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon, following what they called a sharp and alarming expansion of uranium enrichment over the past six months. Initial damage assessments indicate that the strikes on Iran's Natanz nuclear facility were particularly effective, knocking out the electricity on the underground area where the centrifuges used to enrich uranium are stored, Israel Defense Forces said in a statement Friday. Natanz had been the centerpiece of Iran's nuclear infrastructure and the site where much of its uranium fuel has been produced. On Friday evening, Iranian state media reported that Israel began striking Iran's other major enrichment site—Fordow, which is buried deep within a mountain and is considered nearly impervious to conventional airstrikes. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the campaign a 'strike at the head of Iran's nuclear weaponization program,' and said it would continue 'as many days as it takes' to eliminate the threat. Explosions were reported over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv Friday evening as Iran launched a broad retaliatory strike against Israel. Iran has insisted that it is not developing a bomb and that its nuclear program remains non-weaponized for peaceful energy purposes, though international inspectors have found increasing evidence to the contrary. The United Nations' nuclear watchdog reported that Iran's stockpile of 60% enriched uranium—just below weapons-grade—has grown large enough to produce multiple bombs if further enriched. Analysts say Iran could theoretically produce a bomb's worth of material in as little as a week, and that no other country has that level of uranium without a nuclear weapons program. 'This really was done as a last resort,' says Matt Kroenig, the senior director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Center on international security who served in the Department of Defense and the intelligence community during the Bush, Obama, and Trump Administrations. 'They were out of time. The best estimates were that Iran's dash time to one bomb's worth of weapons grade material was down to about a week.' Read more: Trump Issues Grave Warning to Iran After Israeli Strikes: 'No More Death, No More Destruction' Here's what to know about Iran's nuclear program. Iran's nuclear journey began with American support. In 1957, the United States helped launch Iran's atomic energy program under President Eisenhower's 'Atoms for Peace' initiative, when the two nations were allies. By the 1970s, Iran was working on nuclear reactors with U.S. and European assistance, but that partnership collapsed after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Since then, the U.S. has watched with alarm as Iran pursued nuclear capabilities, largely in secret. The Natanz site has been a focal point of that concern. In the early 2000s, it was revealed as part of a covert network of nuclear sites that Iran had failed to disclose to international inspectors. Iran has insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful, aimed at energy production and medical research. It is also a party to the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which obliges members not to develop nuclear weapons. But international watchdogs have warned about the country's enrichment of uranium to levels far beyond civilian use and its concealment of key facilities. Tensions escalated when President Donald Trump in 2018 pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal reached under President Barack Obama, an agreement that rolled back much of Iran's enrichment activity, capped its uranium stockpile, and subjected its facilities to rigorous international inspections. Trump had called the deal 'a disaster' and instead initiated new sanctions on the regime to cripple its economy. But Iran responded by gradually abandoning the agreement's restrictions and ramping up uranium enrichment. It also removed all of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) equipment that had been installed for surveillance and monitoring. By 2024, Iran had resumed operations at Natanz and Fordow at a pace not seen in over a decade, deploying more advanced centrifuges and enriching uranium to 60-percent—alarmingly close to the 90-percent purity required for a nuclear weapon. Read more: Israel Gets the War It Wanted In recent months, Iranian officials confirmed they were building a third enrichment site, further deepening concerns that Tehran was preparing to take its nuclear program underground and beyond the reach of future diplomacy or attack. 'There are only really three key nuclear facilities [in Iran],' says Jonathan Panikoff, the former deputy national intelligence officer for the Near East at the National Intelligence Council, pointing to Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. 'If they succeed in destroying those three facilities, it will really set Iran's nuclear program back.' Technically, Iran has not yet built a nuclear weapon. But the infrastructure and know-how are in place, analysts say. Before Israel's strikes, the IAEA found that Iran could enrich enough uranium for a bomb in about a week. That means that in five months, Iran could have had enough for 22 nuclear weapons. However, analysts note that uranium alone isn't enough for a viable nuclear weapon and that it would take additional time to manufacture it. Netanyahu believes that a nuclear-armed Iran is an existential threat, claiming that Iranian leaders have openly called for the end of the Israeli state and have lent support for groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. 'Eighty years ago, Jews were victims of a Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi regime. Today, the Jewish state refuses to be the victim of a nuclear Holocaust perpetrated by the Iranian regime,' Netanyahu declared on Friday. For Israel, the fear is not just a direct nuclear strike, but that Iran could act more aggressively throughout the region under the protection of a nuclear deterrent. Trump, a strong ally of Israel, has insisted that Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon' and framed the moment as a possible 'second chance' for Iran's leadership to quickly reach an agreement on curbing its nuclear program in order to avoid further destruction 'before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' Israel's strikes on Friday marked the first overt attack on Iran's core nuclear infrastructure. While it remains unclear how Iran's nuclear program will ultimately be impacted, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi told the U.N. Security Council on Friday that Natanz, the facility at the heart of Iran's nuclear ambition, was destroyed in the strikes. Other major nuclear sites were not initially hit, though Grossi later noted that 'Iranian authorities are informing us of attacks on two other facilities, namely the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan.' Several high-ranking Iranian military officials were also killed in the strikes, according to state-affiliated media, including six nuclear scientists and security forces tasked with protecting its nuclear sites. But analysts note that Iran still likely retains much of its expertise and equipment. A full dismantling of Iran's nuclear infrastructure would likely require a sustained campaign involving not only air power, but also cyber warfare, intelligence operations, and potentially ground forces. Even so, the deeply buried Fordow site—nearly half a mile inside a mountain—could be beyond the reach of Israel's current munitions. Only the U.S. is believed to possess the most advanced bunker-busting bombs capable of reliably penetrating such sites, says Panikoff. Write to Nik Popli at
