logo
The CDC says its tally of US measles cases is likely an undercount

The CDC says its tally of US measles cases is likely an undercount

Independent17-04-2025

The number of measles cases traced to the West Texas outbreak are likely undercounted, health officials say.
Dr. David Sugerman, a senior scientist leading the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention measles response, told a meeting of the centers' vaccine advisory committee that officials believe there's 'quite a large amount of cases that are not reported and underreported.'
'In working very closely with our colleagues in Texas; in talking with families, they may mention prior cases that have recovered and never received testing, other families that may have cases and never sought treatment,' he said Tuesday.
Sugerman also noted that most of the nation's cases have been driven in undervaccinated communities like the Lone Star State's Gaines County. The county accounts for nearly 65 percent of the state's cases.
The agency has deployed more than a dozen people to the state, and is sending more this week.
'This reallocation, or what Dr. Sugerman called scraping, is not unique to this outbreak or a direct result of current initiatives to restructure CDC. When outbreaks occur, the agency must reallocate resources from other programs to respond,' the CDC told The Independent on Thursday.
Right now, the CDC reports that there are more than 700 cases across the U.S., although it only updates its tally once a week.
In Texas, the state's health authorities said Tuesday that there were 561 cases confirmed there since January, as well as 58 hospitalizations over the course of the outbreak.
Two unvaccinated children who lived in the outbreak area have died.
Measles is prevented by getting doses of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine that provide decades-long immunity. But, convincing communities to get the vaccine or vaccinate their children has proven to be a major hurdle. Rising vaccine hesitancy has been reported across the nation.
'Parental vaccine hesitancy might be contributing to the low levels of influenza vaccination coverage, due to a higher degree of hesitancy among parents about influenza vaccine compared with other routine childhood vaccines,' researchers said last year in a study published in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
While Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has endorsed getting the measles shots, he has also promoted some questionable alternative practices, claimed the vaccines were 'leaky' and said that the vaccines should not be mandated.
Experts have warned that casting doubts on vaccines could come with deadly consequences and reverse years of medical progress – especially with measles' continued spread. Sugerman said coverage with the vaccine has been decreasing since the pandemic.
'It is often said that the first responsibility of any government is the safety and protection of its people,' the journal Nature's editorial board said. 'That alone should be reason enough for policymakers to encourage people to get themselves and their children vaccinated. Vaccines save lives, and casting doubt on their safety could have dangerous and far-reaching consequences.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: CDC expert resigns from COVID vaccines advisory role, sources say
Exclusive: CDC expert resigns from COVID vaccines advisory role, sources say

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Exclusive: CDC expert resigns from COVID vaccines advisory role, sources say

June 3 (Reuters) - Pediatric infectious disease expert Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos of the U.S. CDC resigned on Tuesday as co-leader of a working group that advises outside experts on COVID-19 vaccines and is leaving the agency, two sources familiar with the move told Reuters. Panagiotakopoulos said in an email to work group colleagues that her decision to step down was based on the belief she is "no longer able to help the most vulnerable members" of the U.S. population. In her role at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's working group of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, she co-led the gathering of information on topics for presentation. Her resignation comes one week after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-time vaccine skeptic who oversees the CDC, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health, said the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women had been removed from the CDC's recommended immunization schedule. The move was a departure from the process in which ACIP experts meet and vote on changes to the immunization schedule or recommendations on who should get vaccines before the agency's director made a final call. The committee had not voted on the changes announced by Kennedy and the CDC does not yet have a permanent director. Two days after Kennedy's announcement, the CDC published a vaccine schedule online saying that COVID-19 vaccines remain an option for healthy children aged 6 months to 17 years when parents and doctors agree that it is needed. It had previously recommended updated COVID vaccines for everyone aged six months and older, following the guidance of the panel of outside experts. Two sources said Panagiotakopoulos did not include a specific reason for her departure. Panagiotakopoulos did not return requests for comment. "Unfortunately for me, this is a personal decision," Panagiotakopoulos wrote in an email to members of the working group that was read to Reuters by a source who received it. "My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role." The committee is scheduled to meet on June 25-27 and is expected to deliberate and vote on recommendations for use of COVID-19 vaccines, according to one of the sources who was not authorized to speak publicly.

A woman contracted a fatal brain-eating ameba after rinsing her sinuses. Here's how to avoid it
A woman contracted a fatal brain-eating ameba after rinsing her sinuses. Here's how to avoid it

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

A woman contracted a fatal brain-eating ameba after rinsing her sinuses. Here's how to avoid it

An elderly woman from Texas has died after contacting a brain-eating ameba from rinsing her sinuses, the Centers for Disease Control said. Last Thursday, the CDC reported a previously healthy 71-year-old woman who developed 'severe neurologic symptoms' after using a nasal irrigation device using non-boiled water from an RV's water system at a Texas campground. The woman experienced 'fever, headache, and altered mental status' within 4 days of using the nasal irrigation device. Medial professionals suspected that she had a primary amebic meningoencephalitis, or PAM, infection. She was treated for PAM, but developed seizures and then died 8 days after her first symptoms appeared, the CDC said. PAM is a very rare, but almost always fatal, brain infection caused by brain-eating ameba known as Naegleria fowleri. Using tap water for nasal irrigation is a factor for PAM. PAM usually infects fewer than 10 people a year in the U.S., but almost everyone who is infected dies from it. Out of the 164 known people who got infected with PAM in the U.S. from 1962 to 2023, only four survived. The CDC confirmed that Naegleria fowleri was found in the woman's cerebrospinal fluid. While the ameba was not found in the RV water supply, the water was 'inadequately disinfected,' according to the CDC. While this case is rare, it brings awareness to the health risks associated with the misuse of nasal irrigation devices. To keep yourself safe from potential sickness, use distilled, sterilized or boiled and cooled tap water when using a nasal irrigation device. The CDC says these recommended practices are 'critical to reducing the risk for illness.' Naegleria fowleri thrives in warm freshwater lakes, rivers and hot springs, so it's important to take some actions to reduce the risk of exposure. The CDC recommends holding your nose or wearing a nose clip when jumping or diving into fresh water. You should also always keep your head above water in hot springs, according to the agency. The CDC also advises against digging in shallow water as the ameba is more likely to live there.

What is Operation Stork Speed? RFK Jr's plan to take on the baby formula industry
What is Operation Stork Speed? RFK Jr's plan to take on the baby formula industry

The Independent

time7 hours ago

  • The Independent

What is Operation Stork Speed? RFK Jr's plan to take on the baby formula industry

Federal health officials are set to overhaul the U.S. food supply, starting with a fresh examination of i nfant formula. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has instructed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct a thorough review of the nutrients and ingredients found in infant formula, a staple for millions of American babies. This initiative, named "Operation Stork Speed," marks the first comprehensive evaluation of these ingredients since 1998. Kennedy stated, "The FDA will use all resources and authorities at its disposal to make sure infant formula products are safe and wholesome for the families and children who rely on them." According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately three-quarters of infants in the U.S. consume formula within their first six months, with about 40% relying on it as their sole source of nutrition. Formula has been widely used in the U.S. for roughly six decades, feeding generations of infants who have flourished, said Dr. Steven Abrams, a University of Texas infant nutrition expert. The broader scientific community has been calling for a reevaluation of infant formula for years and is 'fully supportive of this idea of a comprehensive look,' he said. Current formula products in the U.S. continue to be safe and nourishing, he said. 'But there's been a lot of science and we want the FDA rules to align with the most recent science from around the world,' he said. Here's what you need to know about Operation Stork Speed: What is infant formula and why do so many babies consume it? Infant formula is a manufactured product, usually made from cow's milk or soy, that is intended to mimic human breast milk for kids up age 12 months. It may be the sole source of nutrition or supplement breastfeeding. FDA regulations require that infant formulas contain 30 specific nutrients, with minimum levels for all and maximum levels for 10 of them. The ingredients vary, but all formulas must have a balance of calories from protein, carbohydrates and fat that mirrors what's found in human milk. Federal guidelines recommend that babies be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life and that parents continue breastfeeding for the first year or more while adding new foods to the child's diet. Parents use formula when a mother cannot or chooses not to breastfeed for a wide range of reasons, including medical conditions, work conflicts, to allow other family members to help with feedings and other situations. Why is the government reviewing baby formula now? Kennedy announced the review of infant formula in March as part of his 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda for the U.S. food supply. The FDA's review will include increased testing for heavy metals and other contaminants as well as a review of nutrients, the agencies said. U.S. health officials will hold a two-hour roundtable discussion of infant formula on Wednesday. What issues will that cover? The FDA is asking for new scientific data and information about whether required ingredients in infant formula should be added, removed or changed. The deadline for comments is Sept. 11. Scientists say a review is long overdue regarding the most recent data on the composition of human milk and how babies digest and absorb nutrients in breastmilk and formula. In addition, they want the FDA to consider how U.S. formulas compare with those made elsewhere, said Bridget Young, who studies infant nutrition at the University of Rochester. 'How do our regulations differ?' she said. 'Maybe it's time for them to relook at their regulations and consider potential international harmonization.' More international alignment might have eased the U.S. infant formula crisis in 2022, when contamination shut down an Abbott factory, leading to monthslong shortages for American parents, Young said. What about specific ingredients? In recent years, some parents have sought out infant formula made in Europe with the belief that products made overseas are healthier options, experts said. Formula regulations in the U.S. and Europe, including requirements for nutrients and testing, differ somewhat, but are generally similar, Abrams said. 'The differences between the U.S. and Europe should not be considered as 'higher' or 'better' or 'greater' in one vs. the other,' he said. Still, iron, for instance, is included at higher levels in U.S. formulas than in those in Europe — and Abrams suggested that U.S. officials may consider lowering iron targets. Other components have been added to formula in recent years. They include docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, an essential omega-3 fatty acid, and human milk oligosaccharides, complex sugars that are found breast milk but not in cow's milk. Although they may be beneficial, they are not required. 'These have been added to some formulas, but not to other formulas, so we want to take a look,' Abrams explained. Many parents have raised concerns over formula ingredients such as added sugars and seed oils, which are also being targeted by Kennedy as hazards in the wider food supply. Recent research suggests that added sugars such as glucose and corn syrup solids in infant formula may be linked to weight gain in children. Young said that most experts agree that lactose, the primary type of sugar found in breast milk, is preferred. Infant formulas in the U.S. do contain seed oils, Young said. But that's because there are a finite number of vegetable oils that provide the essential saturated and unsaturated fats that babies require. 'They need to provide the variety of fatty acids that you see in breast milk,' she said. What are the next steps? Done properly, the FDA's infant formula review would take 'at least a year,' Abrams said. And it will require broad input from multiple government agencies, formula manufacturers and consumers. 'No shortcuts are possible and no one review, white paper or even committee report will suffice to do it right,' he said. The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store