
Feds should penalize companies that move production outside of Canada: Unifor
The federal government has an even more powerful trade-war weapon than counter-tariffs at its disposal and should begin using it immediately, says Canada's biggest private sector union.
In a letter to Prime Minister
Mark Carney
being sent Tuesday and provided to the Star, Unifor national president Lana Payne urges Carney and his government to use the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act to penalize companies that shift production out of Canada to avoid
tariffs imposed by U.S. president Donald Trump
.
The act gives the attorney general — in conjunction with the foreign affairs minister — the power to issue orders barring companies and individuals from complying with foreign laws and policies which have the potential to 'adversely affect Canadian interests in relation to international trade or commerce.'
The act allows a maximum penalty of $1.5 million for companies, and $150,000 plus five years in prison for individuals.
While counter-tariffs have been a necessary and effective measure to fight the trade war, said Payne, the urgency is growing as companies shift production and shed jobs.
'As tariffs persist, and threats of layoff and plant closures mount, further aggressive and defensive action must be taken to solidify Canada's industrial economy,' Payne wrote in her letter to Carney.
'I urge your government to take immediate and decisive action using the Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act (FEMA), to prevent corporations operating in Canada, from offshoring jobs in response to foreign trade policies — particularly those originating from the United States.'
Unifor is also calling for stronger penalties, including asset seizures for companies that violate orders issued under FEMA, as well as compliance with FEMA orders, to be a condition for any company seeking relief from Canada's own retaliatory tariffs.
'We need to stop rewarding companies that gut our communities and undermine our economy,' said Payne. 'This is about protecting good Canadian jobs and defending our sovereignty.'
In a legal brief prepared for Unifor, international trade lawyer Craig Logie said FEMA could be even more effective with a few legislative tweaks, including explicitly making U.S. instructions to 'off-shore' jobs from Canada an unenforceable measure. Logie also suggested raising the maximum fines, as well as giving courts the ability to order the seizure and sale of property of companies or individuals who disobey an order under FEMA.
Logie noted that the Act can also apply to everything from official court rulings and government legislation, to 'intimations of policy and other communications issued by...the foreign state or foreign tribunal.'
'This is very broad language,' Logie wrote in his analysis.
The 1985 Act has been invoked twice before, both times involving American trade and economic policies.
In 2014, the Conservative government of Stephen Harper used it to fight Buy American provisions in an Alaskan-operated ferry terminal being refurbished in Prince Rupert, B.C.
In 1992, Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservative government invoked the Act to make it illegal for Canadian companies and individuals to comply with the U.S. trade embargo on Cuba.
Still, using it to punish companies for trying to avoid tariffs would be novel ground, said John Boscariol, head of the international trade law group at McCarthy Tetrault.
'FEMA has never been used in the way they're proposing,' said Boscariol. 'They might have a hard time convincing the government to use it like this.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Senator Calls LA Unrest 'Anarchy and Chaos' As Trump Deploys Guard: Live Updates
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., has sharply condemned the escalating unrest in Los Angeles, warning that Democrats risk losing the moral high ground if they fail to denounce the violence. His remarks, posted on X, have drawn reactions across the political spectrum, including responses from Elon Musk and other officials. What to Know: Fetterman called the Los Angeles protests "anarchy and true chaos" and urged his party to speak out. "I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that," he wrote. Elon Musk responded to Fetterman's remarks with an American flag emoji. Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy praised Fetterman, saying it takes courage to speak hard truths. Deputy White House chief of staff Taylor Budowich claimed Fetterman's stance stresses divisions within the Democratic Party. Sen. Bernie Sanders also spoke against violent protests, calling for disciplined, nonviolent resistance. The unrest has led to the deployment of National Guard troops, with President Trump defending the decision. Stay with Newsweek for the latest.


San Francisco Chronicle
6 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Trump's deployment of National Guard to L.A. protests shouldn't be a surprise
Donald Trump's playbook seems entirely predictable. If you want to turn a democracy into a military dictatorship, you only need two steps. First, you take actions that will guarantee a large public outcry and protests, and then bring in the military to restore order. Just like Trump did this weekend in deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles after the protests in response to immigration raids. Conversion completed. And if these protests aren't sufficient to declare martial law, no doubt future actions against immigrants will generate the necessary strife. President Trump will not stop until he has destroyed American democracy, and the world can only watch. Steen Petersen, Nanaimo, British Columbia Alarming arrest threat So, President Donald Trump thinks Gov. Gavin Newsom should be arrested. Exactly what laws did the governor break? I'm old enough to remember Alabama Gov. George Wallace standing in the doorway trying to prevent two Black students from enrolling at the University of Alabama in 1963. As much as President John F. Kennedy probably wanted to have Wallace handcuffed and jailed, he didn't. Trump's comments now suggest he is both judge and jury. This is a slap in the face of the greatest of all democratic principles: The rule of law. Denny Freidenrich, Laguna Beach, Orange County Insufficient CCSF response Regarding ''I do not feel safe': City College of S.F. instructor shaken by union leader's verbal attack' (San Francisco, June 5): I'm shocked about what I believe is an antisemitic attack by union leader Maria Salazar-Colon at a public meeting and upset after reading the City College Board of Trustees' statement in response. The statement shows that the board and the college administration don't take antisemitism as seriously as other forms of hate speech. I would ask readers to consider whether they feel that this response would be acceptable if the speaker had used such hateful language toward other racial or ethnic groups. The board's statement is insultingly vague and short on specific condemnation of antisemitism. This is an 'all lives matter' response to a specific attack on Jewish Americans. I would like the board to issue a new statement that specifically references that a speaker made antisemitic comments, and that it condemns them. When there was anti-Asian hate, we condemned it as anti-Asian, not generalized disrespect or lack of decorum. The board should also commit the institution to include addressing antisemitism as part of any training around equity and diversity. Doug Shoemaker, San Francisco Not Lowell caliber Regarding 'These graduating Lowell students were called 'lottery kids.' The stigma never went away' (San Francisco, June 6): The story says that data shows relatively small academic disparities between students enrolled at Lowell High School by lottery and merit-based admittees. However, every piece of data in the story says the lottery students did worse on average than those who attended based on merit — hardly proof that the lottery kids belonged. Michael Singer, Santa Rosa Stop S.F. warehouse project Regarding 'S.F.'s largest industrial project could get a green light after years of delay' (Real Estate, June 3): The article does not tell the whole story about this planned 2-million-square-foot warehouse and distribution center in the Bayview, a neighborhood that is highly impacted by poor air quality and high levels of cancer, asthma and other lung diseases. Residents are concerned about what will likely be a huge Amazon warehouse (nonunion) and the increase in diesel trucks that worsen the levels of particulate matter, ozone and nitrous oxide, which are already high in the area, increasing the risk for asthma, bronchitis, lung irritations and cancers. The effects are cumulative. The pollution from this project will impact the air quality in nearby neighborhoods and beyond. This is a San Francisco issue, not just a Bayview issue, and it is an environmental justice issue.


San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Exclusive: Trump administration may hit S.F. with a $140 million bill. Here's why
The Trump administration could claw back about $140 million in federal funding that San Francisco already received to cover costs the city incurred during the pandemic, the Chronicle has learned. San Francisco spent well over $400 million to shelter vulnerable homeless people in hotels to protect them from COVID-19 after the virus began spreading five years ago. After the city applied for reimbursement, the Federal Emergency Management Agency under former President Joe Biden sent $148 million — and the city was expecting even more money. But this week, San Francisco officials learned that FEMA has indicated it now believes the city is entitled to be reimbursed for just $7 million of the total amount spent on the shelter-in-place hotels. While FEMA hasn't officially requested any money back, city officials believe that determination lays the groundwork for the agency to seek a $141 million refund from the amount it already paid the city. There's a big problem: San Francisco already spent the money. And the city is in a dire financial situation, with Mayor Daniel Lurie working to close a roughly $800 million shortfall in his inaugural budget proposal expected to be announced Friday. San Francisco's government costs are rising faster than its tax revenue, which is being hampered by one of the nation's slowest economic recoveries from the pandemic. It's not clear how FEMA arrived at its determination. The Chronicle has reached out to the agency for comment. FEMA's decision, which San Francisco is expected to appeal, represents one of the largest direct hits the Trump administration has tried to take against the city this year. Lurie and other local officials are bracing for more: The mayor plans to propose a $400 million reserve to help the city defend itself against the uncertainty caused by threatened cuts to federal funding. Lurie said in a statement to the Chronicle that San Francisco endeavored to keep its citizens safe during the pandemic 'with a commitment from the federal government to cover those costs.' 'As our administration makes the tough decisions to tackle the historic budget deficit we inherited, we are navigating tremendous uncertainty at the federal and state levels and preparing for challenges that may lie ahead,' Lurie said. 'But right now, FEMA still owes San Francisco hundreds of millions of dollars, and I will continue to advocate relentlessly with our federal partners until we receive every single dollar.' Supervisor Connie Chan, who chairs the Board of Supervisors' budget committee, said the $400 million reserve being planned by city officials is intended largely as 'a guardrail' against possible federal cuts to Medicaid and housing subsidies — not to pay back pandemic reimbursements already sent by FEMA. 'San Francisco must fight Trump, not only against potentially upcoming draconian cuts, but also for this illegal clawback of the money that San Francisco has already delivered,' Chan said. If San Francisco is unsuccessful in its appeal of the FEMA decision, Chan believes a lawsuit is likely called for, saying she is looking to City Attorney David Chiu 'and his capable team to stand firm and have a strategic approach to protect San Francisco's resources.' Jen Kwart, a spokesperson for Chiu, said in a statement that her office is 'working with our clients and evaluating next steps to ensure San Francisco gets the resources it is entitled to.' In remarks to reporters after he introduced his $15.9 billion city budget proposal Friday, Lurie said San Francisco would 'fight for every dollar that our city is owed.' He confirmed that the city would appeal the FEMA funding decision and said it would take 'probably a number of months for us to find out.'