Wesgroup proposes significantly more density at Coronation Park site to offset new Metro Vancouver fees, affordable housing
Wesgroup approached Port Moody council on Tuesday with a multi-pronged proposal to keep its long-planned Coronation Park development on track – including significant density increases, alternative financial securities, and support tied to a federal financing program.
Spanning 15 acres, the development was set to include six residential towers between 26 and 31 storeys and 100,000 square feet of commercial space following council approval in 2023. Of the 2,587 units, 101 were set to offered as rentals.
The May 10 delegation from Wesgroup follows a 2023 letter of intent the developer submitted to explore affordable housing options in exchange for increased density after concerns were raised about the complete absence of below-market units in the project.
The proposal will require another OCP amendment and rezoning to allow for another tower to be built on site, as well increasing the height of three other towers.
Dean Johnson, Wesgroup's senior vice president of development, said the amount of density is needed to offset costs related to recent increases to Metro Vancouver developer cost charges (DCCs) hurting the project's bottom line, and building market rentals under the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) Apartment Construction Loan Program (ACLP).
'The CMHC's ACLP is the only viable path forward in today's financial environment,' Johnson said. 'We have two options in front of us: additional density to offset the cost, or decrease the amenity package we previously agreed to with the community. We do not want to go down that path.'
Wesgroup's proposal would add an additional 35-storey tower, as well as 13 storeys on three other towers. In exchange, Wesgroup would convert one of the 26-storey towers fronting Ioco Road to 100 percent rental housing. Of its 288 units, 72 would be secured at below-market rates for 25 years.
CMHC's $55-billion ACLP provides low-cost financing to developers in exchange for rental and affordable housing commitments. But the 2025 funds have already been claimed, and the 2026 intake window is nearly full. In order to qualify, Wesgroup needed municipal confirmation that Port Moody supports the project's alignment with CMHC affordability goals.
While council only received the proposal for information, it unanimously approved the issuance of a 'comfort letter' needed to advance Wesgroup's application to the CMHC.
Offsetting costs
Shortly after Port Moody council
approved Coronation Park in October 2023
, Metro Vancouver's Mayor's Council approved steep increases to regional DCCs, resulting in a $30 million in unplanned fees, according to Johnson.
He said the DCC spike is a significant cost burden on the project, and without the added density, Wesgroup may have to scale back the amenity package approved for the development.
'There was a substantial increase – once in a lifetime, really, for many of us – and this cost is going to be something that we have to deal with on this project,' Johnson said.
Additional density is also needed due to the value difference between market condominiums and market rental.
Most of the additional square footage, however, is being used to offset Metro Vancouver's DCC increases, which account for approximately 77 percent of the increase in density.
Johnson noted that one of the benefits of using the CMHC program is that both towers facing Ioco Road would be built simultaneously, while much of the density would be added in later phases of the project.
Surety bonds
Wesgroup's final request was for the city to consider accepting surety bonds as an alternative to letters of credit when developers post financial securities tied to development permits.
A surety bond offers municipalities a secure financial guarantee that a developer will complete their obligations, while giving the developer more financial flexibility compared to traditional bank-issued letters of credit.
'Letters of credit tie up millions of dollars in equity,' Johnson said. 'Surety bonds are insured, regulated, and already accepted in municipalities like Burnaby, Surrey, and Vancouver.'
He noted Wesgroup currently faces a $15.8 million letter of credit due in July, which it is seeking to defer until building permits are issued in March 2026.
The company is still in the pre-sale phase and has not yet secured final project financing, making the immediate issuance of such a large letter of credit 'challenging,' Johnson said.
Council response
Coun. Haven Lurbiecki was sharply critical of the amount of density being proposed, and questioned whether the CMHC proposal was even related.
She accused Wesgroup of 'shifting the goalposts' by asking the public to essentially subsidize an already massive project.
Lurbiecki noted the original plan includes mostly studios and one-bedroom units at a time when the city needs affordable family-sized housing, townhomes, co-ops, four-plexes, and seniors housing.
'Anything but more condos,' she said. 'To even consider this request for more density, I just find it irresponsible and inexplicable.'
Other councillors took a more supportive approach. Coun. Kyla Knowles welcomed the affordable housing plan and said the financial pressures facing developers must be understood if homes are to be delivered.
'We need homes. So let's build the homes,' Knowles said. 'If there's an extra $30 million in DCCs, you could say, 'Great, the developer makes less.' But that cost falls on end users.'
She also supported Wesgroup's request to explore surety bonds as an alternative to letters of credit for financial security deposits.
'Financing has changed. It's gotten more challenging,' Knowles said. 'To not have any understanding of that means you are worsening the crisis.'
Coun. Callan Morrison said he supported the comfort letter but wanted more information before weighing in on the broader density and financial deferral requests. 'I appreciate this is going to need a bigger discussion,' he said.
Mayor Meghan Lahti emphasized the comfort letter was only to allow Wesgroup to begin its CMHC application – not an endorsement of all its future asks.
'We may support them sending in the application, but we may not support it at the end of the day,' she said. 'This is helping them get to the next step.'
In principle, however, the mayor supported the rental housing proposal.
'If all things were equal, would we be supportive of a CMHC project happening on that site in the second tower? My answer is a resounding yes,' Lahti said. 'But obviously, there are multi-faceted levels of conversation that need to take place.'
Staff will return with a report on the broader proposal – including the OCP amendment, rezoning, and requests related to financial securities and density.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sibson to take Mitchell's tax increment district complaints before SD audit committee
May 30—MITCHELL — Mitchell resident Steve Sibson is taking Mitchell's increment tax districts before a state legislative committee, raising concerns that the number of tax districts in the city lacks proper scrutiny and may not follow state approval procedures. On May 19, Sibson gave the city council an update on his conversations with the South Dakota Department of Revenue, particularly with regard to TID No. 41. According to previous discussions, increment districts no longer have to be pre-approved by the revenue department before going before a city council or county commission. However, Sibson shared that this was not the case, and that Mitchell was receiving special treatment because of the volume of TIDs the city has. "When I brought up the push back on that requirement for a pre-approved submission as to classification type, I was told that is still in place," Sibson said. "It seems like the Department of Revenue is rubber stamping what we're doing here." The Mitchell Republic reached out to the South Dakota Department of Revenue to confirm Sibson's statements to the council, but the department had not responded by the time this article was published. During its May 19 regular meeting, the Mitchell City Council approved a developer agreement for Tax Increment District (TID) No. 41 for affordable housing and street construction, and also approved a developer agreement for TID No. 42 to expand the Dale's A1 Transmission service building on South Burr Street. The council previously approved the creation and project plans of these tax districts on May 5. TID No. 41 includes two projects, which Sibson took as an issue to the revenue department. In particular, the TID No. 41 agreement lays out what will happen to increment-generated tax funds once the affordable housing units are completed, specifically the construction of Mattie Street. Sibson raised concerns with the revenue department that property owners along Mattie Street, some of whom are outside of Mitchell city limits in Davison County, will be taxed to complete Mattie Street. The city's response is that they don't know if that will happen yet. City Attorney Justin Johnson told the Mitchell Republic that the city won't know how much of the Mattie Street construction can be supported by TID No. 41 until the apartments have been built and the property values have been established. In the coming years, if the council decides to construct Mattie Street without enough support from TID No. 41, then the rest of the project will have to be paid for somehow, according to Johnson. "It's possible that part of it could be done by special assessment, which neighboring properties would be responsible for," Johnson said. If TID No. 41 covers part of the cost of constructing Mattie Street, property owners along Mattie Street would likely be paying less than if there was no tax district at all, Johnson noted. If there were no tax district funds available and the council decided to move forward, assessments for those properties along Mattie Street would cover the whole construction cost of Mattie Street. In other words, if TID No. 41 doesn't pay for all of the construction costs and the city doesn't pay for it out of general funds, Mattie Street property owners are on the hook to complete the road. The boundaries of Mattie Street are within the Mitchell city limits. However, only the right of way for the street is within the city limits while the properties on either side of Mattie Street on the south side are outside of the city limits. A tax increment is only generated from property within the boundaries of the TID, but no tax funds will be generated from the street itself, which is a right-of-way, and therefore tax-exempt, according to Mitchell Finance Officer Michelle Bathke. If a special assessment were levied against property owners, then even those property owners outside of city limits would be liable for paying a share of the burden to finish construction of Mattie Street to East Havens Avenue. In addition to the city potentially raising a tax levy against individual property owners along Mattie Street, the status of TID No. 41 may result in a special levy to maintain tax funds for the Mitchell School District. According to Sibson, the city of Brookings passed a TID that required a special assessment in the amount of $470,000, which taxpayers had to pay. Sibson raised concern with Davison County auditors that the same thing could happen in Mitchell. TID No. 41 was passed to fund Paul Groeneweg's Woods Apartments, a proposed 70-unit complex with two-and-three-bedroom apartments across 12 buildings, which Sibson found no fault with. It is estimated that the developer's infrastructure will be covered by TID No. 41 at an estimated $2.28 million in tax funds. However, Sibson had problems with the city including street construction as a separate project on the same TID. A violation of TID rules, according to Sibson's research. This TID is unique in that it also has a plan to construct the area of Mattie Street south of First Avenue and north of East Havens Avenue, including intersections, with a projected $2.02 million in tax funds. This is not the first TID to seek to complete a portion of Mattie Street. In 2012, TID No. 17 was introduced to cover the construction cost of a portion of Mattie Street, but ultimately failed to complete the task. TID No. 17 was paid off in nine years and resulted in $12,849,130 of assessed value growth when it was dissolved, according to City Administrator Stephanie Ellwein. At the time TID No. 17 was approved in 2012, it was estimated that $200,000 would be raised toward the construction of roughly 450 feet of Mattie Street. TID No. 17 included five phases, with the last phase being Mattie Street's road, sewer and water installation. This would have connected the area of Mattie Street between East Birch Avenue and Charles Avenue, but would not have connected to East Havens Avenue. TIDs have four kinds of classifications with the Department of Revenue — local, industrial, economic development and affordable housing. Previously, Sibson told the council he was concerned about the Mattie Street project, that if it included a local TID classification then it would be denied at the state level for tax reimbursement for the school district. In a local TID, projects usually benefit the local government instead of having a regional or statewide benefit, according to the Department of Revenue. Local TID projects are subject to a special levy protection for school districts by the county auditor. This means that even if a local TID is passed, it may result in additional levies on all property in the Mitchell School District, not just those properties within the TID boundaries. "This is not just about the city of Mitchell. This is statewide concerning how our property taxes are being impacted by things like this," Sibson told the council. A revenue department employee offered Sibson the opinion to refer TID No. 41 to a vote of the people, which Sibson told the council he would not do. Instead, Sibson is tackling the issue at the state level by addressing legislative committees directly. Sibson said he would take the issue to the South Dakota Government Operations and Audit Committee, which is made up of a mix of senators and representatives. "I just want to give the city council a heads up that if some things come up at the state level about this particular project, I don't want it to be me giving the city of Mitchell a black eye for doing something that's going on statewide," Sibson said.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wisconsin Senators mixed, but both pushing against, 'Big, Beautiful, Bill'
WASHINGTON, DC (WLAX/WEUX) – President Trump and Republicans call it the 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Wisconsin's Republican Senator Ron Johnson thinks it's a bit ugly. Johnson said, 'It just misses the moment. It's not even close to adequate.' Johnson says he thinks there are enough no votes in the Senate to slow down the process. He wants cuts in the bill to go deeper. He wants a return to pre-pandemic spending levels. Johnson explained, 'It don't talk about cuts. I'm talking about using the exact same expenditures that Clinton, Obama and Trump laid out. That's not cutting, that's just returning to a reasonable spending level.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the tax changes add to Federal Deficits by $3.8 trillion from 2026 through 2034. It also finds cuts of about $1 trillion to Medicaid and Food Stamps. Wisconsin's Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin said, 'I am here to speak on behalf of the nearly 14 million Americans whose healthcare is on the chopping block right now in this bill. Republicans are advancing a plan to take away care from working families, so that the super wealthy can get richer.' The GOP-led House passed the bill. The debate will now turn to the US Senate. President Trump has been quoted as saying, 'We'll see what happens… it has a ways to go.' Republicans can only lose 3 GOP votes in the Senate and still pass this bill. They'll tweak the House bill to find those votes. If they can pass that version of the bill, then the House would have to ratify the changes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
When the Status Quo Doesn't Cut It
This is an edition of the Books Briefing, our editors' weekly guide to the best in books. Sign up for it here. Why are so many Americans so eager to find alternatives—political, medical, vocational—to the status quo? By many measures, the 9-to-5 workplace, the medical industry, and other mainstays of American life seem to have served the country's population very well: The United States has the world's largest economy, and its population is far healthier and wealthier than it was before World War II. Yet in 2023, North Americans spent an average of $5,800 each on 'wellness' treatments whose efficacy has not always been backed by research. One in 13 Americans have participated in multilevel marketing, even though research has shown that 99 percent of them lose money in the process, and 30 percent supported a Cabinet position for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the leader of the movement to 'make America healthy again,' who has falsely claimed that vaccines cause autism. This state of affairs has animated several stories in The Atlantic's books section over the past two weeks, and all of them identify the same basic answer: The status quo is no longer working. First, here are four new stories from The Atlantic's books desk: A reality check for tech oligarchs The world that Wages for Housework wanted Five books that will redirect your attention 'I Remember': A poem by William H. McRaven As Adam M. Lowenstein wrote in his essay on Gardiner Harris's No More Tears, an exposé about the pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson's persistent efforts to downplay the risks of some of its products, evidence that the health-care system puts profits first may have 'left some people so disillusioned and distrustful that they were willing to try anything else.' Cases of pharmaceutical wrongdoing give a message like Kennedy's—that the medical industry is corrupt—an understandable appeal. This same message underlies the $6.3 trillion wellness industry, with its array of purported miracle cures. Sheila McClear, in an essay on Amy Larocca's new book, How to Be Well, wrote this week that 'Americans are exhausted from navigating a health-care system so costly and inconvenient that it has sent many of them scrambling for alternatives.' Those who can't find a therapist who takes insurance can instead buy a '$38 jar of adaptogenic 'dust' that claims to improve your mood,' for example, while the wealthy can enroll in boutique health services that make house calls. This deep distrust in American institutions—and the parade of disruptive entrepreneurs eager to take advantage of it—extends far beyond the medical arena. Last week, Lora Kelley wrote about Bridget Read's book Little Bosses Everywhere, a history of MLMs—companies that hire salespeople who earn commissions by signing up more salespeople. These businesses first proliferated during the Great Depression, and it felt like no coincidence to Kelley that they resurged online a few years ago during the 'Great Resignation,' when growing numbers of workers were laid off or quit out of frustration. Many modern MLMs, Kelley writes, 'promise what American jobs used to: security, freedom, dignity. Those promises have consistently failed to materialize. But the fact that so many are desperate to get in on the schemes each year is not a credit to the broader job market.' She summarizes Read's argument like so: 'MLMs are a toxin masquerading as a cure.' McClear, in her article, writes that the second Trump administration has opened the gates to medical skeptics. Casey Means, a wellness influencer, is the current nominee for surgeon general, and Kennedy now leads the Department of Health and Human Services. McClear notes that some of Kennedy's policy positions, such as curbs on microplastics, unhealthy foods, and unscrupulous pharmaceutical companies, could be productive reforms, and others, such as reducing access to vaccines and fluoride, feel like dubious solutions in search of a problem. It's not so hard to argue that the current state of the nation has left many people disappointed—in some cases, desperate for something that works. But this doesn't mean that any alternative is necessarily better. Some are proving to be demonstrably worse. The Perilous Spread of the Wellness Craze By Sheila McClear A new book reveals how health-care inequality fueled the spread of anti-science conspiracy theories. Read the full article. , by Denis Johnson Johnson's drama of the American frontier is barely a novel; the thin paperback can be started on a hot afternoon and finished by happy hour. Yet it has accrued a devoted following in the nearly 15 years since it was published, because it conjures a great expanse—the mythic West. Its main character, Robert Grainier, works as a contract laborer for the railroads running through Idaho and Washington State. Sweating and straining, he hauls down giant conifers in the region's old-growth forests. He feels a sweet freedom while riding over freshly laid rail, watching the wilderness blur by through a boxcar's slats. Train Dreams is not overly romantic about its time and place: In the first chapter, Grainier's boss orders him to throw a Chinese laborer off an unfinished bridge. A curse later seems to fall upon Grainier. He experiences God's cosmic vengeance, a cleansing fire racing across the dry landscape. Johnson has a cinematic style, lingering on images. But the novella barrels forward with the locomotion evoked in its title, until the end of Grainier's days, and the end of the Old West. Give it a few hours in June, and it may hold on to your imagination until August. — Ross Andersen From our list: The 2025 summer reading guide 📚 Atmosphere, by Taylor Jenkins Reid 📚 Baddest Man: The Making of Mike Tyson, by Mark Kriegel 📚 Charlottesville: An American Story, by Deborah Baker The Talented Mr. Vance By George Packer J. D. Vance poses a problem, and at its core is a question about character. In the years after the 2016 election, he transformed himself from a center-right memoirist and public speaker, offering a complex analysis of America's social ills and a sharp critique of Donald Trump, into a right-wing populist politician whose illiberal ideas and vitriolic rhetoric frequently out-Trump the original. According to Vance and his supporters, this change followed a realization during Trump's first term that the president was lifting up the fallen working class of the heartland that had produced young J. D. To help his people, Vance had to make his peace with their champion. According to his critics, Vance cynically chose to betray his true values in order to take the only path open to an ambitious Republican in the Trump era, and as a convert under suspicion, he pursued it with a vengeance. In one account, a poor boy from the provinces makes good in the metropole, turns against his glittering benefactors, and goes home to fight for his people. In the other, the poor boy seizes every opportunity on his way up, loses his moral compass, and is ruined by his own ambition. Read the full article. When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic. Sign up for The Wonder Reader, a Saturday newsletter in which our editors recommend stories to spark your curiosity and fill you with delight. Explore all of our newsletters. Article originally published at The Atlantic
