logo
US Grows Defense Partnership Next Door to China

US Grows Defense Partnership Next Door to China

Miami Herald3 hours ago

The United States has transferred a third coast guard ship to Vietnam, as the former foes expand their defense partnership amid China's growing threats in nearby disputed waters.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese defense and foreign ministries for comment by email.
In 1995, the U.S. and Vietnam-former adversaries during the Vietnam War, which ended in 1975-normalized diplomatic relations. Following Washington's lifting of an arms sales ban in 2016, Hanoi acquired military equipment from its new partner, including training aircraft.
The bilateral defense cooperation comes against the backdrop of tensions in the South China Sea, where overlapping sovereignty claims by countries such as Vietnam and China, as well as the strong presence of the Chinese coast guard, continue to heighten friction in the region.
The U.S. Mission to Vietnam announced on Wednesday that the former U.S. Coast Guard ship USCGC Mellon has been transferred to Vietnam as the high-endurance cutter CSB 8022. The ship arrived in Ninh Hoa, south-central Vietnam, the same day following a trans-Pacific voyage that began in Seattle, with stopovers in Hawaii and Guam.
The Vietnam Coast Guard received CSB 8020-formerly USCGC Morgenthau-in 2017 and CSB 8021-formerly USCGC John Midgett-in 2020. All three ships were transferred under a defense cooperation memorandum of understanding, according to the U.S. Mission.
"Through this cooperation, the United States and Vietnam is enhancing the development of maritime law enforcement, search and rescue, and humanitarian and disaster relief abilities, and supporting capacity to protect sovereignty," the U.S. Mission said in a statement.
The former U.S. Coast Guard vessels were built as Hamilton-class cutters designed for extended maritime operations, each weighing over 2,700 tons and having a range of 10,000 miles-the approximate straight-line distance between New York and Melbourne, Australia.
This class of cutter is capable of conducting a wide range of missions, including search and rescue, defense operations, and law enforcement. The Mellon was once armed with missiles, torpedoes, and sonar, but all were later removed, according to the U.S. Coast Guard.
The recent transfer of the coast guard ship comes as the U.S. and Vietnam celebrate the 30th anniversary of their diplomatic relations. However, an American aircraft carrier canceled its planned visit to Vietnam and transited toward the Middle East amid the Iran-Israel conflict.
U.S. Chargé d'Affaires in Vietnam Courtney Beale said in a statement on Wednesday: "The United States and Vietnam respect each other's sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political system, and remain firmly committed to supporting our shared vision of peace and stability, and of prosperity and security in the Indo-Pacific."
The U.S. Mission to Vietnam said on its website: "The United States and Vietnam are trusted partners with a friendship grounded in mutual respect that has developed since the normalization of diplomatic relations on July 11, 1995. U.S.-Vietnam relations have become increasingly cooperative and comprehensive, evolving into a flourishing partnership that spans political, economic, security, and people-to-people ties."
The U.S. is expected to continue its defense cooperation with countries in the South China Sea, including the Philippines, its mutual defense treaty ally. Whether Washington will provide additional military equipment to boost Vietnam's capabilities remains to be seen.
Related Articles
Iran Rules Out US Talks Unless Israel Halts StrikesHow to Watch Saudi Arabia vs United States: Live Stream CONCACAF Gold Cup, TV ChannelIran Threatens To Close Strait of Hormuz: What Would Happen?Former Spy Chief: 'Good Case' for US To Strike Iranian Nuclear Site
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foreign policy experts rip Tim Walz's claim that China has 'moral authority' in Middle East conflict
Foreign policy experts rip Tim Walz's claim that China has 'moral authority' in Middle East conflict

Fox News

time8 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Foreign policy experts rip Tim Walz's claim that China has 'moral authority' in Middle East conflict

Former vice presidential nominee Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., is facing criticism after claiming China could be the voice of "moral authority" in the Israel-Iran conflict. During a "What's Next: Conversations on the Path Forward" event hosted by the Center for American Progress (CAP) last week, Walz responded to a question from former Biden White House advisor, Neera Tanden, about the "escalatory" nature of the strikes between the two countries. "Now, who is the voice in the world that can negotiate some type of agreement in this? Who holds the moral authority? Who holds the ability to do that? Because we are not seen as a neutral actor, and we maybe never were," Walz said of the United States' role in deescalating tensions in the Middle East. As the United States weighs striking Iran and war in the Middle East rages on, Danielle Pletka, a distinguished senior fellow in Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute (AEI), told Fox News Digital that Walz's comments are "ignorance on display." According to Walz, the United States once attempted "to be somewhat of the arbitrator" in the Middle East, but Americans must face the reality that the "neutral actor" with the "moral authority" to lead negotiations in the Middle East "might be the Chinese." Walz didn't elaborate on why China would be that world leader. "It's so staggering to me that Tim Walz was within a heartbeat of the presidency," Pletka said, before adding, "We don't need a neutral player here," and urging him to "stick to local politics." Andy Keiser, senior fellow at the conservative National Security Institute and former senior advisor on the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News Digital that someone should "remind Governor Walz that China is far from a moral authority on much of anything," and said China is committing "cultural genocide." "The Chinese government has reportedly arbitrarily detained more than a million Muslims in reeducation camps since 2017," according to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). "Most of the people who have been detained are Uyghur, a predominantly Turkic-speaking ethnic group primarily in China's northwestern region of Xinjiang." In addition to the detentions, "Uyghurs in the region have been subjected to intense surveillance, forced labor, and involuntary sterilizations, among other rights abuses," according to the CFR. According to Human Rights Watch, President Xi Jinping has "detained human rights defenders, tightened control over civil society, media, and the internet, and deployed invasive mass surveillance technology" in Xinjiang and Tibet, which the human rights watchdog likened to "crimes against humanity." "I would strongly beg to differ that China has a moral authority on much in the world," Keiser said, and added, "I would not see them as a neutral arbiter here." "Obviously, we are not going to be a neutral broker between a terrorist and a democratic state," Pletka said. "That's just not how it works. You threatened to kill the President of the United States, but we're then meant to think of you in a balanced way with the state of Israel, our most important ally in the Middle East?" Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Fox News' Bret Baier on Monday that President Donald Trump remains a target of the Iranians. "They want to kill him. He's enemy No. 1." "I don't know how anybody could have said what [Walz] said about the role that China plays. The idea that there is some neutral interlocutor in this world, that anybody is an 'honest burger' is nothing other than grad school silliness," Pletka said. Pletka added that "Of course, China can't play that role. China is an authoritarian communist [state] that is supporting Russia in its war on Ukraine, that is threatening Taiwan, that has broken its word over Hong Kong." And she said, "This is not a playground in which you need somebody who can talk to both Bobby and Billy about why it is you don't smack your friends." "The idea that it should be reduced to something where you have an arbiter who sees the arguments on both sides, no. This is a situation where there's a right and a wrong, and there's a winner and a loser. That's how it should be, by the way, because Iran has fashioned itself as an enemy, not just to the state of Israel, but to the United States." Nikki Haley – former U.S. Ambassador to Israel and a 2024 GOP presidential candidate, who sounded off on China's threat to the United States on the campaign trail – was quick to criticize Walz's viral comments last week. "This is absolute insanity. Democrats think that we need the Chinese to be the negotiators between Iran's nuclear production and Israel…God bless Tim Walz. Totally tone deaf," Haley posted on X.

Republican Defends Potential Sale of Million Acres of Public Land
Republican Defends Potential Sale of Million Acres of Public Land

Newsweek

time32 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Republican Defends Potential Sale of Million Acres of Public Land

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Senator Mike Lee has defended his push to include the potential sale of public lands in the party's budget reconciliation bill, arguing that criticism of the idea is misplaced and that the provision is necessary to address the country's housing crisis. Speaking with conservative podcast host Glenn Beck on Thursday, Lee responded to what he called "falsehoods being circulated by the Left," and said that objections to his proposal failed to grasp its parameters. "When this bill puts land in the category of eligibility for sale, it doesn't mean for sale," Lee said. "It just means there's a process by which it could be transferred." Newsweek reached out to Lee's office for comment. Why It Matters The plan, which some estimate could put hundreds of millions of acres of public land up for auction, has sparked intense backlash from environmentalist groups and other advocates for the conservation of America's wilderness. Criticism has also come from lawmakers, including from members of Lee's own party, which has already been grappling with internal divisions over other elements of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill." What To Know Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has long advocated for making public land under federal stewardship available for housing projects, introducing a bill on the issue in 2022. He announced his plans to incorporate the provision into the GOP's tax bill last week. Senator Mike Lee speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee markup in Washington, D.C., on June 5, 2025. Senator Mike Lee speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee markup in Washington, D.C., on June 5, 2025. Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images According to an updated draft released by his committee, this would direct the secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to "select for disposal" between 0.5 and 0.75 percent of land currently held by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management across 11 eligible states, equivalent to between two and three million acres. However, analysis by The Wilderness Society found that more than 250 million acres could be at risk, including 18.7 million acres in Lee's home state of Utah. Lee has called the map released by the group "flat out misleading." Newsweek reached out to the Wilderness Society via email for comment. A fact sheet released by Lee's committee last week said that selling off government-owned land would "increase the supply of housing and decrease housing costs for millions of American families," but the proposal has faced intense pushback from environmental groups. A letter, drafted by Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and signed by nearly 150 similar organizations, was sent to members of the Senate this week, urging them to oppose the budget reconciliation bill if this provision remains in place. "We strongly oppose any attempts to recklessly sell public lands through legislative shortcuts like budget reconciliation, which bypass public input, environmental review, and accountability," the letter read. "Doing so threatens public access, undermines responsible land management, puts environmental values, cultural resources, and endangered species at risk along with clean drinking water for 60 million Americans and betrays the public's trust Jeff Crane, president and CEO of the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, told Newsweek that, "for millions of sportsmen and women, federal public lands provide unmatched access for our hunting, fishing, trapping, and recreational shooting traditions." "This network of lands that belong to all of us is a key component to what makes America unique," Crane said. Some Republicans, too, have come out in opposition. A spokesperson for Montana Representative Ryan Zinke, who helped successfully remove a similar but more limited proposal from the House version of the tax bill last month, told The New York Times that he remains "a hard no on any bill that includes the large-scale sale of public lands." What People Are Saying Utah Senator Mike Lee, Thursday on The Glenn Beck Program: "The federal government owns 640 million acres of land, nearly a third of all land in the United States. The vast majority of that land has zero recreational value. Disposing of a fraction of 1 percent of that, so that the next generation can afford a home, is a common-sense solution to a national problem." In an article for Deseret News last year, Lee wrote: "The federal government's stranglehold on the West means our communities can't fully benefit from the lands surrounding them. The inability to access these lands or collect property taxes stifles local economies and strains public services." The Wilderness Society, in a statement: "The bill directs what is likely the largest single sale of national public lands in modern history to help cut taxes for the richest people in the country. It trades ordinary Americans' access to outdoor recreation for a short-term payoff that disproportionately benefits the privileged and well-connected." Jeff Crane, president and CEO of the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, told Newsweek: "While we are not opposed to the sale of public lands in principle, we do not support the sale of lands through budget reconciliation as there are existing processes in place that we need to leverage to address challenges facing local communities. Without allowing time to properly identify and vet lands set for disposal, critical access for sportsmen and women may be lost." Travis Hammill, DC director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, in a statement: "Senator Lee's never-ending attacks on public lands continue. His hostility stands in stark contrast with Americans' deep and abiding love of public lands. Senator Lee's plan puts Utah's redrock country in the crosshairs of unchecked development." "Utah and the West, public lands are the envy of the country – but Senator Lee is willing to sacrifice the places where people recreate, where they hunt and fish, and where they make a living – to pay for tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy," he added. "The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, our members, and our partners will work to defeat this Bill." What Happens Next Lee told Beck he believed there was a "very good chance" of the provision being included in the tax bill, which he said the Senate will be considering "as early as next week." The reconciliation narrowly made it through the House last month. With growing public opposition and a handful of dissenting members within the GOP, the One Big Beautiful Act is on a similarly rocky path before it can move to Trump's desk.

Japan hosts coast guard drills with US and Philippines as sea tensions rise

time36 minutes ago

Japan hosts coast guard drills with US and Philippines as sea tensions rise

TOKYO -- Japan's coast guard on Friday held a joint exercise with counterparts from the United States and the Philippines, as the three Pacific nations beef up defense cooperation in the face of China's expanding maritime activities. The exercise came after Japan confirmed that two Chinese aircraft carriers had operated together for the first time in the Pacific in June. Japan and China had blamed each other after Tokyo complained that a Chinese fighter jet from one of the carriers flew dangerously close to Japanese reconnaissance aircraft. Friday's coast guard exercise just off Japan's southern prefecture of Kagoshima involved 350 personnel from the three countries, and was based on a scenario of a collision between vessels at high seas, a fire and crew members falling overboard. , as they expressed concern over Beijing's military maneuvers in the region. Their first joint drills were held in the Philippines in 2023. The coast guard cooperation is part of an effort to secure a 'free and open' Indo-Pacific by promoting mutual understanding and trust, Japan coast guard commander Adm. Yoshio Seguchi told a news conference Wednesday. China routinely sends coast guard vessels, warships and warplanes around disputed East China Sea islands, and recently as far as Guam, a U.S. Pacific territory with military bases. Beijing also sends coast guard vessels in the South China Sea, which it claims virtually in its entirety, clashing frequently with Philippine vessels.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store