
Elon Musk's X sees partial recovery after outage hits US users, Downdetector shows
A 3D-printed miniature model of Elon Musk and the X logo are seen in this illustration taken January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
(Reuters) -Social media platform X showed signs of recovery on Saturday after an outage disrupted access for thousands of users in the United States, according to outage tracking website Downdetector.com.
Reports of disruptions had dropped to around 1,041 by 7:42 p.m. ET, down from a peak of more than 10,000, according to Downdetector, which tracks outages by collating status reports from various sources.
Downdetector's numbers are based on user-submitted reports. The actual number of affected users may vary.
In May, Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to back U.S. President Donald Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans last year, said he'll resume working '24/7' at his companies.
"Back to spending 24/7 at work and sleeping in conference/server/factory rooms. I must be super focused on X/xAI and Tesla (plus Starship launch next week), as we have critical technologies rolling out," Musk had said in an X post.
"As evidenced by the X uptime issues this week, major operational improvements need to be made," he added.
Earlier in March, Musk had blamed a cyberattack after a similar outage at X.
X did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
(Reporting by Surbhi Misra in Bengaluru; Editing by Richard Chang and Nick Zieminski)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Contradictheory: A buffet of personal data up for grabs?
It must have been about 25 years ago when I attended a talk about the power of integrating databases, and back then we were lucky governments hadn't quite figured it out yet. But obviously all that has changed now. The speaker was from Canada, and he illustrated the concept with an example: On one hand, the government struggled to catch welfare recipients who were quietly nipping across the border to work in the United States. On the other hand, it would have been trivially easy to catch them if someone just thought to cross-reference the welfare database with weekday border crossing records. The technology wasn't the issue. The stumbling block was getting different government departments to cooperate. But while this was an opportunity begging to be taken, the speaker also highlighted the potential dangers: The power inherent in data sharing, when coupled with the reach and authority of national governments, could lend itself to a wide scope of abuses. Which is precisely what is happening in the United States at the moment. Reports indicate that Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has equipped agents with 'backpacks full of laptops, each with access to different agency systems... to combine databases currently maintained separately by multiple federal agencies'. Why are they doing this? Because DOGE wants to collate immigration data and cross-reference it with tax records, welfare claims, and even state voting records. According to critics, they allegedly want to target immigrants not just for tracking, but possibly for persuasion, prosecution, and persecution. Civil liberties groups are sounding the alarm, pointing out that this level of cross-agency integration is ripe for abuse. Truth is, this isn't something new or foreign for Malaysia. Back in 2018, politician Rafizi Ramli openly discussed how his startup, Invoke, was leveraging big data to support the then Opposition candidates. Using electoral roll data, phone polls, and surveys, they constructed detailed voter profiles based on age, postcode, gender, race, and religion to create a 'microtargeting' strategy to identify and win over swing voters with a 40%-60% chance of flipping. Fast-forward to today, and the government's interest in big data is no secret. From the MyDigital Blueprint to the freshly minted Data Sharing Act 2025, the rhetoric is all about 'digital transformation' and 'evidence-based policymaking'. Then in April, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) told telcos to hand over mobile network usage data, down to your call records, IP connections, and yes, your location coordinates. Failure to comply could result in a fine of RM20,000 or up to six months in official line is that this is for the 'generation of official statistics to support evidence-based policymaking' in the ICT and tourism sector. (Specifically, to identify the number of mobile broadband subscriptions, and to track the number of visitors and 'domestic tourist trips'.) The government assures us that all data handed over is anonymised and contains no personally identifiable information. But I've learned to be sceptical following alleged breaches that reportedly had data from millions of Malaysians in government databases being sold online. Now we are to trust the authorities when they say they want the data for policymaking? It's a bit of an overkill, like queuing up for an hour for a free plate of nasi kandar. (Which I have done before.) But why settle for a plate when you could have the whole buffet of personal information data? A tech news website said what many of us might be thinking: 'What just happened doesn't feel like planning. It feels like surveillance.' Local technologist and computer scientist Dinesh Nair was more colourful, labelling MCMC's explanation as (if I may paraphrase) horse excrement, noting that location data coupled with the time could be used to positively identify individuals. This isn't theory. We've known for decades how it's possible to do 'data re-identification'. In 1997, MIT computer scientist Latanya Sweeney famously cross-referenced public voter records with anonymised health data to identify then-governor of Massa-chusetts, Bill Weld. She even mailed him his own medical records as proof. And a few years later, I was reviewing drafts of what would eventually become Malaysia's Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA). While the PDPA was a good step forward in defining personal data rights – like requiring consent and allowing individuals to revoke it – it had one gaping hole: it doesn't apply to government entities. Section 3(1) of the Act explicitly exempts federal and state bodies. I was told at the time that government departments handled so much data, it would bog them down in red tape to comply. That was the official line. I suspect the unofficial thinking has evolved into: 'Why would we give up control of such a rich treasure trove?' Fixing this isn't hard. Step one: remove the PDPA exemption for government agencies. Just cross out a paragraph. Step two: appoint an independent oversight body where people can lodge complaints if their rights are violated. The latter's nearly in place, given that the current government has promised an Ombudsman Bill this year that could serve this very function. At the very least, amending the Act would allow us to point to a breach and say, 'That's illegal', instead of shrugging and saying, 'Well, it's the government. What can you do?' Because we were warned. We just didn't listen. In his fortnightly column Contradictheory, mathematician-turned-scriptwriter Dzof Azmi explores the theory that logic is the antithesis of emotion but people need both to make sense of life's vagaries and contradictions. Write to Dzof at lifestyle@ The views expressed here are entirely the writer's own.


The Sun
14 hours ago
- The Sun
PSG inspired by Los Angeles as it sets out to build new stadium
PARIS St Germain is drawing inspiration from the success of new state-of-the-art venues in Los Angeles as the Champions League title winners begin the process of building a new stadium for the team, CEO Victoriano Melero said. PSG has outgrown the 48,000-capacity Parc des Princes, and team officials will spend a year studying potential sites in Massy and Poissy with an eye toward offering a variety of entertainment options, Melero said. 'The next challenge is a new stadium,' Melero told Reuters in Los Angeles ahead of PSG's Club World Cup match on Sunday in Pasadena. 'For one year we're going to go into an analysis and make a choice for our future, and we're inspired by what is going on in the U.S. with sports facilities,' he said. 'One example here is SoFi Stadium. It's incredible and much more than a sports facility - it really is part of entertainment and shows. So that is what we really want to push to diversify our revenue.' SoFi Stadium, a technological marvel that opened in 2020, is home to the NFL's Rams and Chargers and has hosted concerts by artists like Taylor Swift and Beyonce. It will play a key role in next summer's World Cup and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. The $5 billion stadium is located in Hollywood Park, a growing commercial and residential area. The 70,000-capacity indoor-outdoor stadium sits next to Intuit Dome, the high-tech NBA arena that opened last year. PSG is looking at Massy, south of Paris, and Poissy, west of the French capital, as potential sites for a new stadium. The team will play Parc des Princes for the foreseeable future while the new stadium is built. U.S. fans and investors have played a vital role in the stunning success of the club both on and off the field, said Adrien Frier, the French consul-general in Los Angeles. 'Paris St Germain is what you would call in the tech sector a unicorn, and it's a unicorn that has some American blood in it,' he said at a reception honoring the team in Beverly Hills, where the Champions League trophy was on display. PSG has an estimated five million fans in the U.S. and has benefited from its high-profile partnership with Nike's iconic Air Jordan brand. U.S.-based Arctos Partners holds 12.5% of the shares of the team, with majority owner Qatar Sports Investments owning the remaining 87.5% for a club that is valued at $4.4 billion. Melero said the team's ambitions are only growing. 'We wrote the story of the club with that cup,' he said, gesturing toward the gleaming trophy. 'And right now the next move is to write the story of football with this very young team.'


The Star
14 hours ago
- The Star
Japan's Ishiba heads to G7 to press Trump to drop auto tariffs
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump holds a joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in the East Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., February 7, 2025. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura/File Photo TOKYO (Reuters) -Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba heads to Canada on Sunday for trade talks with U.S. President Donald Trump, hoping to persuade him to drop trade tariffs that have imperilled Japan's auto companies and threaten to undermine his fragile government. The two are expected to meet on the sidelines of a summit of the Group of Seven nations in Kananaskis, Alberta, for their second in-person encounter. It follows a sixth round of high-level trade talks in Washington on Friday. Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said he explored the possibility of an deal in detailed meetings with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The trick for Ishiba, who spoke with Trump by phone on Friday, will be to get the president to drop the 25% tariff he imposed on Japanese cars, as well as a paused 24% across-the-board levy that Trump calls a reciprocal tariff, without making concessions that could hurt the prime minister's public support at home. Returning to Tokyo with no deal would be better politically than conceding too much, analysts say. "If it goes badly, it could even be seen as a positive for Ishiba, standing up to Trump and standing up for his country when he's under assault," said Michael Cucek, a political science professor at Temple University in Tokyo. Ishiba and his ruling Liberal Democratic Party face an upper house election next month that comes after a lower house loss in November that left him reliant on the support of other parties to stay in power. Another poor electoral result could bring down his government and would force Trump to reset trade talks with a new Japanese administration. "The most important thing is that Ishiba does not cave in for a bad (auto) deal," said Joseph Kraft, a financial political analyst at Rorschach Advisory in Tokyo. "I expect there will be some kind of deal, although it could be haphazard. Trump needs some good news and I don't think he has much interest in G7 activities." Failing to reach an agreement in Canada might not have an immediate economic impact on Japan, but tariffs that stay in place will eventually drag down growth, said Asuka Tatebayashi, senior analyst at Mizuho Bank. "If you look at the data for car exports to the U.S. for April, it was quite striking. The volume in dollars was down by nearly 5%, but the number of cars has increased a lot," she said. "It means either they are only selling cheap cars or the manufacturers are absorbing the cost. I think the latter is the case and this is not very sustainable." Tariffs could shave 0.9% off Japan's gross domestic product, Mizuho Research & Technologies estimated in a report in April. (Reporting by Tim Kelly; Additional reporting by John Geddie; Editing by William Mallard)