Cartel Suspicion: Hotel Industry Practices Inviting Distrust
The Japan Fair Trade Commission has issued warnings to 15 operators of hotels in Tokyo, urging them to prevent a recurrence of the practice of exchanging information on such matters as room rates, saying it could possibly constitute an 'unreasonable restraint of trade,' violating the Antimonopoly Law.
Companies that were the target of the warnings included the operators of well-known hotels such as the Imperial Hotel, Tokyo and The Okura Tokyo. Representatives from each company reportedly held monthly meetings to exchange internal information such as room occupancy rates, average prices, reservations and pricing plans.
The commission ultimately concluded that it could not confirm any price gouging practices, but it said some hotels explained during the investigation that they had used information from other companies as a reference for setting room rates.
Such information exchange within the hotel industry could be construed by consumers as contributing to the rise in accommodation prices. This practice is said to have been going on for decades. The companies should take the JFTC's warning seriously.
It must be said that the underlying issue is the collusive nature of the hotel industry. When deciding rates and services, it is said to be important to accurately predict demand. Similar meetings have reportedly been held among business hotels and hotels in regional areas as well.
The commission has also issued requests to business associations to which those hotels belong, asking them to tell their members to be compliant with laws. It is important for the industry as a whole to strive to improve its behavior.
Exchanging information between companies is not always problematic. Exchanging information on market trends and customer preferences to improve services is likely important.
However, when information exchange between companies leads to price fixing, it can constitute a cartel. In such cases, consumers are forced to pay higher prices than the level set by price competition.
Hotel room rates have been rising steadily. According to a private research firm, the average price of a room last year was ¥16,289, and there is data showing that it has increased by 40% from the level immediately before the COVID-19 pandemic.
While there are inevitable factors such as rising labor and utility costs, many people still feel that accommodation prices are too high. It is important to avoid giving the impression that prices are being tacitly adjusted within the industry.
In the industry, an increasing number of hotels are using artificial intelligence to predict future demand and set accommodation prices. It is hoped that the industry will move away from obsolete business practices and strive for fairly improving services.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 10, 2025)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
5 hours ago
- Japan Today
U.S. home sales rise in July as mortgage rates ease a bit and home prices grew more slowly
FILE - Homes and properties are shown in San Francisco on Friday, July 18, 2025. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File) By ALEX VEIGA Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes rose in July as homebuyers were encouraged by a modest pullback in mortgage rates, slowing home price growth and the most properties on the market in over five years. Existing home sales rose 2% last month from June to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.01 million units, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday. Sales edged up 0.8% compared with July last year. The latest sales figure topped the 3.92 million pace economists were expecting, according to FactSet. Home prices rose on an annual basis for the 25th consecutive month, although the rate of growth continued to slow. The national median sales price inched up just 0.2% in July from a year earlier to $422,400. That was the smallest annual increase since June 2023. Even so, the median home sales price last month is the highest for any previous July, based on data going back to 1999. 'The ever-so-slight improvement in housing affordability is inching up home sales,' said Lawrence Yun, NAR's chief economist. 'Wage growth is now comfortably outpacing home price growth, and buyers have more choices.' The U.S. housing market has been in a sales slump since 2022, when mortgage rates began climbing from historic lows. Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes sank last year to their lowest level in nearly 30 years. This year's spring homebuying season, which is traditionally the busiest period of the year for the housing market, was a bust as stubbornly high mortgage rates put off many prospective homebuyers. Affordability remains a dauting challenge for most aspiring homeowners following years of skyrocketing home prices. First-time homebuyers, who don't have home equity gains to put toward a new home purchase, accounted for 28% of homes sales last month, down from 30% in June, NAR said. Historically, they made up 40% of home sales. The average rate on a 30-year mortgage has remained elevated this year, although last week it dropped to a 10-month low of 6.58%. Homes purchased last month likely went under contract in May and June, when the average rate ranged from 6.76% to 6.89%. Mortgage rates eased in July, dropping briefly to 6.67%. As home sales have slowed, the number of unsold homes on the market has been rising. There were 1.55 million unsold homes at the end of last month, up 0.6% from June and 15.7% from July last year, NAR said. That's the most homes on the market since May 2020, early on in the COVID-19 pandemic. Still, the inventory remains well below the roughly 2 million homes for sale that was typical before the pandemic. July's month-end inventory translates to a 4.6-month supply at the current sales pace, down from a 4.7-month supply at the end of June and up from 4 months in July last year. Traditionally, a 5- to 6-month supply is considered a balanced market between buyers and sellers. Homes are also taking longer to sell. Properties typically remained on the market for 28 days last month before selling, up from 24 days in July last year, NAR said. Home shoppers who can afford to buy at current mortgage rates or pay in cash are likely to benefit from the slower growth in prices and increased supply of properties on the market. It's not uncommon now for sellers, especially those in Southern and Western markets, to lower their asking price and offer incentives such as money for closing costs or repairs in order to sweeten the deal, real estate agents say. In July, some 20.6% of homes listed for sale had their price reduced, according to That's down slightly from June. 'One can say that things are a little better today as a buyer, compared to say just a couple of years ago,' Yun said. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
The Mainichi
19 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Japan's FY 2026 budget request guidelines raise concerns over unchecked expansion
The Japanese government has set its fiscal 2026 budgetary request guidelines, which will serve as the rules for ministries and agencies when submitting their requests toward the compilation of the budget at the end of the year. The objective of the guidelines is to impose certain limits to prevent the expansion of expenditure. However, this framework has been increasingly hollowed out in recent years. This time, the conditions for increasing the budget requests for prioritized policies have been relaxed. This raises concerns that expansion of the budget may go unchecked, further exacerbating making Japan's debt-laden fiscal situation. Previously, if a ministry or agency reduced its discretionary expenses by 10%, it was permitted to request a budget up to three times that amount. Now, even without reducing expenses, they can increase their requests by 20% from the fiscal 2025 budget. The reason cited is the difficulty in cutting costs due to recent rising prices. However, without a mechanism to restrain expenditure, the task of reviewing ineffective projects may be neglected. It is precisely now, when the fiscal situation is becoming more severe, that this mechanism should be utilized. Another concern is the continued broad acceptance of "item requests" without specified budget amounts. Without a monetary cap, this effectively becomes "no limit." Initially, this was an exceptional measure to respond to unforeseen circumstances, but since the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been frequently used. It seems to have transformed into a means to secure large budgets. No overall cap on requests was established either. This approach has been continued since the era of "Abenomics," the economic policy mix of the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, which centered on expansionary fiscal policy. Total budget requests for fiscal 2025 exceeded 117 trillion yen (around $794 billion), marking a record high. There is a possibility that this figure will further swell this time. Competition between the ruling and opposition parties to lavishly spend under the pretext of countering rising prices cannot be overlooked. They have agreed on implementing a gasoline tax reduction worth around 1 trillion yen (approx. $6.78 billion). Additionally, the ruling coalition is considering cash handouts, while opposition parties are calling for a reduction in the consumption tax. There are voices relying on increased tax revenue from high-performing companies as a source of funding, but this is susceptible to economic fluctuations. Under a minority government, the ruling bloc cannot pass the budget bill without the cooperation of the opposition. It is anticipated that the scale of the budget may increase further by accommodating the demands of the opposition. Amid concerns over fiscal stability, government bonds were sold, leading to interest rates recently reaching their highest levels in 17 years. The repayment burden on the national and local governments, which are saddled with debts exceeding 1.3 quadrillion yen (about $8.82 trillion), could become heavier. If future generations are burdened with enormous debts, it will be challenging to navigate the super-aged society where social security costs are escalating. It is the responsibility of politics to present a path for financial reconstruction.
The Diplomat
a day ago
- The Diplomat
Indonesia High-speed Rail Project a Financial ‘Time Bomb,' Official Says
While passenger numbers are up so far in 2025, the $7.3 billion 'Whoosh' project remains far short of profitability. The newly appointed head of Indonesia's state railway operator says that the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway project faces mounting financial strain that constitutes a potential 'time bomb.' The $7.3 billion rail line, which links the capital Jakarta to the city of Bandung in West Java, began operations in October 2023. With a maximum speed of 350 kilometers per hour, the train has cut travel time between the two cities from three hours to around 40 minutes. However, the railway – its official name is 'Whoosh' – has also created a heavy debt burden for the Indonesian government due to cost overruns and construction delays. Speaking at a parliamentary hearing with Commission VI on Wednesday, Bobby Rasyidin, the CEO of the railway operator PT Kereta Api Indonesia (KAI), acknowledged that he had only recently discovered the extent of financial and operational problems facing KAI and PT Kereta Cepat Indonesia China (KCIC), the Chinese-Indonesian joint venture that has spearheaded the railway project since its inception in 2015. 'We are confident that within a week, we can fully understand the challenges inside KAI,' he told legislators, as per the Jakarta Post. 'We are also studying KCIC's issues, which, as has been said, indeed resemble a time bomb.' Bobby was appointed as CEO of KAI on August 12, replacing Didiek Hartantyo, as part of a broader board reshuffle at the railway operator. The Whoosh project has been enveloped in debt controversies since its inception. The price of the project was initially estimated at $6 billion, but this blew out as the project experienced a series of delays and cost overruns, mostly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and complications involving land acquisition along the proposed line. In February 2023, the Indonesian and Chinese governments agreed on a final cost overrun of 18 trillion rupiah (around $1.2 billion). Of the initial construction cost, 75 percent was contributed by a $4.5 billion loan from the China Development Bank, while the remaining 25 percent was contributed by KCIC. A further loan has since been taken out to cover the cost overrun, at a higher annual interest rate of 3.4 percent, compared to 2 percent for the initial loan. While the rail line recorded 2.9 million passengers in the first half of this year, a 10 percent increase on the same period in 2024, revenues have yet to catch up with the significant cost of operating the train line and servicing the existing loans. As the Jakarta Post explains, KAI has borne the brunt of the financial stress, given that it holds the largest stake (more than 58 percent) of the four Indonesian state-owned firms that make up Pilar Sinergi BUMN Indonesia (PSBI). This local consortium controls 60 percent of KCIC, with the remaining 40 percent held by a consortium of five Chinese state-owned companies. According to the Post, KCIC reported a Rp 1.6 trillion ($98.3 million) loss in the first half of 2025, of which KAI has been forced to shoulder Rp 951.48 billion ($58.4 million). This marks an improvement on 2024, when PSBI's total losses amounted to Rp 4.2 trillion ($258 million), of which KAI was forced to absorb Rp 2.23 trillion ($137 million). While these figures are moving in the right direction, Jakarta has already announced its intention to renegotiate more advantageous terms in order to relieve the pressure on the bottom line of KAI and other state-run enterprises. Earlier this month, Indonesia's new sovereign fund Danantara announced that it was working on a debt restructuring plan for the China-backed project. As I noted at the time, the project's symbolic importance in the relations between China and Indonesia 'ensures that Indonesia will be able to negotiate a debt restructuring of some kind, but also probably imposes limits on how hard it can afford to push.' Whatever arrangement is reached by Jakarta and Beijing, Whoosh's debt trouble highlights the inherent risks involved in infrastructure megaprojects of this kind. According to one recent article, cost overruns have made the rail project the most expensive infrastructure project undertaken under the aegis of China's Belt and Road Initiative. While academic researchers have convincingly debunked the meme of Chinese 'debt-trap diplomacy,' particularly the idea that Beijing purposefully seeks to mire partner countries in debt so that it can extract strategic assets in return for debt relief, this is a reminder that debt still carries considerable fiscal risks.
