logo
Having a bawl: why Avatar 3 will reduce you to a sobbing husk (just ask James Cameron's wife)

Having a bawl: why Avatar 3 will reduce you to a sobbing husk (just ask James Cameron's wife)

The Guardian11-03-2025

Can you feel it? If you're paying enough attention, and you have your spirit tuned to the frequencies of the planet, then you'll be able to sense that the old Avatar machinery is starting to crank up again. The third instalment of the series, Avatar: Fire and Ash, is set for release in December. And this means that James Cameron finds himself saddled with a familiar task; in just nine months he has to try and motivate people to see a film from a franchise that they've already forgotten about twice before now.
The bad news is that these are incredibly expensive films to make. So expensive, in fact, that Cameron previously stated that the second film needed to be the third highest grossing movie of all time just to break even. And, just to compound things, that film was such an incomprehensible mishmash of confused mythology, nondescript motivation and vague characterisation that this one needs to be something really special to get bums on seats.
But the better news is that James Cameron has been here before. He knows exactly how to get people excited for Avatar movies now, and by God he's going to pull out the big guns. So, how is Cameron going to make you want to watch Avatar: Fire and Ash? Simple, by promising you a sustained emotional breakdown.
So far, one of the only people to have watched Fire and Ash in its entirety is Cameron's wife Suzy Amis Cameron. According to an interview in Empire, Suzy watched the film just before Christmas. There is a chance she might not yet be over it.
'My wife watched the whole thing from end to end. She had kept herself away from it and I wasn't showing her bits and pieces as we went along. This was 22 December,' Cameron said. 'She bawled for four hours. She kept trying to get her shit back together so she could tell me specific reactions, and then she'd just tear up and start crying again. Finally, I'm like, 'Honey, I've got to go to bed. Sorry, we'll talk about it some other time.''
Now, Fire and Ash is thought to be a long film – Cameron has already said it will be longer than Avatar 2, which had a three hours and 12 minutes runtime – but even so, a four-hour bawling fit seems excessive. This is a film that will make you cry so hard and for so long that even James Cameron will eventually get bored. That's really saying something.
Let's do the maths here. If Suzy Amis Cameron's reaction is any indication then, come December, you're going to have to put aside seven-and-a-half hours aside to experience Avatar: Fire and Ash; three-and-a-half to watch it and then another four to lie on the floor weeping and wailing as you process what you just saw. That's a big chunk of time. It means that realistically you can only watch a matinee performance, or else you risk losing a full night's sleep to sobbing uncontrollably about the fate of some blue smurf thing whose name you will never be able to remember. Surely that will affect box office grosses.
But let's look at this as an opportunity. If Fire and Ash is really as emotionally pulverising as Cameron makes out, then the marketing possibilities are endless. Perhaps audiences could be handed a sachet of rehydration salts with their tickets, or maybe fleets of therapists could be waiting in the lobby to soothe the exploded nervous systems of everyone who sees it.
Also, it's worth pointing out that the third Avatar film isn't even going to be the most hysterically brutal Avatar film of the series. No, that honour goes to the fourth instalment. In 2022, Cameron revealed that, while studio executives sent him three pages of notes after reading the script for Avatar 2, and just one for Avatar 3, the sum total of the response to the fourth film's script was an email reading 'Holy fuck'.
Now, bear in mind that Avatar 3 managed to ruin Suzy Amis Cameron for four hours, with the implication being that the same will happen to you. What on earth is going to happen after the fourth film? Will you bawl for five hours? Six? Will your hair spontaneously burst into flames? Will your heart explode inside your ribcage and kill you instantly? Better start pre-booking your ambulances for December 2029.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netflix fans keep watching 'amazing new take on a classic' despite low rating
Netflix fans keep watching 'amazing new take on a classic' despite low rating

Daily Record

time2 days ago

  • Daily Record

Netflix fans keep watching 'amazing new take on a classic' despite low rating

Fans have been singing its praises despite initial reviews Netflix viewers can't stop watching a 'must see film' that offers a fresh spin on a classic tale. The 2018 release, Robin Hood, has surprisingly become one of the most viewed titles on the platform, despite a meagre 14% rating. ‌ At the time of writing, it currently sits in second place in the top ten films most watched by subscribers in the UK. It's sandwiched between recent releases Tyler Perry's Straw in the top spot and French action thriller K.O. in third. ‌ Robin Hood is a radical reinterpretation of the timeless story of the outlaw who robbed from the rich to give to the poor. In this version, Taron Egerton, known for his roles in Kingsman, Rocketman and Carry-On, portrays Lord Robin of Loxley. He seeks revenge after returning from the Third Crusade to discover that the corrupt Sheriff of Nottingham, played by Rogue One's Ben Mendelsohn, has declared him dead and seized all his property, reports Surrey Live. According to Empire's review of the film, Robin's journey mirrors that of Bruce Wayne becoming Batman. Egerton's rendition of the character even starts being referred to as 'The Hood'. He is trained by Jamie Foxx's character Yahya or John. Meanwhile, Robin also attempts to win back his girlfriend Marian, played by Eve Hewson, who later starred in Netflix's The Perfect Couple. Marian is now with another man, Will Scarlet, portrayed by Jamie Dornan, who is actually a member of the Merry Men in the original tales. ‌ Despite the somewhat tepid critical reception of the film, Netflix audiences have found reasons to be entertained. One admirer took to the internet to express their thoughts, stating: "This is a must see movie. Its a new take and twist of the classic tale of Robin Hood and breathes life into the legend once again. It might not be the most historically accurate remake of the tale but that is part of its charm." They pressed on, saying: "Solid stunts and despite all the hate the movie has endured none can question the hard work and love the whole cast and crew put into it. Their extraordinary archery skills are way beyond just CGI. In fact they were trained by famous archer Lars Anderson and can more than handle themselves around a bow and arrow." ‌ Another enthusiast commented: "I thought this film was incredible. An amazing new take on a classic. The immense number of Robin Hood films were starting to repeat one another and it was frankly getting tired, but this brought the movies back alive for younger audiences that perhaps haven't been too engaged in the previous versions. With a brilliant cast, some of which are popular, well known actors, and others who are rising stars, I think the production is incredible." One person even suggested: "Outside of the legendary (Disney) cartoon, this is the best Robin Hood out there." Meanwhile, another voiced a congruent opinion: "It was so much better than expected. It was a different take on the old Robin Hood movies." However, not all viewers were impressed. One disgruntled film-goer echoed the critics' sentiments, stating: "Everything was just as bad as the trailer promised. Don't watch this unwatchable piece of garbage. It will haunt your eyes forever."

London AI firm says Getty copyright case poses ‘overt threat' to industry
London AI firm says Getty copyright case poses ‘overt threat' to industry

The Guardian

time2 days ago

  • The Guardian

London AI firm says Getty copyright case poses ‘overt threat' to industry

Getty's case against Stability AI for copyright and trademark infringement relating to its vast photography archives reached the high court in London on Monday. Stability allows users to generate images using text prompts, and its directors include James Cameron, the Oscar-winning film director of Avatar and Titanic. But Getty called the people who were training the AI system 'a bunch of tech geeks' and claimed they were indifferent to the problems their innovation might create. Stability countered by alleging that Getty was using 'fanciful' legal routes and spending approximately £10m to fight a technology it feared was 'an existential threat' to its business. They added: 'The problem is when AI companies such as Stability want to use those works without payment.' In submissions to the court on Monday Getty claimed Stability had trained its image generation model on databases that contained child sexual abuse material. Stability is fighting the overall Getty claim and its lawyer said the allegations relating to child sexual abuse material were 'repugnant'. A spokesperson for Stability AI said it was committed to preventing misuse of its technology, 'particularly in the creation and dissemination of harmful content, including CSAM [child sexual abuse material]'. It said it had robust safeguards 'to enhance our safety standards to protect against bad actors'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The case comes amid a wider campaign from artists, writers and musicians, including Elton John and Dua Lipa, to protect their copyright from alleged theft by generative AI companies, which then use it to allow their customers to create new pictures, music or text. The UK parliament is locked in a similar dispute after the government proposed that copyright holders would have to opt out of their material being used to train algorithms and produce AI-generated content, otherwise it would be free to use by tech companies. The trial, which is scheduled to run for several weeks, will focus in part on the use of images by celebrated photographers, including photos of the former Liverpool football coach Jürgen Klopp taken by the award-winning British sports photographer Andrew Livesey; a picture of the Chicago Cubs baseball team by Gregory Shamus, an American sports photographer; a photo of the actor and musician Donald Glover by Alberto Rodriguez; and photos of the actor Eric Dane and film director Christopher Nolan by Andreas Rentz. Seventy-eight thousand pages of evidence have been disclosed in the case and AI experts are being called to give evidence from the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Freiberg in Germany.

Disneyland to close Monsters, Inc. ride to make way for new attraction
Disneyland to close Monsters, Inc. ride to make way for new attraction

The Independent

time4 days ago

  • The Independent

Disneyland to close Monsters, Inc. ride to make way for new attraction

Disneyland is closing the Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! ride in early 2026 to make way for a new Avatar-themed attraction. The Monsters, Inc. ride, which has been operating since 2005, takes guests through Monstropolis in a taxi as they help Mike and Sulley return Boo to her home. Disney Experiences Chairman Josh D'Amaro announced the new Avatar destination, based on Avatar: The Way of Water, at the D23: The Ultimate Disney Fan Event. The Avatar attraction will allow guests to experience the world of Pandora, including its natural wonders, beauty, and dangers, with a focus on the seas of Pandora. Disneyland will also begin construction on a new Coco-themed ride near Paradise Gardens Park and Pixar Pier in the fall, though an opening date has not been released.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store