logo
Prince Harry Reeling From 'Hostile Takeover'—But he May Have a Plan

Prince Harry Reeling From 'Hostile Takeover'—But he May Have a Plan

Newsweek2 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Prince Harry feels his HIV and AIDS charity set up in Princess Diana's memory was wrenched from him in a "hostile takeover" but there is still a chance he could make a comeback.
The Duke of Sussex and co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho created Sentebale to continue the legacy of their mothers and worked with the organization to support children with HIV and AIDS in Lesotho and Botswana.
However, they both resigned in March over a toxic dispute with the chair, Sophie Chandauka, which wound up being probed by U.K. regulator the Charity Commission.
Prince Harry joins in a confidence building exercise run by the Sentebale charity at the Kasane Health Post, in Kasane, Botswana, on September 26, 2019.
Prince Harry joins in a confidence building exercise run by the Sentebale charity at the Kasane Health Post, in Kasane, Botswana, on September 26, 2019.
Pool/Samir Hussein/WireImage
Harry had hoped the watchdog would force Chandauka out, a source told Newsweek, recognizing his own perspective that she was not fit to run Sentebale.
The Charity Commission, though, wrapped up its case on Tuesday, criticizing both sides and imposing an action plan on the charity, now run by Chandauka.
She remains in charge of Sentebale while Harry, Seeiso and several trustees who resigned alongside them remain frozen out.
Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso Have not Walked Away
There is though, a possible avenue for them to regain control of part of the charity, which is being actively explored.
A source close to the two princes told Newsweek: "There are a lot of complexities to the governance structure of Sentebale, which means we're not entirely clear as to, for example, whether or not Sentebale in Lesotho is a separate organization and charity to Sentebale in the U.K. And it's something that Prince Seeiso is exploring."
If there is a legal division then it is not impossible that the princes could regain control of the charity's Lesotho division
"If Prince Seeiso can find a way to extricate Sentebale in Lesotho from Sophie Chandauka he would do it in a heart beat," the source said. "If that were the case, then I think there is a world in which Prince Harry would love to work with Prince Seeiso again in effectively continuing the good work the pair have done for nearly the last two decades."
Nothing is certain, however, and it is possible the plan will not succeed, leaving the two princes contemplating other avenues for helping children in Lesotho and Botswana.
Prince Harry and Seeiso 'Absolutely Devastated'
The loss of Sentebale hit Harry hard. He was cleared of major allegations by Chandauka of "bullying and harassment at scale," while the former trustees more generally were also cleared of misogyny and misogynoir, racism targeting Black women.
But the source close to Harry and Seeiso told Newsweek that the commission's decision to leave Chandauka in charge showed it was a "toothless tiger."
"Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry are absolutely devastated by what Sophie has effectively done, which is a hostile takeover of this charity," the source said. "It is a charity that Seeiso and Harry set up 19 years ago and certainly in Harry's adult lifetime its been his life's work.
"It was set up in part to honor the work of both Queen 'Mamohato (Seeiso's mother) and Princess Diana and the legacy of their work in Africa to support a lot of people living with HIV/AIDS.
"It's a charity that they've put their blood sweat and tears into over the last 19 years and a huge amount of their own personal wealth as well."
They also suspect that Chandauka's reign at the top of Sentebale may run into serious problems if she is not able to generate funding.
"The numbers won't lie," the source said. "I think what you'll see is a charity that in the last 12 months has tanked under the operational leadership of Sophie and her three trusties."
"To have a regulatory action plan imposed on you by the Charity Commission, that's not a good thing," they added.
How Sophie Chandauka Reacted to Charity Commission Ruling
Chandauka said in a statement released to Newsweek: "The unexpected adverse media campaign that was launched by those who resigned on 24 March 2025 has caused incalculable damage and offers a glimpse of the unacceptable behaviours displayed in private.
"We are emerging not just grateful to have survived, but stronger: more focused, better governed, boldly ambitious and with our dignity intact.
"Despite the recent turbulence, we will always be inspired by the vision of our Founders, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso, who established Sentebale in memory of their precious mothers, Princess Diana and Queen 'Mamohato.
"To all who believe in our mission: please walk with us as Sentebale recovers, renews, and rises to meet the hopes and expectations of the next generation."
"We have continued to directly serve children and young people in Lesotho and Botswana with the steadfast support of long-standing funders, strategic partners, and community leaders," she added.
What the Charity Commission Said
The Charity Commission criticized both sides for the public nature of the dispute and found no evidence of "widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity."
However, the commission "has acknowledged the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally."
It imposed a Regulatory Action Plan to strengthen governance which it also said "sets out the importance of the trustees securing sufficient funding to enable the charity to deliver for its beneficiaries."
David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: "Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day. However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength.
"Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardizing the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve."
What the Former Sentebale Trustees Said
A statement from the former trustees of Sentebale said: "We are disheartened by the way in which the Charity Commission has chosen to ignore key concerns and irrefutable evidence raised with them regarding the leadership and oversight of Sentebale's Chair.
"We accept there is always room to strengthen governance of an organisation, which is why we welcomed a governance review by the Chair initiated in February 2024, and that should have only taken a matter of months - we unfortunately never saw a report or any outcomes enacted, more than two years into her tenure.
"We remain gravely concerned for the future of the charity and the wellbeing of the communities we served for 19 years, following the mission set out by Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso in honour of their mothers."
Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page.
Do you have a question about King Charles III and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Kate, Meghan and Prince Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@newsweek.com. We'd love to hear from you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ohio Removes Over 600,000 People From Health Care Plan
Ohio Removes Over 600,000 People From Health Care Plan

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Ohio Removes Over 600,000 People From Health Care Plan

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Hundreds of thousands of Americans in Ohio have been rolled off a health care plan in the space of roughly two years, data from KFF, a nonprofit health policy research and news organization, has shown. Around 600,000 Ohioans were disenrolled from the state's Medicaid program as part of the unwinding process happening nationwide after Medicaid coverage was expanded during the COVID pandemic. Newsweek has contacted the Ohio Department of Health via email for comment. Why It Matters The unwinding process has resulted in significant drops in Medicaid enrollment across the U.S. in recent years. Rates of decline in enrollment vary widely between states, with millions removed from the Medicaid program over two years in highly populated states, while other states have seen smaller, but still notable, decreases. Experts and policymakers both have warned how the growing number of Americans without health insurance will not only grow following the passage of President Donald Trump's budget bill, which will bring about major changes to the Medicaid program, but also how high uninsured rates will impact health outcomes and medical costs. File photo: three surgeons stand in an operating room with one making notes. File photo: three surgeons stand in an operating room with one making To Know In Ohio, there were 3,421,792 covered by Medicaid in March 2023, but by April 2025, that number was 2,802,277, KFF data shows. However, while this marked a drop of just over 600,000 Medicaid recipients, the enrollment levels had not returned back to prepandemic levels in April 2025, as they were still 8 percent higher than levels in February 2020—when there were 2,596,917 enrolled on the state's Medicaid program. These drops in Medicaid enrollment have been happening across the country after the COVID pandemic, when some states expanded the federal program under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Federal rules forced states to keep recipients of the program enrolled, regardless of changes to eligibility, until March 2023. That month, states were then allowed to start an "unwinding process," where those no longer eligible for the program were disenrolled. However, concerns have been raised about the process with which recipients were pushed off the program in various states, with some experts saying that many individuals who were still eligible for the program were removed from it due to the administrative burden of proving eligibility. While some of those disenrolled from the Medicaid program in Ohio may have had access to other forms of health insurance, such as through employment, many may have been left uninsured. As Trump's budget bill will make significant cuts to the Medicaid program, as well as bringing in new work requirements among other changes, there is increasing concern about America's most vulnerable not having access to affordable health care - particularly in rural areas where many hospitals are also at risk of closure. What People Are Saying Bruce D. Meyer, a professor in the Harris School of Public Policy and the College at the University of Chicago, told Newsweek: "There will be financial difficulties for hospitals and clinics as uncompensated care increases. Based on the best research, financial hardship of low-income individuals will rise, as will their depression and other mental illnesses. Most starkly, mortality of adults is likely to rise in the states with large cutbacks in Medicaid coverage." What Happens Next As the unwinding continues, more reductions in enrollment are expected across the country, elevating concerns about how the rates of uninsured Americans could impact health outcomes.

Expression of Dog Returned To Shelter for Being 'Too Boring' Breaks Hearts
Expression of Dog Returned To Shelter for Being 'Too Boring' Breaks Hearts

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Expression of Dog Returned To Shelter for Being 'Too Boring' Breaks Hearts

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A rescue dog is back at the shelter and appears despondent after being returned for the most soul-crushing of reasons. In a video posted to her TikTok @ Jackie Gonzalez, a dog care associate at the Valley Animal Center in Fresno, California, posted a clip of Lucy, a dog who she said was returned to the shelter for being "too boring and nervous." Lucy cuts a nervous figure in the clip, shaking and clearly uncomfortable within the confines of the facility she now calls home. "Lucy struggles from lack of confidence, she is afraid and anxious of all her surroundings," Gonzalez told Newsweek. "At the shelter Lucy is terrified, to hear dogs barking all the time is a high stressor for her. She barely moves from her corner just from how scared she is." The clip has drawn a significant response, with over 260,000 views and counting as well as a glut of emotional comments. "Can someone please adopt this poor soul?" one viewer pleaded, with another writing: "I would literally pick her up tomorrow, I am so sad I'm in Florida. My heart broke seeing she's in Fresno." It's normal for rescue dogs to experience anxiety when first entering a shelter. A 2016 study published in the journal Physiology & Behavior found dogs tend to experience a spike in cortisol levels, the so-called stress hormone, that decreases in the days that follow. However, Lucy has more reason than most dogs to feel anxious about the shelter, given what she previously went through. "Lucy came to us after being removed by animal control from another rescue that was closed down due to it turning into a hoarding situation," Gonzalez said. "We do not know much about her life before that. We got her from animal control, severely overweight and covered in flies from how bad she smelled." Given Lucy's struggles at the shelter, efforts were made to set her up with a stay at a foster carer. Sadly it didn't work out. Within days of taking Lucy on, her foster carer had returned her. "She was returned from her home because her foster parent, I believe, had the expectations of a hyper dog, or a dog that would be active," Gonzalez said. "She considered her 'boring.'" Now Lucy is back at the shelter and facing her biggest fear all over again. The problem is that, the longer time ticks on without her finding another home, the worse Lucy is likely to get. Lucy the dog is back at the shelter and she is struggling. Lucy the dog is back at the shelter and she is struggling. TikTok/ In 2021, a study published in the journal Animals exploring the characteristics of long-term shelter dogs noted that while being in the shelter had not impaired the physical wellbeing of these dogs, they did exhibit "stress-related behaviors" over time. Lucy needs someone to break her out of what could quickly become a vicious cycle. "She is the type of dog that needs time and patience," Gonzalez said. "To be introduced to new experiences without increasing her anxiety, which can take a lot of patience on her adopters side. Lucy is the type of dog that will take a long time to feel comfortable in her own skin." Having spent an extended period of time with Lucy, Gonzalez is better placed than anyone to explain what kind of forever home this brave rescue dog would be best suited to. "Lucy would be better suited in a quiet home that does not have much going on, she can go with other animals as long as they have a calm personality," she said. "She would also do ok in a home with older teens that can learn to respect her space. She has the potential to be a great dog, she just needs someone who is not expecting her to be jumping off the walls. She needs space, time and patience." Gonzalez said: "She will open up as soon as she feels safe and comfortable but that can take time, months to years even and truthfully , part of Lucy might always be this way. She just needs her person to understand her in that way."

Georgia's Ossoff a Step Closer to Major Drinking Water Change: What To Know
Georgia's Ossoff a Step Closer to Major Drinking Water Change: What To Know

Newsweek

time12 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Georgia's Ossoff a Step Closer to Major Drinking Water Change: What To Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Georgia Democratic U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff has secured bipartisan backing for a proposal that would substantially increase funding for the Reducing Lead in Drinking Water program for both the Peach State and nationwide. Newsweek contacted Ossoff for comment Thursday via email outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters According to the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "there is no known safe level of lead in a child's blood," as it poses a particular health risk to youths. "A dose of lead that might have minimal effect on an adult can have significant consequences for a child. Lead poisoning can lead to both physical and behavioral issues, and these impacts can be long-lasting or even permanent," the EPA said. What To Know An amendment introduced by Ossoff calling for the Reducing Lead in Drinking Water program to have its funding boosted by nearly 50 percent has passed the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee as part of its Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies spending package. The federally funded program provides resources to states and local communities to tackle lead contamination of water by, for example, covering costs of removing leaky pipes. It also supports water treatment programs for schools and child care facilities. A stock photo shows water flowing from a bathroom tap on January 12, 2007, in Berlin. A stock photo shows water flowing from a bathroom tap on January 12, 2007, in Berlin. Sean Gallup/GETTY According to the EPA, "tens of millions of Americans rely on private wells for their drinking water," some of which are contaminated with lead, which can also enter the water supply through old and rusty pipes. The agency notes that "lead can be present in drinking water without any noticeable changes in color or odor." In October 2024, a new law was enacted, requiring water utility providers to identify and replace water systems using lead pipes within 10 years. Florida is believed to be the worst impacted state, with over 1.1 million service lines contaminated by lead, followed by Illinois with just over 1 million. In mid-July, the Illinois Water Company issued an alert after routine testing found elevated levels of lead in the water supply for some areas. What People Are Saying Ossoff, in a statement: "Every Georgian deserves clean, healthy drinking water. There's no worse nightmare for any family than not having access to clean water. "That's why I brought Republicans and Democrats together to pass my amendment that will help communities in Georgia and across the nation remove dangerous lead pipes from homes, schools, and child care facilities." What Happens Next Having passed the Senate Appropriations Committee, the funding bill, to which Ossoff attached his amendment, must now pass the full Senate and U.S. House of Representatives to become law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store