Lebanon marks 20th anniversary of Rafik Hariri's assassination amid political shifts
Thousands of supporters gathered in downtown Beirut Friday to commemorate the 20th anniversary of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri's assassination, which comes amid seismic regional political shifts. The ousting of Al-Assad in December after 54 years of family rule in Syria marked the fall of a government long accused of orchestrating Hariri's assassination and other political killings in Lebanon.
Meanwhile, the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah–whose members were convicted by a UN-backed tribunal for their role in Hariri's murder–now faces its own turning point following the assassination of its leader Hassan Nasrallah in an Israeli airstrike in September. Nasrallah's funeral is set for February 23. 'This is the beginning of justice. If the justice of the earth did not serve us, no one escapes the justice of heaven,' said Hariri's son, former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, as he addressed a huge crowd in the capital, Beirut. 'After 20 years, Rafik Hariri's project is continuing, and those who tried to kill the project, look where they are now,' Saad added.
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, appointed in early February, visited Hariri's burial site earlier Friday. 'Today we remember the legacy of the great martyr in serving Lebanon, preserving its national unity and working for its prosperity,' Salam wrote on X. 'He was greatly respected in the Arab world and the world, leaving Lebanon with a remarkable moral and political legacy.'
Lebanon's president, Joseph Aoun, also paid tribute to Hariri, saying on X that Hariri's national stances were a fundamental building block in strengthening national unity and protecting civil peace.
Hariri was killed on Feb. 14, 2005, when a massive bomb exploded near the St. Georges Hotel, a historic landmark on Beirut's waterfront. The blast killed 21 other people and injured over 200. In 2020, a UN-backed tribunal convicted one member of the terrorist group Hezbollah and acquitted three others of involvement in the assassination. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon said Salim Ayyash was guilty as a co-conspirator of five charges linked to his involvement in the suicide truck bombing. None of the suspects was ever arrested or attended court to hear the verdicts.
The assassination of Hariri ignited the Cedar Revolution, leading to massive protests against Syria's nearly three-decade military presence in Lebanon, ultimately culminating in the withdrawal of Syrian troops in 2005. The assassination also intensified sectarian divisions within Lebanon and bolstered the political influence of al-Assad's ally, Hezbollah.
Buses from across Lebanon arrived early, bringing supporters to downtown Beirut to commemorate the anniversary. Thousands of people filled the streets and waved Lebanese flags and the blue flag of Hariri's Future Movement to songs honoring Hariri's memory. 'After the Syrian and Iranian guardianship ended and the ousting of the Syrian regime, the Lebanese state alone rules us,' Mohammad Kanaan told The Associated Press. 'In this square you expelled Al-Assad from Lebanon,' Saad said during his speech. 'And after twenty years of sectarian rule, detention and brutality, the heroic Syrian people rose up and expelled the criminal from Syria.'
Another supporter, Ahmad Serhal, said he hoped that Lebanon would unite after the departure of al-Assad. 'All the political shifts are for the good of this country. Lebanon is for all the Lebanese; we need to reach an agreement and unite. God took revenge upon those who assassinated president Rafik–from ousting Al-Assad, from ousting the system that is allied with Iran,' Ahmad Trab said. 'We hope for a better future now with Syria.'
The anniversary of Hariri's death comes just four days before the deadline for Israeli troops to withdraw from southern Lebanon under a cease-fire agreement that ended a 14-month war with Hezbollah in late November. The cease-fire deal also stipulates that Hezbollah must end its military presence south of the Litani River, with the Lebanese Army and UN peacekeepers deploying in the vacated areas. The pullout deadline, initially set for Jan. 26, was postponed to Feb. 18.
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri said Lebanon absolutely rejects an Israeli proposal to keep troops in five strategic border points after the withdrawal. 'It is the responsibility of the Americans to impose (the withdrawal); otherwise they will have caused the biggest setback for the government,' he said. Aoun has also insisted that Israel must adhere to the agreed-upon timeline. During his speech, Saad also emphasized the need for the Israeli army's withdrawal from Lebanon. Saad addressed the people of southern and eastern Lebanon regions, largely supporters of and influenced by Hezbollah, urging them to seize Lebanon's golden opportunity while dispelling any perception of being a force of obstruction.
On Feb. 8, Lebanon formed a new government led by Salam, the first fully empowered administration since 2022. Salam, a former president of the International Court of Justice, was appointed following the election of Aoun in January. The 24-member cabinet includes a mix of technocrats and political figures representing various sects, including Hezbollah's allies. Although Hezbollah did not formally endorse Salam's appointment, the group negotiated during the government formation process.
The US has expressed support for the new government, emphasizing the importance of stability and reforms, though opposing Hezbollah's direct participation in the cabinet. Salam's government now faces Lebanon's longstanding economic crisis and an urgent need to implement key financial reforms. The political shift has reopened the door for renewed Arab engagement, particularly from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which had previously distanced themselves from Lebanon due to the growing influence of Iran and its ally Hezbollah. These countries, which had strong ties with Lebanon under Hariri, are now reassessing their approach with hopes of reintegrating Lebanon into the Arab fold.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
8 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Crown Prince reaffirms Saudi condemnation of Israeli attacks in call with Iran's president
Saudi Gazette report RIYADH — Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman held a phone call on Saturday with Iranian President Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian, expressing condolences and solidarity following Israeli attacks on Iran. Prince Mohammed conveyed his sympathy to President Pezeshkian, the Iranian people, and the families of those killed in the attacks, and wished a swift recovery for the injured. The Crown Prince reiterated the Kingdom's condemnation and denunciation of the Israeli strikes, stating they represent a violation of Iranian sovereignty and a breach of international laws and norms. He warned that the attacks have disrupted ongoing diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis and hindered de-escalation talks. Emphasizing Saudi Arabia's position, the Crown Prince affirmed the Kingdom's rejection of using force to settle disputes, stressing that dialogue remains the essential path for resolving differences. President Pezeshkian thanked the Crown Prince for his supportive stance and sincere sentiments toward the Iranian people, and praised Saudi Arabia's position in rejecting the aggression. He also expressed appreciation to Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz for ensuring the care and services provided to Iranian pilgrims during their stay in the Kingdom and their safe return home.
Al Arabiya
9 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Iran says to limit cooperation with IAEA amid Israel strikes
Iran said Saturday it would limit its cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog, while criticizing it for its silence over Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Makkah Newspaper
10 hours ago
- Makkah Newspaper
Gulf investments: A sovereign right impervious to critices
Do critics have the right to question the Gulf states' investments in thriving global economies? What truly drives these criticisms? The complex interplay of economic and political dynamics reveals a clear truth: such critiques often lack objective grounding, rooted instead in dubious political or ideological motives, tinged with envy and resentment toward the Gulf's remarkable achievements. Statistics and historical data confirm that, since their founding, Gulf states have pursued a balanced strategy for managing their wealth. They blend domestic development, generous foreign aid, and strategic investments in stable, advanced economies. This thoughtful approach has proven successful over decades, enabling Gulf states to preserve and grow their wealth for future generations while setting a global standard for generosity and support for those in need. An unbiased observer can see that critics who brand Gulf investments in robust global economies as 'plunder' or 'waste' often hail from corrupt authoritarian regimes, terror groups, or factions pushing extremist ideologies hostile to prosperity and stability. These detractors deliberately ignore the Gulf states' sovereign right to manage their wealth and investments in line with their national interests. History clearly documents the Gulf's generosity, with hundreds of billions of dollars in aid extended to Arab, Islamic, and developing countries over decades. For example, Saudi Arabia's aid from 1975 to 2024 totaledapproximately 498.54 billion riyals (132.94 billion USD). From 1976 to 1987, its international development aid reached 49 billion USD, second only to the United States. The United Arab Emirates, meanwhile, has consistently surpassed the United Nations' goal of allocating 0.7% of gross national income to official development assistance, reaching 1.17% in 2014. In several years, the UAE exceeded this target, earning acclaim in reports from the OECD's Development Assistance Committee as the top donor relative to its economy's size. The UAE's deep commitment to humanitarian and developmental responsibilities has been driven by a vision that sees fostering progress in developing countries as a foundation for global stability, not just a diplomatic gesture. When viewed with clarity and fairness, it is evident that Gulf states have never leveraged their aid to exert political pressure or meddle in the affairs of recipient countries. Their assistance springs from genuine humanitarian, moral, and religious values, setting it apart from the often conditional aid of some major powers, which is typically tied to political or economic agendas. The Gulf's decision to channel financial surpluses into strong global economies, notably the United States, is not impulsive but a carefully crafted strategy grounded in a deep understanding of global markets and the need for secure, profitable investments. The U.S. economy, accounting for over 40% of global investments, is a natural choice for countries with surplus funds aiming to maximize returns while minimizing risks. Its vast scale, relative stability, and diverse sectors offer a safe and dynamic investment, unlike the volatility of emerging or unstable markets. Gulf investments in the U.S. serve not only economic purposes but also strategic ones, safeguarding political and security interests. Given their geopolitical position and oil wealth, Gulf states face complex security and political challenges, requiring powerful allies to provide protection and support against regional threats. Investments in economies like the U.S. strengthen strategic partnerships, creating shared interests that bolster regional stability and security. Advanced economies attract Gulf investments due to their political and economic stability, robust legal frameworks, diverse opportunities, technological innovation, and ease of market entry and exit. Calling Gulf investments in thriving global economies 'plunder' is a misguided and misleading label, betraying a lack of understanding of global economic dynamics and international investment principles. Investment is a mutually beneficial exchange, not exploitation. Gulf states gain financial returns and strategic benefits, while host economies benefit from capital inflows that fund projects, create jobs, and fuel economic growth. Since their inception, Gulf states have embraced a governance model built on wisdom, transparency, and long-term planning. Recognizing the finite nature of oil wealth, they understood early on that over-reliance on it threatens future generations. Their strategy hinges on three pillars: domestic development, foreign aid, and global market investments. Openness and coexistence define Gulf societies, setting them apart from those under authoritarian regimes or extremist influence. These states have fostered inclusive, tolerant communities where diverse cultures, religions, and ethnicities thrive in mutual respect and cooperation. Millions of expatriates from around the world live and work in the Gulf with freedom and dignity, practicing their religious and cultural traditions without restriction or harassment. To be sure, Gulf investments in strong global economies come from a place of prudent wealth management and a forward-thinking vision to ensure a prosperous, sustainable future for generations to come. Critics who challenge these investments lack credible evidence or rigorous economic analysis, driven instead by questionable political and ideological motives, revealing envy and resentment toward the Gulf region's success in wisely stewarding its wealth and investments.
