Concerns over Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Rules permitting hoardings in violation of road safety norms
Rule 322(1) of the Rules allow hoardings and display materials to be installed on a range of public infrastructure, including flyover pillars, road medians, traffic barricades, streetlight poles, and moving vehicles fitted with digital screens.
According to IRC 46:1972, advertisements are not permitted within 100 metres of road junctions (50 metres in urban areas), within 10 metres from the edge of the carriageway, or within the right-of-way of highways. Hanging banners across roads and flashing or moving-light advertisements—except for public information—are also prohibited.
K. Kathirmathiyon, secretary of Coimbatore Consumer Cause, said the rule overlooks long-standing safety restrictions and judicial orders. 'Advertisements are being permitted in zones considered hazardous under IRC guidelines. These include areas near junctions, along highways, and even directly above carriageways,' he said.
'The rules must be withdrawn in their present form and redrafted in full compliance with IRC guidelines. Road safety cannot be compromised for the sake of revenue. We have urged the government to ensure that future regulations are framed with safety as the primary consideration,' he added.
'In earlier court proceedings in 2011, 2016, and 2017, the State itself acknowledged that advertisements on medians and barricades posed risks to drivers. Despite those submissions, the present rule reintroduces such practices. The High Court had also held that barricades should not be used for commercial advertisements, allowing only informative materials.'
He further raised concern over the shift in licensing authority from District Collectors to urban local body officials, stating that it had resulted in reduced oversight and an increase in violations.
The rules have been criticised for prioritising local body revenue over road safety, without consulting transport authorities. The Madras High Court has admitted the public interest litigation and directed officials to respond within eight weeks.
Corporation officials said the matter will be looked into.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Kerala IT firm CEO, who accused ex-employee of extortion, faces sexual harassment complaint from her
An alleged extortion case against a woman former employee of an IT firm and her husband has taken a turn with the CEO of the same company and his three colleagues now facing a case of sexual harassment on the complaint of the woman. A day after Kochi infopark police registered the case against the CEO of Litmus 7 Systems Consulting Private Limited, Venu Gopalakrishnan, on Wednesday, he sought pre-arrest bail from the High Court. The HC restrained the arrest of his colleagues Jacob P Thamby, Eby Paul and Bimalraj Haridas till the government prosecutor files instructions from the police. However, the HC has not given any relief to 51-year-old Venu booked for criminal intimidation, insulting modesty of woman and sexual harassment. The CEO and others faced the case a week after his former colleague and her husband were arrested on charges of extortion. After obtaining bail, the couple filed complaints with police higher ups, leading to registration of FIR against Venu and others. Last month, Venu, in his complaint, had alleged that the couple had accused him of having an affair with the woman and threatened him with a rape case to extort money . He alleged that on July 23, she contacted the three staff members of the company and asked them to come to a hotel in Kochi where the couple allegedly demanded Rs 30 crore to settle the matter. The couple allegedly sought an assurance in writing from Venu and asked him to transfer `10 crore to her account and two cheques for the remaining amount. On July 28, Rs 50,000 was transferred from Venu's account to that of the woman's. The next day, the couple were arrested by the police on charges of extortion and remanded in judicial custody. Days later after they got bail, the couple complained to police alleging sexual harassment by Venu when she worked with him. She said she joined the company in February 2024 and quit after getting married earlier this year, but she alleged that her former employer continued to pester her. She alleged that when she and her husband were about to lodge a complaint against the CEO, the three representatives of the company came for mediation. She alleged that the staff told her Venu was ready to apologise and asked the couple to come to a hotel on July 29, where they were arrested. The couple, in their complaint, said Venu transferred Rs 50,000 to her bank account without information her. In her complaint, she gave details about the alleged incidents of sexual harassment.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC rejects plea to shift Hadapsar garbage plant
Pune: The Bombay high court on Tuesday rejected a petition seeking relocation of the garbage processing unit from the Hadapsar industrial estate to an alternate site and directed Pune Municipal Corporation and Pune Cantonment Board to ensure scientific processing of solid waste. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court also directed the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board to act against any violation of Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules by the civic bodies or their contractors at the site. The bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep V Marne said the authorities must ensure that mixed solid waste was not dumped on the 28-acre site. Instead, municipal solid waste brought there should be processed and disposed of through methods like composting, recycling, and reusing dry waste, with non-biodegradable waste sent to suitable landfills, the bench said. The bench also ordered measures to control and suppress foul odours, toxic gases, dust and other pollutants from the waste processing facility, directing the use of modern techniques to prevent adverse health impacts on nearby residents. "Controlling odorous gas and dust from waste processing facilities is crucial for both environment and health," the bench said. The judgment puts to rest a decade-old demand by the local residents to relocate the waste processing unit. It gives hope to PMC to push its plan for decentralised garbage processing at different spots, to reduce cost of garbage transport to the Uruli Devachi processing facility. PCB, which generates 200 metric tonnes of garbage daily, has been using the Hadapsar facility for almost a century now, while PMC, which generates 800 metric tonnes of waste daily, started using the facility in 2000 as a decentralised facility for processing a part of its daily garbage. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Hadapsar Industrial Association, St Patrick's Town Cooperative Housing Society and Sopan Baug residents had filed PILs, citing issues like foul odour and health risks posed by the garbage plant to nearby residents. They sought relocation of the plant. The petition named PMC, PCB, MPCB, Pune collector and state govt as respondents. The bench, however, observed in its ruling, "We are unable to grant prayer of the petitioners for shifting the waste processing unit from the current site. The operation of the waste processing facility is in consonance with the SWM Rules and as per the order passed by the principal secretary of the Urban Development Department (UDD) of Sept 11, 2008. This court in fact does not appreciate repeated attempts being made for closure or shifting of the waste processing facility. " Instead of suggesting positive measures for better processing of solid municipal waste in a scientific manner without causing health hazards to nearby residents, the petitions were aimed at shifting the waste processing facility in someone else's backyard, the court said. The HC said PMC and PCB were duty-bound to ensure that processing waste has the least impact on residents and industrial units in the locality. The court noted, "PMC has implemented some measures like high jet spraying of the area every three hours to reduce dust and odour. It has also proposed certain measures like covering the compost plant to suppress odour. It has issued tenders for carrying out the erection work of fogging and misting system for controlling odour. PMC is proposing to install automatic chemical sprinklers at the composting plant. It has been planned to increase the height of the compound wall from 12ft to 16ft. These measures need to be implemented both by PMC and PCB." The HC directed PCB and PMC to make representation to state govt if they required additional land for disposal for operation of waste processing facilities.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
India looks to make it harder for automakers to skirt strict fuel efficiency norms
New Delhi/Mumbai: The government's proposal to give the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) the power to impose penalties will help strictly implement the upcoming fuel emission norms that the auto industry has termed 'too aggressive", according to experts. The government has authorized the bureau to verify compliance with Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency or CAFE norms, according to the draft Energy Conservation (Compliance Enforcement) Rules, 2025 released on 4 August. The case will be judged by the adjudicating officer of the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, where the manufacturer's head office is located. The industry has 30 days to share its feedback on the proposal. 'The new proposal clears the entire process on how the penalty will be imposed. Due to confusion over the penalty imposition process, no OEM (original equipment manufacturer) has ever been penalized for violating norms," said Amit Bhatt, India managing director at International Council on Clean Transportation 'With Cafe 3 and 4 norms coming soon, this is a signal that the government is serious about ensuring compliance with Cafe norms." The government is finalizing CAFE 3 norms, which will be implemented on 1 April 2027. The industry, however, has strictly opposed the latest iteration of the fuel efficiency standards. Under the second iteration of these standards, each company is allowed up to 113 grams of CO2 emissions per km on average, calculated by measuring the tailpipe emissions of an individual vehicle. However, according to the draft CAFE 3 rules prepared by the BEE, the ceiling will be further lowered to 91 grams. In a letter to the ministry of power in December, the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, which counts all major automakers as its members, said the proposed norms of BEE are 'too aggressive and risk the sustainability of the Indian Auto Industry". Recently, the automobile lobby held discussions seeking concessions for small cars and small commercial vehicles. While demand for relaxation for small cars has only been backed by Maruti Suzuki India Ltd, Tata Motors Ltd and Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd are said to have sought exemptions for small commercial vehicles weighing less than 3,500kg. However, the new draft for commercial vehicle efficiency norms didn't grant any concession to any category. The BEE's latest draft of fuel efficiency norms covers heavy (N1), medium (N2) and light commercial vehicles (N3). The final draft of CAFE norms for passenger vehicles has yet to be released. Notwithstanding strict rules, the government has faced challenges in imposing any penalty on automakers in the past. It delayed releasing a key emissions compliance report that showed eight automakers, including Hyundai Motor India, Kia India and Mahindra and Mahindra, failed to meet the CAFE-II norms in FY23, Mint reported on 22 October last year. Legal experts said the notification of compliance enforcement rules can change that. 'CAFE norms have shifted from loose guidelines to a firm legal framework. Now, BEE can take action, state officers impose penalties, and carmakers must report and verify their data," said Aurelia Menezes, partner, King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates and Attorneys. 'Earlier norms lacked a clear penalty pathway; but now there is a clear process from detecting violations to collecting fines, shared by Centre and states." Rahul Sundaram, partner at IndiaLaw LLP, said that automakers will have to file periodic CAFE data with BEE if the draft rules are implemented. 'Non-compliance will now trigger a statutory, time-bound process and with penalty being imposed for any underachievement in accordance with the provisions of the Energy Conservation Act, 2001."
