Israel launches air strikes on Yemen to target Houthi leaders
The Israeli military said it attacked energy infrastructure belonging to the Houthi rebels more than 1,000 miles away from Tel Aviv.
The attack came in response to the Houthi rebels' repeated ballistic missile and drone attacks against Israel, the first of which were launched in solidarity with Hamas in October 2023.
The IDF said that the Houthi 'terrorist regime' operates under the direction and funding of the Iranian regime, to 'harm Israel and its allies'.
'The terrorist regime exploits the maritime domain to project force and carry out terror activity against global shipping and trade routes,' the army added.
Houthi-run Al Masirah TV said explosions were heard at the Haiz power plant near the capital of Sanaa, but fell short of blaming Israel.
Local reports suggest that Houthi leaders were inside the plant's control room when it was struck by missiles. Power went and a fire broke out.
It is understood that the Israeli navy carried out the operation. Israel has launched several large-scale attacks on Houthi-controlled targets since July last year, including the al-Hudaydah Port, the international airport in Sanaa, as well as energy infrastructure.
The Houthis began attacking shipping in the Red Sea in October 2023, in what they said was a response to Israel's attack on Gaza following the Oct 7 terror attacks.
They have vowed to continue their campaign until the war in Gaza is over, which dragged Western nations – led by the US – into the conflict.
The coalition, which includes the UK, launched dozens of attacks against the Houthis before the US struck a ceasefire with the group in May.
However, the Houthis continued their attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea last month, sinking the Liberia-flagged Eternity C. Four crew members died in the assault, while around a dozen were taken hostage. One sailor lost a leg, according to the European Union's naval operation in the Red Sea.
A few days earlier the group attacked a Greek-operated vessel, the Magic Seas.
Israel has long accused Iran of directly funding the Houthis while supplying it with ballistic missiles.
The Wall Street Journal reported last month that a major shipment of Iranian-made missiles, drone components, and other military equipment destined for the Houthis was intercepted by Yemen's internationally recognised government.
The seizure, described by US officials as one of the largest ever, raised fresh concerns that Tehran is pushing ahead with efforts to reinforce its allies and destabilise the region despite its diminished position.
US Central Command said the Houthi-bound shipment contained 750 tonnes of weaponry, including cruise missiles, anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles, warheads and drone engines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Newshour Russian strikes across Ukraine ahead of talks in Washington
President Zelensky has condemned the latest deadly Russian attacks on Ukraine, ahead of his talks with President Trump and European leaders in Washington. Mr Zelensky accused Russia of carrying out what he called demonstrative killings to 'humiliate diplomatic efforts' to end the war. Ukraine says at least ten people have been killed in strikes on Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia. Also the Egyptian foreign minister and the Palestinian prime minister are visiting the Rafah border crossing with Gaza to highlight the need for more food aid to get through. We have an interview with the Palestinian prime minister, Mohammad Mustafa. And Croatian ultra-nationalist mega-gig exposes divided society. (Photo: A residential area damaged by strikes in Kharkiv, north-east Ukraine, on Monday. Credit: EPA)
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Donald Trump boasts he's ended 'six wars in six months' but has he?
Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed to have ended 'six wars in six months' ahead of a crunch meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky. The US President insists he has already averted a nuclear apocalypse and now only has the 'complex' Russia-Ukraine war left in his sights as he makes a bold bid for a Nobel Peace prize. The Metro takes a look to see if Trump's claim that he is an international peacekeeper worthy of following in the footsteps of Nelson Mandela and long-term rival Barack Obama. 'I've settled 6 Wars in 6 months, one of them a possible Nuclear disaster, and yet I have to read & listen to the Wall Street Journal, and many other who truly don't have a clue, tell me everything that I am doing wrong on the Russia/Ukraine MESS, that is Sleepy Joe Biden's war, not mine. I'm only here to stop it, not to prosecute it any further', Trump wrote in a bragadocious post on Truth Social. 'It would have NEVER happened if I was President. I know exactly what I'm doing, and I don't need the advice of people who have been working on all of these conflicts for years, and were never able to do a thing to stop them. They are 'STUPID' people, with no common sense, intelligence, or understanding, and they only make the current Russia/Ukraine disaster more difficult to FIX. Despite all of my lightweight and very jealous critics, I'll get it done — I always do!!!' Donald Trump boasted he ended the standoff between India and Pakistan which has been running since the countries were divided along religious lines by the British in 1947. India launched military strikes under Operation Sindoor on May 7, in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which terrorists killed 26 people, mostly civilians. Trump has claimed he was the one who stopped the conflict by offering trade deals between the two nations before it could escalate into a full-blown war. Pakistan hailed Trump's role and even backed the president's calls for a Nobel Peace prize. But India later revealed there was no call between Prime Minister Modi and Trump from the 22nd of April when Trump called up to convey his sympathy and the 17th of June, when he called up Prime Minister [Modi] in Canada to explain why he could not meet him. While Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for the ceasefire India has maintained that the halt in military action on May 10 was a result of direct contact between both nations. 'This contact was initiated by the Pakistani side,' India has said. In June, Trump intervened in the Iran-Israel conflict by ordering US strikes on three key Iranian nuclear facilities, bringing the Middle East to the brink of a new regional war. He then announced there had been a ceasefire. But the truce faltered when Israel accused Iran of launching missiles into its airspace after the ceasefire was supposed to take effect and vowed to retaliate. Iran's military denied firing on Israel, yet explosions boomed and sirens sounded across northern Israel and an official said two Iranian missiles were intercepted. Trump's frustration was palpable as he spoke to reporters, using an expletive to hammer home his point. 'I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with Iran, either, but I'm really unhappy with Israel going out this morning,' Trump said. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f—- they're doing.' On Monday, he told reporters that he had ended Iran's nuclear capability. Under pressure from Trump, who threatened to delay crucial trade talks, the two Asian countries agreed to a ceasefire on July 28. The recent fighting was triggered by a land mine explosion in disputed land along the border that wounded five Thai soldiers. That came just a week after a similar incident. 'It means that we only want to live side-by-side with Thailand as a good neighbor, living with unity and peace with each other,' Khem Sorn, the chief monk for Phnom Penh said. It was the latest eruption of hostilities in a decades-old dispute over ownership of several small pockets of territory along the 800-kilometer (500-mile) land border. A ceasefire that took effect on July 29 ended major fighting, though both sides have alleged violations of the truce and the underlying dispute over territorial claims has not been resolved. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan shook hands at a White House peace summit before signing an agreement aimed at ending decades of conflict. The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan centres on the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan but has a majority Armenian population. This dispute has led to multiple wars and periods of intense conflict, most recently in 2020. Trump was in the middle as Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan flanked him on either side at a meeting in the White House. As the two extended their arms in front of Trump to shake hands, the president reached up and clasped his hands around theirs. Trump said Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev would also be signing agreements with the US to 'pursue Economic opportunities together, so we can fully unlock the potential of the South Caucasus Region.' 'Many Leaders have tried to end the War, with no success, until now, thanks to 'TRUMP,'' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. Foreign policy experts said Trump deserves some credit for recent peace agreements in several conflicts. But Trump has struggled to made headway on the world's two most vexing conflicts: the Russia-Ukraine war and Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said last month that the US was bringing home its negotiating team from Qatar to assess its next steps. Witkoff said the move was made because Hamas was not showing 'good faith' toward reaching a ceasefire. No major breakthroughs have occurred despite weeks of talks in Qatar, along with a visit to the White House by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Witkoff said the U.S. would 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home,' but officials did not answer questions about what those options could include. President Donald Trump appeared to endorse Israel's plan to take control of Hamas's last strongholds in the Gaza Strip on August 18, writing on Truth Social: 'We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be.' Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump expressed hope that Monday's critical talks with Ukrainian and European leaders at the White House could lead to trilateral talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring an end to Russia's war on Ukraine. 'They want to give protection and they feel very strongly about it and we'll help them out with that,' Trump said. 'I think its very important to get the deal done.' Monday's hastily assembled meeting comes after Trump met on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin and has said that the onus is now on Zelensky to agree to concessions that he said could end the war. 'If everything works out today, we'll have a trilat,' Trump said, referring to possible three-way talks among Zelenskyy, Putin and Trump. 'We're going to work with Russia, we're going to work with Ukraine.' He said: 'All of us would obviously prefer an immediate ceasefire while we work on a lasting peace. More Trending 'And maybe something like that could happen as of this moment it's not happening, but president Zelensky and president Putin can talk a little bit more about that. 'You know, in the six or so wars that we stopped, we haven't had a cease fire. You can do it through the war, but I like the ceasefire because you immediately stop the killing. 'But I believe a peace agreement at the end of all of this is something that's very attainable, and it can be done in the near future, with all of the wars that I got involved in, we only have this one left. 'Of course, as soon as I walk out the door, there'll probably be a new one starting, and I'll get that stopped too. But I thought this was going to be one of the easier ones. It's actually one of the most difficult. They're very complex.' MORE: Zelensky tells Trump 'it's the best I had' after turning up in black suit with no tie MORE: Russian troops troll Zelensky by flying US flag on mission into Ukraine MORE: From elite Oligarchs to cringeworthy fashion – readers discuss the Alaska summit
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Gaza's journalists are talented, professional and dignified. That's why Israel targets them
The first time I met Al Jazeera's Gaza team lead, Tamer Almisshal, was in July last year. His team had already buried two journalists, Hamza al-Dahdouh and Samer Abu Daqqa. The rest, he told me, were hungry. They were also dealing with trying to get hold of protective gear, threats from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the killing of family members. Ismail al-Ghoul hadn't seen his wife and child in months and was missing them intensely. Hossam Shabat, Mohammed Qraiqea and Anas al-Sharif were asking for time to secure food in the morning before they could start reporting. Today, they are all dead. I spoke with various members of the Gaza team while writing a profile of Gaza's veteran reporter Wael al-Dahdouh, who lost his wife, three of his children and grandson. All spoke of their work as a duty that needed to be carried out despite the risks. Three members of that team have since been killed in a chain of assassinations. Each time I sent condolences, the response was always that the coverage would not cease. 'We are continuing,' the Gaza editor told me last week, after he lost his entire Gaza City team in the targeted strike that claimed the lives of Sharif, Mohammed Nofal, Ibrahim Thaher and Qraiqea. 'We will not betray their message, or their last wishes.' As these killings dazed the world – and the response to them became mired in unproven and in some cases risibly implausible claims that some of these journalists were militants – little has been said about the calibre of journalism in Gaza. How fluent, articulate and poised its journalists are under impossible circumstances. How much they manage to capture horrific events and pain on a daily basis, in a journalistic Arabic that they have perfected to an art, while maintaining a professional, collected presence on camera. How much they manage to keep their cool. I struggled often to translate their words into English, so rich and expansive is their expression. Even Sharif's final message, a text for the ages, loses some of its power in translation. In it, he addresses those who 'choked' our breath, but the word he uses is closer to 'besieged' – evoking not just physical asphyxiation but the silencing of a surveilled people's voice. What strikes me when I speak with journalists in and from Gaza is how evangelical and heartbreakingly idealistic they are; how much journalism to them was a duty even if it meant certain death. All who have been killed had a choice, and those who are still alive and reporting still do. Sharif said he had been threatened several times by Israeli authorities over the past two years. Al Jazeera told me that he was sent a warning by Israeli intelligence and told to stop reporting. When he refused, his father was killed in an airstrike. When Ghoul took over from Dahdouh early last year, Dahdouh told him that it was a dangerous job, and no one would fault him for leaving his post and returning to his wife and child. Ghoul refused, and was decapitated in a targeted strike. What the Israeli government is trying to do with these killings is not just stop the stream of damning reports and footage, but annihilate the very image of Palestinians that these media professionals convey. The credibility, dignity and talent that Gaza's journalists exhibit to the world in their reports and social media posts has to be extinguished. The more Gaza is a place that is teeming with militants, where there are no reliable narrators, and where Israel's justifications for killing and starvation cannot be challenged by plausible witnesses, the easier Israel can prosecute its genocidal campaign. A recent investigation by +972 Magazine and Local Call identified the sinisterly named 'legitimisation cell', a unit of the Israeli military tasked, in the words of the report, with 'identifying Gaza-based journalists it could portray as undercover Hamas operatives, in an effort to blunt growing global outrage over Israel's killing of reporters'. According to the investigation's sources, the effort is 'driven by anger that Gaza-based reporters were 'smearing [Israel's] name in front of the world''. Central to this effort is Israel's ability to rely on western media to treat its claims as somehow plausible, despite the fact that time and time again, it has made claims that turn out not to be true. Emergency workers who were killed because they were 'advancing suspiciously', according to the IDF, were said to be found in restraints with execution-style shots. The claim that Hamas was systematically stealing aid, which is used to justify blockade and starvation, was contradicted by sources within the Israeli military itself. It is Hamas that is shooting Palestinians queueing for aid, Israel has said, not us. Eventually, this behaviour deserves to be called what it is: systemic deception that forfeits your right to be a credible authority. And still we are told that Israel has killed a journalist, but here is Israel's claim that the journalist was a militant. You can make up your mind. The resulting ambiguity means that even if these claims cannot be verified, they are imbued with potential truth. Do you see how that works? The truth is that journalists in Gaza have been colossally failed by many of their colleagues in the western media – not just in terms of how their killings are reported, but in how the entire conflict is described. Figures of the dead and starving in Gaza are often described as coming from 'Hamas-run' ministries, but you don't see the statements coming from Israeli authorities caveated as serially unreliable, or the phrase 'wanted by the international criminal court' attached to the name Benjamin Netanyahu. Meanwhile, the word of Palestinian journalists is never quite enough – not until foreign media (who are not allowed into Gaza) can give the final gold-standard judgment. They are cast out of the body of journalism, their truth buried along with them. In Gaza, however, there will always be someone brave and clear-eyed who continues the coverage. Who puts on a press flak jacket that makes them a target. They continue to bear, alone, the responsibility of bringing the world the reality of events in Gaza, even as their voices and breaths are besieged. Nesrine Malik is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
