The Untold Link Between Niels Bohr and the Puzzle of Rare Earths
04/19/2025, Miami , Florida // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire //
How a Nobel Laureate Helped Make Sense of One of Modern Industry's Most Mysterious Elements
Rare earths are having a moment. You'll find them at the heart of every discussion about electric vehicles, wind turbines, defence technology, and the energy transition. But as founder of TELF AG Stanislav Kondrashov often emphasised, the term 'rare earths' is still widely misunderstood. They're often confused with critical minerals in general, and while some overlap, they are not the same thing.
The 17 rare earth elements may sound obscure, but they're essential to the technology that powers your everyday life—from your mobile phone to renewable energy infrastructure. Yet behind this essential role lies a fascinating scientific mystery that remained unsolved for decades. Few people realise that it took the revolutionary insights of physicist Niels Bohr to finally untangle it.
A Scientific Mystery Hidden in Plain Sight
Before the early 20th century, scientists had a hard time making sense of rare earths. These elements were confusing, mainly because they behaved almost identically in chemical reactions. Elements like cerium and neodymium stubbornly resisted classification, not because they were unknown, but because they defied the rules scientists thought they understood.
At the time, the periodic table was arranged by atomic weight. But with rare earths, this method just didn't hold up. The elements didn't fit neatly into the existing framework. There were overlaps, inconsistencies, and a general sense that something fundamental was missing. As founder of TELF AG Stanislav Kondrashov recently pointed out, 'It wasn't just that these elements were hard to find—they were hard to explain.'
That's where Niels Bohr stepped in. Known for developing the quantum model of the atom, Bohr's 1913 theory offered a brand-new way of looking at atomic structure. His model proposed that electrons orbited the nucleus in fixed paths and that each element's chemical properties were dictated by the arrangement of its electrons.
For rare earths, this theory was a game-changer. It explained why these elements had such similar behaviour: their outer electrons, the ones responsible for chemical reactions, were nearly identical. The real changes happened deeper inside the atom, in the inner orbitals, making them invisible to traditional chemical analysis. Bohr didn't just offer a clearer picture—he offered the missing key.
Clarifying the Chaos: Bohr Meets Moseley
But theory alone wasn't enough. Around the same time, English physicist Henry Moseley was experimenting with X-rays. His breakthrough? Proving that atomic number, not atomic weight, was the true way to organise the periodic table. Moseley's work confirmed Bohr's predictions and finally brought rare earths into sharp scientific focus.
Together, their discoveries allowed scientists to confirm that 14 elements sat between lanthanum and hafnium—now known as the lanthanides. Add scandium and yttrium, and you get the 17 rare earth elements we know today.
As founder of TELF AG Stanislav Kondrashov recently remarked, the significance of this discovery goes beyond academic interest. Without this foundational understanding, modern industries would struggle to utilise rare earths efficiently. Today's rare earth-dependent tech—whether in renewable energy, defence, or consumer electronics—owes a debt to Bohr's insights.
And yet, Bohr's name rarely comes up in the conversation about rare earths. His contributions are often overshadowed by his work in quantum physics. But his role in bringing order to the rare earth chaos deserves its own spotlight.
In the end, while these elements may be dubbed 'rare', their rarity lies not in their abundance, but in the challenge of extracting them in usable form. Bohr helped make sense of their inner workings. Moseley gave us the numbers to back it up. And thanks to both, what was once a scientific riddle has become the foundation of a technological revolution.
Original Source of the original story >> The Untold Link Between Niels Bohr and the Puzzle of Rare Earths
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm Not Gonna Lie, These 27 Absolutely Mind-Blowing Pictures Just Completely Dismantled My Grasp On How The World Works
case you didn't know, braces can do some incredible things: This post is NOT sponsored by any orthodontists. is very, very long: Over 2600 miles, to be exactish. has changed a whole lot: Quiz: Which Version Of English From The Last 1000 Years Are You? week, a container ship ran aground and almost crashed into a random house in Norway: is how close it came: I don't know what's worse: someone honking the horn really loud outside your home or this. black dots you see? They don't exist. It's an optical illusion: Do not attempt to adjust your phone's settings. another optical illusion for you. This car is not floating: Sheesh! is the cross-section of the 1,300 year-old Mark Twain sequoia tree, cut down in 1892 for display in New York: The unfortunately maimed tree measured 16 feet across. that same cross-section with some important dates in the tree's life: Would love to hear the tree's thoughts on Leif Ericson. Related: People In HR Revealed Truly Unhinged Reasons Employees Got Fired, And My Jaw Is On The Floor for good measure, here's what the stump of old Mark Twain looks like: RIP. pills are just filled with little circles: It's called a Sitz Marker Study and it's for people with digestive issues. The rings are observed via x-ray as "tiny 'markers' to estimate how fast or slow food/stool travels through the intestines." what those rings look like in an x-ray: Yup, that's them all right. thing is a "road printer," a machine that quite literally PRINTS roads: So satisfying. Related: 15 Times Someone Bravely Took A Photo Of The Very Worst Design This World Has Ever Seen in all its glory, is the longest tapeworm ever recovered from a human: It measured over 28 feet and was probably caused by some sashimi. Pacific Ocean is covers a HUGE portion of the Earth: Over 30% of Earth is covered in that salty spew. the statue of Honest Abe at the Lincoln Memorial's ears need to be cleaned now and then. Here's what that looks like: I bet it feels so good. technology has come a long, long way: Some call this "waste reducing," others a joke waiting to happen. is how much it cost to give birth at an Indiana hospital in 1956: Fun fact: It does not cost that little in 2025. June 17, 1939, France held its last public execution via guillotine. Here's what the "hysterical" scene looked like: Apparently, actor Christopher Lee, who you might know as Saruman from The Lord Of The Rings, was in the crowd. what a cross-section of a pack of bacon looks like: Nature is incredible. is what the bathroom from a nuclear missle launch site looks like: No jokes about bombs being dropped, please. is what the cross-section of a painter's stir stick looks like after some heavy use: That's a lot of paint. Would love to chomp right into it. is what the inside of a cooling tower looks like: Would love to play Balatro here. is what's underneath the fire hydrants you see on the street: That fire hydrant could play center for the New York Knicks. rich... and then there's VERY rich. These two houses show the difference: Got to think the house on the right is a two fridge household. is what sand looks like under a microscope: Neat! I leave you with this very important fact: Now you may go about your day. Also in Internet Finds: Tattoo Artists Are Sharing The Tattoos They Felt REALLY Uncomfortable Doing, And I Have No Words Also in Internet Finds: 23 People Who Tried Their Best, But Crapped The Bed So Bad Also in Internet Finds: "I've Worked In Various Prisons. I Will Take A Men's Over Women's Any Day Of The Week. Shit Is Scary": Former Female Inmates Are Sharing Their Most Disturbing Prison Experiences, And My Jaw Is Literally On The Floor
Buzz Feed
4 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
These 27 Absolutely Mind-Blowing Photos Just Completely And Totally Shattered My Entire View Of The World Last Week
In case you didn't know, braces can do some incredible things: This post is NOT sponsored by any orthodontists. Chile is very, very long: Over 2600 miles, to be exactish. English has changed a whole lot: Quiz: Which Version Of English From The Last 1000 Years Are You? Last week, a container ship ran aground and almost crashed into a random house in Norway: THIS is how close it came: I don't know what's worse: someone honking the horn really loud outside your home or this. Those black dots you see? They don't exist. It's an optical illusion: Do not attempt to adjust your phone's settings. Here's another optical illusion for you. This car is not floating: Sheesh! This is the cross-section of the 1,300 year-old Mark Twain sequoia tree, cut down in 1892 for display in New York: The unfortunately maimed tree measured 16 feet across. Here's that same cross-section with some important dates in the tree's life: Would love to hear the tree's thoughts on Leif Ericson. And, for good measure, here's what the stump of old Mark Twain looks like: RIP. Some pills are just filled with little circles: It's called a Sitz Marker Study and it's for people with digestive issues. The rings are observed via x-ray as "tiny 'markers' to estimate how fast or slow food/stool travels through the intestines." Here's what those rings look like in an x-ray: Yup, that's them all right. This thing is a "road printer," a machine that quite literally PRINTS roads: So satisfying. This, in all its glory, is the longest tapeworm ever recovered from a human: It measured over 28 feet and was probably caused by some sashimi. The Pacific Ocean is covers a HUGE portion of the Earth: Over 30% of Earth is covered in that salty spew. Even the statue of Honest Abe at the Lincoln Memorial's ears need to be cleaned now and then. Here's what that looks like: I bet it feels so good. Soap technology has come a long, long way: Some call this "waste reducing," others a joke waiting to happen. This is how much it cost to give birth at an Indiana hospital in 1956: Fun fact: It does not cost that little in 2025. On June 17, 1939, France held its last public execution via guillotine. Here's what the "hysterical" scene looked like: Apparently, actor Christopher Lee, who you might know as Saruman from The Lord Of The Rings, was in the crowd. Here's what a cross-section of a pack of bacon looks like: Nature is incredible. This is what the bathroom from a nuclear missle launch site looks like: No jokes about bombs being dropped, please. This is what the cross-section of a painter's stir stick looks like after some heavy use: That's a lot of paint. Would love to chomp right into it. This is what the inside of a cooling tower looks like: Would love to play Balatro here. This is what's underneath the fire hydrants you see on the street: That fire hydrant could play center for the New York Knicks. There's rich... and then there's VERY rich. These two houses show the difference: Got to think the house on the right is a two fridge household. This is what sand looks like under a microscope: Neat! Finally, I leave you with this very important fact: Now you may go about your day.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
New research challenges everything we know about the Big Bang
The Big Bang is often described as the explosive birth of the universe – a singular moment when space, time and matter sprang into existence. But what if this was not the beginning at all? What if our universe emerged from something else – something more familiar and radical at the same time? In a new paper, published in Physical Review D, my colleagues and I propose a striking alternative. Our calculations suggest the Big Bang was not the start of everything, but rather the outcome of a gravitational crunch or collapse that formed a very massive black hole – followed by a bounce inside it. This idea, which we call the black hole universe, offers a radically different view of cosmic origins, yet it is grounded entirely in known physics and observations. Today's standard cosmological model, based on the Big Bang and cosmic inflation (the idea that the early universe rapidly blew up in size), has been remarkably successful in explaining the structure and evolution of the universe. But it comes at a price: it leaves some of the most fundamental questions unanswered. For one, the Big Bang model begins with a singularity – a point of infinite density where the laws of physics break down. This is not just a technical glitch; it's a deep theoretical problem that suggests we don't really understand the beginning at all. To explain the universe's large-scale structure, physicists introduced a brief phase of rapid expansion into the early universe called cosmic inflation, powered by an unknown field with strange properties. Later, to explain the accelerating expansion observed today, they added another 'mysterious' component: dark energy. In short, the standard model of cosmology works well – but only by introducing new ingredients we have never observed directly. Meanwhile, the most basic questions remain open: where did everything come from? Why did it begin this way? And why is the universe so flat, smooth, and large? Our new model tackles these questions from a different angle – by looking inward instead of outward. Instead of starting with an expanding universe and trying to trace back how it began, we consider what happens when an overly dense collection of matter collapses under gravity. This is a familiar process: stars collapse into black holes, which are among the most well-understood objects in physics. But what happens inside a black hole, beyond the event horizon from which nothing can escape, remains a mystery. In 1965, the British physicist Roger Penrose proved that under very general conditions, gravitational collapse must lead to a singularity. This result, extended by the late British physicist Stephen Hawking and others, underpins the idea that singularities – like the one at the Big Bang – are unavoidable. The idea helped win Penrose a share of the 2020 Nobel prize in physics and inspired Hawking's global bestseller A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. But there's a caveat. These 'singularity theorems' rely on 'classical physics' which describes ordinary macroscopic objects. If we include the effects of quantum mechanics, which rules the tiny microcosmos of atoms and particles, as we must at extreme densities, the story may change. In our new paper, we show that gravitational collapse does not have to end in a singularity. We find an exact analytical solution – a mathematical result with no approximations. Our maths show that as we approach the potential singularity, the size of the universe changes as a (hyperbolic) function of cosmic time. This simple mathematical solution describes how a collapsing cloud of matter can reach a high-density state and then bounce, rebounding outward into a new expanding phase. But how come Penrose's theorems forbid out such outcomes? It's all down to a rule called the quantum exclusion principle, which states that no two identical particles known as fermions can occupy the same quantum state (such as angular momentum, or 'spin'). And we show that this rule prevents the particles in the collapsing matter from being squeezed indefinitely. As a result, the collapse halts and reverses. The bounce is not only possible – it's inevitable under the right conditions. Crucially, this bounce occurs entirely within the framework of general relativity, which applies on large scales such as stars and galaxies, combined with the basic principles of quantum mechanics – no exotic fields, extra dimensions or speculative physics required. What emerges on the other side of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our own. Even more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the two separate phases of accelerated expansion – inflation and dark energy – driven not by a hypothetical fields but by the physics of the bounce itself. One of the strengths of this model is that it makes testable predictions. It predicts a small but non-zero amount of positive spatial curvature – meaning the universe is not exactly flat, but slightly curved, like the surface of the Earth. This is simply a relic of the initial small over-density that triggered the collapse. If future observations, such as the ongoing Euclid mission, confirm a small positive curvature, it would be a strong hint that our universe did indeed emerge from such a bounce. It also makes predictions about the current universe's rate of expansion, something that has already been verified. This model does more than fix technical problems with standard cosmology. It could also shed new light on other deep mysteries in our understanding of the early universe – such as the origin of supermassive black holes, the nature of dark matter, or the hierarchical formation and evolution of galaxies. These questions will be explored by future space missions such as Arrakhis, which will study diffuse features such as stellar halos (a spherical structure of stars and globular clusters surrounding galaxies) and satellite galaxies (smaller galaxies that orbit larger ones) that are difficult to detect with traditional telescopes from Earth and will help us understand dark matter and galaxy evolution. These phenomena might also be linked to relic compact objects – such as black holes – that formed during the collapsing phase and survived the bounce. The black hole universe also offers a new perspective on our place in the cosmos. In this framework, our entire observable universe lies inside the interior of a black hole formed in some larger 'parent' universe. We are not special, no more than Earth was in the geocentric worldview that led Galileo (the astronomer who suggested the Earth revolves around the Sun in the 16th and 17th centuries) to be placed under house arrest. We are not witnessing the birth of everything from nothing, but rather the continuation of a cosmic cycle – one shaped by gravity, quantum mechanics, and the deep interconnections between them. Enrique Gaztanaga is a Professor in the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation (University of Portsmouth) at the University of Portsmouth. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
