logo
As Trump steamrolls ahead, Democrats see a growing 'heartbeat' of resistance

As Trump steamrolls ahead, Democrats see a growing 'heartbeat' of resistance

Yahoo12-03-2025

In an interview on MSNBC, Faiz Shakir, a senior advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders, described "thousands and thousands" of people showing up to recent rallies held by the Vermont senator in Republican-held congressional districts.
Shakir said the crowds were "angry and frustrated" with Trump and billionaire Elon Musk's apparent grip on government spending, and "urging Democrats to stand up and do something."
"In my mind," he said, "I have Bernie Sanders holding a stethoscope up to the Democratic Party and saying, 'Hey, listen to this: the heartbeat of America.'"
Shakir's remarks reflected a growing sentiment among Democrats, progressive protesters and others displeased with the way President Trump has steamrolled back into office and over long-standing Democratic norms.
Shaking off an earlier sense of resignation that had dampened protest in the days following Trump's return to power, they are finding their voices, landing on new resistance strategies focused on what they see as Trump's most egregious overreaches, and delivering those messages to receptive audiences at town halls, rallies, marches and street protests.
On Friday, hundreds of scientists marched in Los Angeles at a "Stand Up for Science" event, part of a larger nationwide day of protest against Trump policies that have slashed federal funding for scientific research and threatened agencies dedicated to weather forecasting and environmental protection.
Read more: Former Rep. Katie Porter announces run for California governor
On Saturday, the arrest of Columbia University student and Palestinian protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil by federal immigration officers, despite his facing no criminal charges and being a green card holder, sparked protests in New York and around the country.
On Sunday, Trump was again on everyone's mind as Democratic lawmakers joined thousands of others for a march to commemorate the 60th anniversary of "Bloody Sunday," when law enforcement brutalized voting rights activists in Selma, Ala., in 1965. "At this moment, faced with trouble on every side, we've got to press on,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said.
On Monday, after weekend visits to big crowds in Wisconsin as part of his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour, Sanders, 83, stood with a bullhorn on the back of a pickup truck in suburban Detroit, addressing an overflow crowd that couldn't fit into the high school gym where he was speaking.
"The people of this country will not allow us to move toward oligarchy. They will not allow Trump to take us into authoritarianism," Sanders said, to cheers. "We're prepared to fight. And we're going to win."
The Trump administration did not respond to a request for comment.
The latest protests are not the first since Trump took office. Last month, for instance, thousands of people across the country protested Trump's planned mass deportations. In L.A., they shut down the 101 Freeway. More immigration protests have occurred since.
Read more: Thousands rally in downtown Los Angeles, shut down 101 Freeway to protest Trump's immigration policies
And still, Democrats and other progressives could hardly be credited with running a cohesive, well-oiled resistance movement. They have for months been accused of being flat-footed, ineffective and poorly coordinated in their response to Trump's agenda, including during Trump's joint address to Congress last week.
Still, the resistance seems in some ways to be ratcheting up, and has clearly started to reach — and aggravate — the White House.
For weeks now, activists have been targeting Musk, the world's richest man and head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, by going after his bottom line. They have called for a boycott of Tesla, Musk's electric automaker, and staged protests outside Tesla showrooms and dealerships. Partly as a result, the automaker's sales and stock price have plunged.
Trump blasted those efforts Tuesday as somehow illegal, and said he would buy a Tesla as a "show of confidence and support" for Musk.
"Elon Musk is 'putting it on the line' in order to help our Nation, and he is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "But the Radical Left Lunatics, as they often do, are trying to illegally and collusively boycott Tesla, one of the World's great automakers, and Elon's 'baby,' in order to attack and do harm to Elon, and everything he stands for."
Protesters took the president's comments as another challenge. Tesla Takedown, a decentralized group that has helped amplify Tesla protests in California and across the country in recent weeks, said in a statement to The Times that they would not be cowed by Trump, and that peaceful protests would continue.
"We will not be bullied or allow our rights to be trampled on or stolen," the group said. "If you're ready to show Donald Trump and Elon Musk that there are no kings in America, join a Tesla Takedown protest in your community this weekend."
Katie Fallow, deputy litigation director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia, said that, in a moment like this, it is "extremely important" for free speech protections to be defended and for critics of the president to "make their voices known" — "particularly given the number of moves that this administration has made in just the first 50 days or so to try to shut down criticism of the government or of Trump."
She cited the arrest of Khalil, the administration's threat to revoke federal funding for universities that allow for protests on their campuses, and attacks the Trump administration has launched against big law firms that have worked for Trump's political opponents or with prosecutors who have built cases against Trump in the past, as clear overreaches of power that must be confronted.
Such actions send a "chilling message to others who may want to take to the streets or engage in some other form of protest or dissent," Fallow said, and the Trump administration will only grow more emboldened if such steps work to silence their critics.
"It is important for lawyers, for law firms, companies, people who have power and privilege, to use their resources to fight back," she said.
Whether the recent momentum will hold up, or protests will continue to proliferate, is unclear. Active resistance — including from states like California — is far from the only response to Trump.
Polling shows Trump retains broad support among Republicans, and even some Democrats have decided to stay quiet or move toward the center rather than hold the line.
Read more: U.S. resumes military aid and intelligence sharing as Ukraine says it is open to a 30-day cease-fire
For weeks, Democrats and other political observers have mulled advice put forward in the New York Times by veteran Democratic operative James Carville, who suggested that Democrats should "roll over and play dead" while Republicans "crumble beneath their own weight" and "make the American people miss us."
Ahead of Trump's joint address last week, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi advised Democrats to let Trump "stew in his own juice" rather than vocally oppose him. And in a new podcast launched last week, Gov. Gavin Newsom tacked hard toward the middle in an interview with controversial conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
On Sunday, Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan — who delivered the Democratic rebuttal to Trump's joint address — gave a sober analysis of where Democrats stand on NBC's "Meet the Press."
Slotkin said it's not a secret that Democrats "have been on their heels since Trump won the election," are "still finding our footing" and need to land on a better strategy to respond to Trump as he continues "flooding the zone" with controversial and chaos-inducing policy measures.
Outside Detroit the next day, Sanders struck a decidedly different tone. He said the Trump administration is driving the country toward authoritarianism and kleptocracy, but Americans of all political stripes are standing up across the country to push back.
"We're here today to in fact make sure that after so many people in our country have fought and fought and died for democracy, that we are going to be — stay — a government of the people, by the people and for the people," he said.
The crowd roared.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

Hamilton Spectator

time42 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Who's running for office? Georgia candidates announce 2026 bids
Who's running for office? Georgia candidates announce 2026 bids

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Who's running for office? Georgia candidates announce 2026 bids

State Rep. Derrick Jackson, a Tyrone Democrat, has become the latest candidate to launch a bid for governor. The 2026 elections are more than a year away, but campaign announcement season in Georgia is in full swing, as candidates seek to secure a position under the Peach State's iconic Gold Dome. State Rep. Derrick Jackson, a Tyrone Democrat, has become the latest candidate to launch a bid for governor, unveiling a campaign Friday that highlighted his military service, business experience and focus on advocating for Georgia residents' civil rights. 'When I see something that's not right, that's not fair, that's unjust, I have a moral obligation as an elected official,' he said in an interview with the Georgia Recorder, citing a conversation he had with the late civil rights icon and long-time Georgia Congressman John Lewis that inspired him to run for governor. 'I realized we are in a political season right now where I need to do more.' He said he hopes to implement policies that would benefit working families in Georgia, including a $20 minimum wage and eliminating state taxes for teachers, nurses, military veterans and senior citizens. 'A lot of citizens are looking at this American dream, and they see it fading away because of some of the laws and policies that we put in place in Georgia,' he said. 'And so as governor, I would be in the pivotal place to stop some of these harmful pieces of legislation that are negatively impacting families in urban, suburban, rural and underserved areas in Georgia.' Jackson, a General Electric marketing executive, began his first term in the state House in 2017, but emphasized his 42 years of leadership experience throughout his time in the U.S. Navy, the Legislature and in his private sector work. He joins fellow legislator Sen. Jason Esteves of Atlanta and former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms on the Democratic ballot. On the Republican side, Attorney General Chris Carr is the only announced candidate, but with Gov. Brian Kemp term-limited from running again, there will likely be a long list of GOP primary candidates. Lt. Gov. Burt Jones is widely expected to mount a run for governor. This also isn't Jackson's first bid for higher office. In 2022 he ran for lieutenant governor, but finished sixth in the Democratic primary. He returned to the State Legislature in 2023 after winning a special election to replace Rep. Tish Naghise, a Fayetteville Democrat who died during her first term. Most recently, he ran for House Minority Leader in 2024 but lost to Rep. Carolyn Hugley, a Columbus Democrat. The gubernatorial race isn't the only statewide contest that's getting competitive. Among the candidates who launched campaigns this week are state Sen. Brian Strickland, a McDonough Republican who is entering the race for attorney general, and President Pro Tem John F. Kennedy, a Macon Republican hoping to become Georgia's next lieutenant governor. Democratic state Rep. Jasmine Clark of Lilburn also launched a bid for Congress this week, vying to unseat incumbent Rep. David Scott to represent Georgia's 13th congressional district. Ahead of this year's Aug. 26 special election, candidates are vying for a chance to replace outgoing state Sen. Brandon Beach, an Alpharetta Republican who President Donald Trump appointed to serve as U.S. Treasurer earlier this year. A total of seven candidates — six Republicans and one Democrat — are hoping to fill his shoes. Farooq Mughal, the former Democratic state representative from Dacula, is seeking reelection after losing his seat in one of Georgia's narrowest state legislative races of the 2024 season. Mughal made history as the first Pakistani-American in the Legislature when he was elected in 2022. However, after the 2023 redistricting cycle drew more conservative voters into his district, he became the target of a governor-backed effort to flip some of the most competitive House districts red, losing to Republican challenger Sandy Donatucci in 2024 by only 80 votes. Now, he's hoping to return to the legislature with an agenda focused on supporting public schools, securing tax relief for families and addressing gun violence. 'It was the honor of my life to serve the people of District 105,' Mughal said in a statement announcing his candidacy. 'I'm running to return to the State House because there's still critical work to be done for Gwinnett families.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids
Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

By Jane Ross and Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Helmeted police in riot gear turned out on Friday evening in a tense confrontation with protesters in downtown Los Angeles, after a day of federal immigration raids in which dozens of people across the city were reported to be taken into custody. Live Reuters video showed Los Angeles Police Department officers lined up on a downtown street wielding batons and what appeared to be tear gas rifles, facing off with demonstrators after authorities had ordered crowds of protesters to disperse around nightfall. Early in the standoff, some protesters hurled chunks of broken concrete toward officers, and police responded by firing volleys of tear gas and pepper spray. Police also fired "flash-bang" concussion rounds. It was not clear whether there were any immediate arrests. An LAPD spokesperson, Drake Madison, told Reuters that police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted several locations, including a Home Depot in the city's Wetlake District, an apparel store in the Fashion District and a clothing warehouse in South Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles City News Service (CNS). CNS and other local media reported dozens of people were taken into custody during the raids, the latest in a series of such sweeps conducted in a number of cities as part of President Donald Trump's extensive crackdown on illegal immigration. The Republican president has vowed to arrest and deport undocumented migrants in record numbers. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement action. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and massed outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were believed to be held. Impromptu demonstrations had also erupted at some of the raid locations earlier in the day. One organized labor executive, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, was injured and detained by ICE at one site, according to an SEIU statement. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." No details about the nature or severity of Huerta's injury were given. It was not clear whether he was charged with a crime. ICE did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for information about its enforcement actions or Huerta's detention. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement condemning the immigration raids, saying, "these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store