SC rejects BJP leader's plea to enforce NEP's three-language formula in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal
Temples in Delhi are conducting prayers and "havan" ceremonies for the safety of armed forces and the nation's well-being amid the India-Pakistan military conflict. Rituals include recitations of "Durga Saptashati," "Hanuman Chalisa," and "Vishnu Sahasranama," focusing on peace and national harmony. Collective prayers aim to foster unity, spiritual resilience, and gratitude towards Mother Earth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Two held for ‘Hanuman Chalisa' outside mosque granted bail
Prayagraj: Allahabad High Court granted bail to two members of Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Suraksha Samiti held in Mar for reciting 'Hanuman Chalisa' near a mosque in Meerut. Sachin Sirohi and Sanjay Samarval were booked by Meerut police under sections 191(2) [rioting], 196 [promoting enmity between different groups and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony], 197 [imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration] of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). As per case of the prosecution, the accused, along with their associates, protested outside a mosque, raised anti-religious slogans and recited Hanuman Chalisa, promoting enmity and hatred on the grounds of religion. They have also been accused of threatening to demolish the mosque, due to which, chaos prevailed in the area tension arose among the people going towards the railway station. The counsel for the accused submitted that allegations levelled against the applicants were false and claimed they had been implicated in the matter for political reasons. It was also argued that contents of FIR and statements of witnesses gave no credible evidence against the applicants, hence they should be granted bail. State counsel opposed their bail plea, arguing that in order to disturb harmony, applicants recited 'Hanuman Chalisa' at a Muslim religious place, thereby inciting enmity on basis of religion. Justice Raj Beer Singh, however, found it a fit case to grant bail, observing that seriousness of the allegation or availability of material in support thereof were not the only considerations for declining bail. "It is well settled that at pre-conviction stage, there is presumption of innocence. The object of keeping a person in custody is to ensure his availability to face trial and to receive the sentence that may be passed. The detention is not supposed to be punitive or preventive," the court remarked as it granted bail in order dated Jun 3. Prayagraj: Allahabad High Court granted bail to two members of Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Suraksha Samiti held in Mar for reciting 'Hanuman Chalisa' near a mosque in Meerut. Sachin Sirohi and Sanjay Samarval were booked by Meerut police under sections 191(2) [rioting], 196 [promoting enmity between different groups and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony], 197 [imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration] of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). As per case of the prosecution, the accused, along with their associates, protested outside a mosque, raised anti-religious slogans and recited Hanuman Chalisa, promoting enmity and hatred on the grounds of religion. They have also been accused of threatening to demolish the mosque, due to which, chaos prevailed in the area tension arose among the people going towards the railway station. The counsel for the accused submitted that allegations levelled against the applicants were false and claimed they had been implicated in the matter for political reasons. It was also argued that contents of FIR and statements of witnesses gave no credible evidence against the applicants, hence they should be granted bail. State counsel opposed their bail plea, arguing that in order to disturb harmony, applicants recited 'Hanuman Chalisa' at a Muslim religious place, thereby inciting enmity on basis of religion. Justice Raj Beer Singh, however, found it a fit case to grant bail, observing that seriousness of the allegation or availability of material in support thereof were not the only considerations for declining bail. "It is well settled that at pre-conviction stage, there is presumption of innocence. The object of keeping a person in custody is to ensure his availability to face trial and to receive the sentence that may be passed. The detention is not supposed to be punitive or preventive," the court remarked as it granted bail in order dated Jun 3.
News18
3 days ago
- News18
Hanuman Chalisa At Mosque: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To Two On ‘Presumption Of Innocence'
Last Updated: The court reaffirmed the principle that pre-trial detention should not be punitive, stressing the fundamental presumption of innocence until proven guilty The Allahabad High Court on June 3, 2025, granted bail to two individuals accused of attempting to incite communal disharmony by allegedly reciting Hanuman Chalisa near a mosque in Meerut. The court reaffirmed the principle that pre-trial detention should not be punitive, stressing the fundamental presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The bench of Justice Raj Beer Singh, while hearing the bail plea of Sachin Sirohi and Sanjay Samarval, observed that continued custody is not justified solely based on the seriousness of the allegations. 'The object of keeping a person in custody is to ensure his availability to face the trial and to receive the sentence that may be passed. The detention is not supposed to be punitive or preventive," the judge noted, drawing from the Supreme Court's ruling in Vinod Bhandari v. State of MP. The duo had approached the court for relief in Case Crime No. 73 of 2025, registered under Sections 191(2), 196, and 197 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) at Sadar Bazar police station, Meerut. According to the prosecution, the applicants, along with others, entered a religious site belonging to the Muslim community and forcibly recited Hanuman Chalisa, allegedly aiming to provoke enmity between religious groups. Opposing the bail plea, the Additional Government advocate and counsel for the aggrieved parties contended that the accused acted deliberately to disturb communal harmony. The seriousness of the act, they argued, warranted denial of bail. However, counsel for the applicants maintained that the allegations were baseless and politically motivated. They argued that there was no credible evidence against their clients and that the criminal history referred to had been adequately explained in the affidavit submitted with the bail application. Weighing both sides, the court ruled that, without delving into the merits of the case at this stage, the applicants had made out a case for bail. Accordingly, bail was granted with strict conditions. These included a bar on tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses and a requirement for regular court appearances. The order further makes it clear that the applicants must refrain from making any inducements or threats to individuals acquainted with the case, and any breach would give the trial court liberty to cancel their bail. First Published: June 05, 2025, 14:54 IST
Time of India
5 days ago
- Time of India
Vidyadas Baba takes charge as Anjanadri temple's chief priest
Gangavathi (Koppal): Vidyadas Baba has taken charge as the chief priest of the Sri Anjaneya Swamy Temple at Anjanadri Hill in Chikka Rampur village, a location considered sacred as Lord Hanuman's birthplace. Following his petition to the Supreme Court challenging his dismissal and the temple's acquisition, the court issued a notice to the state govt on May 27, instructing him to continue conducting the temple's puja and karmic activities. Upon his arrival at Anjanadri, Vidyadas addressed the gathered devotees, proclaiming that the truth was victorious. He said the temple premises will be kept clean, and religious activities, including Sanskrit Pathshala, Homa Havan and Hanuman Chalisa chanting, will be organised regularly. Additionally, a special puja for Anjaneya will occur every Saturday, with free food provided to the devotees. The dispute began in 2018 when the state govt attempted to place the Anjanadri Temple under the Muzrai department's control using the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1997. This action faced strong opposition from Vidyadas, whose family maintained the temple's religious practices for over 120 years following the Ramanandi tradition. On May 27, the Supreme Court instructed the state govt to retain Vidyadas as chief priest, allowing him to continue his religious duties and reside in the Mandir room. This decision temporarily halted the govt's takeover plans and reinforced the High Court's 2023 interim order permitting his continued service. The Supreme Court stated that interference with the Pandit's removal or religious practices would face serious consequences. While acknowledging the Muzrai department's administrative role, it upheld Vidyadas and his family's right to conduct worship undisturbed, ensuring their accommodation and basic needs at the premises. Before 2018, the Kishkinda Trust and Pandit family managed the mandir independently without govt involvement. The Koppal deputy commissioner's 2018 order transferred administrative control to the govt under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1997. The writ petition lodged by Vidyadas is awaiting resolution in the Karnataka high court. The order from the Supreme Court functions as a provisional directive, compelling compliance with the earlier orders of the high court and advising the state govt against any breaches.
