
The 6 beers good for your gut health according to experts
Researchers have been accumulating evidence to suggest that certain beers could help improve the diversity of species in the gut microbiome.
A study in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, from 2022, followed 22 men who drank a little more than half a pint of beer every day for four weeks and found as a result, they had better intestinal health, The Telegraph reported.
Health experts have now conducted a review of experiments in Frontiers in Nutrition and have come to the conclusion that various ingredients in beer may have a positive impact on the immune system.
Nutrition researcher at King's College London and founder of The Gut Health Doctor, Dr Megan Rossi, said this was due to plant chemicals known as polyphenols, which are found in certain beers, and are useful for the bacteria in your gut.
Dr Rossi, speaking to The Telegraph, said: 'Bacteria have been shown to digest about 90 per cent of polyphenols and turn them into chemicals, which can have anti-inflammatory effects."
The six beers that are good for your gut health, according to health experts, are:
Guinness is thought to be rich in certain plant chemicals, according to Dr Rossi.
She said: 'Some polyphenols are particularly high in Guinness.
"We talk about diversity (being good for the gut), and that's the case for drinks as well.
"So, if you drank a little bit of Guinness one night, and then a little red wine another time, while keeping within the alcohol limit, that's probably going to get you a wider range of these polyphenols.'
Guinness is among the beers experts say could be beneficial for your health. (Image: PA)
Medical scientist at Imperial College London, Dr Federica Amati, said: 'It's not a health drink, but some of these ales will contain more of these useful chemicals as well as yeast strains left in the beer.
'They're probably not going to be alive, but there's a vein of thought that they still have some sort of beneficial impact on our immune system when they reach the gut.'
Belgian branded beers such as Hoegaarden, Westmalle Tripel and Echt Kriekenbier are fermented twice.
This second fermentation uses a different strain from the traditional brewer's yeast, The Telegraph reports, which not only increases the strength of the beer, but also means it contains more useful microbes.
Belgian professor Jeroen Raes added: 'We know that even dead yeasts could have an effect on the composition of the microbiota, and it could also have an effect on transit times."
Craft beers and dark ales also contain gut-boosting yeast, according to The Telegraph.
Dr Amati said if there's a little bit of sediment at the bottom of your craft beer or dark ale, "that's always a good sign".
If you are a larger drinker, try finding an unfiltered version as it may contain more potentially useful chemicals, as well as having a more "complex flavour and aroma".
Dr Amati continues: 'If you drink a fairly long fermented and traditionally made beer, so not one that's super filtered, you will get some of those polyphenols and yeast strains left in the beer."
If you are a larger drinker, finding an unfiltered version will be better for your gut health. (Image: PA)
"Drinking alcohol-free beers could offer all the benefits to your gut, without the disadvantages of the actual alcohol content," The Telegraph said.
Alcohol free beer - in particular Doom Bar's version - are said to be more likely to contain helpful plant chemicals.
According to Dr Amati, there are also several artisan cider brands, including the likes of Old Rosie Scrumpy Cider and Henry Westons Vintage Cider, that can have benefits for the gut microbiome.
She explained: 'They tend to have some of the actual fruit left in the drink, meaning that fermentation carries on for longer.
'The cloudier ciders are better as these are sugars known as polysaccharides which float in the cider and they're good prebiotics to feed the gut bugs.'
Other drinks, such as mead, are also thought to be beneficial for the gut.
While the likes of Guinness, Newcastle Brown Ale and Stella Artois Unfiltered are good for your health, there are a number of beers that are not so good for you, and the experts have warned to avoid them.
There are also beers to avoid, according to health experts, including the likes of Budweiser, San Miguel and Peroni. (Image: JD Wetherspoon)
The six beers drinkers should avoid, according to the health experts, are:
While the experts say there are benefits to some beers, they also emphasise alcoholic drinks are not health drinks and in many cases, any benefits for the gut are likely to be cancelled out by the impact of alcohol on the body.
Dr Amati said: "I'm very keen to pass on the message that we have to drink very moderately.
'Have at least three days with no alcohol in your week, and no more than one drink when you do drink.'
While Dr Rossi advocates drinking no more than one or two alcoholic drinks at a time.
RECOMMENDED READING:
Is wine good for you and what are the healthiest options - dietician has their say
Chocolate is good for you and here are the 7 health benefits to prove it
Walkers Cheese & Onion to Kettle Lightly Salted - which crisps are the healthiest?
These are the 8 foods to eat that will help you live to 100 (or longer)
She added: 'When we're talking about any anti-inflammatory benefits for the gut from these darker beers, that becomes pro-inflammatory after about two drinks.'
'That's because the alcohol starts to make the gut a little bit leaky, allowing things to move from our gut into the bloodstream that wouldn't normally be there, and causing low-grade inflammation.'
The NHS recommends drinking no more than 14 units of alcohol a week, spread across 3 days or more.
That equates to around six medium (175ml) glasses of wine, or six pints of 4% beer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Prostate cancer patients ignored five times before diagnosis
Men with prostate cancer are being turned away by GPs multiple times before they can get a diagnosis. New data show almost 10,000 men a year are being diagnosed with the disease only after at least three visits to their GP. They include thousands of men who were referred for the right tests only after they turned to their family doctor at least five times. Today, The Telegraph is launching a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer. It is also encouraging men to check if they are at risk of the disease. Currently, men are not offered tests, even if they have a family history of the disease. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that PSA blood tests would be offered to those at heightened risk of the disease. The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) is currently considering whether to recommend the rollout of such testing. Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer in men, with 55,000 diagnoses and 12,000 deaths annually. When the disease is caught early, it significantly increases the chances of successful treatment and long-term survival. Yet there is no screening programme, despite improvements in back-up diagnostic methods to support blood tests. It is the last major cancer without a screening programme. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, praised The Telegraph's campaign. He said: 'I applaud The Telegraph and its readers for their long history of campaigning for better cancer care. ' As a cancer survivor who owes his life to the NHS I know all too well how important screening is and I would like to see a screening programme in place but it must be evidence-led. 'The UK National Screening Committee is looking at this as a priority – including reviewing the evidence for screening men with a family history of prostate cancer. 'While we wait for the evidence as to whether a screening programme would be safe, accurate and reliable, we are getting on with improving cancer treatment and prevention, as well as funding tens of millions of pounds of research and cutting waiting lists through our Plan for Change.' While there is no prostate cancer screening programme, there is a national breast screening programme for women, with mammograms offered every five years to those between the age of 50 and 70. The NHS data shows that men with prostate cancer fare far worse than women with breast cancer, in securing access to diagnostic tests and prompt treatment. The figures show 18.7 per cent of men with prostate cancer only received a diagnosis after least three visits to their GP. This amounts to 9,724 annually. For women with breast cancer the figure is 7.4 per cent, according to data from the NHS National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. For 5.2 per cent of men with prostate cancer, it took at least five visits, against 2.5 per cent of women with breast disease. The plight of men with prostate cancer has been highlighted by Sir Chris Hoy, a six-time Olympic cycling gold medallist, who was diagnosed with terminal cancer that originated in his prostate in 2023. Despite a family history of prostate cancer – which affected both his father and grandfather – he was never offered PSA tests. Mr Streeting has said that Sir Chris 'makes a powerful argument' about the case for prostate screening, especially where there is a family history of disease. Commenting on the data uncovered by The Telegraph, Oliver Kemp, the chief executive of Prostate Cancer Research, said: 'While these findings are alarming, sadly they confirm what patients have been telling us for years: too many men are slipping through the cracks, with their concerns dismissed time and time again. 'Prostate cancer is being caught far too late because we don't have a system designed to find it early. That's why it remains the second-biggest cancer killer of men in the UK. We urgently need a targeted screening programme to find those at risk early – when they have the best possible chance of survival.' Chiara De Biase, director of health services, equity and improvement at Prostate Cancer UK, said men with prostate cancer were subject to 'life-threatening inequalities'. She added: 'Those who've weighed up the pros and cons of PSA testing and made an informed choice to request a test are still being refused. And if you're black, working class, or even live in the North of the UK, you're more likely to get an incurable diagnosis. This is unacceptable and it's getting worse.' She said the situation was worsened by outdated NHS guidelines that tell GPs not to raise the issue of prostate cancer or PSA testing with patients, and rely instead on men to come forward. Ms De Biase added: 'Prostate cancer is the last major cancer without a screening programme. We submitted evidence more than two years ago backing the case for screening the highest-risk men, and we look forward to working with the UKNSC on their decision later this year.' The charity is encouraging all men to use their risk checker to assess their chance of prostate cancer, by going to: Prof Kamila Hawthorne, chairman of the Royal College of GPs, said: 'GPs want the best for their patients and while they are referring more patients to receive a timely cancer diagnosis in secondary care by making appropriate referrals, this can be incredibly challenging as early symptoms may often be vague or indicative of more common and less serious conditions – and some, such as prostate cancer, may not display symptoms until they are already at quite a late stage. 'Cancer screening programmes have potentially saved millions of lives, but screening does not come without risk, including the potential for overdiagnosis and harm to patients as a result, so it's vital that any screening programme is evidence-based and reliable.' Prof Peter Johnson, NHS national clinical director for cancer, said: 'The NHS is diagnosing more men with prostate cancer at an early stage than ever before – providing the best chance of success from treatment. 'Prostate cancer symptoms can be hard to distinguish from less serious causes, meaning it can take extra visits to the GP to rule these out, and we would encourage men to continue to come forward if they have any concerns about their health.'


The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Streeting warns doctors must feel ‘pain' of strikes to prevent further action
Striking doctors must feel the 'pain' of taking industrial action to prevent the spread of walkouts in other public sectors, Wes Streeting has warned. The health secretary has instructed hospitals to minimise disruption to appointments as safely as possible, as up to 50,000 junior doctors stage a five-day walkout in the latest row over pay. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, have called for a 29 per cent pay increase and have taken to the picket lines across England from 7am on Friday, as part of a five-day walkout due to last until Wednesday. In a transcript seen and reported by The Telegraph, Mr Streeting told NHS leaders: 'It is really important that these strikes are not pain-free for resident doctors or the BMA, because otherwise we will see broader contagion across the BMA and potentially broader contagion across the public sector.' It has also been reported that doctors will be warned that repeated absences from duties could slow career progression. It comes after Mr Streeting sent a personal letter to NHS resident doctors, saying: 'I deeply regret the position we now find ourselves in.' The health secretary said that while he cannot pledge a bigger pay rise, he has been committed to progress to improve doctors' working lives. He also said he does not now believe the British Medical Association's resident doctors committee (RDC) has 'engaged with me in good faith' over bids to avert the strike. Members of the public have been urged to come forward for NHS care during the walkout, and are being asked to attend appointments unless told they are cancelled. GP surgeries will open as usual and urgent care and A&E will continue to be available, alongside NHS 111, NHS England said.


The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Guinness World Record's most premature baby at 21-weeks of gestation celebrates his first birthday
A baby born at only 21 weeks of gestation last July in Iowa City, Iowa, has just celebrated his first birthday, and among his gifts is a Guinness world record for most premature baby. Nash Keen was born on July 5, 2024 — 133 days earlier than the expected due date and weighing only 10 ounces (283 grams) -- about the size of a bar of soap. He spent the next six months in the neonatal intensive care unit at the University of Iowa Health Care Stead Family Children's Hospital before he was allowed in January to go home to Ankeny, Iowa, with parents Mollie and Randall Keen. 'Nash is so full of personality. He's a happy baby,' Mollie Keen said Wednesday, adding that he's slept through most nights since coming home from the NICU. 'Being in the NICU as long as he was, you'd think that he would be, you know, more fragile and stuff. And he's not. He's a very determined, curious little boy, and he's just all smiles all the time.' Nash is among the growing number of extremely premature infants who are getting lifesaving treatment and surviving. Upon reaching his first birthday, Guinness World Records declared Nash the world's most premature baby, beating out by a single day the organization's previous record holder born in 2020 in Alabama. Nash's parents had already experienced the heartbreak of losing a baby when Mollie's first pregnancy ended in a miscarriage. That's when she learned of a medical condition she had that might make it difficult for her to carry to full term. Mollie worried she and her husband might lose Nash, too, when she learned at her 20-week prenatal checkup that she was already 2 centimeters dilated. Doctors don't typically try to perform lifesaving measures for babies born before 22 weeks gestation as most born that young can't survive. But Mollie learned the neonatal team at Stead Family Children's Hospital was performing lifesaving measures on babies born at 21 weeks gestation. She went into labor days before that benchmark, but with medical help, she was able to stall the birth to exactly 21 weeks. The next month was fraught with medical scares as an entire team of doctor's worked to keep Nash alive and thriving. ' One of the things I noticed about the medical team is that they were very calm,' she recalled. 'You never really saw them, like, get anxious or anything. And so we kind of just learned to, like, watch them. And if, you know, if the doctors and the nurses weren't freaking out, there was no reason for us to freak out.' Dr. Malinda Schaefer, a high-risk obstetrician who delivered Nash just hours after he surpassed the 21-week mark, described his birth as a new frontier in maternal fetal medicine. Still, when consulting with the Keens before the birth, she didn't sugarcoat Nash's chances at survival or the likelihood that he would face serious medical complications if he did survive. 'Ultimately, it is not me that lives with the outcomes of parents' decisions, so it is really important to me to have honest and open conversations with parents, so they feel fully informed to make the best decision for them and their family," Schaefer said. While Nash has experienced some complications and developmental delays common to those born extremely prematurely, his progress has been as good as medical science could hope for, his doctors say. At just over a year old, Nash remains on oxygen to help him breathe and is fed solely through a feeding tube, although he's preparing to try pureed foods. He also has a minor heart defect, which his doctors believe will resolve itself as he gets older. He's not yet crawling, but he is rolling over. "He's learning how to stand on his two feet, which is awesome," his mom said. 'He's got a lot of strength in those legs.'