Trump's Border Wall Is Back—And So Is His Fight With Texas Landowners
'This is the piece they want to take out of me,' said Clarke, who is fighting back against the government's push to take control of his land. 'My entrance y todo.'
President Trump's border wall is back—and more expensive than his first term. Congress recently allocated $46 billion in taxpayer funds to pay for it.
Construction of the wall was a signature promise of Trump's first term, when he said it would cost $8 billion and Mexico would ultimately pay for it. He ended up allocating $18 billion before leaving office in early 2021, mostly to rebuild stretches of wall on federal land in New Mexico and Arizona. Trump made little progress in Texas, where land to build wall must be seized from private owners.
Now that process is restarting, with money from Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' For South Texans, that means again grappling with a confusing and highly unpopular eminent domain process, in a region where many family ranches predate their inclusion in the U.S. and rely on access to the Rio Grande as their only source of water. Since Trump regained office, border encounters have fallen further to their lowest levels since the 1960s.
The government this year has filed dozens of eminent domain lawsuits against Texas landowners, continuing a process that began in the first Trump administration. The cases are complicated, often involving small patches of land with poorly-documented titles and generations of owners. One pending case, where the government is seeking to take just over one-tenth of an acre, lists 130 defendants, many of them 'unknown heirs' of deceased former owners.
Low water levels in the Rio Grande as seen from El Refugio, Texas, near Rio Grande City last week.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem called the completion of the border wall crucial to national security. 'Successful mass deportations mean nothing if we don't control the border and keep future illegal aliens out,' she wrote in a New York Post opinion column in June. 'That's why the BBB legislation also funds hundreds of miles of new border wall and water-based barriers in the Rio Grande, which will permanently secure the border for decades.'
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said President Trump was elected based on his promise to secure the southern border and said a border wall is key to doing that permanently. 'President Trump cares deeply about protecting American communities and securing our border while also ensuring the wall is built in the most safe and efficient way possible,' she said. The Department of Homeland Security didn't respond to a request for comment.
Lawyers and landowners recognize that the government has broad authority to take land for national security purposes and resisting it is rarely, if ever, successful. Those like Clarke who fight the eminent domain cases do so either on principle, to delay the process in case political winds shift or to try to increase their compensation.
In Starr County, politics have been shifting rightward for several political cycles for what locals said are mainly economic reasons. In 2020, some who shifted their votes to Trump said they opposed the wall but didn't consider it a factor because he hadn't successfully built much in his first term.
Under former President Joe Biden, construction of the wall became 'a messy landscape,' said Ricky Garza, border policy counsel for the Southern Border Communities Coalition. In some cases, the eminent domain process stopped and the government revested land to families. In other areas, construction of the wall continued—with shorter bollards, alongside reconstruction of flood levees—angering antiwall activists. The Biden administration faced lawsuits over use of funding already allocated for the wall.
Meanwhile, Texas began an effort to build its own border wall, across land the state purchased or obtained agreements for from owners. Crews working on lighting and camera systems along a stretch of new state wall on a recent afternoon were asked to clear out so a sorghum farmer leasing the field could spray pesticides.
Sorghum growing on the north side of the border wall in La Casita-Garciasville, Texas.The state of Texas has been funding a border wall near Rio Grande City.
Some 200 miles upriver, in Eagle Pass, the state of Texas installed a floating buoy barrier in the Rio Grande. Now, the federal government is following suit. Last month, Noem signed a waiver to expedite installation of 17 miles of a 'waterborne barrier' near Texas' southernmost tip.
Clarke, a 58-year-old Starr County native, was among those who fought the government's taking of his land under the first Trump administration only to see it returned to him under Biden. Previously, Clarke tried to argue for his property himself in court, but with only a seventh-grade education he said he found himself over his head.
This time, he hired a lawyer, though he says he'll struggle to afford it. The government is offering just $3,000 for the acre it plans to take, leaving the rest of the 9-acre tract south of the wall. He's also angry about the billions allocated, which he said would be better spent helping the region manage a water crisis that is crippling farms.
'I'm not gonna beat Trump—you know it and I know it,' Clarke said, adding that security hasn't been a problem on his property. 'But if someone is going to kick your butt, are you just going to lie down?'
Farming equipment on the south side of the state-funded border wall in La Casita-Garciasville.
Some in South Texas said they were ambivalent about the wall, or simply viewed its construction an unavoidable reality. Osvaldo Garcia, a local elementary school principal, said his neighbors met to strategize during the first Trump administration when efforts moved forward to build a stretch of wall and access road behind the brushy backyards and swing-sets of their quiet neighborhood. Now, with the efforts restarting, Garcia said he hopes the government will at least hire local workers and be sensitive to bright lights along the wall shining into people's windows.
His neighbor Cynthia Garza, a nurse, said she has never seen immigrants cross her property but regularly sees emergency room visits from those who injured themselves climbing over the wall, convincing her that it isn't effective. Garza worries about the impact of blocking animals from the only significant nearby water source.
'It just feels like we're misallocating money,' Garza said.
Cynthia Garza says she has never seen immigrants crossing her property in Rio Grande City, near where a new stretch of wall will be built.
Raquel Oliva has shelves filled with research into her family's history and the Starr County land where they have grown tomatoes, cotton, hay and other crops since 1798. Recently, binders of border-wall legal documents have joined the shelves.
Following an eminent domain process over a border-access road during the first Trump administration, the government filed proceedings in February to take over a strip of the family's land for construction of a wall. While the government is seeking ownership over fewer than 3 acres, it would block off some 100 acres where the family farms, hunts and operates a gas well, said Oliva and her cousin, Lazaro Rodriguez.
Oliva, a 75-year-old retired nonprofit executive, avoided the cost of a lawyer by using AI to draft an objection to the government, describing the impact the wall would have on her family's land. Oliva also requested a 16-foot access gate, an irrigation pipeline to the north side of the wall and more compensation.
Rodriguez and Oliva described themselves as political opposites—he's right-leaning, she's left-leaning—but both have been left with a bad taste in their mouths from the eminent-domain process.
'No one has a problem stopping illegal immigration or drugs, but we live on the border—it's always been like this,' Oliva said. 'Now it feels like an invasion of the government on us.'
Write to Elizabeth Findell at elizabeth.findell@wsj.com
Trump's Border Wall Is Back—And So Is His Fight With Texas Landowners
Trump's Border Wall Is Back—And So Is His Fight With Texas Landowners
Trump's Border Wall Is Back—And So Is His Fight With Texas Landowners
Trump's Border Wall Is Back—And So Is His Fight With Texas Landowners
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Back to Cold War era? Russia ends nuclear treaty as Trump sends nuke submarines into position
Synopsis Russia has formally dropped its self-imposed restrictions under the 1987 INF Treaty, blaming the West for escalating tensions. Once a Cold War milestone, the INF deal curbed the deployment of mid-range nuclear missiles. Now, with the US redeploying submarines and preparing missile stations in Europe and Asia, Moscow says the conditions that kept the treaty alive no longer exist. Amid nuclear posturing and diplomatic threats, a new era of arms competition is quietly but rapidly taking shape. TIL Creatives Representative AI Image Russia has now officially abandoned its last pretence of observing the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. In a statement released on Monday, the Foreign Ministry made it clear: Moscow "no longer considers itself bound" by its "previously adopted self restrictions" under the treaty. It cited the deployment of US intermediate-range weapons in Europe and the Asia-Pacific as a direct threat to Russian treaty, signed in 1987 by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, was supposed to end one of the most dangerous chapters of the Cold War. It banned ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometres. Over 2,600 missiles were dismantled. At the time, it was hailed as a major arms control optimism didn't last. The US formally withdrew from the INF in 2019 under President Donald Trump, who argued that Russia had been breaking the rules for years by developing and deploying the 9M729 missile system (known to NATO as the SSC-8). Moscow denied the claim, but the accusations dated back to at least 2014, during Barack Obama's the US withdrawal, Russia kept its own moratorium, on paper. In practice, its actions in Ukraine suggested November, Russia reportedly used an Oreshnik missile, a weapon with a range that breaches the now-defunct treaty, against a Ukrainian city. That missile, which President Vladimir Putin has confirmed is now in service, is capable of carrying nuclear warheads and is already being deployed to Belarus. A troubling development, considering Belarus borders three NATO members. Russia's decision to end its observance of the treaty comes just days after former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev issued a nuclear threat online. In response, Trump ordered two US nuclear submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions.' He later told Newsmax, 'When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared… and we're totally prepared.'Trump added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.'Medvedev, who now serves as deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, hasn't been subtle. He posted on X, 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps.'His claim: NATO's "anti-Russian policy" has triggered the end of the missile moratorium. It's a familiar message from Moscow, one that frames every escalation as a defensive nuclear rhetoric has become a regular feature in Russia's propaganda arsenal. It's part sabre-rattling, part information a bigger context to all this. The United States plans to begin 'episodic deployments' of intermediate-range missiles to Germany from 2026. Typhon missile launchers have already appeared in the Philippines. US weapons testing during Australia's Talisman Sabre military exercise also raised Moscow's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, speaking to RIA Novosti last December, said the unilateral moratorium was 'practically no longer viable.' He blamed the US for ignoring joint warnings from Moscow and Beijing.'The United States arrogantly ignored warnings from Russia and China and, in practice, moved on to deploying weapons of this class in various regions of the world.'Putin himself has warned that the collapse of the INF Treaty would 'significantly erode the global security framework.'The Kremlin, however, played down Trump's submarine comments. Dmitry Peskov, Putin's spokesman, told reporters:'In this case, it is obvious that American submarines are already on combat duty. This is an ongoing process… of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric.'Tensions between Moscow and Washington are running high. Trump has issued an ultimatum: Putin must agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine by August 9 or face sweeping new sanctions, including penalties against oil buyers like India and China. Meanwhile, Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, is expected in Moscow this Putin doesn't look ready to fold. Last week, he claimed that while peace talks had shown 'some positive progress,' Russia has the 'momentum' in the war. That doesn't sound like a man ready to pull this really means is that the arms control era that started in the 1980s is over. Dead, buried, and now being actively INF Treaty wasn't perfect. It didn't cover sea- or air-launched weapons. It didn't include China. And enforcement was always shaky. But it worked as a firebreak. Without it, there are fewer guardrails. More room for miscalculation. And a growing temptation to escalate, decision to scrap its remaining commitments marks a shift from strategic ambiguity to open rearmament. The US won't be far so, nearly four decades after the Cold War began to cool, the world is once again talking about nuclear missiles in Europe. Not as history, but as breaking news.
New Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Some foreign visitors will have to pay bond of up to $15,000 to enter US under new programme
NEW YORK: The Trump administration is implementing a pilot programme under which foreign visitors arriving in the US on tourist or business visas could be required to pay a 'bond' of up to USD 15,000 to ensure they don't overstay their visas. The countries that would come under the purview of the programme have not been announced yet. The US State Department has issued a 'temporary final rule' under which a 12-month long visa bond pilot programme will be started. The State Department said that under this pilot programme, foreign individuals applying for the B-1/B-2 visas to come into the US for business or tourism could be required to post a bond of up to USD 15,000. The Department said that the rule is described as a " key pillar of the Trump administration's foreign policy to protect the United States from the clear national security threat posed by visa overstays and deficient screening and vetting". "Individuals applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure (B-1/B-2) and who are nationals of countries identified by the Department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering Citizenship by Investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot programme," the department said in a public notice. It said consular officers may require covered nonimmigrant visa "applicants to post a bond of up to USD 15,000 as a condition of visa issuance, as determined by the consular officers". The pilot programme, expected to start this month, will be effective till August 5, 2026. The pilot programme appears to be part of the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration, a key agenda of the US president's electoral run and his second term in the White House. The public notice states that over the years, it has been found that hundreds of thousands of nonimmigrant visitors do not depart the US timely and overstay their visas. While the public notice does not mention which countries will come under the purview of the programme, it said that the State Department will announce the covered countries within at least 15 days before the pilot programme takes effect and this list will be amended as required. "In announcing the covered countries, the Department will also provide a brief explanation of the basis for requiring bonds consistent with this rule," it said. "The pilot programme is further designed to serve as a diplomatic tool to encourage foreign governments to take all appropriate actions to ensure robust screening and vetting for all citizens in matters of identity verification and public safety and to encourage specified countries with visa overstays to ensure their nationals timely depart the United States after making temporary visits." "The public notice said that by its design and intention, the pilot programme is a tool of diplomacy, intended to encourage foreign governments to take immediate action to reduce the overstay rates of their nationals when travelling to the United States for temporary visits". The notice also cites estimates by the Department of Homeland Security, which said that in the DHS FY 2023 Overstay Report, data indicated there were over 500,000 suspected in-country overstays, - individuals who remained in the country past the end of their authorised stay and had yet to depart the country - among nonimmigrants admitted through air or sea ports of entry. Through the programme, the Department seeks to send a message to all countries to take immediate action to encourage their nationals to comply with US immigration law, it said.
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
In over 80% of areas, collector rates have increased by only 10%: CM Saini
Chief minister Nayab Singh Saini on Monday launched a scathing attack on the Congress, asserting that despite 55 years in power post-Independence, the party failed to bring genuine change for the poor. Addressing a state-level programme in Panchkula, Chief minister Nayab Singh Saini contrasted the Congress's legacy with the transformative impact of welfare schemes implemented by the central and state governments under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership. (HT Photo) Addressing a state-level programme in Panchkula, CM Saini contrasted the Congress's legacy with the transformative impact of welfare schemes implemented by the central and state governments under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership. 'During the reign of the Congress, the poor became poorer,' Saini stated, emphasising that the current administration has delivered tangible benefits at the grassroots level. He specifically highlighted the discrepancy in housing initiatives. 'In the past, Congress promised plots to poor families but failed to provide proper documents or possession. Today, our government has not only given legal documents but also handed over the actual possession of 100-square-yard plots to beneficiaries,' he affirmed. Saini also challenged Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's skepticism regarding 'Jan Dhan' accounts. 'I challenge him to look at the data; he should see the figures of 'Jan Dhan' accounts, in which the poor have deposited their hard-earned savings in the last 11 years,' the CM said. Refuting opposition claims that the government is collecting ₹5,000 crore in the name of collector rates, Saini clarified, 'The truth is, in over 80% of areas in Haryana, rates have increased by only 10%. There is a process for this, under which the collector rate is renewed every year considering the highest registry as the basis. Spreading such lies is irresponsible.' At the event, Saini handed over 'interim' ownership certificates under the Mukhyamantri Shehri Awas Yojana and plot allotment letters under the Mukhyamantri Gramin Awas Yojana 2.0 to thousands of beneficiaries. He announced that 1,144 beneficiaries in Sector-23, Jagadhri, received urban interim ownership certificates, while 3,884 rural beneficiaries received plot allotment letters across 58 villages. Sharing further details on housing, Saini said that under the first phase of the Mukhyamantri Shehri Awas Yojana, 15,256 families in 14 cities had already been allotted 30-square-yard plots, receiving a ₹2.5 lakh subsidy per household under PMAY–Urban 2.0 for house construction. In rural areas, the process to allot plots to 1.58 lakh applicants in 561 villages is underway under Mukhyamantri Gramin Awas Yojana–2.0. Additionally, rural beneficiaries will receive ₹1.38 lakh under PMAY–Gramin, ₹12,000 for toilets, and 90 days of unskilled labor wages under MGNREGA. Development & panchayats minister Krishan Lal Panwar lauded CM Saini's leadership, noting that historic decisions are being taken for the welfare of the poor, youth, and women. He also mentioned that families with annual incomes up to ₹1.80 lakh would be provided 2 kW solar panels.
