Saving Gaza from Starvation
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
World
Saving Gaza from Starvation
International Crisis Group
15 minutes ago
Israel's plan to conquer Gaza and impose a new aid scheme threatens to prolong the war and weaponise the starving population's most vital needs.
Smoke rises following an Israeli army bombardment in the Gaza Stip, as seen from southern Israel, Monday, May 19. Photo: AP/PTI
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
This article was originally published here by the International Crisis Group.
On 4 May, the Israeli cabinet endorsed new plans to ramp up the military's offensive in Gaza, nineteen months into the war sparked by Hamas's assault on southern Israel on 7 October 2023. Dubbed Operation Gideon's Chariots, Israel's incremental plan aims first and foremost to conquer Gaza and defeat Hamas, as well as to free the remaining Israeli hostages in the strip. It also involves taking control of the enclave's internal aid distribution channels, expanding Israel's longstanding restrictions on the entry of vital supplies. Since 2 March, aid has been completely blocked by Israel, pushing 2.2 million Palestinians toward mass starvation; the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a UN-coordinated body, warns that Gaza is now at 'critical risk' of famine. Operation Gideon's Chariots has not yet rumbled into motion; Israeli officials say it may start after U.S. President Donald Trump's much-anticipated visit to the Middle East on 13-16 May and will likely take place in stages. Trump's itinerary includes stops in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates but not Israel.
As the presidential trip approached, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee held a press conference to rebrand the aid component of Israel's plan as a U.S.-led initiative, carefully distinguishing it from Israel's military campaign and promising its imminent rollout using private security contractors. It was an apparent attempt to assuage Gulf Arab concerns about how it would look for them to be striking investment deals with President Trump while Gaza is being starved. Yet whoever will run the new food distribution scheme, it is not merely insufficient, but misguided and dangerous. Tens of thousands of tonnes of desperately needed food, medicine and supplies are sitting waiting at Gaza's borders. The dozens of aid groups, including UN agencies, that have been keeping the population alive insist they only need Israel to open the crossings, so that they may recommence their work without fear; they do not need anyone to build an entirely new system. Meanwhile, if Israel's military operation does move forward as proposed, it is almost certain to unleash even deeper catastrophe for Gaza's population.
Trump's forthcoming visit is an opportunity to alter this trajectory. On 11 May, following talks with the U.S. mediated by Arab states, Hamas announced that it would release hostage Edan Alexander (a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen), in effect bypassing the deadlock in its negotiations with Israel. What Hamas might receive in return – if anything – remains unclear. Gulf leaders, who enjoy some influence with the White House, reportedly hope that Trump will express support for the two-state solution while in the Middle East, which would be welcome. But the immediate priority must be pressing the U.S. president to definitively end the war in Gaza and allow humanitarian groups to do their jobs.
A path to protracted reoccupation
The latest plan reportedly calls for beefed-up Israeli army units to capture and 'clean' out more of Gaza's 365 sq km, some 70 per cent of which Israel has already turned into 'no-go zones' for Palestinians. Many – perhaps most of Gaza's population – would be displaced to Rafah, the strip's southernmost city, which Israel took in March and has all but razed since then. Palestinians are now mostly concentrated around Gaza City in the north, and between Khan Younis and Deir al-Balah in the south, with most having suffered repeated displacement and living in tents or damaged buildings. According to the plan, they would be channelled through Israeli checkpoints designed to sift out those suspected of links to Hamas. They would then be herded into Israeli-controlled 'humanitarian zones', where pre-packaged rations amounting to 1,700 calories per person daily would be distributed to pre-approved family members by private security contractors or Israeli-vetted aid organisations. The first phase of the plan envisions serving only 60 per cent of Gaza's population, with Ambassador Huckabee saying the proportion would gradually increase over time.
In effect, the plan puts Israel on a path to a protracted, direct reoccupation of Gaza, confining Palestinians to even tinier parts of the strip and enabling Israel to control access to necessities, without meaningful guarantees that these will indeed be provided. Of particular concern is how much of the population will be fed, as well as whether the scheme will afford the specialised treatment needed by acutely malnourished young children and people with chronic diseases or the broader range of basic services necessary to prevent or halt epidemics, which typically become the main killer among starving people.
Whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet has publicised the Gideon's Chariots scheme as a bluff or truly plans to proceed with it is not fully clear. But the Israeli government appears to calculate that by heaping even greater pressure on Gaza's already immiserated people, it can force Hamas to release some or all of the 58 hostages the group still holds (between 21 and 24 are believed to be alive, while the remainder are thought to be dead). It also appears to believe that by stopping what it alleges is Hamas's use of aid flows for financial gain and political leverage, the group can be stripped of its ability to keep fighting and to rule Gaza, with Israel making far fewer concessions than were stipulated in the January ceasefire deal, which it broke on 18 March. (That deal's first phase saw Hamas release Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, Israeli troops leave parts of Gaza and humanitarian aid increase; rather than move to its second phase, which would have entailed more hostage-prisoner swaps, a full Israeli withdrawal and a negotiated end to war, Netanyahu chose to relaunch the fighting.) Today, Israel proposes only a certain number of days' truce in exchange for a certain number of hostages. Its government seems to hope that if the military campaign does not force Hamas to capitulate, an uproar from Gaza's suffering population will. In the longer term, it expects thousands of the group's Gaza-based leaders and fighters to go into exile, while the remainder would disarm and disband.
The prime minister heralds the operation as an 'intense entry' into Gaza; his far-right coalition partners, including Finance Minister and Deputy Defence Minister Bezalel Smotrich, bluntly call it a 'conquest'. At the very least, it would be a return to Israel's direct occupation of Gaza, as existed in the strip from 1967 until 2005 and as still exists in much of the West Bank. But it could also go further. An official bureau, approved by the Israeli government but still vague in its details, is encouraging 'voluntary emigration' of Gaza's residents to as-yet-undetermined third countries. The term is a crude euphemism, given that Israel itself has made the strip all but uninhabitable, thus rendering the Palestinians' proposed departure anything but voluntary. Meanwhile, Israeli settlers are clamouring to be allowed to resettle a newly depopulated Gaza.
Mounting risks and opposition
The Gideon's Chariots plan faces pushback, as does the U.S. aid delivery scheme. Notwithstanding Israeli determination to remove Hamas from power, the army's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, has made clear the risks and limitations of a new escalation: primarily, that it endangers the hostages, whose freedom the army sees as its most urgent goal. Its concern stands in contrast to the statements of the Netanyahu government, whose more overt priority is defeating Hamas even at the hostages' expense. Hamas's surprise release of Alexander on 12 May, apparently as a good-will gesture to the Trump administration, exposed the costs of the Israeli government's tactics, which have evinced a preference for force over negotiation.
Even as it prepares for Gideon's Chariots, Israel's military leadership remains wary of what an indefinite operation with no clear endpoint might entail and how high the cost might be. The army is already beginning to suffer higher casualty rates as it enters denser urban spaces; five soldiers were killed in the past week alone. Most of the Israeli public has been indifferent to Palestinian suffering, but the army fears that scenes of starvation could incriminate commanders and soldiers in future war crimes investigations conducted abroad. It is also cognisant of the declining rate of reservists showing up for duty due to war fatigue and public anger about the government's relegation of the hostage question.
Aid providers so far view the proposed solution as harmful. Israel and the U.S. charge that Hamas is stealing and diverting aid, but UN agencies refute this claim, stressing that they already have 'end-to-end' systems in place to avoid that happening. Crisis Group interviews indicate that criminal groups – suppressed by Hamas authorities during most of the war to date as well during as the January ceasefire – are the primary impediment to aid distribution within Gaza, opportunistically profiting from the disorder. The IPC assesses that the aid scheme could avert what it identifies as a 'critical risk' of famine in Gaza, yet it would still likely leave about a quarter of the population starving; an expansion of military operations or continuation of the blockade would lead to famine. With one in five Gazans estimated to be starving already, according to the IPC, and the entire strip facing acute food insecurity and malnutrition, drip-feeding aid will not reverse months of harm caused by food, water and medical deprivation.
Israel will also have to contend with mounting international opposition. UN Secretary-General António Guterres condemned Israel's new plan as 'a dead end – totally intolerable in the eyes of international law and history'. Governments are growing more vocal, with several European capitals warning that the plan would 'cross yet another line'. The Netherlands has called on the European Union to review its Association Agreement with Israel, citing the latter's total blockade as a violation of international humanitarian law; the EU Foreign Affairs Council is set to discuss the matter on 20 May. The Trump administration, which has hitherto shown little concern for Palestinian suffering in Gaza, now makes the case that 'the most important danger is people starving to death' and has urged the UN and NGOs to get on board with its new aid plan. Even so, humanitarian agencies have roundly rejected the U.S. scheme, insisting that they will not participate.
Lastly, the plan would create new operational risks. Israel has been attacking Hamas's governing apparatus, including police and civil servants, who had continued performing their functions in coordination with Gaza's clans. Order among the hungry, displaced population has accordingly deteriorated. Israeli troops are not likely to be able to restore it. Nor are private foreign contractors, who will be mistrusted by a society that will view them as an extension of Israel's military occupation. Hamas fighters and other armed groups, which have largely gone underground amid Israel's aerial bombardment, may escalate their guerrilla campaign in the vicinity of the 'secure distribution sites', which will be staffed by the contractors and ringed by Israeli soldiers. Weakened as Hamas is, it is unlikely that the new offensive will eradicate the group, which appears to be bracing for an asymmetric war of attrition and continues to insist on a permanent end to the war in ceasefire talks.
Past time for the world to act
Though the IPC has made no formal famine declaration as yet, Gaza is being starved. At least 57 people, most of them children, have reportedly died of starvation since the war's resumption in March, with thousands more at imminent risk. Looting of surviving food stocks, along with theft and violence among residents, is rising sharply as hungry families grow ever more desperate. Mass starvation will almost certainly progress to famine under a continued, complete blockade, and significant risks remain even if the Israeli plan proceeds exactly as described. The overt weaponisation of food and aid, with what has been at least until now a tacit green light from Washington, comes on top of a war that has left at least 52,000 Palestinians killed, perhaps many more, nearly 119,000 wounded and Gaza's hospitals and health system wrecked, in addition to the massive destruction of property and the immeasurable psychological harm inflicted on an entire society.
The plan to corral as many as 2 million Palestinians into 'sanitised' zones, and then to sustain them indefinitely on survival rations, promises only more privation, misery and death. Those excluded from the first phase of the inadequate aid distribution may not survive long enough to benefit from the promised expansion. In short, the stage is set either for forced displacement or for a prolonged period of mass internment, with a high risk of mass death from starvation and disease, barely avoiding famine in the best of cases.
It is long past time for the world's governments, especially Israel's friends, to not merely signal outrage or concern, but take active measures to restrain the Netanyahu government. The U.S. is the prime mover in this regard. President Trump is visiting Gulf monarchies in the coming days. While extracting a statement from Trump on the continued viability of the two-state solution, as Gulf Arab leaders reportedly intend to try doing, would be an important step, the priority has to be finding a quick end to the suffering in Gaza. Arab leaders should seek, even if behind closed doors, to persuade Israel's superpower patron that improvised stopgap measures are not enough. There are ways to end the war, to secure the release of Israel's hostages – more than 150 of whom have already been freed via negotiations – and to guarantee Israelis' and Palestinians' safety that do not entail starving and holding hostage an entire population in Gaza. Indeed, just before returning to the White House in January, Trump helped push Netanyahu into a ceasefire that offered one such path. Now, Alexander's release, loosening Netanyahu's chokehold on negotiations, if only for the moment, reaffirms the utility of serious talks. If Israel's plan is allowed to proceed, it will risk immensely more death and destruction in Gaza. It will chip away at Israel's already precarious standing across the Middle East and further corrode Israeli society itself. Israel's closest friends should be the most alarmed by that prospect.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Israel Allows Limited Aid To Enter Gaza; France, UK, Canada Call Move 'Wholly Inadequate'
'We've Killed So Many Children – It's Hard to Argue with That': Tel Aviv Protesters in Silent Vigil
Judge's Order Frees Indian Scholar Detained in US Over Support for Palestine
A Moral History of Our World
2,000+ Academics Condemn Israel's Attacks on Gaza's Educational Infrastructure
Photograph of Gaza Boy Who Lost His Arms in Israeli Airstrike is World Press Photo Winner
No Criminal Probe Against Israel Finance Minister, Likud MK Despite Their Calls to 'Destroy' Gaza
Pakistan's Slick US Strategy: It's Deja Vu All Over Again
US Targets Indian Travel Agents with Visa Bans as Part of Immigration Policy
View in Desktop Mode
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump's travel ban: Who is impacted? List of countries facing US action from June 9
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday revived one of the previous policies of his first term, announcing that citizens from 12 countries would be barred from entering the United States, with additional restrictions imposed on travellers from seven others, most of which are mainly Muslim nations. In a video shared on social media, Trump linked the newly announced travel ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, arguing that it highlighted the risks posed by individuals who overstay their visas. The suspect in the attack, however, is from Egypt — a country not included on Trump's restricted list — and, according to the Department of Homeland Security, had overstayed a tourist visa. Trump justified the ban by claiming that certain countries have 'deficient' screening and vetting processes or have consistently refused to repatriate their citizens. His decision heavily draws on an annual report by Homeland Security, which tracks visa overstays among tourists, business travellers, and students entering by air or sea, focusing on nations with particularly high overstay rates. 'We don't want them,' Trump said. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban', was reworked amid legal challenges until the Supreme Court upheld a version in 2018. The ban impacted various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, as well as North Koreans and certain Venezuelan government officials and their families. Trump has defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was intended to protect the country and was not based on anti-Muslim bias. However, Trump had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House. Here are the 12 countries placed under the ban and the seven placed under travel restrictions: Banned from US travel: Afghanistan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Restricted to US travel: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. The proclamation signed by Donald Trump will come into force on 9 June 2025, at 12:01 AM EDT, a cushion that may avoid the chaos that unfolded at airports nationwide when a similar measure took effect with virtually no notice in 2017. Trump, who signalled plans for a new ban upon taking office in January, appears to be on firmer ground this time after the Supreme Court sided with him. The travel restrictions apply to foreign nationals from the designated countries who: Are outside the United States as of 9 June, and Do not possess a valid visa on that date. However, the proclamation clarifies that any immigration or non-immigrant visa issued before 9 June will remain valid and will not be revoked under this order. Some, but not all, 12 countries also appeared on the list of banned countries in Trump's first term. The proclamation restricts entry for immigrants and those on specific temporary visas—B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, and J visas—from the following countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. 1. Lawful permanent residents (green card holders) of the US. 2. Dual nationals travelling on a passport from a non-restricted country. 3. Diplomats with valid non-immigrant visas. 4. Athletes and their immediate relatives attend events like the Olympics or other major sports competitions. Immediate family immigrant visas. Afghan Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs). Special Immigrant Visas for U.S. government employees. Immigrant visas for persecuted ethnic and religious minorities from Iran. The ban includes exceptions for Afghans holding Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs), typically granted to those who worked closely with the US government during the two-decade war in Afghanistan. It is to be further noted that Afghanistan was among the top sources of resettled refugees, with approximately 14,000 arrivals in the 12 months leading up to September 2024. It's a stark contrast to Trump's earlier outlook— he had suspended refugee resettlement on his very first day in office during his previous term. 'To include Afghanistan — a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years — is a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold,' said Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of #AfghanEvac. Trump wrote that Afghanistan 'lacks a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents, and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures'. He also cited its visa overstay rates. Haiti, which avoided the travel ban during Trump's first term, was also included for high overstay rates and large numbers who came to the US illegally. Haitians continue to flee poverty and hunger, and political instability deepens while police and a UN-backed mission fight a surge in gang violence, with armed men controlling at least 85 per cent of its capital, Port-au-Prince, as reported by AP. 'Haiti lacks a central authority with sufficient availability and dissemination of law enforcement information necessary to ensure its nationals do not undermine the national security of the United States,' Trump wrote. The Iranian government has yet to respond to its inclusion on the list. The Trump administration labelled Iran a 'state sponsor of terrorism', barring visitors except those already holding visas or entering the US on special visas granted to minorities facing persecution. The travel ban stems from an executive order issued by Trump on 20 January, directing the Departments of State, Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to prepare a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US and assess whether entry from certain countries posed a national security threat. International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations roundly condemned the new ban. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, as reported by The Associated Press. Other Middle Eastern countries on the list—Libya, Sudan, and Yemen—are all engulfed in ongoing civil conflicts with territories controlled by rival factions. Sudan is currently experiencing active warfare, Yemen's conflict remains largely stalemated and Libya's armed factions continue to clash. (With inputs from Associated Press)
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's travel ban: What happens to visas granted before June 9, list of exceptions — All you need to know
US President Donald Trump signed a new order on Wednesday banning the citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States. The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Moreover, the entry of people from seven other countries — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela — will be partially restricted. The ban takes effect on June 9, 2025 (Monday) at 12:01 am EDT (0401 GMT). The proclamation stated that the full and partial travel bans apply to foreign nationals of the designated countries who: > Are outside the United States on June 9, and > Do not have a valid visa on June 9 The order stated that visas issued before June 9 will not be revoked. No immigrant or non-immigrant visa issued before June 9 "shall be revoked pursuant to this proclamation," the proclamation stated. > Any lawful permanent resident of the United States > Diplomats traveling on valid non-immigrant visas > Athletes or members of an athletic team and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event > Immediate family immigrant visas > Afghan Special Immigrant Visas > Special Immigrant Visas for United States government employees > Immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran Trump reportedly said the move was needed to protect against "foreign terrorists" and other security threats. The directive is part of an immigration crackdown Trump launched this year at the start of his second term, Reuters reported. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," Trump said in a video posted on X. He said the list could be revised and new countries could be added. For some countries, such as Afghanistan, Eritrea, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Libya and Venezuela, the proclamation claimed that there is no reliable central authority for issuing passports or screening and vetting nationals traveling out of the country, the Guardian reported. For other countries, such as Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo and Turkmenistan, the proclamation cites a high rate of immigrants overstaying their visas in the US. Besides, several other countries were included because of terrorist activity or state- sponsored terrorism. These included Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Iran and Cuba. (With inputs from agencies)
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
David Jolly, a Trump critic and former GOP congressman, to run for Florida governor as a Democrat
David Jolly, a Trump critic and former GOP congressman, to run for Florida governor as a Democrat (Image: AP) TALLAHASSEE: A former Republican congressman and vocal critic of Donald Trump says he wants to become governor in the president's adopted home state of Florida, and that he's running as a Democrat. David Jolly formally announced his bid on Thursday, becoming the latest party convert hoping to wrest back control of what had been the country's premier swing state that in recent years has made a hard shift to the right. Under state law, term-limited Republican Governor Ron DeSantis can't run for re-election in 2026. Even as Florida serves as a place for the Trump administration to poach staff and test policies, Jolly says he's confident that issues such as affordability, funding public schools, and strengthening campaign finance and ethics laws will resonate with all voters in 2026. He predicts elections next year will herald nationwide change. "I actually think Republicans in Tallahassee have gone too far in dividing us. I think we should get politicians out of the classrooms, out of the doctor's offices," Jolly said. "I think enough people in Florida, even some Republicans, now understand that. That the culture wars have gone too far," he said. Jolly was first elected to his Tampa Bay-area congressional seat during a 2014 special election, and was re-elected for one full term. The attorney and former lobbyist underwent a political evolution that spurred him to leave the Republican Party in 2018 to become an independent and then a registered Democrat. And he has built a national profile for himself as an anti-Trump political commentator on MSNBC. Jolly said he has considered himself "part of the Democratic coalition" for five or so years, and believes in what he sees as the party's "fundamental values" - that government can help people, that the economy should be "fair" to all, and that immigrants should be celebrated. "I struggled to exercise those values in the Republican Party," Jolly said, continuing, "The actual registration as a Democrat wasn't a pivot. It was a kind of a formality." Jolly has broken from his old party on immigration, as Florida lawmakers race to help Trump fulfil his promise of mass deportations. Jolly skewered Republicans who he said have "conflated immigration and crime," which he described as wrong and immoral. "If you were born here or if you immigrated here, or if you're a Tallahassee politician who steals Medicaid money, we're going to be tough on crime," Jolly added, referring to a probe into the use of Medicaid settlement funds by a charity associated with first lady Casey DeSantis. Jolly's gubernatorial run as a Democrat draws comparisons to the failed bid of former Republican congressman-turned-independent-turned-Democrat Charlie Crist, who lost to DeSantis in 2022 by 19 points. It was Crist, running as a Democrat, who ousted Jolly from his congressional seat in 2016. Jolly joined the Florida Democratic Party at what is arguably one of its most vulnerable points in years. Florida currently has no Democrats elected to state wide office, and there are now 1.2 million more registered Republicans than Democrats, according to the state's active voter rolls. The GOP has made significant inroads in formerly Democratic strongholds in the state, such as Miami-Dade County. The day that Jolly announced his new affiliation, the-then top Democrat in the Florida Senate, Jason Pizzo, revealed he was leaving the party, declaring that "the Democratic Party in Florida is dead." Pizzo, a former prosecutor, has said he will launch his own run for governor as a candidate with no party affiliation. On the Republican side, Jolly will face Trump-backed Rep. Byron Donalds, who is also a frequent presence on cable news as a surrogate for the president. Among the other names floated as potential GOP candidates are former Rep. Matt Gaetz and Casey DeSantis.
