logo
Boise State coach should weigh Idaho history when invoking Christianity

Boise State coach should weigh Idaho history when invoking Christianity

Yahoo18-05-2025

Boise State University head football coach Spencer Danielson has brought his team considerable success.
His players seem to respect and admire him, with good reason. He promotes good character and hard work at least as well as he prepares players to win.
He has been criticized, including by this board, for his excessive expressions of his Christian faith in his capacity as a public university's employee.
As the Idaho Statesman's Shaun Goodwin reported, the criticisms from outside don't seem to be shared by those on the inside — members of the team, their parents and others.
That doesn't mean his possible encroaching of the separation of church and state should be taken lightly.
'Coach D, he's an amazing human, and religion is a huge part of him, and he doesn't force it upon anybody,' long snapper Mason Hutton told Goodwin.
But another thing is clear: If Danielson were not acting as a Christian leader to his players, he would not be permitted this freedom for very long.
To test this, ask yourself a question: What if Danielson led the athletes in Muslim prayer or quoted from the Quran in TV interviews? What if he led them in Hindu worship? What if he repeated passages from ardent atheist Richard Dawkins?
The answer is obvious: It would not be tolerated for a second. Idaho lawmakers would call for him to be fired and likely ax college budgets. There would be outrage, and then some, from the state's growing far-right population.
Danielson does not operate in a vacuum, and the state of Idaho has a very ugly history of religious intolerance. When the state was founded, members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints were not allowed to vote, hold office or serve on juries.
That was a long time ago, but there are plenty of contemporary examples, like the repeated efforts to demonize Idaho's refugees because some of them are Muslim.
The Idaho Legislature begins each day with a prayer, invariably a Christian one.
There was an exception a decade ago, when leaders of the then-more moderate Idaho Senate decided to embrace ecumenicism by allowing a Hindu cleric to give the prayer — in a country founded on freedom of religion. In response, Sen. Sheryl Nuxoll, as far-right a senator as could then be found, who would find herself a relative centrist today, denounced Hinduism as a 'false religion with false gods.' Not to be outdone, Sen. Steve Vick accused Hindus of 'worshiping cows.'
The following year, members of the Legislature invited Pastor Shahram Hadian to give a talk called 'The True Face of Islam,' a hate-filled rant attacking members of the world's second-largest religion. Also that year, lawmakers killed a bill that allowed interstate collection of child support payments under the bizarre theory that it would cause Idaho to be governed by Sharia.
That was a decade ago. Today, things are different. Now, it is inconceivable that far-right legislative leaders would allow a Hindu, Buddhist or Muslim religious leader to give the opening prayer. Now, bills are introduced to require all public school students to read the King James Bible at length.
Add all that up, and there's a clear message being sent to any non-Christian in Idaho: Here, the official religion is Christianity.
Here, if you are something else, you may be tolerated or you may be persecuted. The one thing you will never be is equal.
Danielson is not responsible for this history, but he operates within it. He carries a special obligation to ensure that non-Christian players and potential recruits can be assured that they will be treated as equals. Thankfully, that appears to be what he is doing.
As Danielson said: 'There are guys on our team that are Christian, there are guys on our team that are LDS, there's guys on our team that are Muslim, there's guys on our team who at this point in their life want nothing to do with religion.'
Given that, isn't it reasonable that, from time to time, the team would be given readings and inspirational passages from the Book of Mormon and the Quran, as well as critiques of religious belief? And perhaps they are; Danielson would not be interviewed specifically for Goodwin's story.
There is no doubt that Danielson is well-intentioned. There is no doubt he is striving to be a good coach and a good mentor.
But he is also a state actor. He is the highest-paid employee of Idaho's largest public university. It is incumbent upon him not to cross lines.
And he has considerable personal power over his players' futures. He decides when and if they will play, who starts, and — with colleges now paying players — he may also be responsible for how they are compensated. He is something very akin to his boss.
He should realize that when he says things like, 'It will be based on giving Jesus the glory. … If people don't like that, don't come here.'
That could mean some very good, upstanding and talented teenagers might think they are not welcome at Boise State if they don't want to give Christ the glory.
Statesman editorials are the opinion of the Idaho Statesman's editorial board. Board members are opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, editor Chadd Cripe, newsroom editors Dana Oland and Jim Keyser and community members Greg Lanting, Terri Schorzman and Garry Wenske.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump issues new travel ban affecting 12 countries, effective June 9. Read list
President Trump issues new travel ban affecting 12 countries, effective June 9. Read list

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

President Trump issues new travel ban affecting 12 countries, effective June 9. Read list

President Donald Trump has resurrected a controversial travel ban from his first term that will ban the travel of citizens from 12 countries. The executive order was issued late Wednesday, June 4. It goes into effect on June 9 at 12:01 a.m. The travel ban affects travelers from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The order also places new heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. More: US Rep. Veronica Escobar questions ICE over Fort Bliss migrant detention plans, conditions Trump referenced Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado in a video announcing the ban to justify his order, saying that people who over stay their visas create a threat. The suspect in the attack was from Egypt, which does not appear on the current travel ban list. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm," Trump said in the video posted to the White House's account on X. He added that other countries could be added to the list. More: 'Mexico embraces you' shelter in Juárez stands ready, but few migrants arrive to fill it Trump's travel ban echoes the executive order that became known as the Muslim ban issued during his first term, which barred travel and refugee resettlement from various predominantly Muslim countries. The controversial travel ban was eventually upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018. Immigrant rights advocates have condemned Trump's latest arbitrary travel ban. 'The travel bans of the Trump administration's first term never demonstrated any meaningful value as a national security tool," Jeremy Robbins, executive director of the American Immigration Council, said in a statement on the order. "Sweeping national origin bans declare many innocent people to be a threat based on factors they cannot control in their home countries. There is no evidence this is making us safer." The travel ban affects travelers from the following countries: Afghanistan Myanmar Chad The Republic of Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen The order also places new heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Jeff Abbott covers the border for the El Paso Times and can be reached at:jdabbott@ @palabrasdeabajo on Twitter or @ on Bluesky. This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: Trump travel ban 2025, 12 countries list: What to know

Fury and resignation around the world as Trump's travel ban comes roaring back
Fury and resignation around the world as Trump's travel ban comes roaring back

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Fury and resignation around the world as Trump's travel ban comes roaring back

Countries across the world were in shock Thursday after President Donald Trump announced a travel ban on nationals from a dozen countries and the cancellation of visa programs for seven more. For many, the move seemed like a return to 2017 and one of the most controversial policies of Trump's first term. Trump on Wednesday cited national security and terrorism concerns as motivating factors behind the ban on nationals largely from Africa and Asia, triggering reactions from representatives of those countries that ranged from weary diplomacy to downright anger. 'The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans,' said Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello during a weekly show on state television. With the Trump administration canceling a special visa program with Venezuela among other countries on Wednesday, Cabello described the U.S. government as 'fascist,' adding that 'they persecute our countrymen, our people for no reason.' The new order affects a patchwork of 19 countries — some of them banned for the first time, for reasons that the administration said include high rates of visa overstays, lack of "appropriate screening and vetting measures" and allegedly being sponsors of terrorism. Nationals of 12 countries will be barred from entering the United States: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Partial bans have also been placed on nationals from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Many on the list are majority-Muslim countries, and several began observing the Hajj pilgrimage holiday late Wednesday, making an immediate response less likely. Officials at U.S. embassies in Libya, Chad, Eritrea, Sudan and Turkmenistan were not available for comment. Still, Shawn VanDiver, president of the Afghan refugee advocacy group #AfghanEvac, referred to the ban as 'political theater' and 'a second Muslim Ban, dressed up in bureaucracy.' Trump began a video address Wednesday by citing the recent violence in Boulder, Colorado, where an Egyptian man seeking asylum with an expired tourist visa injured at least 12 demonstrators in what city officials called an antisemitic attack, as justification for the renewed travel ban. Egypt is not on the list of banned countries, but its absence speaks to the importance of Egyptian influence both on American Middle East policy and in the region at large, said Ahmed Aboudouh, an associate fellow at Chatham House, a London-based think tank. Trump's order largely affects 'conflict-prone [nations], or ones which have security issues at this time, or don't have the diplomatic or security heft to respond very aggressively to this U.S. ban,' Aboudouh said. 'We're not seeing the U.S. going after its strategic partners in either the Middle East or Africa.' The White House's decision prompted a rebuke from the African Union Commission, which in a statement Thursday urged the U.S. to exercise its right to protect its borders 'in a manner that is balanced, evidence-based, and reflective of the long-standing partnership between the United States and Africa.' 'The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on ... relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades,' it said. It was a relatively tame statement from a body that represents nations already disproportionately affected by the Trump administration's decision to cut USAID programs. International aid groups have condemned the new ban, with Amnesty International on Thursday calling it 'discriminatory, racist, and downright cruel' in a post on X. Somalia, which had its American assistance slashed and U.S. military aid in training local forces to fight terrorist groups pulled, struck a similarly conciliatory tone. 'Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the U.S., said in a statement Wednesday. The administration pointed to terrorism as a reason for banning travel from Somalia. 'The United States Government has identified Somalia as a terrorist safe haven. Terrorists use regions of Somalia as safe havens from which they plan, facilitate, and conduct their operations,' according to a statement released by the White House. 'The Government of Somalia struggles to provide governance needed to limit terrorists' freedom of movement.' Alex Nowrasteh, the vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute, a nonpartisan and independent public policy research organization, said terrorist attacks by nationals from the 12 countries facing outright bans are rare. 'A single terrorist from those countries murdered one person in an attack on U.S. soil: Emanuel Kidega Samson from Sudan, who committed an attack motivated by anti-white animus in 2017. The annual chance of being murdered by a terrorist from one of the banned countries from 1975 to the end of 2024 was about 1 in 13.9 billion per year,' Nowrasteh wrote. Trump's order also pulls the rug from under nearly 200,000 Afghans who have relocated to the U.S. since America's chaotic and botched exit from the country in 2021. That includes about 14,000 resettled refugees who arrived in the 12 months through September. Trump, who suspended refugee resettlement for Afghans on his first day in office, on Wednesday criticized Afghanistan's passport authority and its screening and vetting measures. Representatives of the Afghan government did not immediately respond to NBC News' request for comment. 'To include Afghanistan — a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years — is a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold,' #AfghanEvac's VanDiver added. For experts watching Trump's approach to the developing world since before he first took office in 2017, the move was less of a surprise. Trump has for years expressed a desire to limit immigration from Haiti and African nations, deriding them as 'shithole' countries in discussing the visa lottery system at a White House meeting in 2018. Thomas Gift, an associate professor of political science at the University College of London, called the president's latest move 'part and parcel of an 'America First' foreign policy.' The travel plan and visa cancellation sends 'a loud and clear message,' said Gift, 'that America isn't an open, pluralist nation that welcomes the world to its shores.' This article was originally published on

Hamas's worldwide network and Al Jazeera 'Media Jihad' role in global media manipulation
Hamas's worldwide network and Al Jazeera 'Media Jihad' role in global media manipulation

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hamas's worldwide network and Al Jazeera 'Media Jihad' role in global media manipulation

A leading Israeli expert on Islamic popular movement noted that in order to understand Hamas, researchers must look behind Gaza's borders. Understanding Hamas requires looking beyond Gaza's borders, according to Dr. Nesya Shemer, a leading expert on Islamic studies and political Islam movements from the Department of Middle Eastern Studies at Bar Ilan University. In a recent interview, Dr. Shemer explained how Hamas operates as part of a much larger, globally coordinated information warfare campaign that extends far beyond the confines of the Gaza Strip. "Hamas is not just an organization of a few thousand fighters remaining in Gaza," Shemer emphasized. "Hamas is part of a global Muslim Brotherhood movement, which has branches worldwide and is particularly well-organized in the West." Central to Hamas's global influence, Shemer argued, is the Al Jazeera network, owned by Qatar, one of the major patrons of the Muslim Brotherhood. Shemer described the Qatari outlet as having become "a central factor in shaping Arab public opinion." She noted that Al Jazeera broadcasts in multiple languages, including Arabic, English, French, Spanish, Chinese, and Bosnian/Serbian/Croatian, and maintains a comprehensive digital presence across Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, including a special youth-oriented channel, AJ+. Shemer explained that Hamas also receives religious backing from international organizations of Muslim scholars, most notably the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), founded by the renowned Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the same Qatari based cleric who endorsed and espoused Hamas's suicide bombings. "Hundreds of thousands of Muslim religious figures from around the world are members of this organization," she said, adding that these religious leaders are also active on social media platforms with millions of followers. The core narrative that Hamas promotes, according to Shemer, centers on two demonizing claims: that Israel is committing 'genocide' in Gaza and forcing the survivors into exile. She pointed out that this narrative building has also harnessed statements from both President Trump regarding the establishment of a "Riviera" in Gaza and haphazard declarations by Israeli officials about establishing settlements in Gaza or committing war crimes. 'Many don't understand that in democracies, declarations are more like rhetorical battles and have no real effect on the polices on the ground,' Shemer continued. 'In practice, neither decision-makers nor the majority of the Israeli public are fighting for these goals or are willing to use practices that violate international law - but are interested in defeating Hamas and removing it from any position of power in the Gaza Strip and returning the hostages.' "These two messages—destruction and displacement—are the worst possible messages from the perspective of Muslim and international ears," Shemer commented. She described how Al Jazeera floods the Muslim and international world with both carefully chosen negative 'buzzwords' and difficult images of affected civilians in Gaza, particularly mothers and small children, creating a deeply emotional impact on Muslims worldwide. However, Shemer noted a critical information gap: "Al Jazeera does not provide the broader context of the fight against Hamas, which uses civilians as human shields while hiding in underground tunnels, or the fact that Hamas itself attacked civilians on October 7 and still holds them as hostages." Shemer revealed the extent of ignorance about basic facts regarding Israel's situation among global Muslim populations. "According to research, Muslims around the world barely know basic facts about the situation in Israel," she said. "Information reaches consciousness at the headline level, and sometimes not even that." To illustrate this point, she shared an example from her conversations with Muslims worldwide: "I asked if they knew who the Bibas family was. The answer was no; and the Bibas family was the most famous event regarding Israel in the world." She added that even regarding October 7 itself, there isn't sufficient information, compounded by the fact that Hamas and Al Jazeera have vehemently denied harming civilians, knowing such actions are perceived as illegitimate by Muslims and the international community. Shemer emphasized that Hamas's success in propagating this narrative stems from its appeal to human and Muslim emotions. However, she characterized this as manipulation, explaining that "Hamas's political and religious leadership doesn't focus at all on the human suffering in Gaza. This is suffering they caused, but they justify it with the religious ideology of jihad warfare for the 'liberation of Palestine,' which essentially means the elimination of Israel." The Israeli scholar continued: 'this is in full contrast with the reality that Hamas's military leadership hides in underground tunnels while the political and religious leadership resides in five-star hotels around the world.' These images, she explained, are the tactic Hamas uses to create strong political pressure on Israel, an endeavor termed "Al-Jihad Al-I'lami" or 'media jihad.' Despite the dominance of Hamas and its backers in Qatar over the narrative, Shemer noted that voices from Gaza are emerging expressing disgust with Hamas's corrupt rule, which she said 'uses Islam as a tool while only caring about control.' She referenced a fatwa issued several months ago by a Gaza religious figure named Salman al-Diya, who argued that Hamas made a mistake in launching the October 7 attack because they failed to foresee the consequences and not only failed to liberate a centimeter of Palestine but brought destruction upon the Palestinians. 'It should be noted that the signs of resistance to Hamas do not necessarily mean a decline in support for the armed struggle against Israel as a central tool for achieving Palestinian goals,' Shemer clarified. 'This view is still consensual.' Shemer explained that when Israel took control of aid distribution from Hamas, it effectively removed Hamas's control over the population, which Hamas had been using and exploiting as victims. She described how aid previously went to Hamas, who would take it from the population, store it in their warehouses, and sell it at exorbitant prices that poor Gazans couldn't afford—citing an example of a 25-kilogram bag of flour costing 3,000 shekels. "We hear more and more voices of Gazans on social media whose fear barrier from Hamas has been broken and they are speaking out openly against it," she observed. Regarding Israel's current global narrative position, Shemer was candid: "Israel's situation right now is not good in terms of narrative in the Arab world." She called for Israel to create a well-organized information body capable of responding in real-time to accusations in global media, and emphasized the importance of not forgetting the Arab world, including peace treaty partners Egypt and Jordan, as well as Abraham Accords countries. "Public pressure is being created toward the regimes in these countries, when the public comes to them with complaints about how they normalized relations with Israel while Israel is portrayed as a criminal," she concluded, warning that a decade of diplomatic efforts to achieve the Abraham Accords could be lost. However, Shemer claimed that not everything is lost. She advocated for Israel to continue and expand aid distribution, noting that aid distribution areas are safe zones where Israel doesn't fight. She proposed creating a protected, separate compound supervised by international or Israeli authorities where the entire civilian population could relocate, providing food, medical care, and everything the population needs while ensuring positive images of Israel caring for the civilian population emerge. "Take care of the population and ensure that positive pictures come out of a civilian population that Israel cares for,' Shemer suggested. 'At the end of the day, it is Israel that is making tremendous efforts to untie the Gordian knot that Hamas has created between its terrorist activity and the civilian population and to separate, to the best of its ability, those involved in the fighting and those not involved, within an incredibly complex arena.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store