Photos show kidnapping accuser leaving 'crypto bros' $75k-a-month NYC mansion freely, defense says
The Italian man allegedly kidnapped by two crypto investors was moving about Manhattan freely during the days he claimed he was tortured in captivity, lawyers for the suspects said in court Wednesday.
Lawyers representing William Duplessie, 32, and John Woeltz, 37, both claimed that their alleged victim Michael Valentino Teofrasto Carturan, 28, was seen in photos and videos 'laughing and smiling' on the days he was supposedly being violently extorted for the password to unlock the bitcoin in his crypto wallet worth millions of dollars.
Prosecutors instead argued that Carturan was clearly in distress, as surveillance video showed him running barefoot out of the SoHo apartment he was allegedly locked away in for 17 days.
Sam Talkin, Duplessie's lawyer, said photos and videos showed Carturan participating in group sex and smoking crack cocaine while 'laughing and smiling the whole time,' the Associated Press reported.
'The story that he is selling doesn´t make sense,' Talkin said in Manhattan Supreme Court as the defendants were formally arraigned. Both men were ordered to be held behind bars until their next court date on July 15.
Woeltz´s lawyer, Wayne Gosnell, said that witnesses told him Carturan came and went as he pleased from the upscale town house where he says he was held - going to church, clubs and dinners.
Duplessie and Woeltz both pleaded not guilty to first-degree kidnapping, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault.
Assistant District Attorney Sarah Khan attempted to explain away the photographic and video evidence presented by the defense by saying someone who supports the defendants has been selectively leaking the content to mislead.
Khan maintained that Carturan was constantly being watched, was not permitted to leave the house without being guarded and was subjected to violence.
This allegedly included pistol whipping him, attempting to light him on fire and urinating on him, according to ABC6.
The alleged kidnappers even had a chainsaw and threatened to cut the his legs off if he didn't reveal his passwords to his crypto accounts.
When he emerged from the apartment barefoot and bloody, Carturan told police he had been severely beaten, drugged, shocked with electrical wires and threatened with death.
Duplessie and Woeltz, who were arrested in May after Carturan got loose, also took photos of him in various poses and acts to create the impression that he was not being held against his will, Khan said.
Khan also dropped the bombshell that discussions her office has had with other unnamed law enforcement agencies has indicated to her that Woeltz and Duplessie have tortured people before. She did not elaborate any further than that.
Prosecutors say that on May 6, the two men lured Carturo to their townhouse in the posh neighborhood of SoHo by threatening to kill his family.
This had been the third time Carturo met with Duplessie and Woeltz, according to prosecutors.
Duplessie (left) and Woeltz (right) were known for their partying lifestyle and were regulars at New York City's exclusive night club The Box, reportedly spending over $100,000 in single nights there
Duplessie (pictured) and Woeltz would reportedly host extravagant parties at the residence, offering guests drugs, alcohol and food from NYC hotspots including Blue Ribbon Sushi, Nobu, and Cipriani's
After being tormented with electrical wires, being forced to smoke from a crack pipe and being dangled from a staircase five stories high, prosecutors say, that's when Carturo handed over his password.
While the alleged kidnappers went to go retrieve his device, that's when Carturo said he was able to escape and call police.
Khan said he hasn't received his money or electronic devices back.
Woeltz started renting the multimillion-dollar townhouse on March 17, less than two months before the alleged crime. He pays his landlord between $75,000 and $95,000 per month to reside there, insiders told TMZ.
He and Duplessie, 32, intent on climbing the elite Manhattan social ladder, would reportedly host extravagant parties at the residence, offering guests drugs, alcohol and food from NYC hotspots including Blue Ribbon Sushi, Nobu, and Cipriani's.
Photographs captured from inside the stunning six-story home show how the pair littered the kitchen with cocaine, empty top shelf liquor bottles, including Don Julio and Greygoose, mixers, disposable vapes, and empty take-out containers.
The pair also regularly frequented The Box, an exclusive erotic nightclub in Nolita, with insiders alleging they would spend upwards of $100,000 during a night out and often brought women back to the townhouse to continue partying.
Police have locked down the property while they carry out their investigation. Officials will not release the home back to its owner until the probe is complete.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Tennessee judge to hear arguments about releasing Kilmar Abrego Garcia from pretrial detention
A Tennessee judge is scheduled to hear arguments Friday about whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia can be released from jail pending the outcome of a trial on human smuggling charges. In a motion asking U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes to order Abrego Garcia detained, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Rob McGuire described him as both a danger to the community and a flight risk. Abrego Garcia's attorneys disagree. They point out that he was already wrongly detained in a notorious Salvadoran prison thanks to government error, and argue that due process and 'basic fairness' require him to be set free. Abrego Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador who had been living in the United States for more than a decade before he was wrongfully deported in March. The expulsion violated a 2019 U.S. immigration judge's order that shielded him from deportation to his native country because he likely faced gang persecution there. His case quickly became a rallying point for opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda. While the Trump administration described the mistaken removal as 'an administrative error,' officials have continued to justify it by insisting that Abrego Garcia was a member of the El Salvadoran gang MS-13. His wife and attorneys have denied the allegations, saying he is simply a construction worker and family man. The motion for detention pretrial accuses Abrego Garcia of trafficking people, drugs and firearms and of abusing the women he transported, among other claims. It states that human smuggling was Abrego Garcia's actual job, not construction. It even accuses him of taking part in a murder in El Salvador. However, none of those allegations are part of the charges against him, and at Abrego Garcia's initial appearance June 6, Judge Holmes warned prosecutors that she can not detain someone based solely on allegations. One of Abrego Garcia's attorneys last week called the claims 'preposterous,' characterizing them as a desperate attempt by the Trump administration to justify the mistaken deportation three months after the fact. 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy,' private attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg said last week. In a Wednesday court filing, Abrego Garcia's public defenders argued the government is not even entitled to a detention hearing — much less actual detention — because the charges against their client are not serious enough. Although the maximum sentence for smuggling one person is 10 years, and Abrego Garcia is accused of transporting hundreds of people over nearly a decade, his defense attorneys point out that there is no minimum sentence. The average sentence for human smuggling in 2024 was just 15 months, according to court filings. Ohio State University law professor César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández said he would not be surprised if the judge releases Abrego Garcia because he's too well-known to pose a flight risk. 'The thought that this is somebody who can disappear or who might violate the law without anyone noticing seems farfetched,' García Hernández said. But even if Abrego Garcia is released on the criminal charges, Immigration and Customs Enforcement might immediately move to detain and deport him, García Hernández said. Most people in ICE custody who are facing criminal charges are deported, he said, and the idea that ICE would take Abrego Garcia to his court proceedings in Tennessee is 'next to unheard of.' 'This is an unusual situation in that most criminal defendants are not household names in the Oval Office,' García Hernández said. 'I would hope the folks in the Trump administration have thought this through.' The decision to charge Abrego Garcia criminally prompted the resignation of Ben Schrader, who was chief of the criminal division at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Tennessee. He posted about his departure on social media on the day of the indictment, writing, 'It has been an incredible privilege to serve as a prosecutor with the Department of Justice, where the only job description I've ever known is to do the right thing, in the right way, for the right reasons.' He did not directly address the indictment and declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press. However, a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter confirmed the connection. Although Abrego Garcia lives in Maryland, he is being charged in Tennessee based on a May 2022 traffic stop for speeding in the state. The Tennessee Highway Patrol body camera video of the encounter that was released to the public last month shows a calm exchange between officers and Abrego Garcia. It also shows the officers discussing among themselves their suspicions of human smuggling before sending him on his way. One of the officers says, 'He's hauling these people for money.' Another says Abrego Garcia had $1,400 in an envelope. Abrego Garcia was not charged with any offense at the traffic stop. Attorney Sandoval-Moshenberg said in a statement after the video's release that he saw no evidence of a crime in the footage. Meanwhile, the lawsuit over Abrego Garcia's mistaken deportation isn't over. Abrego Garcia's attorneys have asked a federal judge in Maryland to impose fines against the administration for contempt, arguing that it flagrantly ignored court orders forseveral weeks to return him. The Trump administration said it will ask the judge to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that it followed the judge's order to return him to the U.S. —- Finley reported from Norfolk, Virginia.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Closing arguments: Is Karen Read's murder trial a tale of love gone wrong or a police coverup?
Lawyers in the murder trial of Karen Read are set to give their closing arguments Friday after weeks of testimony in a highly divisive case in which the prosecution's theory of jaded love turned deadly is countered by a defense claim that a cast of tight-knit Boston area law enforcement killed a fellow police officer. Read, 45, is accused of fatally striking her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, 46, with her SUV and leaving him to die in the snow outside a house party where other local police and a federal agent were closing out a night of drinking in 2022. She's charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene in Canton, outside Boston. Read's defense has suggested she was the victim of a wide-ranging conspiracy that included planting evidence and using her as a convenient scapegoat for her boyfriend's death. The first Read trial ended July 1 in a mistrial due to a hung jury, and several jurors came out after to say that the panel had unanimously agreed that Read was not guilty of the most serious charge of second-degree murder. Prosecution has focused on the scene of death The state's case was led by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who called fewer witnesses than prosecutor Adam Lally, who ran the first trial against Read. Brennan has referenced Read's statement about the possibility that she backed into O'Keefe, which the defense has pointed out came not from police reports but from a voluntary interview she did for a documentary series. In the television interview, Read said, 'I didn't think I hit him,' but acknowledged she could have 'clipped him.' In the first trial, the state called Michael Proctor, the lead investigator in the case. Proctor would later be fired after a disciplinary board found he sent sexist and crude text messages about Read. Proctor was asked to read the texts aloud in court during the first trial, but in the second, the prosecution relied on others to read the offensive comments. The defense called one of Proctor's friends to read more texts that suggested he had focused on Read early in the investigation. During the first trial, Proctor acknowledged being friends with Kevin Albert, a Canton police officer who is the brother of the owner of the home where the party was held. Prosecutors this time focused on evidence from the scene, and tried to make the point that broken pieces of Read's taillight show she struck O'Keefe with her vehicle. The defense has argued that the taillight was actually damaged when Read was backing out of O'Keefe's house and hit his car. They have suggested Proctor and others could have colluded to plant the pieces of broken plastic near O'Keefe's body after they took the vehicle back to the police department. Experts called by the prosecutors testified that data on O'Keefe's phone matched with it being located near a flagpole on the lawn, near the street, where his body was found. There was also no phone activity after that and the phone's battery temperature dropped considerably, the specialist said. Another specialist used GPS and phone data to place Read's vehicle at the scene around the same time. Another expert testified that Read's vehicle reversed more than 50 feet (15 meters) at about 23 mph (37 kph). Andre Porto, a forensic scientist who works in the DNA unit of the Massachusetts State Police Crime Lab, detailed various items he tested, including the broken rear taillight and pieces of a broken cocktail glass found in the yard. Only O'Keefe was a likely match for both. A hair found on Read's vehicle was a match for O'Keefe. Traces of DNA from three people, O'Keefe and two unknown individuals, were on the outside of Read's taillight and O'Keefe's clothing, Porto said. Prosecutors called a neurosurgeon who testified that O'Keefe suffered a 'classic blunt trauma injury' associated with falling backward and hitting his head. The broken cocktail glass found at the scene is another key piece of evidence, prosecutors have said, because O'Keefe was holding it when Read dropped him off. The prosecution pointed out that Read and O'Keefe were fighting. Voicemails recovered from Read's phone in which she said, 'I (expletive) hate you,' to O'Keefe were played in court. That voicemail would have arrived while he was lying in the snow. The defense's strategy in the second trial Read's defense team has cast doubt on the state's case by suggesting Read was framed. The defense has painted a picture of a deceitful web of people in O'Keefe's social network who saw Read as a scapegoat for his death. The network includes federal agent Brian Higgins, who exchanged flirtatious text messages with Read, leading the defense to question if that led to a fatal confrontation. Higgins was present at the party on the night of O'Keefe's death. Defense attorneys presented a different view of how Read's taillight was cracked. They have attempted to show, via witnesses, surveillance video and photographs, that Read may have damaged her taillight the morning after O'Keefe's death when she backed out of his driveway and bumped his car with her own. Nicholas Barros, a police officer at a department where Read's car was impounded, testified that he saw only a small crack in Read's taillight when the car first arrived. The defense has pointed out that the taillight later looked much more damaged, arguing it could have been tampered with. A crash expert who testified for the defense said, based on every test he performed, the damage to Read's taillight and O'Keefe's clothing was inconsistent with her SUV striking an arm or body at the speed described by the prosecution. The defense has also questioned why investigators never entered the home where the party took place, although witnesses from the scene and prosecutors have said O'Keefe never went inside. Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a former medical examiner called by the defense, said O'Keefe's injuries were consistent with blunt force trauma to the back of the head, but that his eye wounds were not consistent with being hit by the rear of Read's SUV. She testified she did not think O'Keefe was hit by the SUV at all. The defense also questioned Jennifer McCabe, who was at the house party and is the sister-in-law of the host, retired Boston police officer Brian Albert. McCabe made a misspelled web search, 'hos long to die in cold,' after O'Keefe's death. The timing of the search has been in question. The defense argued that McCabe made the search at about 2:30 a.m. and helped cover for the real killer. The prosecution claims she searched after O'Keefe's body was found later in the morning. The defense called into question the actions of others who were at the party the night O'Keefe died. The party happened at the home of Albert, and after O'Keefe's death, the Alberts rehomed their dog Chloe — who the defense claims bit O'Keefe — and refurbished their basement before selling their home at a loss. Dr. Marie Russell, a retired emergency medicine physician, testified that the wounds on O'Keefe's arms were the result of a dog attack, injuries the prosecution attributes to being struck by Read's vehicle. The judge in the case did not allow medical examiner Laposata to testify specifically about potential dog bite wounds, but did allow her to testify that some of O'Keefe's arm injuries were consistent with an animal bite, not with wounds from a broken taillight. The defense introduced phone records that showed unanswered calls between Albert and Higgins in the early morning hours after O'Keefe's death. They both later destroyed their phones, with Higgins testifying in the first trial that he obliterated his phone's SIM card and disposed of it at a military base. The defense also introduced records from McCabe that showed she repeatedly called O'Keefe after midnight, calls she described as 'butt dials.' Read faces a maximum penalty of a life sentence if convicted.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
South Carolina prepares for its 6th execution in 9 months with a man serving 2 death sentences
A South Carolina man sent to death row twice for separate murders is scheduled to die Friday by lethal injection in the state's sixth execution in nine months. Stephen Stanko, 57, is being killed for shooting a friend and then cleaning out his bank account in Horry County in 2005. Hours earlier Stanko killed his live-in girlfriend, strangling her as he raped her teenage daughter in the woman's home in neighboring Georgetown County. He slit the teen's throat but she survived. Stanko also ended up on death row for that crime. Stanko was leaning toward dying by South Carolina's new firing squad, like two inmates before him. But after autopsy results from the last inmate killed by that method showed the bullets from the three volunteers nearly missed his heart, Stanko went with lethal injection. Stanko is the last of four executions scheduled around the country this week. Florida and Alabama each put an inmate to death on Tuesday. On Wednesday, Oklahoma executed a man transferred from federal to state custody to allow his death. There are a couple of long-shot efforts to spare his life. Stanko can appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court after a federal judge refused this week to stop his execution. Stanko's lawyers said the state isn't carrying out lethal injection properly after autopsy results found fluid in the lungs of other inmates killed that way. Or South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster could offer clemency. That decision won't be made until a phone call prison officials make to the governor minutes before every execution. Stanko's execution is set to start at 6 p.m. at a Columbia prison. A governor has not spared a death row inmate's life in the previous 48 executions since South Carolina reinstated the death penalty about 50 years ago. What will happen to Stanko in the death chamber Stanko will be strapped to a gurney in the state's death chamber. An IV line, placed before witnesses enter the room, will stretch into a wall behind him. He will be given at least one massive dose of the powerful sedative pentobarbital. In previous South Carolina executions, prison officials have given inmates a second dose of the drug after 10 minutes when their hearts have shown sporadic electrical impulses because the organ is the last to use the body's stored oxygen. Lawyers for Stanko said the procedure shows inmates suffer. But a federal judge pointed out Wednesday that witnesses to all three South Carolina lethal injection deaths in the past nine months said the inmates took several breaths, some that sounded like snores, then stopped breathing and lost consciousness within one to two minutes. Stanko's two murders across two counties Stanko is being executed for killing his 74-year-old friend Henry Turner. Stanko went to Turner's home in April 2005 after lying about his father dying and then shot Turner twice while using a pillow as a silencer, authorities said. Stanko stole Turner's truck, cleaned out his bank account and then spent the next few days in Augusta, Georgia, where he told people in town for the Masters Tournament that he owned several Hooters restaurants. He stayed with a woman who took him to church. She then called police once she saw his photo and that he was wanted, police said. Hours before killing Turner, Stanko beat and strangled his girlfriend in her home and raped her daughter before slashing the teen's throat. The daughter survived and testified against him at one of his trials. 'Stephen Stanko is just plain evil. He has, in his core, down deep inside, something that makes him evil. He's a bad man, he knows it, and he likes it. He doesn't turn away from it. He will hide it. He's very, very, very good at hiding it, but you cannot equate evil with insanity,' then-prosecutor Greg Hembree said in his closing statement at one of Stanko's trials. Hembree later became a state senator and was the chief sponsor of the 2021 law allowing South Carolina to use a firing squad.
