South Carolina prepares for its 6th execution in 9 months with a man serving 2 death sentences
A South Carolina man sent to death row twice for separate murders is scheduled to die Friday by lethal injection in the state's sixth execution in nine months.
Stephen Stanko, 57, is being killed for shooting a friend and then cleaning out his bank account in Horry County in 2005. Hours earlier Stanko killed his live-in girlfriend, strangling her as he raped her teenage daughter in the woman's home in neighboring Georgetown County. He slit the teen's throat but she survived. Stanko also ended up on death row for that crime.
Stanko was leaning toward dying by South Carolina's new firing squad, like two inmates before him. But after autopsy results from the last inmate killed by that method showed the bullets from the three volunteers nearly missed his heart, Stanko went with lethal injection.
Stanko is the last of four executions scheduled around the country this week. Florida and Alabama each put an inmate to death on Tuesday. On Wednesday, Oklahoma executed a man transferred from federal to state custody to allow his death.
There are a couple of long-shot efforts to spare his life. Stanko can appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court after a federal judge refused this week to stop his execution. Stanko's lawyers said the state isn't carrying out lethal injection properly after autopsy results found fluid in the lungs of other inmates killed that way.
Or South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster could offer clemency. That decision won't be made until a phone call prison officials make to the governor minutes before every execution. Stanko's execution is set to start at 6 p.m. at a Columbia prison.
A governor has not spared a death row inmate's life in the previous 48 executions since South Carolina reinstated the death penalty about 50 years ago.
What will happen to Stanko in the death chamber
Stanko will be strapped to a gurney in the state's death chamber. An IV line, placed before witnesses enter the room, will stretch into a wall behind him.
He will be given at least one massive dose of the powerful sedative pentobarbital. In previous South Carolina executions, prison officials have given inmates a second dose of the drug after 10 minutes when their hearts have shown sporadic electrical impulses because the organ is the last to use the body's stored oxygen.
Lawyers for Stanko said the procedure shows inmates suffer. But a federal judge pointed out Wednesday that witnesses to all three South Carolina lethal injection deaths in the past nine months said the inmates took several breaths, some that sounded like snores, then stopped breathing and lost consciousness within one to two minutes.
Stanko's two murders across two counties
Stanko is being executed for killing his 74-year-old friend Henry Turner. Stanko went to Turner's home in April 2005 after lying about his father dying and then shot Turner twice while using a pillow as a silencer, authorities said.
Stanko stole Turner's truck, cleaned out his bank account and then spent the next few days in Augusta, Georgia, where he told people in town for the Masters Tournament that he owned several Hooters restaurants. He stayed with a woman who took him to church. She then called police once she saw his photo and that he was wanted, police said.
Hours before killing Turner, Stanko beat and strangled his girlfriend in her home and raped her daughter before slashing the teen's throat. The daughter survived and testified against him at one of his trials.
'Stephen Stanko is just plain evil. He has, in his core, down deep inside, something that makes him evil. He's a bad man, he knows it, and he likes it. He doesn't turn away from it. He will hide it. He's very, very, very good at hiding it, but you cannot equate evil with insanity,' then-prosecutor Greg Hembree said in his closing statement at one of Stanko's trials.
Hembree later became a state senator and was the chief sponsor of the 2021 law allowing South Carolina to use a firing squad.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
At least three people have been shot at the homes of Minnesota Democrats in overnight attacks by a gunman posing as cop
AT least three people have reportedly been shot at the homes of Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota in a series of attacks overnight. Law enforcement have issued a shelter in place order in and around Brooklyn Park as they hunt for a gunman believed to be impersonating a police officer. 3 3 The first shooting was reported in Champlin just after 2 am local time at the home of State Senator John Hoffman. Two people, a man and a woman, are reported to have been shot at the residence but their identities have not been confirmed, per BNO News. This was followed by another shooting just a few miles away in Brooklyn Park at the home of another Democratic lawmaker who has not been named. They are believed to be a state representative and at least one man was shot there. At 5:30 am an alert was sent to residents by Brooklyn Park Police saying: "Police are looking for a suspect in multiple targeted shootings who is armed and dangerous. "Suspect is white male, brown hair, wearing black body armor over blue shirt and blue pants and may misrepresent himself as law enforcement." No official statement has been made by law enforcement. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has confirmed that he has been briefed on the situation. Taking to X, Walz said: "I've been briefed this morning on an ongoing situation involving targeted shootings in Champlin and Brooklyn Park. "The Minnesota Department of Public Safety and local law enforcement are on the scene. "We will share more information soon." . 3
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
How Trump hinted at a crackdown on protests long before his inauguration
The White House's escalating response to street protests echoes talk before Donald Trump's inauguration of forcibly quelling resistance in urban America. Those plans are now the present. After the use of federalized national guard units and marines in response to protests in Los Angeles, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) plans to deploy Swat-style special response teams to Seattle, Philadelphia, northern Virginia, New York and Chicago – cities led by Democrats that have long been the target of Trump's invective – before expected protests this weekend, according to reports by NBC and others. The militarization on the streets and in immigration raids dramatically marks the places the administration wants to punish dissent. Late last month, the Department of Homeland Security also posted a list of jurisdictions it said were noncompliant with federal law regarding immigration enforcement. These 'sanctuary jurisdictions' included entire states like California and New York, and an expansive list of counties and municipalities ranging from the metropolis of Los Angeles to tiny Hooker county, Nebraska, with a population of about 700. The list appeared to closely match the Detainer Acceptance Tracker, an internal document of Ice that identifies 'limited and non-cooperative institutions'. The tracker declares a jurisdiction out of 'compliance' if its local jail wouldn't continue to hold a prisoner set for release when Ice had issued a detention notice, or wouldn't give Ice what it considers adequate warning when that prisoner had a release pending. The list perplexed and infuriated state and local officials. Cities like Athens in Georgia or Memphis in Tennessee face strong state prohibitions against the adoption of immigration sanctuary policies. After an outcry, DHS withdrew the list, but it telegraphed the administration's targets for increased immigration enforcement. Days later, Ice began aggressive raids. Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, was asked last month why the administration wasn't arresting the leaders of so-called sanctuary cities. Homan smirked. 'Wait till you see what's coming,' he replied. Cities have long been planning their responses to a Trump-led crackdown. Seattle's government has pledged to resist cooperation with Ice and the city has a history of strident public protest. Its leadership has been unambiguous about where they stand. 'At some point, I will probably go to jail and be in prison because we have an administration that has threatened to jail politicians … and has threatened to jail a governor,' newly appointed Seattle police chief Shon Barnes told the city council this week at his confirmation hearing. 'I will do everything in my power to protect anyone in Seattle from anyone who comes to this city with the intention to hurt them or inhibit their first amendment rights.' Barnes's prediction connects with a pair of executive orders Trump issued on 28 April calling on DHS to identify and defund sanctuary cities and increase immigration enforcement by driving military equipment into local police officers' hands. One of the orders contains a provision that calls on the attorney general to 'prioritize prosecution' of officials who 'willfully and unlawfully direct the obstruction of criminal law' including by trying to stop law enforcement officers from carrying out these 'duties'. Philadelphia district attorney Larry Krasner, long a firebrand figure in city politics, carefully asked for peaceful protest, and pledged to uphold the rule of law as the city manages public demonstrations. But he described the use of federal troops as a provocation, and Trump as a wannabe dictator and criminal. 'The notion that we're actually going to talk to somebody like that in a way that is reasonable makes no sense because we all know what he's actually up to,' he said at a press conference Thursday. 'What he's actually up to is setting up a military overthrow of the United States, and he's doing it like every wannabe dictator and successful dictator has done in the past, which is that you have to scare the population and convince them that there's a bonafide emergency when there isn't.' The Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson called for 'constitutional policing' as both upgunned Ice units and protesters descend on the city this weekend. In a press conference Wednesday, Johnson said he believes his city has been targeted by the administration and by conservatives for policies perceived to be supportive of illegal immigration, specifically noting how Texas governor Greg Abbott trafficked immigrants to the city as a political stunt. 'I will say that it is clear that there is more intentionality around the Trump's administration to attack Democratically-run cities,' Johnson said. 'This president's desire to not only militarize and criminalize, but his commitment to drive chaos, is something that I've said from the very beginning is not only reckless but it's incomprehensible, quite frankly. So, we're going to protect people's right to assemble while also ensuring that Chicagoans can get through their day-to-day.' Just as city leaders have been anticipating a crackdown, Trump administration leaders have been expecting people to respond. In speeches made to private groups in 2023 and 2024, Russell Vought – one of the main architects of Project 2025 and current chief of the office of management and budget – argued for the use of the Insurrection Act to use the military to put down protests he predicted would emerge from administration policies. 'We want to be able to shut down the riots and not have the legal community or the defense community come in and say: 'That's an inappropriate use of what you're trying to do,'' he said. The Center for Renewing America, a Christian conservative thinktank founded by Vought, also argued in a policy brief in 2024 that the president has sweeping authority to use the military as a tool for immigration enforcement, and called on a future president Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act. Trump campaigned on a pledge to use the military to assist in immigration enforcement. 'I can see myself using the National Guard and, if necessary, I'd have to go a step further,' he told Time magazine. 'We have to do whatever we have to do to stop the problem we have.' In that interview, Trump lambasted 'Democratic-run cities' for failing to address 'migrant crime', arguing that the use of the military would be justified in these places. 'I've used the National Guard in Minneapolis. And if I didn't use it, I don't think you'd have Minneapolis standing right now, because it was really bad,' he said. 'But I think in terms of the National Guard. But if I thought things were getting out of control, I would have no problem using the military, per se.' The Posse Comitatus Act has been widely understood to prohibit troops from engaging in domestic law enforcement functions targeting civilians without the invocation of the Insurrection Act. But Trump claimed that undocumented immigrants should be considered 'invaders' and not civilians for purposes of that law. The US district court judge Charles R Breyer rebuked the Trump administration late Thursday for its activation of national guard units in California, and for its broader argument that decisions made by the president about how to use the military lay beyond judicial review. The 36-page order required Trump to return control of the units to the state governor, Gavin Newsom, by noon Friday. An appellate panel of the ninth circuit court put Breyer's ruling on hold late Thursday evening, leaving Trump's use of the military in cities in a state of legal limbo for now. But Breyer's ruling notes that Trump's assertion that protests constitute a threat of rebellion does not justify national guard activation, and declares that failing to work with the governor violates the law. Contrast this with how conservative states with large progressive cities are approaching protests this weekend. The Texas governor Greg Abbott has already activated national guard units, with 5,000 troops being sent to manage 'No Kings Day' protests across the state. In Georgia, a protest Wednesday on Buford Highway in Brookhaven – the heart of metro Atlanta's immigrant community – ended in teargas and six arrests, with charges ranging from disorderly conduct to assaulting a peace officer. 'In Georgia, if you engage in violence for the purpose of changing public policy, you can be charged with Domestic Terrorism,' wrote the Georgia attorney general, Chris Carr, on Thursday. 'So, for those trying to make their weekend plans, the bottom line is this – we will defend the right to peacefully protest, and we will not hesitate to bring Domestic Terrorism charges for those who earn it. We are not California or New York. We are Georgia. We don't make excuses for criminals here. We prosecute them.' Progressive leaders of American cities on the edge right now are matching the tone of this rhetoric. 'What we have seen in Los Angeles is really not about immigration,' Johnson said in Chicago. 'This is not about policy. This is about power. We have a tyrant in the White House who has a complete disregard for our constitution and the dismissing of our democracy.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Ice arrests of migrants with no criminal history surging under Trump
The federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agency has exponentially increased the arrest and detention of immigrants without any criminal history since the second Trump administration took office, a data analysis by the Guardian shows. The information sharply contradicts Donald Trump's claims the authorities are targeting 'criminals' for deportation as part of his aggressive anti-immigration agenda. According to numbers gathered from Ice and the Vera Institute of Justice, after Trump returned to the White House in late January there was a steep surge in arrests of immigrants, in general. One of the sharpest increases in arrest numbers has been of immigrants with pending charges, who have not yet been convicted of any crimes. But the biggest increase has been people with no charges at all. Between early January, right before the inauguration, and June, there has been an 807% increase in the arrest of immigrants with no criminal record. The Department of Homeland Security and top White House officials continue to claim that Ice is targeting 'criminals' and 'criminal illegal aliens'. But the Ice data shows the agency is not just targeting those with criminal records. Being undocumented in the US is a civil infraction, not a criminal offense. 'The group of people arrested with only immigration violations used to be very, very small,' said Austin Kocher, an assistant research professor at Syracuse University. 'The data reflects the fact that Ice is in the community, arresting an awful lot of people who don't have criminal histories. It doesn't reflect what the agency has claimed they're doing, which is going after the hardened criminals first, which I don't think the data supports.' Ice is certainly arresting people with criminal records, but the administration has not published data on what crimes people have been convicted of. Detailed statistics on arrestees is not available for 2025, but between October 2022 and November 2024, 78% of people arrested by the agency had a misdemeanor conviction or no conviction at all. Only 21% of people over that two year time period had a felony criminal conviction, a Guardian analysis of monthly Ice enforcement and removal operations shows. It is impossible to know how many people arrested since January have a felony criminal conviction because the government has not released that data. The sharpest increase in non-criminal arrests is following a late-May meeting, in which Trump administration officials yelled at top Ice officials, ordering them to arrest more immigrants. During that meeting, DHS secretary Kristi Noem and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller ordered Ice to arrest at least 3,000 people per day, which would be 1 million per year. Trump ran on a campaign of engaging in 'mass deportations' and since he took office his administration has escalated its tactics to meet that goal. As the Guardian reported this month, on 31 May, top Ice managers instructed officers throughout the country to 'turn the creative knob up to 11' to increase arrests. The internal Ice emails reviewed by the Guardian show officers were told to interview and potentially arrest 'collaterals', meaning people coincidentally present during an arrest. In the past, Ice typically targeted immigrants with arrest warrants. Now more people without any criminal history are being swept up in the dragnet. And the Trump White House has ordered an increase in the number of officials engaging in immigration enforcement operations. Special agents from various federal law enforcement agencies – including the FBI, the DEA, the ATF and Homeland Security Investigations – have been delegated to perform immigration enforcement work. There has also been an increase in the number of local jurisdictions deputized by Ice to carry out immigration enforcement work. The increase in immigration arrests has led to a rise in the number of people detained in Ice facilities nationwide. Kocher has been documenting these numbers closely, and tracked that as of 1 June, there were 51,302 people detained in immigration jails – the highest number since 2019. According to Kocher, the Trump administration has increased the number of people in detention so quickly that it is challenging to provide meaningful oversight. 'We know that these facilities are overcrowded, they're over capacity for what they are designed for,' said Kocher. 'Practically speaking, it means people are sleeping on the floor, they may not be getting enough food, they're almost certainly not getting adequate medical care.' In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security told the Guardian that 'since the beginning of President Trump's second term, we have arrested over 236,000 illegal aliens and have deported over 207,000'. However, according to the government's own data, since October, 186,000 people have been booked into immigration detention for the first time. DHS did not respond to follow-up questions regarding the discrepancy between the government data and the numbers the Trump administration is publicizing. Kocher said, in response to the discrepancy in the numbers: 'I think they're being dishonest and un-transparent because they are counting things in ways they have never been counted before to favor their political agenda and the perception they are trying to send to the base.' For advocates, one of the most outrageous steps has been the practice of engaging in arrests at immigration courts around the country. Asylum seekers going through the lengthy legal process of requesting to stay in the US have been targeted by immigration officials. After government attorneys dismiss their cases, Ice officials waiting in hallways or lobbies have arrested asylum seekers. Organizations are challenging the Trump administration's increasing efforts to arrest people at immigration courts. Last week, Innovation Law Lab, a legal organization that represents immigrants in civil rights cases, filed a suit against the Trump administration in Oregon to block the practice of courthouse arrests.
