logo
Britain urged to let hero Afghans bring their families to UK after major data leak put thousands at risk

Britain urged to let hero Afghans bring their families to UK after major data leak put thousands at risk

Independent3 days ago
The government has been urged to let hero Afghans granted sanctuary in Britain bring their loved ones to the UK after a major data breach put the lives of up to 100,000 people at risk from the Taliban.
More than 50 refugee charities and lawyers have written to Yvette Cooper, urging her to make it easier for Afghans who were allowed to relocate to the UK due to British links to bring family members – many of whom are at risk of reprisals – with them.
The pleas come after revelations of a 'catastrophic' data leak at the Ministry of Defence in February 2022, which involved the details of thousands of Afghans who said they were in danger from the Taliban and had applied for sanctuary in Britain being shared online.
The dataset, inadvertently sent out by a member of the armed forces, included the personal details of applicants to the MoD's Arap resettlement scheme, which allows Afghans who supported British troops to seek sanctuary in the UK. The leak was covered up by a superinjunction, which was lifted in July after The Independent challenged the draconian legal order at the High Court.
Ms Cooper has now been told the government 'has no time to waste' if it 'wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality'.
Charity workers and solicitors, including from Asylum Aid and modern slavery charity Kalayaan, told Ms Cooper: 'The UK government has a moral responsibility to the Afghan people who continue to suffer, including now as a result of the data leak and have no choice but to seek safety elsewhere.
'The 2022 data breach directly exposed Afghans still in the country to a risk of reprisals they were not even aware of, and the High Court, in lifting the superinjunction, recognised that its imposition may have increased the risks these people face.'
The letter continued: 'Poor decision-making could yet again have exposed Afghans to serious harm, with many of these people having clear UK family ties'.
They added: 'It is essential that those who were resettled under Arap and ACRS are able to live in safety and are given a fair opportunity to reunite with their families.'
Unlike asylum routes, Afghans using Arap cannot sponsor family members to come to the UK under refugee reunion rules. The same applies to those relocated under ACRS, designed to help those who supported British values, such as journalists or women's rights activists. However, some may be able to make a separate immigration application.
But charities and rights groups say these family routes are very restrictive and can often involve 'extremely costly application fees and require copious, specific documentation'. Decision-makers often refuse these applications from Afghan families, leading to lengthy appeals.
Lib Dem MP Wendy Chamberlain, chair of the all-parliamentary group for Afghan women, said: 'There is already anecdotal evidence of reprisals on family members by the Taliban - the Home Office has no time to waste if the government wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality.
'The Home Office desperately needs to take a pragmatic and compassionate approach to allowing Afghans resettled in the UK to be reunited safely with their families. It is clear that these schemes have been seriously mis-handled, culminating in the recent exposure of the 2022 data leak.'
In one recent case highlighted by The Independent, a security guard who worked for the British embassy in Kabul for almost two decades has been unable to bring his two eldest sons to the UK.
Hamidullah Fahim and his wife Zaghona were brought to Britain with two young children in December 2023, but he couldn't bring his two eldest sons, who are now in their 20s.
He said that his family is struggling with being separated, saying: 'We want to do whatever we can to be reunited with them and to let the Home Office know of the injustice that has been carried out in our case'.
Isaac Shaffer, at Refugee Legal Support, said it was 'critical' that the government sped up decision-making on Arap cases in light of the data breach.
He explained that most of the people he was helping 'have waited over a year for a final decision on their Arap application and have remained in hiding throughout; in constant fear, and in extraordinarily precarious circumstances', adding: 'Knowledge of this data breach has only exacerbated this fear and uncertainty'.
James Tullett, CEO at charity Ramfel, who helped co-ordinate the letter, said: 'The government has acknowledged that the people they have resettled need protection and yet this offer of support comes with the heavy price of separation from family.
'Allowing Afghan families to reunite won't solve all the problems associated with the data leak, but it will make a monumental difference for the affected families'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More electric cars eligible for new Government grants
More electric cars eligible for new Government grants

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

More electric cars eligible for new Government grants

Thirteen more electric car models are eligible for new Government grants. Drivers can save £1,500 with the purchase of certain Nissan, Renault and Vauxhall models, the Department for Transport (DfT) said. The discount will be automatically applied at the point of sale. This comes after four Citroen cars were announced as the first grant-eligible models on Tuesday. More models are expected to be approved in the coming weeks as manufacturers' applications are assessed against sustainability standards. The new £650 million electric car grant scheme enables motorists purchasing some new electric cars costing up to £37,000 to save either £1,500 or £3,750, depending on the vehicle's green credentials. All models announced so far are eligible for grants of £1,500. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'With discounts on 17 car models announced this week alone, we're delivering on our promise to make it easier and cheaper for families to go electric. 'This is about backing drivers, putting money back into people's pockets and creating the jobs and growth that will drive Britain forward.' The DfT has previously said many drivers cite upfront costs as a 'key barrier' to buying an EV and the grant will bring down prices so they 'more closely match their petrol and diesel counterparts'. However, shadow transport secretary Richard Holden said: 'Labour ministers' decision to hand £650 million of taxpayers' money to foreign car companies, for cars made in foreign countries, is deranged. 'This latest mess with a confused rollout and botched incentives is only making things worse. 'Labour has put ideological obsession ahead of hard pressed taxpayers, who are staring down the barrel of billions in tax rises to come after Labour's disastrous massive tax hike budget last year that has already seen over 100,000 people join the dole queue. 'Labour's heavy-handed meddling is damaging confidence, placing British jobs at risk, and putting the brakes on competition. 'Consumers and the market should be trusted to drive the transition to cleaner technologies, not this clueless Government.' RAC head of policy Simon Williams said: 'Another wave of cars qualifying for the Government's revamped electric car grant is yet more welcome news. 'It's also very positive to see other manufacturers that don't meet the grant's green production targets lowering their prices. 'Those looking to make the switch now have a wider choice of better-value vehicles than ever before. This can only help speed up the transition to electric motoring.' Online vehicle marketplace Auto Trader said it has seen a spike in interest for electric cars since the grant was announced, with interest in some brands trebling. James Taylor, managing director of Nissan Motor GB, said the announcement that its models will be eligible is 'an exciting step in the UK's electrification journey'. Steve Catlin, his counterpart at Vauxhall, said the manufacturer has been 'committed to electrifying Britain for years'. Under the Government's zero emission vehicle (Zev) mandate, at least 28% of new cars sold by each manufacturer in the UK this year must be zero emission, which generally means pure electric. Across all manufacturers, the figure during the first half of the year was 21.6%. Colin Walker, head of transport at the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit think tank, warned that the impact of the electric car grant scheme could be 'undermined' by recent changes to the Zev mandate which mean it will be easier for manufacturers who do not meet the targets to avoid fines. He added that this risks 'driving down EV sales'. The Government has pledged to ban the sale of new fully petrol and diesel cars and vans from 2030. Here are the models eligible for the electric car grant:Citroen: e-C3, e-C4, e-C5 and Alpine A290, Megane, 4, 5 and Micra and Ariya (discounts on the Ariya will be available at dealerships from August 13)Vauxhall: Corsa Electric, Combo Life Electric, Astra Electric, Mokka Electric, Frontera Electric and Grandland Electric.

Arrests made during demonstrations outside Canary Wharf hotel as protests take place across UK
Arrests made during demonstrations outside Canary Wharf hotel as protests take place across UK

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Arrests made during demonstrations outside Canary Wharf hotel as protests take place across UK

Two people have been arrested at a protest outside the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf as demonstrations took place near hotels housing asylum seekers across the UK. There was a heavy police presence at the site in central London on Friday evening, with officers separating rival groups. The trouble came as the Metropolitan Police is gearing up for a busy weekend of demonstrations, including another planned protest and possible counter-protest outside the Britannia Hotel on Sunday. More than 100 people were protesting with Stand Up to Racism in Canary Wharf as part of the 'Defend Refugees, Stop the Far Right' demonstrations happening across the UK on Friday. About 100 counter- protesters waving Union flags and St George's Cross flags also gathered on the pavement opposite the hotel. 'One person protesting against the use of the hotel by asylum seekers has been arrested after a bottle was thrown at officers,' the Metropolitan Police said. 'A member of the counter-protest group has been arrested for failing to remove a face covering.' Following the two arrests, police imposed conditions under the Public Order Act, with counter-protesters instructed to remain on the pavement opposite the Britannia Hotel. Police said the measures were to 'prevent serious disorder at the protests in Canary Wharf'. Sabby Dhalu, the co-founder of Stand Up to Racism, who attended the demonstration, said: 'This weekend sees the greatest number of protests targeting refugees that are in hotels accommodating asylum seekers since last year's racist riots. 'We're here to stand up to that because it's clear that people on the far right want to see a repeat of the violence and the horrific scenes that we saw last year – with racist attacks up and down the country, violent attacks on police, violent attacks on mosques… 'We're here to stand up to that racism and violence.' She added: 'We've got to find better solutions as a society to the various problems that the country is facing: the fact that people are getting worse off is not the fault of refugees.' Safia Jama, chief executive of the Women's Inclusive Team charity which provides support to women in Tower Hamlets, was also present. Gesturing at the counter protesters across the road, she said: 'As a woman, I feel less safe today than I've ever felt in Tower Hamlets.' 'Generally, I'm very safe in Tower Hamlets: there is no issue or concerns. 'But I'm very worried about going home later, because they will target (us), and when you look at people across the road, it's mainly men.' She added: 'Tower Hamlets is my home: I went to primary school, primary school here, and I'm still living here. 'I'm not going to have a bunch of people come to my borough and paint my borough as a picture that it isn't, and say that it isn't safe for women. 'I'm safe every day, and you're not going to tell me otherwise.' On the counter protesters' side, a pensioner who went by the name of Susie, from Canary Wharf, said the idea of asylum seekers being housed in a local hotel made her feel unsafe. 'When I take the dog for a walk, I always carry a personal alarm because otherwise I'm terrified of being mugged. 'It's become unsafe because we know from a number of instances throughout the country with migrant hotels that these men, fighting-age men, have got sexual needs and there have been – like in Epping – attacks on girls.' Multiple demonstrations have been held outside a hotel housing asylum seekers in Epping since July 13, after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Susie added: 'It's very important to protest against this migrant hotel: first of all, this is Canary Wharf, which is the engine of a country. 'The sheer stupidity of a government that puts a migrant hotel here just beggars belief. 'These are unvetted, they are criminals by default because they entered the country illegally.' Referring to the counter protesters, she added: 'None of these people here is a racist – they want to look after their own. 'The point is we want to look after children, and girls in particular.' Protests organised by Stand Up to Racism took place outside hotels housing refugees across the country, including in: Islington, London; Portsmouth, Southampton and Aldershot in Hampshire; Hoylake in Merseyside; Barry in Wales; Leicester in the East Midlands; Altrincham in Cheshire; Bournemouth in Dorset; and Birmingham in the West Midlands. In Altrincham, a journalist complained to police after claiming was struck by a placard while attempting to interview anti-racism protesters. Sophie Reaper, GB News ' North West reporter, said in a post on X: 'We went to the Stand Up To Racism counter-protest to offer them the chance to tell their side on GB News – instead I was hit in the head by a metal pole.' A spokesperson for GB News confirmed Ms Reaper was fine following the incident and that she had reported the matter to police. In Epping, Essex, police also put restrictions in place under the Public Order Act, instructing protesters to remain behind the area marked off by metal fencing outside the Bell Hotel. A group of women waving Union flags and St George's Cross flags appeared to defy that order by breaking through metal fences and sitting down on the road outside the hotel, according to footage posted on social media. Essex Police said the protest passed off 'peacefully', though one man was arrested after an officer was struck by an object, while another was arrested on suspicion of breaching court bail conditions. A 'peaceful protest' also took place outside the Brook Hotel in Norwich, Norfolk, according to the local police force. 'I would like to thank all those who attended and made it a peaceful and safe protest,' Norfolk Police Superintendent Wes Hornigold said. 'We put measures in place today to enable people to exercise their right to protest, whilst maintaining safety and minimising disruption. 'A number of officers were deployed to allow this to happen.'

Emma Little-Pengelly defends Wimbledon trip as chance to promote NI
Emma Little-Pengelly defends Wimbledon trip as chance to promote NI

BBC News

time5 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Emma Little-Pengelly defends Wimbledon trip as chance to promote NI

Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly has defended spending public money on a trip to Wimbledon, saying she will always seek to promote and champion Northern £1,000 was spent on flights and accommodation when Little-Pengelly and Education Authority (EA) chief executive Richard Pengelly attended the tennis has faced criticism for the spending from some Stormont parties, with Alliance's deputy leader saying she should pay the money back. The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) defended its party member on Thursday but Little-Pengelly had not directly addressed the criticism until a post on social media site X late on Friday night. In the post, she said in her role she has the "huge privilege" of being invited to attend events of national significance, and that she considered it a "huge honour" to be asked to attend the Royal Box at Wimbledon as deputy first minister."The organisers invite a mix of political, government, investors, business along with the world of sport and entertainment, and of course royalty, as part of the official aspect of the tournament in the Royal Box," she wrote."It is hugely positive that Northern Ireland is invited to be represented at this significant UK British national sporting event, of huge global impact."I will always be the biggest champion of this wonderful place of Northern Ireland. I will always do my best to promote us at every opportunity and it is the biggest honour of my life to ensure our voice is heard."She said that while "some will criticise, some will try and attack", it will not "stop my positivity and championing" of Northern Ireland. Earlier on Friday, Alliance's deputy leader Eoin Tennyson told the Irish News that Little-Pengelly should pay back the £980 of public funding that went towards the described it as a "jolly to Wimbledon on the taxpayers' dime"."It's easy to see why the DUP is clearly unable to explain or justify why the public should be picking up the nearly £1,000 tab."The only decent thing to do, at this point, would be for the deputy first minister to pay the money back."His criticism echoed those of other parties earlier this week, including the Social Democratic and Labour Party's (SDLP's) Matthew O'Toole who said the spending "beggars belief" and Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) assembly member Timothy Gaston who questioned the "justification for the public paying the bill". What's the background to the Wimbledon trip row? The criticism began when the deputy first minister and her husband Mr Pengelly were pictured at centre court's Royal Box alongside celebrities including American pop star Olivia Rodrigo, professional wrestler John Cena and former England football manager Roy Hodgson.A Freedom of Information request by the Irish News revealed that more than £980 was spent on the trip. In the face of the criticism, the DUP said on Thursday the invitation was issued "in her capacity as deputy first minister and will be registered in the normal way".Both the deputy first minister and First Minister Michelle O'Neill were invited to Wimbledon, but O'Neill did not take up the invitation. The Executive Office (TEO) said O'Neill did attend the All-Ireland Football semi-final between Tyrone and Kerry later in July but there were "no costs" associated with that the deputy first minister's trip to Wimbledon, the Executive Office said details of gifts and hospitality received by ministers are recorded on the 'Register of Ministers' Gifts and Hospitality Received'.It previously said that the deputy first minister "flew economy" and that while she was accompanied by her husband, there was "no additional expenditure" incurred by the TEO on his also said the travel and accommodation costs were "in line with NICS (Northern Ireland Civil Service) police".The Education Authority said "no spend was incurred" by it and the trip was "made in a personal capacity" while Mr Pengelly was on annual leave.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store