
Ageism seen to be on the rise in Singapore, more than race and gender bias: IPS survey
A clear majority still believe that levels of prejudice across various identity markers have not changed from five years ago, according to the survey by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS).
IPS, a think-tank within the National University of Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, released its findings on Friday (Jul 25) in a paper titled Prejudice, Attitudes and Critical Perspectives on Race in Singapore.
For the first time, the IPS survey also covered attitudes towards Chinese privilege and critical race theory, which came up in a nationwide debate between survey cycles.
The survey gathered responses from 4,000 citizens and permanent residents. This sample was representative of the age, race and gender make-up of Singapore's resident population.
The study's authors, Dr Mathew Mathews, Mr Melvin Tay and Dr Teo Kay Key, said that age-based prejudice stood out as the area with the "greatest perceived deterioration".
The survey found that 17.6 per cent of people thought ageism had become more common than five years ago. This was less than the 21.3 per cent recorded in 2018.
But it was noticeably higher than the 11.2 per cent and 8.8 per cent who believed racism and gender bias had worsened, respectively, in the latest survey.
AGEISM AT WORK
Those aged 51 to 65 had the highest proportion of respondents who felt ageism had worsened, at 21.1 per cent.
This was followed by the 36 to 50 age group (17.5 per cent), 18 to 35 age group (17.3 per cent) and lastly the respondents above 65 (14.3 per cent).
The study's authors noted that this differed from the more linear survey findings in 2018, where the oldest age group was also the most likely to perceive more age-related bias.
They linked these findings to workplace discrimination and career ceilings.
"Individuals in the 51 to 65 age group may face challenges in the workplace, such as limited opportunities for promotions, training and job security," said the researchers.
"They may feel overlooked for career advancements or suspect that age plays a role in hiring decisions, reinforcing perceptions of age bias."
At the same time, measures in recent years that were aimed at the oldest age group above 65 may have helped to lessen negative sentiments related to ageism, they said.
The proportion who felt that ageism had stayed about the same widened to 54.6 per cent. This was 5.5 percentage points higher than in 2018.
Accordingly, the proportion who saw ageism becoming less common fell to 27.8 per cent, down 1.8 percentage points from 2018.
SOME GROUPS MORE LIKELY TO SEE PREJUDICE
Turning to other forms of prejudice, the authors highlighted that nationality-based bias was also of relatively high concern, with 13.9 per cent who see it worsening.
Apart from age, race, gender and nationality, the survey also covered religion, language and sexuality.
Perceptions of bias across all these identity markers have largely stabilised over time, with a clear majority saying that levels of prejudice remained the same, the researchers said.
But they pointed out that "stability masks divergence" among minorities, younger age groups and the less affluent, who tend to have sharper concerns towards prejudice.
For example, younger people were more likely to see an increase in racism compared to older respondents.
"Younger generations today are more educated on social issues, including racial prejudice, due to greater exposure to conversations on social media platforms and public discussions around these topics," said the researchers.
"This awareness can heighten their sensitivity to issues of prejudice, leading them to perceive it as more prevalent."
ONE-THIRD SUPPORT A SINGLE DOMINANT CULTURE
The survey also found that one-third of respondents felt it would be better for Singapore if everyone embraced a dominant national culture instead of different racial cultures.
This proportion was the same as that in the 2018 survey, and lower than the 55.4 per cent recorded in an earlier survey in 2013.
Compared with Chinese respondents, Malay and Indian respondents were more likely to strongly disagree that a dominant national culture is better.
But at the aggregate levels of agreement and disagreement, there were no major differences across racial groups.
CHINESE PRIVILEGE AND CRITICAL RACE THEORY
Chinese privilege and critical race theory came under scrutiny amid xenophobic comments and high-profile racist incidents during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study's authors noted that racial discourse in Singapore is shaped by "a state-led ideology of multiracialism, which publicly promotes racial harmony and equality".
In contrast, critical race theory centres the experiences of marginalised groups and interrogates the pervasiveness of racism, which is seen as normalised and deeply embedded in social structures, they said.
The survey asked respondents to agree or disagree with seven statements about critical race theory being applied to Singapore.
A high proportion of 73 per cent felt uncomfortable using "concepts from abroad" like critical race theory and white privilege to talk about race in Singapore.
A majority agreed with the statements that race is a social rather than biological construct (57.1 per cent) and that racism is a common experience for racial minorities (56.2 per cent).
Racial minorities, younger and more educated respondents and those living in public housing were more likely to agree that racism is a common experience for minorities.
While 59.6 per cent agreed that "it is easier to be a Chinese Singaporean in Singapore", a lower 44.7 per cent agreed that Chinese privilege exists in the country.
Attitudes towards Chinese privilege diverged along race and age lines, with racial minorities and younger respondents again more likely to acknowledge the existence of such privilege.
Under 46 per cent of all respondents agreed that Chinese Singaporeans only encourage racial equality if it serves their interests, and just 30.4 per cent agreed that only minorities are qualified to talk about racism.
The study's authors said that openness towards critical race perspectives in Singapore presents both opportunities and challenges.
While younger Singaporeans are attuned to structural inequalities, "caution is needed" when it comes to the "wholesale adoption of foreign terminologies and frameworks", they said.
The researchers noted that experiences of discrimination persist, and that there is a still a gap between "multicultural ideals and everyday realities".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Paper
2 days ago
- New Paper
'Ah, National Day has arrived': Uncle Ong's 11-year flag tradition in Toa Payoh
Anyone passing by Block 107 and 109 in Toa Payoh Lorong 1 of late may have noticed a striking '60' made of Singapore flags hanging between the two blocks. Every single one of those flags was tied by Uncle Ong, 63, a familiar face in the neighbourhood who has been quietly flying the flag for Singapore for more than a decade. The retired provision shop owner's story was recently told on kaya, a Ministry of Community, Culture and Youth website that profiles ordinary Singaporeans leading the charge in arts, heritage, community, youth and sports. Uncle Ong has been putting up elaborate National Day flag displays for the past 11 years, in an annual labour of love. "The flags used to be faded and worn, and hung on ground level," he said. "So for SG50, I thought, why not do something special?" That idea led to his very first large-scale flag formation in 2015. He used aluminium tabs from soda cans and fishing rope to string dozens of flags together, forming the number '50' to mark Singapore's golden jubilee. Since then, it has become a yearly tradition, with each year's design more ambitious than the last. "The first time we took a full three to four months to craft the display, and we only hung it up at the end of July," he recalled. "Now we use plastic rope and aluminium ring washers instead, and it takes just about 10 days. We reuse materials too, so it costs less than $150." This year's design features the number '60', with the Chinese characters for sixty, '六十', in the center of the zero. Rooted in the community Uncle Ong has lived in Toa Payoh since the 1970s. His family moved from a kampung in Ang Mo Kio, and his father opened a provision shop there in 1972. It was later run by the Ong Brothers and recently closed down after Uncle Ong's retirement. The shop became more than a place to buy groceries - it was where residents reported broken lifts, fires, and neighbourhood news. Many turned to Uncle Ong, a 27-year grassroots leader with the Toa Payoh North Zone 2 Residents' Network Council, for help with errands and community issues. He hopes to continue hanging the flags even after retirement. "If I stop, it might be a few years before someone else like me steps up to do it again." A quiet patriot Uncle Ong told kaya that his commitment to community service was inspired by his late father, also a grassroots volunteer. "My father always said, 'It's not just about making money. If we can't give much, we can still give our time.'" Uncle Ong has won decoration awards, been featured in the news, and even had a shoutout from then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong during National Day celebrations in 2020. "When people pass by and see the display, I just hope they think 'Ah, National Day has arrived,'" he said.


AsiaOne
2 days ago
- AsiaOne
'Ah, National Day has arrived': Uncle Ong's 11-year flag tradition in Toa Payoh, Singapore News
Anyone passing by Block 107 and 109 in Toa Payoh Lorong 1 of late may have noticed a striking '60' made of Singapore flags hanging between the two blocks. Every single one of those flags was tied by Uncle Ong, 63, a familiar face in the neighbourhood who has been quietly flying the flag for Singapore for more than a decade. The retired provision shop owner's story was recently told on kaya, a Ministry of Community, Culture and Youth website that profiles ordinary Singaporeans leading the charge in arts, heritage, community, youth and sports. Uncle Ong has been putting up elaborate National Day flag displays for the past 11 years, in an annual labour of love. "The flags used to be faded and worn, and hung on ground level," he said. "So for SG50, I thought, why not do something special?" That idea led to his very first large-scale flag formation in 2015. He used aluminium tabs from soda cans and fishing rope to string dozens of flags together, forming the number '50' to mark Singapore's golden jubilee. Since then, it has become a yearly tradition, with each year's design more ambitious than the last. "The first time we took a full three to four months to craft the display, and we only hung it up at the end of July," he recalled. "Now we use plastic rope and aluminium ring washers instead, and it takes just about 10 days. We reuse materials too, so it costs less than $150." This year's design features the number '60', with the Chinese characters for sixty, '六十', in the centre of the zero. Rooted in the community Uncle Ong has lived in Toa Payoh since the 1970s. His family moved from a kampung in Ang Mo Kio, and his father opened a provision shop there in 1972. It was later run by the Ong Brothers and recently closed down after Uncle Ong's retirement. The shop became more than a place to buy groceries — it was where residents reported broken lifts, fires, and neighbourhood news. Many turned to Uncle Ong, a 27-year grassroots leader with the Toa Payoh North Zone 2 Residents' Network Council, for help with errands and community issues. He hopes to continue hanging the flags even after retirement. "If I stop, it might be a few years before someone else like me steps up to do it again." A quiet patriot Uncle Ong told kaya that his commitment to community service was inspired by his late father, also a grassroots volunteer. "My father always said, 'It's not just about making money. If we can't give much, we can still give our time.'" Uncle Ong has won decoration awards, been featured in the news, and even had a shoutout from then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong during National Day celebrations in 2020. "When people pass by and see the display, I just hope they think 'Ah, National Day has arrived,'" he said. [[nid:720908]] This article was first published in The New Paper . Permission required for reproduction.

New Paper
6 days ago
- New Paper
Time has stood still in this corner of Singapore
To be honest, I don't know why I feel so much nostalgia about living in Queenstown. I wasn't born in this estate, nor did I grow up here. Though I visited the area regularly through the late 1970s and early 1980s, when my family went shopping at the Tah Chung Emporium in Commonwealth Avenue or dropped by the old hawker centre in Commonwealth Crescent for cheng tng, Queenstown was not a big part of my childhood. And yet I feel a great sense of sentimentality living here. Whenever I am asked where I live, I proudly reply: "In one of the oldest HDB estates." That, incidentally, is not just local pride speaking. Queenstown was built even before Independence, between the late 1950s and mid-1960s, and is Singapore's first satellite town. Named to commemorate the coronation of Queen Elizabeth in 1953, it's a veritable museum of public housing history. The estate was planned by the Singapore Improvement Trust (SIT), as part of moves to reduce congestion in the city centre amid efforts to tackle the country's housing crunch. The newly formed Housing Board, which took over the SIT's task in 1960, built its first blocks here. Singapore's first flatted factory was also built here, marking the beginnings of the country's industrialisation push. My particular block of flats is located in Commonwealth estate on the north-western end of Queenstown, which was built between 1962 and 1964. Officially named Neighbourhood III, this corner of Queenstown was - and still is - colloquially known as "Chap Lak Lau", or "16 storeys" in Hokkien, for three blocks perched on a hill that were Singapore's tallest HDB blocks at the time. Original fittings such as the 1960s-era doors and window louvres can still be seen around Commonwealth estate. PHOTO: LESLIE KOH Unlike many other old estates in Singapore, Chap Lak Lau has managed to retain much of its past. Most of the HDB blocks built in the 1960s are still around, with some flats even sporting the simple but solid wooden front doors dating back to that era. Several of the shops in the neighbourhood "square", such as the local hardware shop, beauty salon and Chinese medical hall, look like they've been plucked right out of that time, too. Block 115, the first flatted factory, is still around and continues to host a mishmash of companies. This sense of living in a time warp is reinforced by the fact that many of the older HDB estates in Singapore have undergone redevelopment over the years, which has changed the face of the heartland significantly. Nearby, the other parts of Queenstown have seen marked changes. The former Margaret Drive estate ("Chap Si Lau" and "Forfar House") is long gone. It is now the site of HDB skyscrapers and swanky condominiums. The 10-storey flats of Tanglin Halt, or "Chap Lau", are being pulled down. And chunks of Stirling Road have been redeveloped. Farther afield, the formerly new-but-now-old towns of Toa Payoh, Ang Mo Kio and Serangoon have received extensive facelifts and upgrades. Meanwhile, numerous new estates such as Sengkang, Bishan and Bidadari have sprouted up in what were once farmlands and cemeteries. And more changes are coming. Under the Urban Redevelopment Authority's Draft Master Plan 2025, which was unveiled in June, we'll soon be seeing more new neighbourhoods in places like Dover and Kranji, along with more redevelopment in older estates like Woodlands and Yio Chu Kang. As Singapore celebrates its 60th birthday, we appear to have a decreasing number of living reminders of the nation's residential history and shrinking links to the past, at least in the heartland. Living with the past in the present All these changes have made living in my corner of Queenstown even more special. When I moved to Chap Lak Lau in 2004, I was delighted to find that some of my neighbours were the first and only owners of their flats. And they had some wonderful stories to tell, like how they used to rent their homes for $60 a month until they were allowed to buy their flats for a then princely sum of $6,200 under the HDB's new home ownership scheme. This scheme was first rolled out in 1964 - in Queenstown, of course. Some of the shopkeepers who had been there since day one (or whose parents had been) would recall how relatives and friends once labelled them "crazy" for moving "so far away from town". Chatting with these originals made me feel like I had travelled back in time, and become inextricably linked to Queenstown's past. Exploring the area, I was thrilled to discover the derelict concrete remains of what seemed to be a circa-1970s playground, tucked away in a "secret garden" behind my block that featured a broken red-brick path which looked like it had not been repaired for decades. It felt like I had uncovered an artefact from my past - even though I had never set foot in this corner of Commonwealth before. Once the tallest HDB blocks in Singapore, the three 16-storey blocks (right) that gave Commonwealth estate its colloquial name, Chap Lak Lau, are now dwarfed by the city skyline in the distance. On the left, in white, blue and red, is Singapore's first flatted factory. PHOTO: LESLIE KOH Observers have coined a term for this strange yet common sense of nostalgia for a place or experience that we don't actually know or have. It's called "anemoia", and I'm most familiar with it. It's that slightly sad, sentimental feeling I get whenever I enter a traditional-looking coffee shop with a dirty mosaic floor in a part of Singapore I've never visited before, or spot an ancient Singer sewing machine that still goes chug-chug-chug when I step on its treadle. Bittersweet feelings aside, nostalgia has its value. It makes us feel personally and intrinsically connected to a place, giving us a sense of stability and belonging when life seems to be moving past us too quickly. Whenever I return to Chap Lak Lau from a visit to Orchard Road or Shenton Way, where malls and office towers come and go, I experience a subtle but tangible sense of homecoming as I walk past 60-year-old shops, through a 60-year-old open-air carpark, and along the common corridor to reach my 60-year-old flat. Returning to an old estate makes me feel that I am a part of the old Singapore, that I am a true-blue, home-grown heartlander, even if I don't always speak Singlish and sometimes crave pasta instead of char kway teow. Not only that, it gives me a comforting sense that I still belong here, even if I sometimes feel left behind and bewildered by the latest technological developments and social trends. In Commonwealth estate's neighbourhood square, you can still find shops - from a beauty salon to hardware store - set up like they were 50 years ago. PHOTO: LESLIE KOH Not everything old is gold But that doesn't mean I'm resisting or mourning the changes that have been made to Commonwealth estate over the past 40 or so years that I've known it. I am immensely thankful, for instance, for the flat upgrading programme that added an extra room to my 600 sq ft flat, and for the network of covered walkways that link my block all the way to the nearest bus stops, MRT station, and even to Holland Village, almost 1km away. I'm a big fan of the new hawker centre with its swanky glass-walled lift and escalator. And I'm totally appreciative of the recent narrowing of some of the lanes in the estate to make them uni-directional and thus easier for senior citizens to cross. These changes have altered the landscape of my little kampung and made it look a little more modern, a little less nostalgic - but I don't mind in the least. Because, if I'm honest, nostalgic living isn't always comfortable. Commonwealth is full of old-school kopitiams and traditional provision shops, but there are times when I wish we had a nice, new shiny mall to hang out in and to shop and dine in air-conditioned comfort. Old-school biscuits stored in old-school ways are an everyday scene in Commonwealth estate. PHOTO: LESLIE KOH The common corridors in all the blocks here are a wonderful throwback to the 1960s, but I'd really prefer to have a private nook next to my flat, like many of the newer flats do, to store my bike. Right now, I have to lock it to a railing along the corridor just next to the lift, which I'm sure is a hindrance as well as an eyesore to my neighbours. And while I've always loved the 1960s-era layout of my flat, with its giant bedrooms, I could do without its 1960s-era hollow-brick walls, which let noise and vibration through with the greatest efficiency. I could also do with another toilet. My flat was built back in the day when it was probably considered a luxury to have a loo inside one's flat rather than a common outhouse for the whole village, which might explain the tiny, cramped unit. So I'm always hankering for a more modern one, with a shower area that can be cordoned off, so that the floor isn't always wet. Which it is now. Changes? Modernity? Bring them on, I say. Preservation and development: An inevitable balance Much has been made of the need for the preservation of old buildings, and for not despoiling old estates with ugly modern facilities. I understand the sentiments, especially when looking at a colonial building or standing in an old, dragon-themed playground. But I'm just as supportive of glitzy new malls, more covered walkways and porches, sheltered multi-storey carparks and manicured estate gardens and park connectors, because, well - they're nice. Neither am I one to bemoan the tearing down of old estates and establishment of new housing estates. Though I might feel a little sayang about the loss of Singapore's rural or forested areas, I accept the simple equation that more people means more homes needed. In the debate on preservation versus development, I'd probably stand right in the middle. Preserving history and heritage is certainly important on a spiritual level but, I would argue, so is improving the standard of living and comfort on a physical level. Physical comfort, surely, has an impact on our emotional, mental and spiritual well-being. Old homes and buildings are great to look at, but I'm not sure I want to live in one, if the modern comforts are missing. With the age of Chap Lak Lau past the halfway mark of 99 and approaching its end-of-lease deadline with each passing year, I may soon have to come face to face with this dilemma in a personal way. Ever since Tanglin Halt was slated for the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme in 2014, rumours have been swirling that my corner of Commonwealth estate could be next. Will I mourn the end of one of Singapore's oldest estates and the passing of an era? Or will I be celebrating the arrival of a new estate and modern flat with all the bells and whistles of the 21st century? I think it'll be both. To be sure, I'll miss the sense of history that's built into the bricks of this neighbourhood. That said, I have to confess that what I might actually miss most about this kampung is not its heritage, but the practical convenience of its location - the access to two MRT lines, the easy amble to Holland Village and the proximity to Orchard Road. And what will I be looking forward to? A shiny new toilet would be nice.