New drawings of Sizewell C's education complex in Leiston emerge
"Building an education campus right here in this town will be life-changing for thousands of local people," she added."This is the start of an exciting new chapter for Leiston and the wider region."
According to those behind the project, the site will deliver technical, vocational, and academic pathways "aligned to the workforce needs of Sizewell C and the wider energy, infrastructure, and engineering sectors".If approved, it will take shape as a two-storey building facing King George's Avenue with space for 150 students and 20 full-time staff.
Alan Pease, principal and chief executive officer at Suffolk New College, said: "We are delighted to announce the location and design of our new Leiston training centre."This news further extends our commitment to support those living in the east of the county and builds on the work that we have achieved."
The new details about the campus are being shared a day after it was revealed the cost of building the Sizewell C nuclear power plant had jumped to £38bn from £20bn.This will mean an additional £1 will be added to household energy bills every month for at least a decade.Ms Pyke said earlier estimates did not account for inflation or risk.But Alison Downes, director of pressure group Stop Sizewell C, said the project had "only crawled over the line thanks to guarantees that the public purse, not private investors, will carry the can for the inevitable cost overruns".She added: "It is astounding that it is only now, as contracts are being signed, that the government has confessed that Sizewell C's cost has almost doubled to an eye watering £38bn - a figure that will only go up."
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour's plot to raise inheritance tax in bid to fill £50bn black hole slammed as ‘politics of envy'
A LABOUR plot to raise inheritance tax has been branded 'politics of envy'. The move would hit strivers who had 'worked hard, saved responsibly, and hope to leave something behind', senior Tory Mel Stride claimed. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly considering tightening the rules on how much money people can gift to their loved ones. She is scrambling for ways to fill a financial black hole as big as £50billion at the autumn Budget after failing to drive growth or slash public spending. Having had to rule out increases in the headline rates of income tax, VAT or National Insurance, Ms Reeves is considering squeezing more funds from death duties. This could include a lifetime cap on the amount that can be gifted to loved ones. Shadow Chancellor Mr Stride said: 'Nothing is safe — not your savings, not your pension, not even the gift of helping your children. 'It's the same old Labour: tax first, think later. 'This is the politics of envy and working families will pay the price.' Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson did not rule out the changes yesterday, saying taxes helped to pay for public services. 1
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Inheritance tax proposals would make UK ‘dangerous place' for wealthy
Treasury proposals to stop parents from making unlimited tax-free gifts to their children would make the UK a 'dangerous place' for wealthy people to live, tax experts have warned. Government officials are said to be examining proposals that would tighten the rules on the gifting of money and assets in an attempt to close the black hole in government finances at the autumn budget. The move has been attacked by the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, who claimed Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, wanted to tax 'what you leave your children … all to pay for [her] failures'. • How an inheritance tax raid could work — and what you can do about it Richard Tice, Nigel Farage's deputy, promised Reform UK would abolish a tax that caused 'unnecessary pain to grieving families' and 'disincentivises hard work, ambition and risk-taking'. Dan Neidle, the founder of Tax Policy Associates, said while a raid on inheritance tax might be a good idea in theory, Reeves was highly unlikely to adopt it amid concerns that it would further discourage wealthy people from living in the UK. 'The changes to inheritance tax rules and non-dom status at the last budget have already sent quite a damaging message to wealthy people and there is a big risk that Labour suffers a death by a thousand cuts on the rich who have the ability to leave the UK,' he said. 'You would be saying to non-doms that not only do you have to pay inheritance tax — as announced in Reeves's last budget — but you can't even gift your way out of it. It would make the UK a very dangerous place for a wealthy person to be'. Neidle added that the move would also not necessarily help Reeves balance the books as it would be almost impossible for the Office for Budget Responsibility to accurately assess how much such a new tax might raise. 'No one knows how much people are gifting currently so there is no way that you could calculate how much the tax might theoretically raise,' he said. 'And if there is one thing the Treasury hates, it is not knowing the impact of tax changes.' David Sturrock, of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said that Reeves was unlikely to be able to raise significant sums from inheritance tax without hitting small gifts made by middle earners. The Treasury is looking at the possibility of tightening rules that taper away inheritance tax liabilities on gifts made within seven years before a death, but Sturrock said there 'isn't a large amount of revenues coming in from gifts within that period. I don't think that is going to be a big revenue raiser'. A lifetime cap on tax-free gifts is also said to be under consideration. Sturrock said this would also have to be set very low to bring in large amounts, pointing to evidence that 90 per cent of the £14 billion in gifts made each year were below £20,000. 'It's going to have to be a number in the small thousands if you want to start bringing in substantial amounts of revenue,' he said. 'In a large majority of cases these gifts are being used to buy houses, it's help with a deposit. Those are more often received by those with wealthier parents, but it is still some 'ordinary' people too. [A cap] might be a way of preventing lifetime gifting to avoid some elements of inheritance tax, but it doesn't seem like it's going to raise game-changing sums unless you drastically expand the scope of gifts that are going to be taxed.' Badenoch said that Labour 'want your savings, your pension, your home and now what you leave your children', arguing for cutting spending rather than raising taxes. Tice confirmed his party was still committed to abolishing inheritance tax completely, a move which would cost an estimated £14 billion by the end of the parliament. 'Inheritance tax does little more than add extra unnecessary pain to grieving families. It disincentivises hard work, ambition and risk-taking, so it's no wonder this Labour government are such big fans of it,' he said. 'Reform UK would abolish this death tax, ensuring people are rewarded for their hard work and putting more money into the pockets of families.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Prioritise beauty in new council homes ‘to avoid repeat of 1960s eyesores'
Beauty must be a priority for new council homes to avoid a repeat of the 'eyesore' housing estates of the 1960s, a report has said. New-builds should be designed with consideration for aesthetic appeal to avoid more 'concrete eyesores', Policy Exchange recommended. Labour MPs and a former communities secretary under Tony Blair backed the think tank's 35-point blueprint for attractive social housing. It warned Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, not to allow a repeat of the 'design failure' of council housing in the 1950s and 1960s. The think tank wrote: 'Half a century later, many of these homes and estates have been or are in the process of being pulled down because they became totemic symbols of design failure, municipal mismanagement, antisocial malignancy and socioeconomic hopelessness. 'Many of these problems came down to design and to this day, in the minds of many, the words 'council estate' still summon a caustic cocktail of urban deprivation and dystopian collapse. ' Concrete eyesores, crumbling tower blocks, abandoned open spaces, threatening alleyways, smashed windows, graffiti, drugs, refuse, crime, all of which promoted a sinking social spiral that actively suppressed the feelings of ownership and responsibility on which the communal residential condition relies.' In 2024, Ms Rayner, who is also Housing Secretary, removed the requirement for 'beautiful' buildings from national planning rules, which she described as 'ridiculous'. She has promised to deliver 300,000 new social and affordable homes with a fund of £39bn. Ruth Kelly, a former communities secretary under Tony Blair, backed the proposals and urged Ms Rayner to 'wrench beauty from being solely a preserve of the rich to being an egalitarian human and social commodity to which we are all entitled'. Recommendations in the report included making new-builds more colourful to counter the 'grey aesthetic that is common to concrete' used in post-war and Brutalist council flats. It also suggested that architects should employ curves to 'soften and humanise' buildings and to counteract the 'boxes with holes' image of London tower blocks. Council housing should include large windows and be built to 'human scale', which means constructing buildings that feel less intimidating in size, the report suggested. 'Mid-rise is often best primed to achieve optimum residential densities, as the fact that low-rise European cities like Paris and Barcelona tend to have substantially higher densities than British cities where, in recent years at least, high-rises have flourished,' it said. Kevin Hollinrake, the former shadow housing secretary who is now the Conservative Party chairman, said: 'There is no solution to the housing crisis unless we are committed to building beautiful, inspiring and affordable homes.' Margaret Mullane, the Labour MP for Dagenham and Rainham in east London, said: 'This is a timely contribution to the growing discussion around sustainable place-making which, given the new Government's housing ambitions, will prove crucial to ensure we build communities where people can put down roots and thrive.'
