logo
BIO chair: U.S. has a ‘crisis' on drug costs

BIO chair: U.S. has a ‘crisis' on drug costs

Politico17-06-2025
Driving The Day
NEW BIO CHAIR'S POLICY TAKE — The biotech industry faces a mix of longstanding and novel political challenges amid President Donald Trump's second term. One of its chief lobbying arms is gearing up to take them on.
Ahead of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization's annual convention this week in Boston, Genentech's Fritz Bittenbender — who was elected Monday as the group's board chair — chatted with Lauren about BIO's priority issues, distrust in science and medical institutions and its approach to geopolitical engagement. Pros can read the full Q&A, but here are some highlights and outtakes:
An 'existential policy crisis': Bittenbender used the term to refer to debates around 'intellectual property, how do you pay for medicines, what kind of investments are we going to make at early-stage research' — all of which bring to mind Trump administration priorities like the most-favored-nation approach to bringing down drug prices and limiting National Institutes of Health spending on indirect costs in university research.
'We have a lot of sound-bite policy happening right now, and [most-favored-nation is] a great example of that,' he said, adding that the U.S. health system works much differently from those in allied European countries, often held up as examples of cheaper markets.
How industry can combat distrust in science: Biotechs need to do a better job of communicating the benefits they bring to patients, and they need policymakers' help, Bittenbender said.
'Working with policymakers, and … bringing as much transparency to our industry as we possibly can — using real-world data and digital analytics more effectively to understand postmarketing studies of products on the market and being transparent about that,' he said.
Federal job cuts: Regulatory uncertainty is an 'existential threat' to the industry amid the massive downsizing and restructuring of the Department of Health and Human Services, Bittenbender said.
'If it's going to take 10 or 15 years to bring a product to the market and $1 [billion] to $2 billion to do that, that's a significant investment over a long-term period. And for investors to want to do that, they have to know that there's a certain regulatory environment,' he said. 'They have to know that regulatory timelines are going to be met or exceeded.'
The tariff threat: 'Our industry is a national security imperative for the country, and that means having essential medicines that patients really need manufactured here,' Bittenbender said.
'Hopefully, we won't see tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry, and we work in other ways to get manufacturing into the United States and to ensure that essential medicines that we need in times of emergency or pandemic are sourced from a place that we trust and that we know we can get them,' he added.
IT'S TUESDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. NPR reports on how music therapy can help cancer patients manage their stress and symptoms.
Send your tips to David Lim (dlim@politico.com, @davidalim or davidalim.49 on Signal) and Lauren Gardner (lgardner@politico.com, @Gardner_LM or gardnerlm.01 on Signal).
Eye on the FDA
SECOND DMD DRUG DEATH — A second patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy has died after taking Sarepta Therapeutics' Elevidys gene therapy, the company said, prompting a reevaluation of the drug's treatment protocol.
The death occurred in a 15-year-old nonambulatory individual enrolled in the company's randomized, placebo-controlled trial intended to confirm the drug's benefit in patients who can't walk under the FDA's accelerated approval pathway.
A company official said the latest death shares 'some similarities to the previous' death of a teenage boy earlier this year; both fatalities were due to acute liver failure, a known side effect of the viral vector gene therapy used in Elevidys. Sarepta said the signal has emerged only in patients who can't walk, which they consider a surrogate for disease progression.
Sarepta President and CEO Douglas Ingram said the company wants to meet with the FDA 'as rapidly as possible' to establish a new immunosuppressive regimen for nonambulatory patients. Until that's implemented, the company has paused drug shipments for that population, as well as dosing for its clinical trial, it said.
Response: HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said the FDA is treating the death 'with the highest level of concern' and 'will take all appropriate regulatory actions to protect patients during our review of gene therapy products.'
The FDA is reviewing a cell therapy candidate from Capricor Therapeutics to treat DMD. The target date for a decision is Aug. 31.
PDUFA PROBLEMS? KalVista Pharmaceuticals raised some eyebrows late last week after announcing that the FDA had disclosed it would miss its Tuesday PDUFA target for the drug sebetralstat, which is used as therapy for hereditary angioedema, 'due to heavy workload and limited resources.' The rare disorder causes episodes of swelling in various parts of the body and can sometimes be fatal.
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has repeatedly said medical product reviews would continue apace despite thousands of job cuts at the agency, and reviewers were not among the terminated workers. But employees charged with supporting review staff by booking travel and securing supplies were impacted, and drug companies remain concerned about attrition in the remaining workforce.
HHS did not comment.
In Congress
EXPANDED ORPHAN EXEMPTION OUT — The Senate Finance Committee's reconciliation bill strips an effort by the House to expand a Medicare drug price negotiations exemption for orphan drugs to include medicines that treat multiple rare diseases or conditions.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated the policy in the House bill would cost the federal government nearly $5 billion over 10 years, a figure groups like AARP and Patients For Affordable Drugs Now used to urge senators to keep the measure out of the Senate bill.
But pharmaceutical companies argue the provision would incentivize additional investment in rare-disease drug development as the IRA exemption currently applies to orphan drugs that treat a single rare disease.
SANDERS WANTS ACIP INVESTIGATION — Senate HELP ranking member Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wants his counterpart to open a bipartisan investigation into the removal of 17 members of the CDC's outside vaccine committee.
In his letter to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chair of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Sanders asked for 'serious oversight' of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s actions regarding the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.
'Secretary Kennedy's reckless decision to fire these non-partisan scientific experts and replace them with ideologues with limited expertise and a history of undermining vaccines will not only endanger the lives of Americans of all ages, it directly contradicts a commitment he made to you before he was confirmed that he would not make any significant changes to this important Committee,' Sanders wrote to Cassidy.
A spokesperson for Cassidy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In the courts
PURDUE SETTLEMENT 2.0 — All 50 states and several U.S. territories have agreed to sign onto a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its principal owners, the Sackler family, that will resolve state and local government claims.
'The local government sign-on and voting solicitation process for this settlement moving forward will be contingent on bankruptcy court approval,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta's office said in a news release. 'A hearing is scheduled on that matter in the coming days.'
The settlement ends the Sackler family's control of Purdue and prevents them from selling opioids in the country.
Document Drawer
The FDA's Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee will meet on July 18 to discuss Otsuka Pharmaceutical's supplemental new drug application to approve Rexulti to treat adults with post-traumatic stress disorder in combination with sertraline.
The FDA published final guidance outlining recommendations for generic drugmakers on how to submit a pre-submission facility correspondence that can be used to help the agency begin site assessments in advance of submitting an abbreviated new drug application.
WHAT WE'RE READING
The 17 dismissed members of the CDC's vaccine advisory panel published an op-ed in JAMA, saying their abrupt dismissal last week 'undermines the committee's capacity to operate effectively and efficiently, aside from raising questions about competence.'
HHS awarded an Arizona law firm $150,000 for its expertise on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, NOTUS' Margaret Manto reports, suggesting it's considering policy changes to the 40-year-old system.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kristi Noem: President Trump promised to secure the border. And he's delivered.
Kristi Noem: President Trump promised to secure the border. And he's delivered.

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kristi Noem: President Trump promised to secure the border. And he's delivered.

History has immortalized Babe Ruth's 'called shot' in the 1932 World Series. The New York Yankees legend extended his arm toward the centerfield bleachers, then crushed a home run to the spot where he pointed. It was an iconic, seemingly impossible moment. President Donald Trump, like Ruth, called his shot in the 2024 presidential campaign, saying that 'you don't need eight years, you need six months' to turn our nation around. Seven months into his second term, it's clear that the president has done what he said he'd do by reestablishing law and order at our southern border and by removing violent illegal immigrants from our nation. Both actions were necessary for Americans' peace and prosperity. President Trump called on me as secretary of Homeland Security to deliver on his promises. The best way to do that was to let law enforcement uphold our laws, to get out of their way and to put excellence at the heart of everything we do. More than 200 days into this job, we have achieved operational security at the border. Zero illegal immigrants were released into the country in May, June and July. In fact, 1.6 million illegal immigrants have left the United States under President Trump's leadership. Across the country, we are cracking down on vicious criminals − more than 3,000 members of Tren de Aragua and 600 known or suspected terrorists have been arrested. 77980788007 As a result of that success, Americans' lives have improved significantly. Job gains, for example, are now going to American-born workers instead of workers here illegally. As a result of Immigration and Customs Enforcement's actions, illegal immigrants are exiting the labor force because they are either being deported or voluntarily departing. As they go, more Americans are finding steady and gainful employment. In fact, the American-born workforce has seen an increase of 2.5 million between January and July of this year. Opinion: From crime to tariffs, Trump challenges the unacceptable. It's what good leaders do. Customs officials collect tariffs at record pace A key part of the president's economic agenda is the use of tariffs as both a negotiating stick and to raise revenue. U.S. Customs and Border Protection is responsible for collecting tariffs at the border. Under my leadership, CBP was prepared for the president's new tariff policy, with a remarkable 99% success rate in collecting this revenue. Tariffs have brought in more than $150 billion in revenue so far in 2025. In fact, the Trump administration collected a record $28 billion in tariffs in June – only to have that record broken by more than $29 billion in July. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. More businesses are now opening shop in America to avoid tariffs, and American businesses are turning to domestic companies for goods, services and products. All of that contributes to the job growth and wage increases we have seen in recent months. Another reason our economy continues to surge is that it's safer to do business here. Under this administration, 70% of arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement involve illegal immigrants who have been convicted or charged with a crime. White House economists: Trump's tax cuts spurred economic growth. The One Big Beautiful Bill will do it again. | Opinion These arrests and deportations are contributing to the drop in crime. Since President Trump returned to office, homicides were down 17% in 30 cities through June compared with the same period in 2024. Applicants increase for ICE jobs One of the things I'm most proud of are the examples set by DHS agents across the country who are keeping us safe. As a result of their heroism, more Americans are signing up to defend the homeland. Since July, about 100,000 U.S. citizens have applied to join ICE. Why? Because their confidence has been restored in the American government, our heritage and the future. We want men and women who want to defend the nation's borders, our culture and the American way of life. In the new golden age of America, the Department of Homeland Security is making life safer for American families and communities. And by enforcing our immigration laws, we're helping to create well-paying jobs for American workers. 73497215007 Kristi Noem is secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Noem: Trump has made America safer by securing Mexico border | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword

Trump wants to end mail-in voting. Here's what that means for you.
Trump wants to end mail-in voting. Here's what that means for you.

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump wants to end mail-in voting. Here's what that means for you.

Photo from WEWS. More registered Republicans voted by mail in 2024 in Ohio than Democrats did, yet President Donald Trump wants to ban the option due to unsubstantiated claims of fraud. Just in the November 2024 general election, 1.1 million Ohioans voted by mail. 'I like voting because I believe that our democracy works best when we're all participating,' Jen Miller with the League of Women Voters of Ohio said. It's proven to be safe, secure and effective for each party, Miller said. Data from the 2024 general election shows that the main demographic utilizing absentee ballots is voters above the age of 65 by a significant amount. That age group returned about 520,000 ballots by mail, while the second closest was 55-64 with about 205,000 returned. Unaffiliated voters led the pack. Registered Republicans came in second, with Democratic voters following. Ohioans do not need to register with a party to vote in the election, only in primaries, which the majority of registered voters do not participate in. 'It's particularly important for older adults, military members, rural Ohioans, voters with disabilities, and students,' Miller said about voting by mail. Republican Ohio Secretary of State Frank Larose has done audits of all elections he has presided over. Not one has shown evidence of widespread voter fraud. Yet, Trump wants to stop that method of voting. 'Mail-in ballots are corrupt,' Trump claimed Monday. 'Mail-in ballots, you can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots.' The President said his team was drafting an executive order to ban the use of not just mail-in ballots, but also voting machines and tabulators, which allow Ohio boards of elections to get results out on election night. 'Massive fraud all over the place,' Trump claimed. Case Western Reserve University nonpartisan elections law professor Atiba Ellis said that Trump's plan won't work. 'Trump does not have the power to do this,' Ellis said. 'At best, it's in the hands of Congress to dictate how federal elections work and therefore he cannot simply, by executive order, change how American democracy has worked — and worked safely for centuries.' LaRose touts Ohio as the 'gold standard' of elections. We sent him a list of questions about Trump's comments. 'We look forward to reviewing the details of what the President is proposing,' LaRose spokesperson Ben Kindel said. 'Changes to Ohio's voting process require a vote of the General Assembly, so I'm sure we'll be talking with them as well.' We also reached out with questions to both major declared candidates for secretary of state, Republican Treasurer Robert Sprague and Democratic doctor Bryan Hambley. 'We share many of President Trump's concerns over election integrity. We look forward to seeing his Executive Order and working with the Administration to ensure that Ohio elections remain fair and honest,' Sprague's campaign spokesperson Dalton Throckmorton said. After asking, the campaign declined to say which concerns they shared with Trump. Hambley was outright against it. 'Both of these proposals are bad ideas. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud, and Ohio's current Secretary of State has stated that our elections are secure. Cutting access to vote by mail would make it harder for folks in every corner of Ohio to vote. It would disproportionately harm folks in rural communities and our service members overseas. Removing voting machines and requiring counties to count ballots manually would be a much slower process, and would ultimately cost taxpayers much more because of the hours of labor needed. Ohioans deserve a democracy where it is easy and fair for every Ohio citizen to vote,' Hambley responded. The state's perspective is essential to the debate, Ellis said. 'States get to make the rules, including allowing different forms of voting,' Ellis added. Miller has consistently fought against Ohio Republicans' efforts to impose more restrictions on voting, including requiring a photo ID and limiting ballot drop box access — both of which went into law. She worries Trump's rhetoric will cause the state to look for even more ways to make it harder to vote. 'If we do have those drastic overhauls, it's likely going to mean more work for boards of elections, more expense for taxpayers, less access for voters, and overall, an election system that does not run as well,' Miller said. Voting rights groups say they are ready to file a lawsuit against any federal executive order attempting to change the way Ohio currently votes. Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on X and Facebook. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

As Trump tariffs gyrate, economists say the impact on Ohio is murky
As Trump tariffs gyrate, economists say the impact on Ohio is murky

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As Trump tariffs gyrate, economists say the impact on Ohio is murky

New Nissan cars are driven onto a rail car to be transported from an automobile processing terminal. (Photo by) President Donald Trump has imposed massive tariffs on U.S. trading partners and threatened many more. Several economists said last week that it's difficult at this point to predict their impact on the economies of Ohio and other states. But they did say that the tariffs will raise prices for consumers. They added that the unpredictability created as Trump threatens, delays, and imposes tariffs makes it all but impossible for businesses to engage in the complex planning necessary to make major investments. They also said that the promised result of the tariffs — bringing back sectors like Ohio's diminished manufacturing — is a far more complicated proposition than imposing tariffs on a few commodities such as aluminum and steel. While he has threatened far higher tariffs on some countries without following through, the ones Trump has imposed so far have been historic. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'Tariffs are as high as they've ever been,' said Christopher Meissner, a University of California at Davis economist who focuses on global trade. 'They are now about 18%, that's the average tariff. That's as high as they were during the infamous rise in the Great Depression in the 1930s with the Smoot Hawley Tariff. They're about 10 times higher than they were just last year. They're at historical highs. Not only that, they are coming with great amounts of uncertainty. Nobody knows what to predict in the short run, or even the medium run at this point.' Meissner was speaking last week during a virtual press conference on tariffs hosted by SciLine, a service for journalists and scientists offered by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Negative impacts of the Trump tariffs appear to be manifesting. Core inflation surged last month, the job market was weak, and estimates for the two previous months were lowered. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation estimates that over the long run, the Trump tariffs and the retaliatory measures they provoke will sap 1% in gross domestic product, cost nearly 1 million jobs, and cost the average household $1,500 next year. On the other hand, they're expected to generate $2.3 trillion more in government revenue over the coming decade. Meissner and the other panelists said that there are still many uncertainties — including how the unprecedented wave of tariffs will reshape the economy. But they said it's certain they'll be painful for consumers. 'The general lesson is that consumers are going to pay higher prices ultimately for imported stuff — and it will raise prices generally because of less competition,' Meissner said. 'Tariffs generally just lead to higher prices for consumers.' He explained how. 'Tariffs are taxes,' Meissner said. 'They're taxes on imports. But tariffs are taxes on exports, too. So when we put tariffs up, it doesn't just reduce our imports, it's going to inhibit our exports, so stay tuned for that.' Jason Grant, an economist who focuses on agriculture at Virginia Tech, said that unlike the first Trump administration, countries being hit with tariffs have been slower to retaliate this time around. Perhaps they're hoping to work a better deal with Trump, Grant said. But if agricultural products are struck by retaliatory tariffs and other measures, it will be a big problem for Ohio farmers, he said. 'In terms of agriculture, Ohio is dependent on exports,' he said. 'The risk is if these countries choose to retaliate… Our exports are dependent on foreign demand. If that foreign demand retaliates against U.S. products, that's when Ohio farmers, Indiana farmers, Illinois farmers, all the way across to California — whatever form that retaliation takes, tariff or non-tariff — that's what trickles back to lower cash to the farmers.' Vidya Mani, who studies the economics of supply chains at the University of Virginia, said that new tariffs disrupt supply chains, which adds to inflation. Severe supply chain disruptions during the coronavirus pandemic have been blamed in large part for the rapid inflation that occurred starting in 2021. 'Tariffs are a shock,' Mani said. 'Think of a railroad track that's moving seamlessly from the West Coast to the East Coast, and then suddenly you put in stops. You add extra checks. The more stops you put in, the more it's going to create delays.' She added that because of the erratic nature of Trump's tariff policy, businesses can't plan strategically. 'If you have demand seesaw like this, and prices — one day they're protected and they go up and the next day they're not and they go down by a magnitude — no industry can survive a planned production based on those fluctuations,' Mani said. For those reasons, and because it's difficult to turn back the clock, the economists said it's very unlikely that Trump will be able to use tariffs to restore sectors such as Ohio manufacturing to their earlier glory. Meissner explained the complexity of the matter. Aluminum and steel tariffs might help companies that make those commodities. But they hurt all others that use them by making their inputs more expensive, he said. 'Because of the potential for uncertainty, for backtracking, it's unlikely companies are going to pour investment into those sectors, and we wouldn't necessarily be competitive in those sectors,' he said. 'I think the idea that these tariffs are going to bring back or revitalize the economy in the way it was decades ago, I think that's probably a non-starter.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store