logo
Ohio rep included on Minnesota shooter's target list criticizes Trump's response

Ohio rep included on Minnesota shooter's target list criticizes Trump's response

The Hill4 hours ago

Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio) — whose name was purportedly included on the Minnesota shooter's 'hit list' — called for President Trump to show 'moral leadership' in the wake of the shootings of the Democratic lawmakers.
In an interview on CNN's 'The Arena' with Kasie Hunt, Landsman criticized the president for declining to call Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) — who faced off against Trump as former Vice President Harris's running mate in the 2024 presidential election.
'My hope is that this is a turning point, that people realize this has gone too far,' Landsman said on CNN.
'I wish the president would be like presidents in the past and call the governor and do everything in his power to make sure that folks have the resources they need, and then to provide that moral leadership that we all need in moments like this,' he continued.
Walz previously served in the state legislature with Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman (D) and confirmed her death Saturday at a press conference.
'Our state lost a great leader, and I lost a dearest friend,' the governor said.
Trump told reporters early Tuesday during his flight back from the Group of Seven summit that he would not be calling Walz.
'I think the governor of Minnesota is so whacked out. I'm not calling,' Trump said. 'Why would I call him?'
'The guy doesn't have a clue. He's a mess. So, you know, I could be nice and call, but why waste time?' he continued.
Hortman and her husband, Mark, were shot and killed Saturday by a man allegedly impersonating a police officer. The man is also accused of shooting state Sen. John Hoffman (D) and his wife, Yvette, authorities say. They are expected to survive after surgery.
Trump offered his condolences to the victims hours after the incident.
'Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Saturday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the US has shifted military jets and ships in the Middle East
How the US has shifted military jets and ships in the Middle East

Washington Post

time30 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

How the US has shifted military jets and ships in the Middle East

WASHINGTON — The U.S. is shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the Middle East to protect Israel from Iranian attacks as President Donald Trump warns Tehran to step back from the conflict. Trump's social media posts saying his patience with Iran was 'wearing thin' have raised the possibility of deepening U.S. involvement, perhaps by using its bunker-busting bomb to strike a key Iranian nuclear site built deep underground in the mountains. Israel doesn't have the massive munition it would take to destroy the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant , or the aircraft needed to deliver it. Only the U.S. does. As America's national security leaders discuss the next steps, the Pentagon has moved to ensure that its troops and bases in the region are protected. Here's a look at the U.S. military presence in the Middle East: In a social media post, Trump warned that 'we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' U.S. officials insisted as of Tuesday that the American military has not taken any offensive actions against Iran, only defensive strikes to take out incoming Iranian missiles to protect Israel. Additional U.S. fighter jets and refueling tankers have been deployed to the region, but officials have declined to provide specific numbers. Fighter jets have joined in launching strikes to defend Israel, but officials said Tuesday that no American aircraft were over Iran. Aurora Intel, a group that reviews open source information in real time in the Middle East, said the U.S. Air Force had put additional refueling aircraft and fighter jets in strategic locations across Europe, including England, Spain, Germany and Greece. The information was obtained from public aviation tracking websites. U.S. fighter jets have been patrolling the skies around the Middle East to protect personnel and installations, and bases in the region are on heightened alert and are taking additional security precautions, the officials said. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss military operations. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has not provided any details, but said on Fox News Channel late Monday that the military movements were to 'ensure that our people are safe.' American warships also are shooting down Iranian ballistic missiles targeting Israel, with the USS The Sullivans and the USS Arleigh Burke launching strikes over the weekend. The Sullivans has been joined in the Eastern Mediterranean by the USS Thomas Hudner this week to continue those defense strikes, while the Arleigh Burke has moved away from the area, according to a U.S. official. The USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier is in the Arabian Sea with the four warships in its strike group. They are not participating in the defense of Israel. But they are positioned to provide security for U.S. troops and bases along the Gulf of Oman and the Persian Gulf. The USS Nimitz has been long scheduled to take over for the Carl Vinson and is heading west from the Indo-Pacific region toward the Middle East. The official said it is slated to arrive in the region by the end of the month, and the two carriers would likely overlap at least for a short time before the Vinson heads home to San Diego. There also are destroyers in the Red Sea, and others are based in the Western Mediterranean and participating in exercises in the Baltic Sea. The forces in the region have been taking precautionary measures for days, including having military dependents voluntarily leave bases, in anticipation of potential strikes and to protect personnel in case of a large-scale response from Tehran. Officials said they were not aware of many families actually leaving. Typically around 30,000 troops are based in the Middle East, and about 40,000 troops are in the region now, according to a U.S. official. That number surged as high as 43,000 last October in response to heightened tensions between Israel and Iran as well as continuous attacks on commercial and military ships in the Red Sea by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen. The Air Force's B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is the only aircraft that can carry the 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, known as the bunker buster. The powerful bomb uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets — and then explode. There are currently no B-2 bombers in the Middle East region, although there are B-52 bombers based at Diego Garcia, and they can deliver smaller munitions. If tapped for use, the B-2 bombers would have to make the 30-hour round trip from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, refueling multiple times. ___ AP writer Sam Mednick in Tel Aviv, Israel, contributed to this report.

Beloved American toymaker cuts 150 jobs over tariffs
Beloved American toymaker cuts 150 jobs over tariffs

Miami Herald

time31 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Beloved American toymaker cuts 150 jobs over tariffs

The US jobs market has taken another hit because of newly enacted tariffs. The toymaker Hasbro, one of the largest U.S. toy companies, has announced it will lay off 150 workers in a cost-cutting move designed to offset some of the bite associated with increased import costs. Hasbro's decision continues an alarming layoff trend. So far this year, over 696,000 people have been laid off through May, up 80% from last year. The move is the latest by Hasbro to keep its business in the black amid a host of challenges associated with tariffs impact on its bottom line. Many companies pulled some imports forward this year to avoid President Trump's tariff announcements. Still, that inventory is expected to have been mostly sold to customers soon, increasing the likelihood of layoffs and price increases. The President enacted 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico in February, but the tariffs placed on China have dealt the biggest blow to the toy industry in 2025. Related: Google delivers a harsh message to loyal employees In February, a 10% tariff was imposed on Chinese imports, which increased to 20% in March. In April, an additional 34% tariff was levied on China, kickstarting a trade war that, at its peak, lifted US-China tariffs to 145% and China tariffs on US goods to 125%; essentially shutting down trade between the two countries. In May, the tit-for-tat tariff tussle de-escalated to allow for trade negotiations. However, 30% tariffs remain on China, and coupled with tariffs enacted during Donald Trump's first term, Chinese tariffs exceed 50%. The tariffs will likely push costs higher on many items, given that the US has increasingly turned to low-cost China as a source of goods since China's admission into the World Trade Organization in 2001. Many industries, from clothing to car parts and electronics, have been hard hit, but toymakers are among those businesses that have suffered the most significant blow. According to S&P Global, Mattel and Hasbro source 50% and 40% of their toys from mainland China, despite moves in recent years to shift production elsewhere. Unsurprisingly, Hasbro discussed the impact of tariffs during their recent first-quarter earnings conference calls with shareholders. Related: Walmart makes surprise cuts as it looks at tariff price hikes "Ultimately, tariffs translate into higher consumer prices, potential job losses as we adjust to absorb increased costs and reduced profits for our shareholders," said Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks in April. S&P Global doesn't expect the toy industry to grow this year, so demand isn't likely to insulate Hasbro from the hit to its profit margin delivered by tariffs. Most companies have said that mitigating higher import taxes will require three major moves: supplier concessions, higher customer prices, and lower profitability. Related: Procter & Gamble sends stern warning to employees as sales slip In Q1, Hasbro said tariff impacts would range between $100 million and $300 million in 2025, with most of the effects felt during the final two quarters of 2025. After accounting for efforts to offset tariffs, Hasbro expects them to ding profits by $60 million to $180 million. Hasbro plans to shave $1 billion in costs over the next few years, including via job cuts. Since 2023, Hasbro has reduced its headcount by 1,900 workers. The latest round of cuts involves 150 workers, or roughly 3% of Hasbro's employees. However, the job losses aren't likely to fully absorb the tariffs hit. "Targeted pricing actions remain likely," said CEO Chris Cocks on Hasbro's conference call. "Even with Hasbro's relative strength and flexibility, logistics are becoming more complex…Ultimately, tariffs translate into higher consumer prices, potential job losses as we adjust to absorb increased costs and reduced profits for our shareholders." The layoff decision comes after Hasbro's consumer products revenue decreased 4% year over year to $398 million in the first quarter. The segment's adjusted operating loss totaled $31 million during the quarter. Among the bright spots helping Hasbro navigate the challenges are Magic: The Gathering, which saw sales soar 45% year over year in the quarter, and digital games. Most of Hasbro's Wizards products are produced in North Carolina and Texas, with the remainder from Kyoto, Japan. Monopoly Go! strength helped its Digital Gaming segment grow 56% in Q1. Net revenue in the first quarter was $887 million, up 17% from the prior year, while adjusted earnings per diluted share rose 70% to $1.04. Related: Veteran fund manager sends dire message on stocks The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

N.A.A.C.P. Won't Invite Trump to Its National Convention, Breaking 116-Year Tradition
N.A.A.C.P. Won't Invite Trump to Its National Convention, Breaking 116-Year Tradition

New York Times

time33 minutes ago

  • New York Times

N.A.A.C.P. Won't Invite Trump to Its National Convention, Breaking 116-Year Tradition

The N.A.A.C.P. will not invite President Trump to its national convention, breaking from a 116-year tradition of inviting the president to the marquee event of the largest and oldest U.S. civil rights organization. Derrick Johnson, the organization's president, said in a statement that the decision was motivated by Mr. Trump's policies, which he said had set back civil rights. 'Donald Trump is attacking our democracy and our civil rights,' Mr. Johnson said. He added: 'The president has signed unconstitutional executive orders to oppress voters and undo federal civil rights protections; he has illegally turned the military on our communities, and he continually undermines every pillar of our democracy.' The move marked a new low in the relationship between the N.A.A.C.P., which advocates for the rights of African Americans and other minority groups, and Mr. Trump. He has never attended the convention while serving as president, and the organization has vigorously confronted him in high-profile legal battles and symbolic statements. The acrimony has intensified in the second Trump administration, as Mr. Trump has cracked down on diversity, equity and inclusion programs across the federal government. The N.A.A.C.P. and affiliated organizations have been heavily involved in lawsuits seeking to undo Mr. Trump's executive orders banning D.E.I. practices. In a statement, Harrison Fields, a White House spokesman, said that 'The N.A.A.C.P. isn't advancing anything but hate and division, while the President is focused on uniting our country.' Mr. Johnson noted in his statement that there is a long history of both Democratic and Republican presidents attending the convention: President Harry S. Truman spoke at the event in 1947 — a year before he signed an executive order desegregating the military. President Dwight D. Eisenhower attended in 1954 and praised the landmark Supreme Court decision banning public school racial segregation in Brown v. Board of Education. President Ronald Reagan received a cool reception when he spoke at the convention in 1981, vowing in his speech that 'we will not retreat on the nation's commitment to equal treatment of all citizens.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store