Appeals Court reinstates Perak man's eight-month jail term for outraging stepdaughter's modesty
A three-man bench, led by Justice Datuk Azman Abdullah, allowed the prosecution's appeal, setting aside the High Court's acquittal, and restoring the conviction and sentence imposed by the Magistrate's Court in November 2023.
Delivering the court's unanimous decision, Justice Azman said that the High Court had erred in acquitting and discharging the man, who works as a security guard.
He said the High Court judge did not assess the victim's testimony thoroughly, and had ignored her spontaneous response following the incident, which included kicking the respondent (the man), calling for her younger brother, her aunt, and her mother, and lodging a police report.
'We find that there is overwhelming evidence showing the victim to be a credible witness, and her testimony is consistent with the police report,' Justice Azman said, sitting with Justices Datuk Azmi Ariffin and Datuk Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz.
He also said that the man's defence that he entered the room to retrieve dirty clothes was unreasonable, as he entered through the bathroom door without knocking on the door, because the victim's room door was locked.
The victim's testimony was not a fabrication intended to incriminate the respondent, he added.
The Magistrates' Court had earlier found the man guilty of using criminal force with the intention of outraging the victim's modesty. The incident occurred at a house in Muallim district, Perak, at about 9 am on July 9, 2022, when the victim was 19 years old.
He subsequently appealed to the High Court, which acquitted and discharged him last year. The prosecution then brought the matter to the Court of Appeal.
Deputy public prosecutor Solehah Noratikah Ismail argued that the man's act of entering the victim's locked bedroom via a bathroom connected to the kitchen, while she was asleep, demonstrated malicious intent.
The man's lawyer, Siti Umairah Zainudin, submitted that the High Court had correctly acquitted her client after considering inconsistencies in the victim's testimony. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
42 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Zara Qairina's inquest in Kota Kinabalu tomorrow, lawyers say after public outcry over schoolgirl's death
KOTA KINABALU, Aug 17 — The inquest into the death of 13-year-old Zara Qairina Mahathir is scheduled to be mentioned tomorrow (Monday) at the Coroner's Court here. Her legal representatives, lawyers Hamid Ismail and Shahlan Jufri together with four others, confirmed the development on Sunday after being notified by the authorities overseeing the proceedings. The Attorney General's Chambers, on Aug 13, had announced its decision to hold the inquest after receiving and reviewing the police investigation report. The inquest will focus on establishing the cause and circumstances of Zara Qairina's death, including whether any criminal elements were involved. It will be conducted under subsection 339(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593), ensuring the process is carried out independently and transparently. — The Daily Express
Malay Mail
42 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Zara Qairina's inquest in Kota Kinabalu tomorrow, lawyers says after public outcry over schoolgirl's death
KOTA KINABALU, Aug 17 — The inquest into the death of 13-year-old Zara Qairina Mahathir is scheduled to be mentioned tomorrow (Monday) at the Coroner's Court here. Her legal representatives, lawyers Hamid Ismail and Shahlan Jufri together with four others, confirmed the development on Sunday after being notified by the authorities overseeing the proceedings. The Attorney General's Chambers, on Aug 13, had announced its decision to hold the inquest after receiving and reviewing the police investigation report. The inquest will focus on establishing the cause and circumstances of Zara Qairina's death, including whether any criminal elements were involved. It will be conducted under subsection 339(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593), ensuring the process is carried out independently and transparently. — The Daily Express
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Man in Tawau punches wife, allegedly for opening door late, now under police action
TAWAU, Aug 17 — A foreign man in his 30s is being investigated for domestic violence, reportedly after beating her up for being slow to open the door of their rented room in Jalan Dunlop here. Tawau deputy police chief Superintendent Champin Piuh said the victim who is in her 50s filed a formal complaint against her husband for the midnight attack that left bruises on her left arm, The New Sunday Times reported today. He said the case is being investigated under Section 323 of the Penal Code for voluntarily causing hurt, Section 18A of the Domestic Violence Act 1994, and Section 6(1)(c) of the Immigration Act 1959/63, which controls entry into the country. He added that the husband was arrested the next day by the roadside in the town centre. The news report did not disclose when the incident happened. The maximum punishment for voluntarily causing hurt is jail up to a year, or a fine up to RM2,000, or both. Section 18A of the Domestic Violence Act 1994, deals with protection order breaches and the penalties are a little more complicated. For breaches that involve the use of violence, the maximum punishment is jail up to a year, fine up to RM4,000, or both for the first time. Subsequent breaches involving violence can land the convicted perpetrator a jail term between 72 hours and two years, and a maximum fine of RM5,000.
