TfL plans London's Superloop 2 routes 'by end of 2025'
'Bakerloop'
That could mean another 10 services, including a "Bakerloop" bus which would follow the route of the proposed Bakerloo line extension from Elephant and Castle to Lewisham.Asked when TfL would begin consulting on the new services, Mr Lord said: "We'll be doing that shortly. I can't give you any details at the minute, but we're very excited about the next routes."I'm hoping that we'll perhaps be able to get the first one launched by the end of the year."The Superloop has seen a huge benefit in terms of the increase in ridership, increasing people's awareness of our bus services, and we're really excited about what the next phase can deliver for the city."The original Superloop comprises seven services which form a circular series of routes through London's suburbs – launched with the aim of providing better connections between town centres across outer London.A further three routes were also included as part of that first wave, though a further one is yet to launch as it will make use of the Silvertown Tunnel, which does not open for another two months.That route – known as SL4 – will start in Canary Wharf and pass through the new tunnel under the Thames to reach Blackheath, Lee and Grove Park railway stations.
TfL said Superloop services had added more than six million bus kilometres a year to the capital's network, above the four million originally forecast. The network connects with 310 other bus routes, 49 rail stations and 23 rail lines. The full list of proposed Superloop 2 routes:Harrow to Barnet, via EdgwareBarnet to Stratford, via Enfield and ChingfordLeytonstone to South Havering, via Gants Hill and RomfordNorth Greenwich to Thamesmead, via WoolwichBakerloop line: Elephant and Castle to Lewisham, via Old Kent Road and New CrossStreatham to Eltham, via Tulse Hill and LeeRichmond to Wimbledon, via RoehamptonEaling Broadway to Kingston, via Great West Road and RichmondHounslow to Hammersmith, via Great West RoadHendon to Ealing Broadway, via Brent Cross and Hanger Lane
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Councillors who revoke 20mph limits and LTNs risk being held liable for road deaths
Re Sadiq Khan's article (Dear Britain, it's now clear: 20mph zones save lives and don't slow traffic. Implement them, 12 August), many people are unaware of the outstanding success of 20mph limits and low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) in saving lives and preventing injuries and crashes, because the research and statistics are only being reported consistently by the BBC and the Guardian. People who rely on some of the other media outlets will have seen these policies characterised as unpopular, 'hated' or a 'war on drivers'. The failure to report impartially is a distortion of the truth that is misleading the public and politicians, and leading to pressure to revoke these life-saving measures. Highway authorities have a statutory duty to promote road safety, a duty to have 'due regard' to the needs of elderly and disabled people, and a common law duty of care to all road users not to be negligent. On top of this, councils have duties relating to public health, and policies relating to active lifestyles and the prevention of obesity, all of which are supported by creating safer streets. Councillors are obliged to ensure their decisions are reasonable and based on relevant considerations. While councillors and officers are protected by statutory immunity, this protection does not extend to deliberate or reckless wrongdoing. The science and evidence are totally clear: revocation of 20mph limits or LTNs will lead to crashes, injuries and deaths. Councillors and their advisers who pursue such actions risk being held personally liable for the harm that ensues. Robert HuxfordDirector, Urban Design Group Sadiq Khan describes the safety benefits of 20mph limits in urban areas. Hopefully, the increased carbon emissions from the petrol and diesel cars being driven at inefficient speeds will be balanced out by the smoother overall traffic flow and the much greater efficiency of electric vehicles at low speeds. There are even greater benefits to be had from a lower national speed limit of 55mph as road transport decarbonises, but that does not have a champion since the idea was recommended and then inexplicably dropped by the Climate Change ScharfAbingdon, Oxfordshire I congratulate Sadiq Khan on the excellent progress he has made. I would ask, though, whether more speed cameras can be installed. There is a road from Putney to Wimbledon which is 20mph along its whole length, with just one speed camera. Once past this camera, cars speed up and overtake drivers who are maintaining the speed limit. Sadiq should ask councils to install more cameras with the carrot of letting them keep the ensuing PritchardWimbledon, London As a reluctant pedestrian, following a stroke, I have to walk miles along urban roads, using a robust walking stick. It's essential – not for balance but to vent my anger at threatening drivers who speed past and often instinctively veer towards the pavement away from oncoming MorganPoole, Dorset Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Tottenham captain Cristian Romero signs new contract until 2029
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Sadiq Khan continues his feud with Donald Trump by claiming US President could be 'radicalising dangerous people'
Sir has continued his bitter feud with Donald Trump by claiming the US President is 'not a force for good' and could be 'inadvertently radicalising people'. During his visit to Scotland last month, Mr Trump branded the London mayor a 'nasty person' who has 'done a terrible job' in his latest blast at the Labour politician. Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Sir Sadiq dismissed the US President's jibes as 'water off a duck's back'. The London mayor added he sometimes felt like he was 'nine years old again' and 'in the school playground'. He told the Political Party show with comedian Matt Forde: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. 'Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' Sir Sadiq said records showed, since the middle of January this year - when Mr Trump began his second term in the White House - and last month, 'there have never been more Americans applying to British citizenship and living in London'. 'So I think Americans have got good taste by and large,' he continued. He also said he hoped Mr Trump would come to London during his state visit to the Britain next month, with Sir Sadiq stressing the 'diversity' of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness'. 'I think it makes us stronger not weaker, richer not poorer,' the London mayor added. 'And when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous. 'He inadvertently - I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately - he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.' Sir Sadiq voiced fears that minorities 'could be treated less favourably because of the views of the President of the USA' as he accused Mr Trump of 'using London and our diversity as a political football, as a proxy for a culture war'. He added: 'On a personal level, it is water off a duck's back, but we can't run away from the fact that there are some really serious challenges we face as a western society and President Trump, in my view, I speak generally, isn't a force for good.' But the London mayor insisted that he would be 'more than happy to meet President Trump'. He said he would seek to show him that it is 'possible to be proud to be a westerner and a proud to be Muslim, that it is possible to be British, and proud to be British, and be of Pakistani origin and be a law abiding citizen and we aren't three-headed monsters'. He said: 'I suspect President Trump may have formed a view of Muslims because of the actions of a small minority of really bad people who are terrorists and use Islam in a perverted way. 'What I would want President Trump to know is that is a very small fraction of Muslims across the globe. 'So if there was an opportunity to meet President Trump, I would be more than happy to do so.' There has been a long-running feud between Sir Sadiq and Mr Trump, who previously called the London mayor a 'stone cold loser' in 2019. This came after Sir Sadiq allowed a giant inflatable 'Trump baby' blimp to coincide with the US President's state visit that year. In 2016, Mr Trump challenged Sir Sadiq to an IQ test after Mr Khan said his views on Islam were 'ignorant'.
