Fights, politics rock Rawalpindi Arts Council
According to sources, frequent quarrels involving physical assaults have become a routine occurrence, while the administration often disappears during such incidents and no legal action is taken against those involved.
In just the past four days, two fights broke out involving foul language and physical violence. Despite the chaos, no complaints were filed with the police by the council's administration.
Established in 1975 during the tenure of former prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the council was meant to promote entertainment, highlight Punjabi culture, and support local artists through drama festivals.
Over the past 50 years, it staged historic plays and launched the careers of many artists.
However, in the past two years, the council has turned into a political arena. More than half of the artists, directors, and singers have been barred from entering the premises.
A female director's play was pulled from the drama festival schedule at the last minute. A former director was removed abruptly at midnight due to alleged political pressures, sources said. Protests and rallies have been held by artists against these restrictions.
The political entanglements are so intense that even a senator and two MNAs from the PML-N have failed to resolve the issues.
As a result, the number of family attendees has significantly declined. In some shows, only security personnel, administrative staff, and artists' families are present, the sources claimed.
Earlier this week, a serious altercation broke out before a play, with young men exchanging blows and hurling abuse.
Women and children fled the scene, some running upstairs to escape the chaos. The brawl lasted nearly 30 minutes despite efforts by others to intervene.
Families have appealed to Punjab's Information Minister Uzma Bukhari to visit the council, listen to all artist groups, and lift the bans to restore normalcy.
They warned that if immediate action is not taken, the Arts Council could cease to exist as a cultural hub and become a full-fledged battlefield.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PML-N, PPP refuse to sign APC declaration
The PML-N and the PPP on Sunday refused to sign a declaration adopted by an All Parties Conference (APC) that among other things demanded immediate halt to all military operations and described terrorism, extremism, and lawlessness as an outcome of poor government policies. The APC convened in the federal capital by the ANP was attended by all major political parties. Speaking on the occasion, ANP chief Aimal Wali Khan said there are people in Waziristan — a district that has witnessed a number of military operations in the past two decades — who have not returned home for 12 years. He said such a situation could not be called development. Khan said his party is not against Punjab and is pro-Pakistan. "But Pakistan does not give us equal rights. Asking for our rights should not be seen as being against Pakistan," he added. JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman said there is a question mark on the political and parliamentary system of the country as the present government is not representative of the people but a government of the establishment. "Our peaceful protests and marches are branded as rebellion — this is what pushes movements toward revolt," he said. QWP chief Aftab Khan Sherpao said the government, not the establishment, should conduct negotiations with the opposition. "If direct talks are held, it will bypass parliament. The PM should convene a meeting and include representatives of the establishment." PML-N leader Irfan Siddiqui supported Fazl's call for a national dialogue, adding that martial laws and dictators have hollowed out the state. However, he questioned if politicians' hands were also clean. "This same army has defeated an enemy five times its size. If martial law was truly in place, such conferences would not even be possible. "Pakistan will survive, the four provinces will endure, and no one will be allowed to undermine the Constitution. The army sees Pakistan from a Pakistani perspective," he said. A joint communiqué presented at the APC, however, caused a split among political parties. The PML-N and the PPP opposed the declaration, refused to sign it, and boycotted the press conference. The communiqué termed the ongoing unrest, terrorism, and violation of rights in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) and Balochistan as a result of failed state policies, stressing that sustainable peace and progress in Pakistan could not be achieved without democracy, supremacy of the Constitution, and provincial rights. It demanded immediate halt to all military operations in the K-P and Balochistan and establishment of a Truth Commission under judicial supervision to investigate human and financial losses. The declaration described terrorism, extremism, and lawlessness as outcomes of poor government policies, calling for comprehensive measures to eliminate them. It called for disbanding all alleged "death squads" and illegal armed groups, ensuring the protection of citizens' lives and property. It called for recognition of provinces' rights over minerals and resources in line with the 18th Constitutional Amendment and rejected the proposal to merge the Levies Force into the police in Balochistan, calling instead for its modernization. The declaration also called for transfer of all powers in the merged tribal districts to the civil administration and abolition of laws like "Action in Aid of Civil Power". It described enforced disappearances as blatant violations of the Constitution, demanding the recovery and production of all missing persons before courts. It also called for release of all "political prisoners" and provision of a free environment for political activities. The APC also demanded immediate dissolution of unconstitutional bodies, "particularly the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC)". It also called for repealing unjust laws such as 3-MPO and the Fourth Schedule and condemned the government over its failure to arrest the killers of ANP leaders Maulana Khanzeb, Mufti Munir Shakir, and other martyrs. It demanded rehabilitation of terrorism- and operation-affected areas, along with the return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and provision of compensation, jobs, and business opportunities. PPP's Nayyar Hussain Bukhari, PML-N's Irfan Siddiqui and Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Dr Tariq Fazal Chaudhry all declined to sign. "These are your demands, not ours and we cannot endorse them," Siddiqui said. The MQM, the PML-Q, and other parties, however, supported the declaration. Participants also expressed sorrow over the natural disasters and devastating floods in the K-P. In light of the situation, the Islamabad "Peace March" scheduled for August 23 against terrorism and military operations in K-P was postponed.
Business Recorder
6 days ago
- Business Recorder
27th Amendment ‘on the cards'?: Bilawal dismisses ‘baseless rumours'
KARACHI: PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Tuesday dismissed talk of any potential legislation regarding a 27th constitutional amendment as 'baseless rumours'. Speaking to reporters in Hyderabad about the matter, Bilawal addressed the 'baseless rumours', stating: 'So far, no federal minister, prime minister or party member has approached me regarding any amendments.' He also highlighted that the 26th Amendment was passed after reaching a consensus with compromise from political parties. 'PPP wanted constitutional courts, but we compromised,' he said. In a post on X, the PPP quoted him as saying, 'The 26th Constitutional Amendment is an eternal success. Judicial reforms and constitutional courts were a demand of the Charter of Democracy, but we prioritised a constitutional bench over a constitutional court for the sake of consensus.' Though the speculations are rife, there has been no official word regarding the 27th Constitutional Amendment. At present, the proposal to further reform the judiciary is at a very initial stage, but consultations are reportedly underway within the ruling PML-N and some legal circles. Despite these purported consultations, any draft for this proposed bill has yet to see the light of day. While responding to a question about amending the National Finance Commission (NFC) award, Bilawal said, 'Absolutely. Further changes must come in NFC.' He continued, 'The previous NFC award was given before passing the 18th Amendment, which was before 2010.' He said that various responsibilities of the federal government were handed to the provinces, adding, 'But the NFC is the same as it was prior to the 18th Amendment.' The PPP chairman continued, 'The Constitution says that the NFC award must be regularly given after five years. It is already mentioned that the shares of provincial governments cannot be reduced in new NFC awards.' 'All provinces must be given more resources as per the increased responsibilities after the 18th Amendment.' He added, 'We must immediately call NFC and give new awards. All provinces must be given resources according to the 18th Amendment.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
Sadiq again offers to mediate govt-opp talks
National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq once again invited the opposition to sit across the table with the ruling alliance, assuring the opposition of his full cooperation in holding negotiations with the government and reaffirming his role as the "Custodian of the House." The NA speaker reiterated his offer months after the government-opposition talks failed, saying dialogue was the only way to resolve political differences. The speaker said that he would act as a bridge between the two sides to achieve this objective. Sadiq extended the invitation during a session of the National Assembly when opposition member and former speaker Asad Qaiser raised a matter regarding the opposition's privileges. He stated that the Constitution, the law, parliamentary traditions and rules were equal for all and their adherence was essential for strengthening democracy. An official statement from the NA secretariat, however, said that despite his offer, the opposition staged a walkout and left the house. Referring to the arrest of Indian Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi, Sadiq noted that even in that case, no "production orders" were issued. He emphasized that no forum was greater than the National Assembly and the Senate as a "Grand Jirga," and urged all political forces to come forward to strengthen Parliament. Previously, the negotiations between the two sides, which began on December 23, 2024, aimed to address political and economic challenges, had collapsed after just three sittings. PTI's demands were presented in the third round as a prerequisite for broader talks. However, PTI had called off negotiations within a week, claiming the government failed to meet its conditions of constituting judicial commissions within seven days. The government, on the other hand, had accused PTI of prematurely walking away from the process without awaiting a formal response "within seven working days". Later on, the PML-N-led ruling coalition had formally ended its negotiations with the opposition PTI after the opposition party had rejected Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's offer for resuming talks to settle long-standing issues between the two sides. The government had officially closed the door on negotiations with PTI following the opposition party's abrupt withdrawal from the dialogue process and linking further sittings with the formation of judicial commissions to probe May 9, 2023, and November 26, 2024, incidents. The confirmation had come from Senator Irfan Siddiqui, the spokesperson for the government's negotiation committee, expressing regret over PTI's decision and emphasizing that talks could have provided an opportunity for settling thorny issues had PTI continued the process. Senator Siddiqui had said that PTI specifically took names of PTI founder Imran Khan and other leaders, including Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Omar Cheema, Ijaz Chaudhry, Yasmin Rashid and Mahmood Rashid, and demanded their release, saying PTI did not write these names in its charter of demands but said that the government should facilitate their release.
