logo
Students could legally wear Native American regalia at graduation with proposed bill

Students could legally wear Native American regalia at graduation with proposed bill

Yahoo12-02-2025
SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – It drew outrage in May when a Farmington High School grad was told to remove a graduation cap adorned with Native American beads. Now, some state senators are pushing a new law to keep school administrators from doing it again. The bill would codify in state law, that Native American students in public schools can wear tribal regalia at graduation ceremonies or public school events.
Story continues below
Breaking: Deb Haaland formally announces campaign for governor of New Mexico
Don't Miss: Injured pelican found in Santa Fe brought back to health, released into the wild
National: New Mexico Attorney General sues Trump Administration over NIH funding cut
'How disrespectful that was, in terms of those of us, and how we as native people look at an eagle plum. You know and what it represents,' said Senator Benny Shendo, (D- Jemez Pueblo).
It's a video that still sparks intense emotions for some. A Farmington teen at a May graduation ceremony was told to replace her graduation cap because it was decorated. In this case, it was adorned with Native American beads and a feather.
Sen. Shendo is hoping a new state law can make a difference. His bill would make it explicitly legal for Native American students to wear regalia at school graduation ceremonies or events. A specific protection, he says, is needed after the Farmington incident. 'It was kind of unfortunate, I felt almost ashamed that something like this would happen in the state of New Mexico where you know, particularly at a school where a large majority of those are native students,' said Sen. Shendo.
In committee on Tuesday, students and Pueblo leaders showed support.
'Our traditional clothing is our strength; it helps us find our connection back to our ancestors and community. Our traditional clothing tells our story,' said Alicia Kreese, bill supporter.
'Senate bill 163 will allow our Indigenous students to wear their regalia at school ceremonies without the fear of being denied participation or being punished,' said Santiago, bill supporter.
Some lawmakers are worried the bill doesn't clearly define what regalia would be allowed and could be misinterpreted to include offensive symbols. However, the bill passed with unanimous support. 'I think us knowing what New Mexico is, I didn't think we needed a law you know for our students to you know to present who they are at graduation but for these incidents, here we are today,' said Sen. Shendo.
The bill is expected to head to the Senate Education Committee next. Lawmakers also recommended that the bill include an emergency clause so that it would take effect before this year's high school graduation ceremonies.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DAVID MARCUS: DC just had a murder-free week, and yes, Dems, Trump did that
DAVID MARCUS: DC just had a murder-free week, and yes, Dems, Trump did that

Fox News

time30 minutes ago

  • Fox News

DAVID MARCUS: DC just had a murder-free week, and yes, Dems, Trump did that

As the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the Trump administration's takeover of the Washington DC police force begins to fade, the results are coming in, and they are nothing short of extraordinary. As of Wednesday afternoon, the nation's capital has had no murders for seven days, something that had not been achieved since March and something I can find no recent record of in summer months when the murder rate is typically at its highest. Last Monday, when a man was tragically gunned down in Logan Circle just hours after the Trump takeover, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., took to social media to say that "Trump owns this. No word if the congressman agrees Trump also owns the lives saved this past week. And it's not just murder, according to the local police union. Robbery dropped 46% in the week after the takeover, carjackings were down a whopping 83%, and violent crime down 22%. Who could possibly argue against that? What DC needed was not a slow and steady approach to crime that fluctuates the rates here and there. It needed a shock to the system, and it got one. The patient is responding very well. The lesson here, as Shakespeare put it, is "If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly," which is to say that history shows us that cleaning up urban crime is not a slow, laborious process, but one to be attacked fast and aggressively. In his first term as mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani oversaw a 60% drop in Gotham's murder rate, and a violent crime drop of 56%, much of it in his first two years. One of Rudy's first acts as hizzoner was shut down the adult movie theaters in Times Square, which had turned a tourist mecca into a glass and steel valley of squalor, crime, and depravity. As the peep shows and live nude dancers were banished, so too was the high crime in drugs, prostitution and violence that went along with them. The only real question left to ask about Trump's efforts to fight crime in DC is, why didn't we do this sooner? It looks a lot like what the National Guard has succeeded in doing outside of Union Station in Washington, which has long been a hive of homelessness, drug use, and even tent cities. Similarly, flooding the District with law enforcement is having the same impact it did back in early 1990s New York. Criminals understand their chances of being caught committing a crime have just skyrocketed. A few more years of this and you might be able to buy toothpaste and deodorant that isn't under lock and key at a CVS. The only real question left to ask about Trump's efforts to fight crime in DC is, why didn't we do this sooner? The answer is the liberal backlash to the successful crime initiatives of the 1990s, not just in New York, but in other cities that also adopted tactics like broken window policing. That backlash, in the form of cashless bail, reduced police forces and George Soros-backed district attorneys, gave back many of the gains in fighting crime that had been won. In many instances, the Giuliani-era policies were defeated by wealthy elites in safe neighborhoods who thought they were doing something good, not condemning their poorer fellow citizens to a crime-ridden existence. By and large, this is the same demographic that protests Trump's anti-crime approach. If the results and numbers from President Trump's first week in charge of the DC police can be maintained, and there is no reason to think it can't, then there is no political or rhetorical force on Earth that can stop it. Swalwell is absolutely right: Trump owns this remarkable drop in crime in Washington that we are witnessing, just as his Democrats own the killing fields they allowed it and so many of our cities to become in the first place. For the first time in a long time in our capital, there is hope that children being murdered in gang shootouts can be a rare tragedy again, not a predictable occurrence. Many years from now, as the cherry blossoms bloom in Washington, there are going to be people alive who wouldn't be if not for Trump's actions to punish crime. What could be a more important job for our political leadership?

Ending Colombia's Cocaine Conflict Hinges on Unconventional Talks
Ending Colombia's Cocaine Conflict Hinges on Unconventional Talks

Time​ Magazine

time30 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Ending Colombia's Cocaine Conflict Hinges on Unconventional Talks

This article is a co-production with Amazon Underworld, a journalistic alliance covering crime trends throughout the Amazon Basin. A small motorized boat streaks across the San Miguel River—the natural frontier between Colombia and Ecuador—carrying Jairo Marín, a man in his early fifties, light-skinned and battle-scarred, who is also known as Popéye. He is on his way to meet one of his mobile units of heavily armed combatants as his organization prepares for what could be either a path to peace or an escalation of conflict. Earlier this year, Marín, a guerrilla commander born in the Colombian Amazon, became the chief negotiator of the Comandos de la Frontera, which he describes as a '21st century guerrilla organization.' The armed group controls tens of thousands of acres of coca plantations and has gained significant political leverage as President Gustavo Petro's Administration scrambles to secure agreements with armed groups critical to advancing Colombia's broader peace talks and anti-narcotics efforts. Negotiations with the administration, however, are more urgent than ever. Petro has less than a year in office to secure a deal. Meanwhile, coca cultivation is soaring, reaching a record 625,000 acres in 2023 and the U.S. government is threatening to cut military aid and cooperation programs for not meeting anti-drug standards. Time is running out. It seems a narrow path to peace runs through the Colombian Amazon and hinges on working with, not against, the very groups that control drug trafficking and profit from violence. Sporting military fatigues, rubber boots, and a Galil rifle slung across his shoulders, Marín commands an army of at least 1,200 armed combatants scattered across the region—an amalgam of former Colombian Armed Revolutionary Forces (FARC) members, soldiers, paramilitaries, and fresh recruits often from local Indigenous communities enticed with monthly pay. 'We control many things, yes, things that the State with its military and police forces cannot do. We can do it,' he says during an interview near the border. To his south lies the protected area of the Cofán Indigenous people in Ecuador; to his north, in Colombia, stretches a sea of coca—a plant with many cultural and medicinal uses but which is the base ingredient for cocaine. Colombia's protracted internal conflict has evolved from an ideological guerrilla warfare that began in the 1960s into violence increasingly driven by criminal enterprises fighting for control over illicit economies, a shift that has fundamentally complicated the U.S.-backed drug war. Sophisticated transnational networks now control coca-rich regions, prioritizing business goals rather than political influence. The government and the guerrilla groups operate as parallel states that regulate movement of people, punish rule-breakers, and defend against competing armed groups while controlling local populations through coercion and extreme violence. The Comandos and the cocaine business In Putumayo, arguably the Amazon Basin's most conflict-ridden area, over 123,000 acres of coca flourish along borderlands where groups like the Comandos evade crackdowns by crossing into Ecuador and Peru, operating freely across borders without seeking sovereign power. Cocaine from the tri-frontier region reaches Pacific Coast ports in Colombia and Ecuador, but also travels along rivers toward Brazil, both a consumer and transit route to growing markets in Africa and Europe. In 2016, a peace accord between the government and the FARC was adopted. The FARC demobilized the following year as part of the agreement. But after surrendering their weapons, over 500 former members were assassinated. Marín, a former Colombian Armed Revolutionary Forces commander who joined the guerrilla group at age 13 in the 1980s, remembers this moment—and what it ushered in. 'We're going to unite, we're going to begin, we're going to arm ourselves because we cannot let ourselves be killed. That's how this organization began,' Marín says, explaining how a group of 16 people got together in 2017, ultimately forming the Comandos de la Frontera in 2020, filling the power vacuum left by FARC's departure and the State's failure to provide security. Now, the Comandos' regional expanse severely affects local populations, with community representatives sharing stories of recruitment of minors, targeted assassinations, and disappearances, and describing their control as suffocating. Violence is rarely reported to authorities, who are distrusted by local communities. The Comandos embed themselves in villages by recruiting members and pressuring community authorities. 'The enemy had gotten into our house and we didn't realize it,' explains an Indigenous community leader, who requested anonymity for safety reasons. Marín and the rest of the Comandos leadership, often locals themselves, call themselves 'regionalists' and claim to represent rural and State-abandoned communities. They have formed an agenda of what they call 'territorial transformations,' arguing they are willing to give up the coca economy and stop being an armed movement if the State can grant them security guarantees and provide locals with legal livelihoods and rural development investments. A last opportunity for peace under pressure The cocaine economy is the main fuel for Colombia's war economy, which has recently also seen a surge in illegal gold mining. Never before has so much coca been grown in the country and even with increased drug seizures, Washington D.C. under President Trump threatens decertification from its annual anti-narcotics cooperation due to a lack of effort in fighting illicit drugs. This could mean Colombia would miss out on hundreds of millions of dollars in military and police aid, thereby weakening its response capacity to drug trafficking and could ultimately result in the U.S. lobbying against Colombia receiving loans from international institutions such as the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank. With limited time remaining in office, several peace dialogues have been aborted, rural violence exacerbated, and Petro's administration faces dim prospects for achieving anything beyond minimal agreements that would barely impact the country's spiraling drug production. But, on the frontlines of peacebuilding are those who know that small victories might turn the table. 'At least in the dialogues with [the Comandos], we have agreed on the need to overcome the predominance of illegal economies linked above all to coca and illegal mining in those territories,' says Armando Novoa, a spectacled, slick-haired Bogotá-based lawyer who represents the State at the negotiation table with the guerrilla structure that includes the Comandos. 'This is what we have called the economic transformation of the territory or the transition from illicit economies to licit economies,' he explains. 'Of course, security and dialogue must go hand in hand. It's not just dialogue; it's also about having an intelligent public security presence in the territory. But that presence shouldn't rely solely on armed repression against communities to counter coca cultivation.' Coca crop substitution If it were up to many of the coca crop farmers, a transition to legal food crops would grant them an exit from cycles of violence surrounding the drug trade. 'Coca brings violence, deaths, all kinds of problems, you know? So that's also why we want to start transforming things,' says a coca crop owner in rural Putumayo, who requested anonymity for their security. In their drug lab, buyers purchase coca paste on site, while potential food crops lack market access due to poor roads that increase transport costs and damage produce during the journey. Many farmers hope to build legal livelihoods but need land titles, loans, and markets for their products. Past attempts at crop substitution failed due to bureaucratic hurdles, missing funds, and flawed agricultural projects. However, according to Gloria Miranda, Colombia's crop substitution director, this time will be different with aligned peacebuilding and drug policy. 'The coordination between drug policy and 'total peace' policy is fundamental,' she explains. 'The state must recover control through more than just armed force. Military power is only one dimension of control. We're building legitimate state presence through social policies and non-violent means.' In contrast to previous coca crop eradication efforts that faced sniper attacks and landmines from other groups, the Comandos now claim to allow substitution programs to proceed. 'We view the progress of the substitution program very favorably, precisely because the armed group is not opposing it. In fact, the armed group is willing to let the program proceed without confrontation, violence, or threats,' Miranda says. The window for success is closing fast with presidential elections in 2026, and crop substitution projects and partial agreements yet to materialize. Petro needs immediate results before his presidency ends and a potentially less peace-friendly president takes power—a fact not lost on the Comandos. 'If we don't reach at least some minimum agreements, some partial agreements, well we'll go as far as we can [in the process],' Marín clarifies, indicating his willingness to continue peace negotiations even with a possible next right-wing government. Fidgeting with the safety clip of his gun, Marín, just a few hundred meters from Ecuador's border—a quick escape away—says: 'Our policy since we were formed is that we are not going to attack the state,' he says. 'But if they attack us, we'll defend ourselves.'

New ‘South Park' Episode Targets Trump's D.C. Takeover
New ‘South Park' Episode Targets Trump's D.C. Takeover

Forbes

time30 minutes ago

  • Forbes

New ‘South Park' Episode Targets Trump's D.C. Takeover

'South Park' will skewer President Donald Trump's federal takeover of the Washington, D.C., police force in a new episode Wednesday night, according to a trailer posted to social media, marking the show's latest dig at the Trump administration. "South Park" creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker skewer the Trump administration again on a new episode. (Photo byfor Paramount+) Getty Images for Paramount+ 'South Park' posted a trailer announcing the upcoming episode, 'Sickofancy,' which depicts recurring character Towelie, a talking towel who often smokes marijuana, taking a bus ride to Washington, D.C. The excerpt shows Towelie passing the Supreme Court building and the White House, both of which have U.S. Army troops and military tanks stationed outside. Towelie, whom creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have described as the 'lamest character ever' and is known for his catchphrase, 'Don't forget to bring a towel,' gleefully remarks the White House seems like the 'perfect place for a towel' in the trailer. 'Sickofancy' is the third episode of 'South Park' season 27, and it appears to be the third episode in a row that takes aim at the Trump administration. The new 'South Park' episode airs Wednesday night at 10 p.m. EDT on Comedy Central. The episode will be available to stream on Paramount+ the following day. How Has 'south Park' Targeted The Trump Administration? The first two episodes of the new 'South Park' season both provoked the ire of the Trump administration for skewering some of its key figures. The White House called 'South Park' a 'fourth-rate' show that 'hasn't been relevant for over 20 years' after the season premiere depicted Trump as Satan's lover and made frequent jabs over the size of his cartoon portrayal's genitals. The first episode also blasted Paramount over its settlement with the Trump administration, its merger with Skydance and the cancellation of Stephen Colbert's late-night show. In episode two, the show lampooned Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and the administration's Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. In the episode, recurring character Mr. Mackey joins ICE after he loses his job following Trump's Department of Education budget cuts, and ICE is depicted raiding a live production of 'Dora the Explorer.' Throughout the episode, the fictionalized Noem shoots multiple dogs, a reference to her own claim that she once shot and killed her dog because of its aggressive behavior, and her character's Botox procedure occasionally melts off her face. Noem called the portrayal 'petty' and said it is 'so lazy to constantly make fun of women for how they look.' Tangent 'South Park''s satirization of the Trump administration has sparked a big increase in viewership. The latest episode's Comedy Central broadcast earned twice as many views as the season premiere, drawing 838,000 viewers on Aug. 6—up from the 430,000 who viewed the season premiere on July 23. Cross-platform viewing, including the Comedy Central broadcast and streaming on Paramount+, also rose for the second episode of season 27. Episode two earned more than 6.2 million cross-platform views in its first three days, up from the 5.9 million who watched episode one in its first three days. The new episode comes more than a week after Trump said the federal government would take control of the Washington, D.C., police force to deal with what Trump called 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor,' though the city's violent crime rate hit a 30-year low in 2024. Hundreds of National Guard troops have been deployed to the city, and the Republican governors of six states said this week they would also send National Guard troops to the city. Washington, D.C. attorney general Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit against the administration, arguing the police force takeover is a 'brazen usurpation of the district's authority.' Further Reading 'South Park' Viewership Doubles Over Previous Episode, Report Says—As Series Skewers Trump (Forbes) Kristi Noem Rips 'South Park' Portrayal As 'Lazy' And 'Petty' (Forbes)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store