logo
Vehicle used in brutal child murder forfeited to state

Vehicle used in brutal child murder forfeited to state

The Citizen5 days ago
A court orders the forfeiture of the vehicle used by Daniel Hugo Smit to kidnap and murder 13-year-old Jerobijn Van Wyk.
The Western Cape High Court has ordered the forfeiture of the vehicle used by Daniel Hugo Smit to brutally kidnap and murder 13-year-old Jerobejin Van Wyk in February 2022.
On Thursday, Judge James Dumisani Lekhuleni granted the unopposed forfeiture order for Smit's vehicle at the High Court sitting at Vredenburg Magistrate's Court.
The vehicle was used to pursue Van Wyk, knock him over, and kidnap him before brutally murdering him.
Car used to kidnap and murder Van Wyk forfeited
The order was granted after the Asset Forfeiture Unit's (AFU) decision to apply for preservation and a forfeiture order.
The AFU submitted the application because it believed Smit had used the vehicle as an instrument to commit the offences for which he was convicted and sentenced on 5 November 2024.
ALSO READ: Tshwane fire toll at 7 as shack fire kills child
The court sentenced Smit to effective life imprisonment following his conviction on attempted murder, kidnapping, murder, violation of a corpse, and defeating the administration of justice.
The court sentenced him to 15 years' direct imprisonment for attempted murder, 10 years' direct imprisonment for kidnapping, life imprisonment for murder, five years' direct imprisonment for violating a corpse, and three years' direct imprisonment for defeating the administration of justice.
National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said that during the trial, AFU successfully applied for a preservation order, and Judge Hayley Slingers granted it on 19 March 2025.
Car was instrumental in Smit's crimes
'In its application, the unit argued that Smit used the vehicle to pursue the deceased, knock him over, kidnap and murder him, and that it was an instrumentality of the offences listed in items 1, 3, and 7 of Schedule 1 of POCA (Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998), that being murder, kidnapping, assault, and child stealing,' Ntabazalila said.
AFU had ninety days to submit a forfeiture application in accordance with POCA Section 40, after which the preservation order would expire.
ALSO READ: Eswatini man arrested after child's burnt body found
Judge Lekhuleni granted the order unopposed on Thursday. Officials served the application on Smit in prison on 10 April 2025.
The brutal murder of the 13-year-old shocked South Africa, largely due to the horrific manner in which it was committed.
On 2 February 2022, Van Wyk and his friend entered Smit's property and stole fruit from his garden. Smit claimed that he became angry when the boys mocked him during their conversation.
Brutal kidnapping and murder
'After pursuing them with his vehicle and catching Van Wyk, he took the boy home, broke his neck, put his body in the freezer, and later dismembered it,' Ntabazalila said.
The accused burnt the boy's corpse using techniques he said he picked up from a Chinese occult he joined as a teenager. During sentencing mitigation, Smit claimed that the occult had influenced him, attempting to lessen his responsibility.
ALSO READ: Lesotho family's three-year-old still not buried six months after tragic shack fire in SA
However, Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Louise Freister-Sampson, rejected his claim of occult influence.
Freister-Sampson argued that Smit had not been active in the occult for more than 20 years; he had not performed rituals for more than 20 years, had converted to Christianity, and had the Aramaic words of God painted on his house walls and his vehicle.
The prosecutor also argued that Smit was in control when he committed the premeditated murder, that he was not influenced by the occult, and could not claim diminished responsibility. The court concurred.
NPA welcomes forfeiture
The NPA Director in the Western Cape, Advocate Nicolet Bell, welcomed the successful forfeiture of the vehicle.
'This forfeiture forms part of the NPA's broader strategy to ensure that crime does not pay by targeting not only the perpetrators but also the tools and proceeds of criminal conduct,' Ntabazalila said.
NOW READ: Toddler found abandoned on pathway in KZN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Western Cape High Court overturns fraud convictions against Good Hope Construction sole member
Western Cape High Court overturns fraud convictions against Good Hope Construction sole member

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

Western Cape High Court overturns fraud convictions against Good Hope Construction sole member

Ridwaan Rajah has been acquitted of charges against him Image: File Ridwaan Rajah, the sole member of Good Hope Plasterers CC trading as Good Hope Construction, has been acquitted of fraud, theft, and perjury following an appeal to the Western Cape High Court. The judgment, delivered on 12 September 2024, set aside the earlier convictions handed down by the Bellville Specialised Commercial Crimes Court. According to court papers, the charges stem from a 2010 contract between Good Hope Construction and the National Department of Public Works (DPW) to renovate buildings in the parliamentary precinct. As part of the project, Good Hope Construction appointed Winlite Aluminium Windows and Doors as a subcontractor to construct four curtain screens. The DPW agreed to make an advance payment of R519,037.90 for materials to be held offsite by Winlite, subject to a guarantee being provided. Court records show that Winlite was paid R467,131.11 by Good Hope Construction, with a 10% retention applied in line with common building industry practice. However, Winlite failed to complete the work and was subsequently liquidated. The DPW later omitted the advance payment from the final statement of account. In 2015, Good Hope Construction approached the High Court to compel the DPW to include the advance in the final account. The court granted the order by agreement, and the DPW paid the outstanding amount. Following a Special Investigating Unit (SIU) probe under Presidential Proclamation R54 of 2014, criminal charges were brought against Rajah and his company. The State alleged that Rajah misrepresented facts in the affidavit submitted during the civil application and that the second payment constituted theft. According to the High Court judgment, the State's case relied heavily on the testimony of the SIU's forensic investigator, Samuel Adams, who later conceded under cross-examination that a key invoice (Exhibit V) confirmed the payment had indeed been for materials held offsite. Adams also testified that, had he been aware of this invoice earlier, the investigation would not have proceeded. The High Court found that the State had failed to call witnesses with direct knowledge of the final account or to provide evidence proving criminal intent. It further noted that the DPW had not opposed the 2015 application and had agreed to the payment, which was legally ordered by the High Court. The court ruled that the retention of 10% by the contractor was in line with the subcontract agreement and not unlawful. The judgment emphasised that the Regional Court had misdirected itself by failing to consider the full evidentiary context and by relying on incorrect assumptions about contractual obligations and construction industry norms. The appeal court concluded that the State had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt and that the versions presented by the appellants were reasonably possibly true. The appeal was upheld and all convictions were set aside. Weekend Argus

Sharpeville cops busted in ransom scandal
Sharpeville cops busted in ransom scandal

The Citizen

time7 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Sharpeville cops busted in ransom scandal

VEREENIGING – Following allegations involving the unlawful detention and extortion of a foreign national, two Sharpeville SAPS members, Constable Gift Mncedi Nteso (33) and Reservist/Constable Seipati Mofokeng (39), appeared in the Vereeniging Magistrate's Court. A senior SAPS official brought the matter to the attention of the Serious Corruption Investigation (SCI) unit in Vaal Rand. A Chinese national had allegedly been unlawfully detained by SAPS members, with a reported demand of R3 000 for his release. An investigation was immediately launched, and verbal 252A authorisation (entrapment) was secured from the Directorate of Public Prosecutions in Pretoria to monitor the transaction. Before the suspects could collect the full amount, information surfaced that R1 000 had already been paid, and the victim had been released without any formal record of arrest being filed at the police station. SCI members proceeded to Sharpeville SAPS, where two suspects were identified, questioned, and subsequently arrested after failing to provide any lawful justification for the arrest or release of the complainant. Both suspects face charges of kidnapping, corruption, and defeating the ends of justice. The Vereeniging Magistrate's Court granted the duo R1 000 bail each. The accused are expected to appear in court again on September 1.

Limpopo pig farmer's trial postponed as accused turns witness
Limpopo pig farmer's trial postponed as accused turns witness

The South African

time9 hours ago

  • The South African

Limpopo pig farmer's trial postponed as accused turns witness

The High Court in Polokwane postponed the trial of three men to Thursday. The state accuses them of murdering two women and dumping their bodies in a pigsty on a Limpopo farm. Limpopo pig farmer Zachariah Olivier, farm supervisor Rudolph de Wet, and Zimbabwean national William Musora face charges of murder, attempted murder, defeating the ends of justice, illegal possession of a firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. Musora faces an additional charge under the Immigration Act. The state alleges the men shot and killed Maria Makgato and Lucia Ndlovu in August last year at Onverwacht farm, outside Polokwane. A third woman reportedly escaped. The victims had allegedly gone to the farm to collect expired food for the pigs. According to the prosecution, the accused dumped the women's bodies in a pigsty, where the pigs consumed them. During brief court proceedings on Monday, 20-year-old De Wet, a supervisor on the farm, turned state witness under Section 204. His lawyer, Muhammed Farouk Valjee, told the court that De Wet will testify that Olivier fatally shot the women and forced him, under duress, to dispose of their bodies. The state is expected to withdraw charges against De Wet once he gives his testimony. Olivier and Musora, aged 60 and 50 respectively, remain in custody and have yet to enter their pleas. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store